We utilized interdependence theory and conservation of resources to understand how relational sacrifices and hassles impact positive relationship quality constructs (i.e., satisfaction, closeness, and commitment) in romantic relationships (N = 164 couples; 328 individuals). Using daily diary data to examine actor and partner effects, we found that individuals’ sacrifices were positively linked with their own commitment but not with satisfaction or closeness. We also found that hassles were negatively linked with one’s own and one’s partner’s satisfaction and closeness but not with commitment. When examined together, sacrifices remained beneficial for one’s own commitment but only when increased sacrifices occurred on days with low hassles. We discuss the unique pathways of sacrifices and hassles, both on their own and considered together.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AlmeidaD. M.WethingtonE.KesslerR. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55.
4.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
5.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.
6.
AronA.FraleyB. (1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140–160.
7.
BerscheidE.SnyderM.OmotoA. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792–807.
8.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
10.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980.
11.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR.HustonT. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–167). New York, NY: Academic.
12.
BurkeT.YoungV. (2012). Sexual transformations and intimate behaviors in romantic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 454–463.
13.
ButlerE. A.YoungV. J.RandallA. K. (2010). Suppressing to please, eating to cope: The effect of overweight women's emotion suppression on romantic relationships and eating. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 599–623.
14.
CanaryD. J. (2003). Managing interpersonal conflict: A model of events related to strategic choices. In GreeneJ. O.BurlesonB. R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 515–549). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109.
16.
CorkeryS.CurranM. A.ParkmanA. (2011). Relational quality of expectant cohabitors: The roles of relational sacrifice and spirituality. Marriage and Family Review, 47, 345–362.
17.
DeLongisA. (1985). [The relationship of everyday stress to health and well-being: Inter- and intra individual approaches]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
18.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
19.
FinchamF.StanleyS.BeachS. (2007). Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 275–292.
20.
FredericksonC. G. (1977). Life stress and marital conflict: A pilot study. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 3, 41–47.
21.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.DowneyG. (2003). He said, she said: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100–105.
22.
GrzywaczJ. G.AlmeidaD. M.McDonaldD. A. (2002). Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Family Relations, 51, 28–36.
23.
HarperJ. M.SchaaljeB. G.SandbergJ. G. (2000). Daily hassles, intimacy, and marital quality in later life marriages. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 1–18.
24.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.
25.
HobfollS. (1990). Loss as the active ingredient in stress: Response to Arnold Lazarus. American Psychologist, 45, 1275–1276.
26.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.
27.
HobfollS. E.SpielbergerC. D. (1992). Family stress: Integrating theory and measurement. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 99–112.
28.
HustonT. L.VangelistiA. L. (1991). Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 721–733.
29.
ImpettE. A.GableS. L.PeplauL. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 327–344.
30.
ImpettE. A.GordonA. M. (2008). For the good of others: Toward a positive psychology of sacrifice. In LopezS. J. (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people (Vol. 2: Capitalizing on emotional experiences, pp. 79–100). Westport, CT: Prager Publishers.
31.
KelleyH. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structure and processes. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
LarsonR. W.AlmeidaD. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 5–20.
33.
LaurenceauJ.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97.
34.
LippertT.PragerK. J. (2001). Daily experiences of intimacy: A study of couples. Personal Relationships, 8, 283–298.
35.
MashekD.LeB.IsraelK.AronA. (2011). Wanting less closeness in romantic relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 333–345.
36.
MashekD. J.ShermanM. D. (2004). Desiring less closeness with intimate others. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 343–356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
MatjaskoJ. L.FeldmanA. F. (2006). Bringing work home: The emotional experiences of mothers and fathers. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 47–55.
38.
McLaughlinM.CormierL. S.CormierW. H. (1988). Relation between coping strategies and distress, stress, and marital adjustment and multiple-role women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 187–193.
39.
OgolskyB.NiehuisS.RidleyC. (2009). Using online methods and designs to conductresearch on personal relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 610–628.
40.
OtisM. D.RostoskyS. S.RiggleE. D. B.HamrinR. (2006). Stress and relationship quality in same-sex couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 81–99.
41.
ReisH. T.CollinsW. A.BerscheidE. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.
42.
RuppelE.CurranM. A. (2012). Relational sacrifices in romantic relationships: Satisfaction and the moderating role of attachment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 508–529.
43.
RusbultC. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
44.
RusbultC. E.ArriagaX. B. (1997). Interdependence theory. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 221–250). London, UK: Wiley.
45.
RusbultC. E.CoolsenM. K.KirchnerJ. L.ClarkeJ. A. (2006). Commitment. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 615–636). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.
47.
SabatelliR. M.ShehanC. L. (1993). Exchange and resource theories. In BossP.DohertyW. J.LaRossaR.SchummW. R.SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods (pp. 385–417). New York, NY: Plenum.
48.
SeridoJ.AlmeidaD. M.WethingtonE. (2004). Chronic stressors and daily hassles: Unique and interactive relationships with psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 17–33.
49.
SingerJ. D.WilletJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage Publications.
51.
TotenhagenC. J. (2011). Daily processes in romantic relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72, 2589.
52.
TotenhagenC. J.ButlerE. A.RidleyC. A. (2012). Daily stress, closeness, and satisfaction in gay and lesbian couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 219–233.
53.
TotenhagenC. J.CurranM. A. (2011). Daily hassles, sacrifices, and relationship quality for pregnant cohabitors. Family Science, 2, 68–72.
54.
TotenhagenC. J.SeridoJ.CurranM. A.ButlerE. A. (2012). Daily hassles and uplifts: A diary study on understanding relationship quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 719–728.
55.
UmbersonD.WilliamsK.PowersD. A.LiuH.NeedhamB. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 1–16.
56.
Van DoornM. D.BranjeS. J. T.HoxJ. J.MeeusW. H. J. (2009). Intraindividual variability in adolescents’ perceived relationship satisfaction: The role of daily conflict. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 790–803.
57.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.
58.
WhittonS. W.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2007). If I help my partner, will it hurt me? Perceptions of sacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 64–92.
59.
YovetichN. A.RusbultC. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138–164.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
