Recent research shows that racial categorization can be reduced by contexts in which race does not predict how people interact and get along—a manipulation with little to no effect on sex and age. This suggests that our minds attend to race as an implicit cue to how people are likely to get along. However, the underlying mechanism of how these contexts reduce race is not yet known. Is race not encoded? Or, is race encoded, but then inhibited? The present study arbitrates between these possibilities. Results demonstrate that the reduction in racial categorization is happening at recall. Participants are still encoding targets’ race, but this information is locked away or inhibited. This clarifies how the mind switches away from previously relevant, but now irrelevant, social cues: it does not immediately abandon them, rather, it encodes them but inhibits their use.
BennettM.SaniF. (2003). The role of target gender and race in children’s encoding of category-neutral person information. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 99–112.
2.
ByrneR. W.WhitenA. (Eds.). (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford, England: ClarendonPress.
3.
CabecinhasR.AmâncioL. (1999). Asymmetries in the perception of other as a function of social position and context. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 40–50.
4.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ.KurzbanR. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 173–179.
5.
GravesJ. L. (2001). The emperor’s new clothes: Biological theories of race at the millennium. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
EvansR. J. (2004). The coming of the Third Reich. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
7.
HamiltonD. L.StroessnerS. J.DriscollD. M. (1994). Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. In DevineP. G.HamiltonD. L.OstromT. M. (Eds.), Social cognition: I Impact on social psychology (pp. 291–346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
HarcourtA. H. (1988). Alliances in contests and social intelligence. In ByrneR. W.WhitenA. (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence (pp. 132–152). New York, NY: Clarendon Press.
9.
HewstoneM.HantziA.JohnstonL. (1991). Social categorization and person memory: The pervasiveness of race as an organizing principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 517–528.
10.
HirschfeldL. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child’s construction of human kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
KlauerK. C.HölzenbeinF.CalanchiniJ.ShermanJ. W. (2014). How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 21–40.
12.
KurzbanR.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.
13.
MaddoxK. B.ChaseS. G. (2004). Manipulating subcategory salience: Exploring the link between skin tone and social perception of blacks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 533–546.
14.
MansonJ.WranghamR. (1991). Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and humans. Current Anthropology, 32, 369–390.
15.
MessickD. M.MackieD. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45–81.
16.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. V. (2008). Black + White = Black. Psychological Science, 19, 973–977.
17.
PietraszewskiD. (2013). What is group psychology? Adaptations for mapping shared intentional stances. In BanajiM.GelmanS. (Eds), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 253–257). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
PietraszewskiD.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2014). The content of our cooperation, not the color of our skin: An alliance detection system regulates categorization by coalition and race, but not sex. PLoS ONE, 9, e88534. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088534
19.
PietraszewskiD.CurryO.PetersenM. B.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2015). Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system. Cognition, 140, 24–39.
20.
PietraszewskiD.GermanT. (2013). Coalitional psychology on the playground: Reasoning about indirect social consequences in preschoolers and adults. Cognition, 126, 352–363.
21.
PietraszewskiD.SchwartzA. (2014a). Evidence that accent is a dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of perceptual salience, familiarity, or ease-of-processing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 43–50.
22.
PietraszewskiD.SchwartzA. (2014b). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 51–57.
23.
RatnerK. G.KaulC.Van BavelJ. J. (2013). Is race erased? Decoding race from patterns of neural activity when skin color is not diagnostic of group boundaries. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 750–755.
24.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L.RubinD. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25.
SackJ. (2005). The effect of social essentialism on categorization and induction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 3469.
26.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
StangorC.LynchL.DuanC.GlassB. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207–218.
28.
SusskindJ. E. (2007). Preadolescents’ categorization of gender and ethnicity at the subgroup level in memory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 213–225.
29.
TajfelH. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 144–167). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
30.
TaylorS. E.FiskeS. T.EtcoffN. L.RudermanA. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793.
31.
TellesE. E. (2004). Race in another America: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
TishkoffS. A.KiddK. K. (2004). Implications of biogeography of human populations for ‘race’ and medicine. Nature Genetics, 36, 521–527.
33.
von RuedenC.GurvenM.KaplanH. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 402–415.
34.
van BavelJ. J.CunninghamW. A. (2009). Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 321–335.
35.
WeismanK.JohnsonM. V.ShuttsK. (2014). Young children’s automatic encoding of social categories. Developmental Science. doi:10.1111/desc.12269
36.
WilliamsM. J.EberhadtJ. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033–1047.
37.
WilsonJ. PSeeP. E.BernsteinM. J.HugenbergK.ChartierC. (2014). Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory. PLoS ONE, 9, e90668. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090668
