Polish Validation of the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS): Psychometric Characteristics and Relationships with Risk Propensity

Abstract

In three studies, we developed the Polish version of the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS), which measures individual differences in people's spontaneous use of mental imagery in everyday situations. The SUIS-PL consists of nine items with very good internal consistency and validity. For example, it shows a moderate correlation with the vividness of mental images and with temperamental traits related to the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and the Behavioral Approach System (BAS). We also investigated the relationship between the SUIS-PL and measures of risk perception and willingness to take risks, showing the possible applicability of the scale in this context. Interestingly, we found that people with higher scores in the SUIS-PL were generally more willing to take risks, suggesting that they may spontaneously imagine positive, rather than negative, aspects of risky situations.

Keywords

mental imagery individual differences risk perception willingness to take risk

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andraszewicz

Scheibehenne

Rieskamp

Grasman

Verhagen

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

(2015). An Introduction to Bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management, 41(2), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314560412

Antonietti

Colombo

(1997). The spontaneous occurrence of mental visualization in thinking. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 16(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.2190/DYHQ-XMA7-YQW1-NT14

Barsics

Van der Linden

D’Argembeau

(2016). Frequency, characteristics, and perceived functions of emotional future thinking in daily life. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1051560

Beach

L. R.

(2009). Decision making: Linking narratives and action. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.2.10bea

Blackwell

S. E.

(2020). Emotional mental imagery. In Abraham

(Ed.), The cambridge handbook of the imagination ((1st ed, pp. 241–257). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580298.016

Bürkner

P.-C.

(2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017

Campos

Pérez-Fabello

M. J.

(2009). Psychometric quality of a revised version vividness of visual imagery questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108(3), 798–802. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.108.3.798-802

Campos

Pérez-Fabello

M. J.

González

MÁ

(1999). Capacity for mental imagery and its spontaneous use. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(3), 856–858. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.3.856

Corr

P. J.

Cooper

A. J.

(2016). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000273

10.

D’Argembeau

Renaud

Van der Linden

(2011). Frequency, characteristics and functions of future-oriented thoughts in daily life. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1647

11.

Gorgen

S. M.

Hiller

Witthoft

(2015). Die Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS) – Entwicklung und teststatistische Prüfung einer deutschen Adaption. Diagnostica, 62(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000135

12.

Holmes

E. A.

Deeprose

Fairburn

C. G.

Wallace-Hadrill

S. M. A.

Bonsall

M. B.

Geddes

J. R.

Goodwin

G. M.

(2011). Mood stability versus mood instability in bipolar disorder: A possible role for emotional mental imagery. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(10), 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.008

13.

Holmes

E. A.

Geddes

J. R.

Colom

Goodwin

G. M.

(2008). Mental imagery as an emotional amplifier: Application to bipolar disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(12), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.09.005

14.

Holmes

E. A.

Mathews

(2005). Mental imagery and emotion: A special relationship? Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 5(4), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.489

15.

Jankowska

D. M.

Karwowski

(2022). How vivid is your mental imagery?: Validation of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire in five Polish samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000721

16.

JASP Team (2020). JASP (0.14).

17.

J. L.

Geiles

Saulsman

L. M.

(2021). Mental imagery-based episodic simulation amplifies motivation and behavioural engagement in planned reward activities. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 145, 103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103947

18.

J. L.

Heyes

S. B.

MacLeod

Holmes

E. A.

(2016). Emotional mental imagery as simulation of reality: Fear and beyond—A tribute to peter lang. Behavior Therapy, 47(5), 702–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.11.004

19.

Jones

Stuth

(1997). The uses of mental imagery in athletics: An overview. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80016-2

20.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

21.

Kosslyn

Chabris

Shepard

Thompson

(1998). Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS). APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t57899-000

22.

Kosslyn

S. M.

Ganis

Thompson

W. L.

(2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090055

23.

Lerner

J. S.

Valdesolo

Kassam

K. S.

(2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

24.

Marks

D. F. D. F.

(1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x

25.

McCarthy-Jones

Knowles

Rowse

(2012). More than words? Hypomanic personality traits, visual imagery and verbal thought in young adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.004

26.

Nalborczyk

Batailler

Lœvenbruck

Vilain

Bürkner

P.-C.

(2019). An Introduction to Bayesian multilevel models using brms: A case study of gender effects on vowel variability in standard Indonesian. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(5), 1225–1242. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0006

27.

Nanay

(2016). The role of imagination in decision-making: The role of imagination in decision-making. Mind & Language, 31(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12097

28.

Nanay

(2018). Multimodal mental imagery. Cortex, 105, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006

29.

Nelis

Holmes

E. A.

Griffith

J. W.

Raes

(2014). Mental imagery during daily life: Psychometric evaluation of the spontaneous use of imagery scale (SUIS). Psychologica Belgica, 54(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.ag

30.

Pearson

Naselaris

Holmes

E. A.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2015). Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003

31.

Reisberg

Pearson

D. G.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(2003). Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator’s theoretical views. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.858

32.

Sheehan

P. W.

(1967). A shortened form of Betts’ questionnaire upon mental imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(196707)23:3<386::AID-JCLP2270230328>3.0.CO;2-S

33.

Sinclair

A. H.

Hakimi

Stanley

M. L.

Adcock

R. A.

Samanez-Larkin

G. R.

(2021). Pairing facts with imagined consequences improves pandemic-related risk perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2100970118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100970118

34.

Sobkow

Traczyk

Kaufman

S. B.

Nosal

(2018). The structure of intuitive abilities and their relationships with intelligence and openness to experience. Intelligence, 67, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.12.001

35.

Sobkow

Traczyk

Zaleskiewicz

(2016). The Affective Bases of Risk Perception: Negative Feelings and Stress Mediate the Relationship between Mental Imagery and Risk Perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00932

36.

Sobkow

Zaleskiewicz

Petrova

Garcia-Retamero

Traczyk

(2020). Worry, risk perception, and controllability predict intentions toward COVID-19 preventive behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582720

37.

Tanaka

Yoshinaga

Tsuchiyagaito

Sutoh

Matsuzawa

Hirano

Nakazato

Shimizu

(2018). Mental imagery in social anxiety disorder: The development and clinical utility of a Japanese version of the spontaneous use of imagery scale (SUIS-J). Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 9(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2018.1487455

38.

Traczyk

Sobkow

Zaleskiewicz

(2015). Affect-Laden imagery and risk taking: The mediating role of stress and risk perception. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0122226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122226

39.

Tużnik

Francuz

(2019). Factor structure and test-retest reliability of the Polish version of the Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale. Current Psychology, 40(9), 4364–4371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00367-x

40.

White

Ashton

Law

(1974). Factor analyses of the shortened form of Betts’ questionnaire upon mental imagery. Australian Journal of Psychology, 26(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049537408255229

41.

Wytykowska

Fajkowska

Domaradzka

Jankowski

K. S.

(2017). Construct validity of the Polish version of the reinforcement sensitivity theory-personality questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.054

42.

Zaleskiewicz

(2001). Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: Personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S105–S122. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.426

43.

Zaleskiewicz

Bernady

Traczyk

(2020). Entrepreneurial risk taking is related to mental imagery: A fresh Look at the old issue of entrepreneurship and risk. Applied Psychology, 69(4), 1438–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12226

44.

Zaleskiewicz

Traczyk

(2020). Emotions and financial decision making. In Zaleskiewicz

Traczyk

(Eds.), Psychological perspectives on financial decision making (pp. 107–133). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45500-2_6