The aim of the study was to evaluate the relation between the big five personality traits and sense of coherence. Data for the meta-analysis were collected from 19 studies which included 24 independent samples, 133 effect sizes, and 19,960 participants. Lower neuroticism and higher extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were associated with total sense of coherence as well as comprehensibility, manageability, meaningfulness, and reflection dimensions. Personality traits were not linked to balance. There were no moderating effects on these relationships. The study extends current knowledge on the associations between personality traits and sense of coherence.
AllportGWOdbertHS (1936) Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs47: i–171.
2.
AntonovskyA (1979) Health, Stress, and Coping: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical Well-Being. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
AntonovskyA (1987) Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AntonovskyA (1990) A somewhat personal odyssey in studying the stress process. Stress Medicine6: 71–80.
5.
AntonovskyA (1991) The structural sources of salutogenic strengths. In: CooperCLPayneR (eds) Personality and Stress: Individual Differences on the Stress Process. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 67–104.
6.
AntonovskyA (1993) The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine36: 725–733.
7.
BachemRMaerckerA (2018) Development and psychometric evaluation of a Revised Sense of Coherence Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment34: 206–215.
8.
CattellRB (1943) The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology38: 476–506.
9.
CochranW (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometics10: 101–129.
10.
CohenJ (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin1: 155–159.
11.
Connor-SmithJKFlachsbartC (2007) Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology93: 1080–1107.
DearyIJWeissABattyGD (2010) Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest11: 53–79.
15.
EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderM, et al. (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. The BMJ315: 629–634.
16.
ErikssonMLindströmB (2006) Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health60: 376–381.
17.
EysenckHJEysenckMW (1985) Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach. New York: Plenum.
18.
FeldtTLeskinenEKinnunenU, et al. (2003) The stability of sense of coherence: Comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study. Personality and Individual Differences35: 1151–1165.
19.
FeldtTMetsäpeltoRLKinnunenU, et al. (2007) Sense of coherence and five-factor approach to personality: Conceptual relationships. European Psychologist12: 165–172.
20.
Flensborg-MadsenTVentegodtSMerrickJ (2005) Sense of coherence and physical health. A review of previous findings. The Scientific World Journal5: 665–673.
21.
GoodwinRDFriedmanHS (2006) Health status and the five-factor personality traits in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Health Psychology11: 643–654.
22.
HedgesLVOlkinI (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
HigginsJPThompsonSG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine21: 1539–1558.
24.
HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al. (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. The BMJ327: 557–560.
25.
HochwälderJ (2012) The contribution of the Big Five personality factors to sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences53: 591–596.
26.
KaseTUenoYOishiK (2018) The overlap of sense of coherence and the Big Five personality traits: A confirmatory study. Health Psychology Open5(2): 1–4.
27.
KotovRGamezWSchmidtF, et al. (2010) Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin136: 768–821.
28.
LangelandEAKWahlKKristoffersen HanestadBR (2007) Promoting coping: Salutogenesis among people with mental health problems. Issues in Mental Health Nursing28: 275–295.
29.
LarssonGKallenbergKO (1996) Sense of coherence, socioeconomic conditions and health. Interrelationships in a nation-wide Swedish sample. European Journal of Public Health6: 175–180.
McCraeRRCostaPTJr. (2003) Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
32.
MalouffJMThorsteinssonEBSchutteNSJ (2005) The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment27: 101–114.
33.
MilesJNVHempelS (2003) The Eysenck Personality Scales. In: HersenM, et al. (eds) The Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment: Personality Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 147–168.
34.
NilssonBHolmgrenLStegmayrB, et al. (2003) Sense of coherence—Stability over time and relation to health, disease, and psychosocial changes in a general population: A longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health11: 297–304.
35.
RaynorDALevineH (2009) Associations between the five factor model of personality and health behaviors among college students. Journal of American College Health58: 73–81.
36.
RosenthalR (1979) The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin86: 638–641.
RothbartMKBatesJE (1998) Temperament. In DamonW (Series ed.) and EisenbergN (Vol. ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3.Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (5th ed.). New York: Wiley, pp. 105–176.
39.
SotoCJJohnOPGoslingSD, et al. (2011) Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100: 330–348.
40.
SterneJAGavaghanDEggerM (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology53: 1119–1129.
41.
SterneJACSuttonAJIoannidisJP, et al. (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. The BMJ343: d4002.
42.
ThompsonSGSharpSJ (1999) Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine18: 2693–2708.
43.
VianelloMSchnabelKSriramN, et al. (2013) Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences55: 994–999.
44.
ZuckermanM (1991) Psychobiology of Personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
