Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-9
Embodied Capital and Risk-Related Traits,Attitudes,Behaviors,and Outcomes: An Exploratory Examination of Attractiveness,Cognitive Ability,and Physical Ability
The relative state model posits two nonindependent pathways to risk. The need-based pathway suggests people take risks when nonrisky options are unlikely to meet their needs. The ability-based pathway suggests people take risks when they possess resources or abilities making them more capable of successfully “pulling off” risk-taking. Growing laboratory and field evidence supports need-based risk-taking. However, little is known about ability-based risk-taking. We examined whether three indicators of embodied capital (attractiveness, cognitive ability, and physical dexterity) were associated with risk-related personality traits, risk-attitudes, behavioral risk-taking, and outcomes associated with risk-taking. Among 328 community members recruited to maximize variance on risk-propensity, we demonstrate that embodied capital indices predict various instantiations of risk-propensity consistent with the relative state model.
AlessiS. M.PetryN. M. (2003). Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes, 64, 345–354. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00150-5
2.
AndersonS. A. S.HawesD. J.SnowP. C. (2016). Language impairments among youth offenders: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.004
3.
ApalkovaY.ButovskayaM. L.BronnikovaN.BurkovaV.ShackelfordT. K.FinkB. (2018). Assessment of male physical risk-taking behavior in a sample of Russian men and women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 314–321.
4.
BarclayP.MishraS.SparksA. M. (2018). State-dependent risk-taking. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20180180. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0180
5.
BirdR. B.SmithE.BirdD. W. (2001). The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50(1), 9–19. doi:10.1007/s002650100338
6.
BlaisA. R.WeberE. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.
7.
BobadillaL.MetzeA. V.TaylorJ. (2012). Physical attractiveness and its relation to unprovoked and reactive aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.09.004
8.
BurksS. V.CarpenterJ. P.GoetteL.RustichiniA. (2009). Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 7745–7750. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812360106
9.
ByckG. R.SwannG.SchaletB.BollandJ.MustanskiB. (2015). Sensation-seeking predicting growth in adolescent problem behaviors. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46, 466–473. doi:10.1007/s10578-014-0486-y
10.
CaviorN.HowardL. R. (1973). Facial attractiveness and juvenile delinquency among Black and White offenders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1, 202–213. doi:10.1007/BF00916114
11.
CorM. K.HaertelE.KrosnickJ. A.MalhotraN. (2012). Improving ability measurement in surveys following the principles of IRT: The Wordsum vocabulary test in the general social survey. Social Science Research, 41, 1003–1016. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.05.007
12.
CottonS.FowlerK.PomiankowskiA. (2003). Review paper: Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 771–783. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2688
13.
de RidderD. T. D.Lensvelt-MuldersG.FinkenauerC.StokF. M.BaumeisterR. F. (2011). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 76–99. doi:10.1177/1088868311418749
14.
de Tribolet-HardyF.VohsK.MokrosA.HabermeyerE. (2014). Psychopathy, intelligence, and impulsivity in German violent offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37, 238–244. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.018
15.
DohmenT.FalkA.HuffmanD.SundeU. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?American Economic Review, 100, 1238–1260. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.1238
16.
EysenckH. J.EysenckM. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
17.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G.BarrettP. (1995). Personality differences according to gender. Psychological Reports, 76, 711–716. doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.3.711
18.
FarthingG. W. (2005). Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 171–185. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.004
19.
FarthingG. W. (2007). Neither daredevils nor wimps: Attitudes toward physical risk takers as mates. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 754–777. doi:10.1177/147470490700500406
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
21.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J. (1995). Predictive validity of categorically and dimensionally scored measures of disruptive childhood behaviors. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 477–487. doi:10.1097/00004583-199504000-00015
22.
FerrisJ.WynneH. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report (Submitted to the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse). Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
23.
FesslerD. M. T.PillsworthE. G.FlamsonT. J. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 107–123.
24.
FesslerD. M. T.TiokhinL. B.HolbrookC.GervaisM. M.SnyderJ. K. (2014). Foundations of the Crazy Bastard hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.003
25.
FignerB.WeberE. U. (2011). Who takes risks when and why? Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 211–216. doi:10.1177/0963721411415790
26.
FreyR.PedroniA.MataR.RieskampJ.HertwigR. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3, e1701381. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701381
27.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 156–168.
28.
GhasemiA.ZahediaslS. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism, 10, 486–489. doi:10.5812/ijem.3505
29.
GibsonC.PiqueroA.TibbettsS. (2001). The contribution of family adversity and verbal IQ to criminal behavior. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 574–592. doi:10.1177/0306624X01455004
30.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78.
31.
GonzalesJ.MishraS.CampR. D. II (2017). For the win: Risk-sensitive decision-making in teams. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 462–472. doi:10.1002/bdm.1965
32.
GuszkowskaM.BoldakA. (2010). Sensation seeking in males involved in recreational high-risk sports. Biology of Sport, 27, 157–162.
33.
HawkesK.O’ConnellJ. F.Blurton JonesN. G. (2001). Hazda meat sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 113–142.
34.
HighhouseS.NyeC. D.ZhangD. C.RadaT. B. (2017). Structure of the Dospert: Is there evidence for a general risk factor?Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 400–406.
35.
HugillN.FinkB.NeaveN.BessonA.BunseL. (2011). Women’s perception of men’s sensation seeking propensity from their dance movements. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 483–487. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.002
36.
KaplanH. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101, 91–135.
37.
KnustS.StewartA. L. (2002). Risk-taking behaviour and criminal offending: An investigation of sensation seeking and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 586–602. doi:10.1177/030662402236742
38.
LauriolaM.PannoA.LevinI. P.LejuezC. W. (2014). Individual differences in risky decision-making: A meta-analysis of sensation seeking and impulsivity with the balloon analogue risk task. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 20–36. doi:10.1002/bdm.1784
39.
LejuezC. W.AklinW. M.ZvolenskyM. J.PedullaC. M. (2003). Evaluation of the balloon analogue risk task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475–479.
40.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.…BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.
41.
LittlefieldA. K.SherK. J. (2012). Smoking desistance and personality change in emerging and young adulthood. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14, 338–342. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr219
42.
LoyauA.JalmeM. S.CagniantC.SorciG. (2005). Multiple sexual advertisements honestly reflect health status in peacocks (Pavo cristatus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 552–557.
43.
MackenzieR. D.JamesD. V.McEwanT. E.MullenP. E.OgloffJ. R. P. (2010). Stalkers and intelligence: Implications for treatment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 852–872. doi:10.1080/14789949.2010.503900
44.
MarcusB. (2003). An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 674–706. doi:10.1177/0013164403251329
45.
MarcusB.SchulerH. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647–660. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647
46.
MarloweF. W. (2010). The Hazda: Hunter-gatherers of Tanzania. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
McEwanD.BoudreauP.CurranT.RhodesR. E. (2019). Personality traits of high-risk sport participants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.006
48.
McGloinJ. M.PrattT. C. (2003). Cognitive ability and delinquent behavior among inner-city youth: A life-course analysis of main, mediating, and interaction effects. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 47, 253–271.
49.
MishraS. (2014). Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 280–307. doi:10.1177/1088868314530517
50.
MishraS.BarclayP.LalumièreM. L. (2014). Competitive disadvantage facilitates risk taking. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 126–132. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.11.006
51.
MishraS.BarclayP.SparksA. (2017). The relative state model: Integrating need-based and ability-based pathways to risk-taking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 176–198. doi:10.1177/1088868316644094
52.
MishraS.CarletonS. (2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 144–149. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.030
53.
MishraS.LalumièreM. L. (2010). You can’t always get what you want: The motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 605–611. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.009
54.
MiyaguchiK.ShiratakiS. (2014). Executive functioning problems of juvenile sex offenders with low levels of measured intelligence. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39, 253–260. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.925103
55.
MocanN.TekinE. (2010). Ugly criminals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 15–30.
56.
MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (1988). Self-reported delinquency: Results from an instrument for New Zealand. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, 227–240. doi:10.1177/000486588802100405
57.
NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899.
58.
NosicA.WeberM. (2010). How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Analysis, 7, 282–301. doi:10.1287/deca.1100.0178
59.
OrfordJ.WardleH.GriffithsM.SprostonK.ErensB. (2010).PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey: Reliability, item response, factor structure and inter-scale agreement. International Gambling Studies, 10, 31–44. doi:10.1080/14459790903567132
60.
RayburnR.WrightJ. (2009). Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they’ve got nothing to lose. Society, 46, 347–349. doi:10.1007/s12115-009-9219-4
61.
RosenL. H.UnderwoodM. K. (2010). Facial attractiveness as a moderator of the association between social and physical aggression and popularity in adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 313–333. doi10.1016/j.jsp.2010.03.001
62.
RuffR. M.ParkerS. B. (1993). Gender- and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: Normative values for the finger tapping and grooved pegboard tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1219–1230.
SmithE. A.BirdR. B.BirdD. W. (2003). The benefits of costly signalling: Meriam turtle hunters. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 116–126. doi: 10.1093/beheco/14.1.116
65.
SpenceM. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010
66.
StephensD. W.KerbsJ. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
StinchfieldR.McCreadyJ.TurnerN. E.Jimenez-MurciaS.PetryN. M.GrantJ.…WintersK. C. (2016). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder and comparison to DSM-IV. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32, 905–922. doi:10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7
68.
SweenM.CeschiA.TommasiF.SartoriR.WellerJ. (2017). Who is a distracted driver? Associations between mobile phone use while driving, domain-specific risk taking, and personality. Risk Analysis, 37, 349–359. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.001
69.
SylwesterK.PawlowskiB. (2011). Daring to be darling: Attractiveness of risk takers as partners in long- and short-term sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 64, 695–706. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9790-6
70.
SzámadóS. (2011). The cost of honesty and the fallacy of the handicap principle. Animal Behaviour, 81, 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.08.022
71.
von RuedenC. R.LukaszewskiA. W.GurvenM. (2015). Adaptive personality calibration in a human society: Effects of embodied capital on prosocial traits. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 1071–1082. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv051
72.
WalshA. (1987). Cognitive functioning and delinquency: Property versus violent offenses. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 31, 285–289. doi:10.1177/0306624X8703100309
73.
WilkeA.HutchinsonJ. M. C.ToddP. M.KrugerD. J. (2006). Is risk taking used as a cue in mate choice?Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 367–393. doi:10.1177/147470490600400130
74.
WolfleL. M. (1980). The enduring effects of education on verbal skills. Sociology of Education, 53, 104–114.
75.
WongJ. S.PennerA. M. (2016). Gender and the returns of attractiveness. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 113–123. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2016.04.002
76.
YunI.CheongJ.WalshA. (2014). The relationship between academic achievement and likelihood of police arrest among delinquents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 607–631. doi:10.1177/0306624X13482882
77.
YunI.LeeJ. (2013). IQ and delinquency: The differential detection hypothesis revisited. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11, 196–211. doi:10.1177/1541204012463410
78.
ZahaviA. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
79.
ZuckermanM. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
