Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-7
Communal one day,exchange the next: Daily relationship orientation mediates the influence of perceived stress on constructive interactions in close relationships
The current research proposed the concept of dynamic relationship orientation and tested it as a mediator accounting for the relation between the within-individual variations of perceived stress and interpersonal interactions in close relationships. Communal and exchange orientation were considered to be two interaction schemas that could be dynamically activated in different relationships across different situations. Participants’ daily stress and interaction with their mother and romantic partner were measured for 14 consecutive days. Results confirmed that lower activation of the communal schema on a day significantly mediated the negative association between daily perceived stress and constructive interactions in both relationships. The findings supported the important role of dynamic relationship orientation in linking situational factors with interpersonal interactions. The concept of dynamic relationship orientation provides a new theoretical framework to integrate research on contextual factors and relationship dynamics.
AdamsJ. S. (1966). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2
2.
BaldwinM. W.KeelanJ. P. R.FehrB.EnnsV.Koh-RangarajooE. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71, 94–109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.94
3.
BodenmannG.LedermannT.BradburyT. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551–569. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00171.x
4.
BuckA. A.NeffL. A. (2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 698–708. doi:/10.1037/a0029260
5.
BuunkB. P.SchaufeliW. B. (1999). Reciprocity in interpersonal relationships: An evolutionary perspective on its importance for health and well-being. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 259–291. doi:10.1080/14792779943000080
6.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 78–106. doi:10.1037/a0018186
7.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 173–187. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
8.
ClarkM. S.AragonO. R. (2013). Communal (and other) relationships: History, theory development, recent findings, and future directions. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (pp. 255–280). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
ClarkM. S.FinkelE. J. (2005). Willingness to express emotion: The impact of relationship type, communal orientation, and their interaction. Personal Relationships, 12, 169–180. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00109.x
10.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.GrahamS. M.PatakiS. P.FinkelE. J. (2010). Ways of giving benefits in marriage: Norm use, relationship satisfaction, and attachment-related variability. Psychological Science, 21, 944–951. doi:10.1177/0956797610373882
11.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 12–24. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.12
12.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691. doi:10.1177/0146167293196003
13.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. R. (2012). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In VanLangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsT. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 232–250). London, England: Sage.
14.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ.PowellM. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 333–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.333
15.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. R.CorcoranD. M. (1989). Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 533–542. doi:10.1177/0146167289154007
16.
ClarkM. S.OuelletteR.PowellM. C.MilbergS. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 94–103. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.94
17.
ClarkM. S.WaddellB. (1985). Perceptions of exploitation in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 403–418. doi:10.1177/0265407585024002
18.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2136404.
19.
CrockerJ.CanevelloA. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555–575. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.555
20.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.GailliotM. T.ManerJ. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1653–1662. doi:10.1177/0146167208323981
21.
FalconierM. K.NussbeckF.BodenmannG.SchneiderH.BradburyT. (2015). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41, 221–235. doi:10.1111/jmft.12073
22.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.263
23.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S.Dunkel-SchetterC.DeLongisA.GruenR. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992
24.
FungH. H.YeungD. Y.LiK. K.LangF. R. (2009). Benefits of negative social exchanges for emotional closeness. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, 612–621. doi:/10.1093/geronb/gbp065
25.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 5–22. doi:10.2307/353438
26.
GroteN. K.ClarkM. S. (2001). Perceiving unfairness in the family: Cause or consequence of marital distress?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 281–293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.281
27.
HoD. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The Handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 155–165). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
HongY.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.Benet-MartinezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709
JiangY.ChenZ.WyerR. S.Jr (2014). Impact of money on emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 228–233. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.013
31.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 171–174. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00358.x
32.
LambertN. M.ClarkM. S.DurtschiJ.FinchamF. D.GrahamS. M. (2010). Benefits of expressing gratitude. Psychological Science, 21, 574–580. doi:10.1177/0956797610364003
33.
LiT.FokH. K.FungH. H. (2011). Is reciprocity always beneficial? Age differences in the association between support balance and life satisfaction. Aging & Mental Health, 15, 541–547. doi:10.1080/13607863.2010.551340
34.
LiT.FungH. H. (2013). How negative interactions affect relationship satisfaction: The paradoxical short-term and long-term effects of commitment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 274–281. doi:10.1177/1948550612453748
35.
McCallM.RenoR. R.JalbertN.WestS. G. (2000). Communal orientation and attributions between the self and other. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 301–308. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2204_4
36.
MerzC. A.MeuwlyN.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2014). Engaging in dyadic coping: Buffering the impact of everyday stress on prospective relationship satisfaction. Family Science, 5, 30–37. doi:10.1080/19424620.2014.927385
37.
MillsJ.ClarkM. L. (1994). Communal and exchange relationships: Controversies and research. In ErberR.GilmourR. (Eds.), Theoretical framework for personal relationships (pp. 29–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
MillsJ.ClarkM. S.FordT. E.JohnsonM. (2004). Measurement of communal strength. Personal Relationships, 11, 213–230. doi:10.1111/j.1475 6811.2004.00079.x
39.
MohtashemiM.MuiL. (2003). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by social information: the role of trust and reputation in evolution of altruism. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223, 523–531. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00143-7
40.
MursteinB. I.CerretoM.MacDonaldM. G. (1977). A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange-orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39, 543–548. doi:10.2307/350908
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
42.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134–148. doi:10.1177/0146167203255984
43.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97, 435–450. doi:10.1037/a0015663
ParkL. E.TroisiJ. D.ManerJ. K. (2011). Egoistic versus altruistic concerns in communal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 315–335. doi:10.1177/0265407510382178
46.
PrestonS. D. (2013). The origins of altruism in offspring care. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1305–1341. doi:10.1037/a0031755
47.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
48.
RobertsN. A.LevensonR. W. (2001). The remains of the workday: Impact of job stress and exhaustion on marital interaction in police couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1052–1067. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01052.x
49.
SavaniK.MeadN. L.StillmanT.VohsK. D. (2016). No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses. Self and Identity, 15, 342–355. doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1133451
50.
SchulzM. S.CowanP. A.CowanC. P.BrennanR. T. (2004). Coming home upset: Gender, marital satisfaction, and the daily spillover of workday experience into couple interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 250–263. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.250
51.
SprecherS. (1998). The effect of exchange orientation on close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 220–231. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2787109.
52.
SprecherS.FehrB. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629–651. doi:10.1177/0265407505056439
53.
StoryL. B.RepettiR. (2006). Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 690–700. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.690
54.
TriversR. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2822435.
55.
YehK. H.BedfordO. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 215–228. doi:10.1046/j.1467-839X.2003.00122.x
56.
YooS. H.ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.SaloveyP.MoninJ. K. (2011). Responding to partners’ expression of anger: The role of communal motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 229–241. doi:10.1177/0146167210394205
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
