We test the hypothesis that partners’ tendency to “keep score” in a relationship—as reflected in their exchange orientation—will moderate the effect of daily conflicts on their relationship evaluations. Cohabitating romantic partners (N = 82 couples) participated in a 28-day daily diary study. Partners higher in exchange orientation showed lower intimacy with their partner on days with conflict compared to days without conflict; the effect was attenuated for partners lower in exchange orientation. This result held even while adjusting for daily negative affect. We conclude that close monitoring of costs and benefits in a relationship, a characteristic of partners with high exchange orientation, may lead partners to overreact to simple daily conflicts, to the detriment of relationship evaluations.
BeckL. A.ClarkM. S. (2010). What constitutes a healthy communal marriage and why relationship stage matters. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 299–315. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00063.x
2.
BippusA. M.BorenJ. P.WorshamS. (2008). Social exchange orientation and conflict communication in romantic relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 227–234. doi:10.1080/08824090802237584
3.
BolgerN.DeLongisA.KesslerR. C.SchillingE. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808
4.
BradburyT. N.BeachS. R. H.FinchamF. D.NelsonG. M. (1996). Attributions and behavior in functional and dysfunctional marriages. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 64, 569–576.
5.
BresnahanM. J.ChiuH. C.LevineT. R. (2004). Self-construal as a predictor of communal and exchange orientation in Taiwan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 187–203. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2004.00144.x
6.
BuunkB. P.DoosjeB. J.JansL. G.HopstakenL. E. (1993). Perceived reciprocity, social support, and stress at work: The role of exchange and communal orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 801–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.801
7.
BuunkB. P.YperenN. W. V. (1991). Referential comparisons, relational comparisons, and exchange orientation: Their relation to marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 709–717. doi:10.1177/0146167291176015
8.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173–187. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
9.
ClarkM. S.FinkelE. J. (2005). Willingness to express emotion: The impact of relationship type, communal orientation, and their interaction. Personal Relationships, 12, 169–180.
10.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.GrahamS. M.PatakiS. P.FinkelE. J. (2010). Ways of giving benefits in marriage: Norm use, relationship satisfaction, and attachment-related variability. Psychological Science, 21, 944–951.
11.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.12
12.
ClarkM. S.OulletteR.PowellM. C.MilbergS. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.94
13.
ClarkM. S.TarabanC. B.WesnerK.HoJ. (1989). A measure of exchange orientation and its relation to keeping track of inputs, reactions to receiving help, and styles of dividing rewards. Unpublished Manuscript, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
14.
ClarkM. S.WaddellB. (1985). Perceptions of exploitation in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 403–418. doi:10.1177/0265407585024002
15.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721
16.
DowneyG.FreitasA. L.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75, 545.
17.
FinchamF. D.GarnierP. C.Gano-PhillipsS.OsborneL. N. (1995). Preinteraction expectations, marital satisfaction, and accessibility: A new look at sentiment override. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 3.
18.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM.BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045. doi:10.1177/0146167203253473
19.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting with a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 737–745.
20.
GroteN. K.ClarkM. S. (1998). Distributive justice norms and family work: What is perceived as ideal, what is applied, and what predicts perceived fairness?Social Justice Research, 11, 243–269. doi:10.1023/A:1023234732556
21.
IidaM.SeidmanG.ShroutP. E.FujitaK.BolgerN. (2008). Modeling support provision in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 460. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.460
22.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1075
23.
KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.BurtS. A.McGueM. (2008). Growth curve models for indistinguishable dyads using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling: The case of adolescent twins’ conflict with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 44, 316–329.
24.
KennedyJ. K.BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2002). Witnessing interparental psychological aggression in childhood: Implications for daily conflict in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 1051–1077.
25.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.LonsbaryC. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3
26.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.VietorN. A.NeighborsC. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 617–628. doi:10.1177/0146167203262853
27.
McNairD. M.LorrM.DropplemanL. F. (1971). Manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
28.
MillsJ.ClarkM. S. (1994). Communal and exchange relationships: Controversies and research. In ErberR.GilmourR. (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 29–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
29.
MursteinB. I.CerretoM.DonaldM. G. M. (1977). A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange-orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39, 543–548. doi:10.2307/350908
30.
SmithB. W.ZautraA. J. (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity and reactivity to spousal conflict in healthy older women. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 915–923.
31.
ThompsonA.BolgerN. (1999). Emotional transmission in couples under stress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 38–48. doi:10.2307/353881
32.
WickhamR. E.WilliamsonR. E.BeardC. L.KobayashiC. L. B.HirstT. W. (2016). Authenticity attenuates the negative effects of interpersonal conflict on daily well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
