Political conservatives, compared to liberals, are commonly thought to be more threat-sensitive and risk-averse. Using an American sample of community adults (n = 397), we investigated when conservatives and liberals might be risk-taking or risk-averse. Participants completed measures of political orientation, and perceptions of risk, expected benefits (EB) of risk, and risk-propensity, across five domains (financial, recreational, ethical, social, and health). The relation between perceptions of risk and EB and risk-propensity differed as a function of political conservatism and varied across risk domains. For example, with regard to new business ventures, conservatives were generally willing to take risks unless perceived risk was high and expected benefit was low, whereas liberals were generally unwilling to take risks unless perceived risk was low and expected benefit was high. Implications for understanding risk-taking are considered.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (2002). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
AltemeyerR. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AltemeyerR. A. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–91). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
BlaisA. R.WeberE. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.
6.
BromileyP.CurleyS. P. (1992). Individual differences in risk taking. In YatesJ. F. (Ed.), Risk taking behavior (pp. 87–132). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
7.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS.D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
8.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.
9.
ChomaB. L.BusseriM. B.SadavaS. W. (2009). Liberal and conservative political ideologies: Different routes to happiness?Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 502–505.
10.
ChomaB. L.HaferC. L. (2009). Understanding the relation between explicitly and implicitly measured political orientation: The moderating role of political sophistication. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 964–967.
11.
ChomaB. L.HanochY.GummerumM.HodsonG. (2013). Relations between risk perceptions and socio-political ideology are domain- and ideology dependent. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 29–34.
12.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
14.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.
15.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109.
16.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894.
17.
FinucaneM. L.SlovicP.MertzC. K.FlynnJ.SatterfieldT. A. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health, Risk, & Society, 2, 159–172.
18.
GoldsteinW. MWeberE. U. (1995). Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. In GoldsteinW. M.HogarthR. M. (Eds.), Research on judgment and decision making (pp. 566–617). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HanochY.JohnsonJ.G.WilkeA. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment. Psychological Science, 17, 300–304.
20.
HarrisonJ. D.YoungJ. M.ButowP.SalkeldG.SolomonM. J. (2005). Is it worth the risk? A systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the health setting. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1385–1396.
21.
HodsonG.ChomaB. L.BoisvertJ.HaferC. L.MacInnisC. C.CostelloK. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 195–205.
22.
HirshJ. B.DeYoungC. G.XuX.PetersonJ. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655–664.
23.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–725.
24.
Janoff-BulmanR. (2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 120–128.
25.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
26.
JostJ. T.NapierJ. L.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS. D.PalfaiT. P.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007.
27.
KerlingerF. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
KishG. B. (1973). Stimulus-seeking and conservatism. In WilsonG. D. (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (pp. 197–207). London, England: Academic Press.
29.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.OgunfoworaB.BourdageJ. S.ShinK. (2010). The personality bases of socio-political attitudes: The role of honesty-humility and openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 115–119.
30.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.StongD. R.BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.
31.
McFarlandS. (2005). On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360–367.
32.
NicholsonN.SoaneE.Fenton-O'CreevyM.WillmanP. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 157–176.
33.
OxleyD. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.MillerJ. L.ScaloraM.HatemiP. K.HibbingJ. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.
34.
RoetsA.Van HielA.CornelisI. (2006). Does materialism predict racism? Materialism as a distinctive social attitude and a predictor of prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 20, 155–168.
35.
SarinR. K.WeberM. (1993). Risk-value models. European Journal of Operations Research, 70, 135–149.
36.
ShookN. J.FazioR. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 995–998.
37.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE.GriffinT.HutchinsonS.ChamberlinB. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470–487.
SlovicP. (1997). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. In BazermanM.MessickD.TenbrunselA.Wade-BenzoniK. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management (pp. 277–313). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
SoaneE.ChmielN. (2005). Are risk preferences consistent? The influence of decision domain and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1781–1791.
42.
ThorisdottirH.JostJ. T.LiviatanI.ShroutP. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from eastern and western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175–203.
43.
VigilJ. M. (2010). Political leanings vary with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 547–558.
44.
WeberE. U.BlaisA-R.BetzN. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290.
45.
WellsG. L.WildschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125.
46.
WilsonG. D. (1973). A dynamic theory of conservatism. In WilsonG. D. (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (pp. 187–196). London, England: Academic Press.
