Receiving support may yield negative outcomes, although these can be offset by reciprocating support. Here, we argue that support receipt and reciprocation should be considered with reference to two separate needs, for relatedness/communion and competence/agency, which underlie differential effects of equity on affective versus relational outcomes. To test these, we go beyond earlier studies by (a) examining equity along a (daily) continuum, (b) using the novel analytic approach of polynomial regression with response surface analyses, and (c) indexing equity from both monadic and dyadic perspectives. Using dyadic daily diaries (NDays = 35, NCouples = 80), we found personal outcomes (positive affect [PA] and negative affect [NA]) to be worst on inequitable days, particularly overbenefit ones. In contrast, equity did not play the same role with regard to relational outcomes (closeness/satisfaction), for which overbenefit proved more positive. Interestingly, the monadic and dyadic perspectives converged more with personal than with relational outcomes.
Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE. (2013). Disappointment’s sting is greater than help’s balm: Quasi-signal detection of daily support matching. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 956–967. doi:10.1037/a0034905
2.
Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE. (2015). Above and below baselines: The nonmonotonic effects of dyadic emotional support in daily life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 161–179. doi:10.1177/0265407514525888
3.
Bar-KalifaE.RafaeliE.SenedH. (2016). Truth and bias in daily judgments of support receipt between romantic partners. Personal Relationship, 23, 42–61. doi:10.1111/pere.12110
4.
BarrantiM.CarlsonE. N.CoteS. (in press). How to test questions about similarity in personality and social psychology research: Description and empirical demonstration of response surface analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
5.
BarreraM.SandlerI. N.RamsayT. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447. doi:10.1007/BF00918174
6.
BarryR. A.BundeM.BrockR. L.LawrenceE. (2009). Validity and utility of multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 48–57. doi:10.1037/a0014174
7.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
8.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
9.
BrownS. L.NesseR. M.VinokurA. D.SmithD. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320–327. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14461
10.
BurlesonB. R.HanasonoL. K. (2010). Explaining cultural and sex differences in responses to supportive communication: A dual-process approach. In SullivanK. T.DavilaJ. (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 291–317). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
ClarkM. S.AragonO. R. (2013). Communal (and other) relationships: History, theory development, recent findings, and future directions. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 255–280). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721
13.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
15.
EdwardsJ. R. (2001). Ten difference score myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 265–287. doi:10.1177/109442810143005
16.
EdwardsJ. R.ParryM. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613. doi:10.2307/256822.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.DowneyG. (2003). He said, she said a quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100–105. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01426
19.
GleasonM. E.IidaM.BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045. doi:10.1177/0146167203253473
20.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM.ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.824
21.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. doi:www.jstor.org/stable/2092623
22.
HatfieldE.RapsonR. L.Aumer-RyanK. (2008). Social justice in love relationships: Recent developments. Social Justice Research, 21, 413–431. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0080 -1
23.
IidaM.SeidmanG.ShroutP. E.FujitaK.BolgerN. (2008). Modeling support provision in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 460–478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.460
24.
InagakiT. K.EisenbergerN. I. (2012). Neural correlates of giving support to a loved one. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 3–7. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182359335
25.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. (2005). The analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford Press
26.
KneeC. R.HaddenB. W.PorterB.RodriguezL. M. (2013). Self-determination theory and romantic relationship processes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 307–324. doi:10.1177/1088868313498000
27.
KrauseN. (1997). Received support, anticipated support, social class, and mortality. Research on Aging, 19, 387–422. doi:10.1177/0164027597194001
28.
LemayE. P.MuirH. J. (2016). The action model of relationship security: How one’s own behavior shapes confidence in partners’ care, regard, and commitment. Personal Relationships, 23, 339–363. doi:10.1111/pere.12129
29.
LorrM.McNairD. M. (1971). The profile of mood states manual. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
30.
McClureM. J.XuJ. H.CrawJ. P.LaneS. P.BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2013). Understanding the costs of support transactions in daily life. Journal of Personality, 82, 563–574. doi:10.1111/jopy.12061
31.
MehlM. R.VazireS.HolleranS. E.ClarkC. S. (2010). Eavesdropping on happiness well-being is related to having less small talk and more substantive conversations. Psychological Science, 21, 539–541. doi:10.1177/0956797610362675
32.
MuiseA.StantonS. C.KimJ. J.ImpettE. A. (2016). Not in the mood? Men under- (not over-) perceive their partner’s sexual desire in established intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 725–742. doi:10.1037/pspi0000046
33.
O’BrienT. B.DeLongisA. (1996). The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: The role of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775–813. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00944.x
34.
O’BrienT. B.DeLongisA. (1997). Coping with chronic stress: An interpersonal perspective. In GottliebB. H. (Ed.), Coping with chronic stress (pp. 161–190). New York, NY: Plenum.
35.
RafaeliE.CranfordJ. A.GreenA. S.ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2008). The good and bad of relationships: How social hindrance and social support affect relationship moods in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1703–1718. doi:10.1177/0146167208323742
36.
RafaeliE.GleasonM. E. J. (2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1, 20–37. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00003.x
37.
SechristJ.Jill SuitorJ.HowardA. R.PillemerK. (2014). Perceptions of equity, balance of support exchange, and mother–adult child relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 285–299. doi:10.1111/jomf.12102
38.
ShanockL. R.BaranB. E.GentryW. A.PattisonS. C.HeggestadE. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
39.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236–255. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
40.
UchinoB. N.BowenK.CarlisleM.BirminghamW. (2012). Psychological pathways linking social support to health outcomes: A visit with the “ghosts” of research past, present, and future. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 949–957. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.023
41.
UeharaE. S. (1995). Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 483–502. doi:10.1177/ 0265407595124001
42.
VäänänenA.BuunkB. P.KivimäkiM.PenttiJ.VahteraJ. (2005). When it is better to give than to receive: Long-term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 176–193. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.176
43.
WalsterE.WalsterG. W.BerscheidE. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
44.
WangS. W.ShihJ. H.HuA. W.LouieJ. Y.LauA. S. (2010). Cultural differences in daily support experiences. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 413–420. doi:10.1037/a0019885
45.
WeissE. R. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In RubinZ. (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.
XuY.BurlesonB. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–566. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
