Studies on personality and friendship have focused on similarities between friends, while differences in friendship patterns have received less attention. We used data from the British Household Panel Survey data (N = 12,098) to investigate how people’s personalities are related to various characteristics of their three closest friends. All personality traits of the five-factor model were associated with several friendship characteristics with effect sizes corresponding to correlations between −.06 and .09. Openness was especially prominent and idiosyncratic; individuals with high (vs. low) openness were about 3% more likely to have friends who live further away, are of the opposite sex and another ethnicity, and whom they meet less often. Agreeableness and extroversion were related to more traditional friendship ties. Individuals with high agreeableness had known their friends for a longer time, lived close to them, and had more “stay-at-homes” among their friends.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.
2.
AbellL.LyonsM.BrewerG. (2014). The relationship between parental bonding, Machiavellianism and adult friendship quality, 12, 191–197.
3.
AsendorpfJ. B.WilpersS. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1531
4.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.GuptaR. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45–74. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00143.x
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
6.
BeckesL.CoanJ. A.HasselmoK. (2013). Familiarity promotes the blurring of self and other in the neural representation of threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 670–677. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss046
7.
Börsch-SupanA.BrandtM.LitwinH.WeberG. (Eds.). (2013). Active ageing and solidarity between generations in Europe: First results from SHARE after the economic crisis. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
8.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2007). Personality and music: can traits explain how people use music in everyday life?British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 98, 175–185. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1348/000712606X111177
9.
ChristakisN. A.FowlerJ. H. (2014). Friendship and natural selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 10796–10801.
10.
CorreaT.HinsleyA. W.de ZúñigaH. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247–253. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
11.
CurryO.RobertsS. G.DunbarR. I. (2013). Altruism in social networks: Evidence for a ‘kinship premium’. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 283–295.
12.
David-BarrettT.IzquierdoI. B.CarneyJ.NowakK.LaunayJ.RotkirchA. (2016). Life course similarities on social networking sites. Advances in Life Course Research. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2016.04.002
13.
David-BarrettT.RotkirchA.CarneyJ.Behncke IzquierdoI.KremsJ. A.TownleyD.DunbarR. I. (2015). Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: Cross-cultural evidence from social networking. PloS one, 10, e0118329.
14.
DeScioliP.KurzbanR. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PloS one, 4, e5802.
15.
DunbarR. I. M. (2003). The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181.
16.
DunbarR. I. M.SpoorsM. (1995). Social networks, support cliques and kinship. Human Nature, 6, 273–290.
17.
FowlerJ. H.SettleJ. E.ChristakisN. A. (2011). Correlated genotypes in friendship networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1993–1997.
18.
GoosbyB. J.BellatorreA.WalsemannK. M.CheadleJ. E. (2013). Adolescent loneliness and health in early adulthood. Sociological Inquiry, 83, 505–536.
19.
HallJ. A. (2010). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 723–747.
20.
HawkleyL. C.CacioppoJ. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine : A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 218–27.
HruschkaD. J. (2010). Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship (Vol. 5). Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
JanosP. M.MarwoodK. A.RobinsonN. M. (1985). Friendship patterns in highly intelligent children. Roeper Review, 8, 46–49.
24.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
JohnsonK. V.-A.DunbarR. I. M. (2016). Pain tolerance predicts human social network size. Scientific Reports, 6, 25267.
26.
JokelaM. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between U.S. states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 79–83.
27.
JokelaM.AlvergneA.PolletT. V.LummaaV. (2011). Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model. European Journal of Personality, 25, 487–500.
28.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.
29.
KalmijnM. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25, 231–249.
LaakasuoM.PalomäkiJ.SalmelaM. (2014). Experienced poker players are emotionally stable. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 668–671.
32.
LiN. P.KanazawaS. (2016). Country roads, take me home… to my friends: How intelligence, population density, and friendship affect modern happiness. British Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjop.12181
33.
LinN.DeanA.EnselW. M. (Eds.). (1986). Social support, life events, and depression. London: Academic Press.
34.
LyonsM.AitkenS. (2010). Machiavellian friends? The role of machiavellianism in friendship formation and maintenance. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4, 194–202.
35.
LyonsM.CaldwellT.ShultzS. (2010). Mind-reading and manipulation — Is Machiavellianism related to theory of mind?Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 261–274.
36.
MassenJ. J. M.KoskiS. E. (2014). Chimps of a feather sit together: Chimpanzee friendships are based on homophily in personality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 1–8.
37.
MacLeanK. A.JohnsonM. W.GriffithsR. R. (2011). Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25, 1453–1461.
38.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
39.
ParkerJ. G.SealJ. (1996). Forming, losing, renewing, and replacing friendships: Applying temporal parameters to the assessment of children’s friendship experiences. Child Development, 67, 2248–2268.
40.
RiveraM. T.SoderstromS. B.UzziB. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 91–115.
41.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.
42.
RotkirchA.LyonsM.David-BarrettT.JokelaM. (2014). Gratitude for help among adult friends and siblings. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 673–686.
43.
SaramäkiJ.LeichtE. A.LopezE.RobertsS. G. B.Reed-TsochasF.DunbarR. I. M. (2014). Persistence of social signatures in human communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 942–947.
44.
SelfhoutM.BurkW.BranjeS.DenissenJ.Van AkenM.MeeusW. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of personality, 78, 509–538.
45.
SeyfarthR. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 65, 671–698.
46.
SeyfarthR. M.CheneyD. L. (2012). The evolutionary origins of friendship. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 153–177.
47.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
48.
StevensN. L.Van TilburgT. G. (2011). Cohort differences in having and retaining friends in personal networks in later life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 24–43. doi:10.1177/0265407510386191
49.
Stewart-WilliamsS. (2007). Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: Effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 193–198.
50.
TaylorM. F.BriceJ.BuckN.Prentice-LaneE. (2010). British Household Panel Survey user manual: Introduction, technical report and appendices (Vol. A). Colchester: University of Essex.
51.
VigilJ. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18, 143–161.
52.
WrzusC.ZimmermannJ.MundM.NeyerF. J. (In press). Friendships in young and middle adulthood: Normative patterns and personality differences. In HojjatM.MoyerA. (Eds.), Psychology of friendship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
XueM.SilkJ. B. (2012). The role of tracking and tolerance in relationship among friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 17–25.
54.
ZarbatanyL.ConleyR.PepperS. (2004). Personality and gender differences in friendship needs and experiences in preadolescence and young adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 299–310.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
