“Next Time You’ll Know What We’re About”: Follow-Up Focus Groups With Survivors of Gender-Based Violence

Abstract

Focus groups are a common research method for engaging with survivors of gender-based violence. In a project exploring women’s experiences of victim blame from professionals and agencies, follow-up focus groups were held with the same participants and at their request, to allow more time and space to discuss the topic. The women who took part said that meeting again helped them to feel more comfortable with the research focus and process, with the researcher, and with each other. It also led to more in-depth and comprehensive findings than would have been captured by traditional one-off groups. This paper discusses the logistics of this adaptation to the qualitative method and the benefits of this method for research findings and the experience of participants.

Keywords

focus groups: follow-up focus groups qualitative methods gender-based violence victim blame

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aitken

Burman

(1999). Keeping and crossing professional and racialized boundaries: Implications for feminist practice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00359.x

Anderson

G. D.

Overby

(2021). The impact of rape myths and current events on the well-being of sexual violence survivors. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220937782

Beddows

(2022). ‘Everything, it was everything’: Victim blame, victimism, and responsibilisation. PhD Thesis: London Metropolitan University. Available: https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/8390/

Beddows

(2025). Trauma-responsive practices. Research Briefing. Available. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389999064_Trauma-Responsive_Practices_A_Four_Aspect_Model_for_Supporting_Survivors

Beddows

(2026) The ‘new’ victim blaming: Victimism, responsibilisation, and the need for space. In Lombard

(Ed.), The Handbook of Gender and Violence. Routledge. In press (publication date of 2026).

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brison

S. J.

(2002). Aftermath: Violence and the remaking of a self. Princeton University Press.

Brown

(2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.

Burrowes

(2013). Responding to the challenge of rape myths in court: A guide for prosecutors. Report, NB Research. Available. https://nb-research.co.uk/index.php/projects-2

10.

Burt

M. R.

(1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In Parrot

Bechhofer

(Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 26–40). Wiley.

11.

Campbell

(2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. Routledge.

12.

Campbell

Adams

A. E.

Wasco

S. M.

Ahrens

C. E.

Sefl

(2010). “What has it been like for you to talk with me today?” The impact of participating in interview research in rape survivors. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209353576

13.

Chiu

L. F.

(2003). Transformational potential of focus group practice in participatory action research. Action Research, 1(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030012006

14.

Cornish

Breton

Moreno-Tabarez

Delgado

Rua

de-Graft Aikins

Hodgetts

(2024). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(34), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1

15.

Coy

(2006). This morning I’m a researcher, this afternoon I’m an outreach worker: Ethical dilemmas in practitioner research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570601076785

16.

Eberhardt

(2019). Biased. William Heinemann.

17.

Eigenberg

Garland

(2008). Victim blaming. In Moriarty

L. J.

(Ed.), Controversies in victimology (pp. 21–36). LexisNexis Group.

18.

Fanghanel

(2020). Disrupting rape culture. Policy Press.

19.

Farquhar

Das

(1999). Are focus groups suitable for ‘sensitive’ topics? In Barbour

R. S.

Kitzinger

(Eds.), Developing focus group research (pp. 47–63). Sage.

20.

Finch

(1993). ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to’: Ethics and politics of interviewing women. In Hammersely

(Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice (pp. 71–87). Sage.

21.

Frisina

(2006). Back-talk focus groups as a follow-up tool in qualitative migration research: The missing link? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum for Qualitative Social Research, 7(3). Art. 5. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060352

22.

Gillies

Alldred

(2002). The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. In Miller

Birch

Mauthner

Jessop

(Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 35–52). Sage.

23.

Goldman

(1910). The traffic in women. Hastings Women's Law Journal, 13, 9–20. Available. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hwlj/vol13/iss1/3

24.

Haworth

Tompkinson

Richardson

Deamer

Hamann

(2023). “For the Record”: Applying linguistics to improve evidential consistency in police investigative interview records. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1178516

25.

Hesse-Biber

S. N.

Leavy

(2010). The practice of qualitative research. Sage.

26.

Houghton

(2017). Voice, agency, power. In Holt

Overlien

Devaney

(Eds.), Responding to domestic violence: Emerging challenges for policy, practise and research in Europe (pp. 77–96). Jessica Kingsley.

27.

Jaffe

A. E.

DiLillo

Hoffman

Haikalis

Dykstra

R. E.

(2015). Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.004

28.

Johnson

Flynn

(2021). Collaboration for improving social work practice: The promise of feminist participatory action research. Affilia, 36(3), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109920954424

29.

Kelly

(1988). Surviving sexual violence. Polity Press.

30.

Kelly

(2010). The (in)credible words of women: False allegations in European rape research. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210387748

31.

Kelly

Burton

Regan

(1994). Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression? In Maynard

Purvis

(Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 27–48). Taylor & Francis.

32.

Kelly

Regan

Burton

(1992). Defending the indefensible? Quantitative methods and feminist research. In Hinds

Phoenix

Stacey

(Eds.), Working out: New directions in women’s studies (pp. 149–160). Falmer Press.

33.

Kitzinger

(1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023

34.

Kitzinger

(1995). Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299

35.

Kitzinger

Farquhar

(1999). The analytical potential of ‘sensitive moments’ in focus group discussions. In Barbour

R. S.

Kitzinger

(Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 156–172). Sage.

36.

Lerner

M. J.

(1980). Belief in a just world. Plenum Press.

37.

Liamputtong

(2007). Researching the vulnerable. Sage.

38.

Liamputtong

(2015). Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. Sage.

39.

Lykes

M. B.

Hershberg

R. M.

(2012). Participatory action research and feminisms. In Hesse-Biber

S. N.

(Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 331–367). Sage.

40.

Madigan

Gamble

(1991). The second rape. Jossey-Bass Inc.

41.

Manne

(2018). Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press.

42.

Maynard

(1994). Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In Maynard

Purvis

(Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10–26). Taylor & Francis.

43.

Mishra

Craddock

Chan

Elwyn

Cerea

Tan

W. Q.

Haamed

H. B.

Turk

(2023). You can't be too skinny. You can't be too fat. I don't know what you are supposed to be.: A qualitative focus group study exploring body image experiences of South Asian women in the UK. Body Image, 46, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.05.005

44.

Moran

(2017). Re-positioning female heterosexuality within postfeminist and neoliberal culture. Sexualities, 20(1-2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649335

45.

Moran

L. J.

Skeggs

Tyrer

Corteen

(2003). Safety talk, violence and laughter: Methodological reflections on focus groups in violence research. In Lee

R. M.

Stanko

E. A.

(Eds.), Researching violence (pp. 107–125). Routledge.

46.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J.

(2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

47.

Pain

Whitman

Milledge

(2019). Participatory action research toolkit. Practice guide. Durham University. Available. https://www.youngfoundation.org/institute-for-community-studies/repository/participatory-action-research-toolkit-an-introduction-to-using-par-as-an-approach-to-learning-research-and-action/

48.

Park

(2006) Knowledge and participatory research. In Reason

Bradbury

(Eds.) Handbook of action research (pp. 81-90). Sage.

49.

Pini

(2002). Focus groups, feminist research and farm women: Opportunities for empowerment in rural social research. Journal of Rural Studies, 18(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00007-4

50.

Pinto

A. A.

Bright

(2016). The biology of resilient beliefs. Current Ethology, 15(1), 30–54.

51.

Pösö

Honkatukia

Nyqvist

(2008). Focus groups and the study of violence. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085297

52.

Pugh

(1990). My statistics and feminism – A true story. In Stanley

(Ed.), (pp. 103–112). Feminist Routledge.Praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology.

53.

Reisner

S. L.

Randazzo

R. K.

White Hughto

J. M.

Peitzmeier

DuBois

L. Z.

Pardee

D. J.

Marrow

McLean

Potter

(2018). Sensitive health topics with underserved patient populations: Methodological considerations for online focus group discussions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1658–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317705355

54.

Rentschler

C. A.

(2014). Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2014.070106

55.

Rich

(2003). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian experience. Journal of Women's History, 15(3), 11–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2003.0079

56.

Roald

G. M.

Schruijer

Neergård

G. B.

(2024). The researcher’s facilitating role in stimulating a constructive group climate in online focus-group interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 31(6), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241260656

57.

Rose

(2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/40.2.321

58.

Saldaña

(2012). Coding manual for qualitative researchers 2^nd Ed. Sage.

59.

Savigny

(2020). Cultural sexism. Bristol University Press.

60.

Scott

(1998). Here be dragons: Researching the unbelievable, hearing the unthinkable. Sociological Research Online, 3(3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.189

61.

Shaver

K. G.

(1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028777

62.

Sheriff

Guggelberger

Hall

Scholes

(2014). “From start to finish”: Practical and ethical considerations in the use of focus groups to evaluate sexual health service interventions for young people. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000014

63.

Smithson

(2008). Using focus groups in social research. In Alasuutari

Bickman

Brannen

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 357–370). Sage.

64.

Sprague

(2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers. Altamira Press.

65.

Sullivan

Bhuyan

Senturia

Shiu-Thornton

Ciske

(2005). Participatory action research in practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(8), 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277680

66.

Taylor

(2020). Why women are blamed for everything. Constable Press.

67.

Thiara

R. K.

Roy

(2015). Between the lines: Service responses to Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) women and girls experiencing sexual violence. Report, Imkaan. Available. https://www.imkaan.org.uk/publications

68.

Ullman

S. E.

Townsend

S. M.

(2007). Barriers to working with sexual assault survivors: A qualitative study of rape crisis center workers. Violence Against Women, 13(4), 412–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207299191

69.

Velasco

Sanmartín

F. J.

(2025). Victim-blaming in sexual violence against sex workers: A systematic review. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2025.2482916

70.

Wegrzyn

Tull

Greeson

M. R.

Pierre-Louis

Patton

Shaw

(2023). Rape crisis victim advocacy: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1966–1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082089

71.

Westmarland

(2001). The quantitative/qualitative debate and feminist research: A subjective view of objectivity. Forum for Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.974

72.

Westmarland

Bows

(2018). Researching gender, violence and abuse. Routledge.

73.

Wild

(2023). Gendered discourses of responsibility and domestic abuse victim-blame in the English children’s social care system. Journal of Family Violence, 38(7), 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00431-4

74.

Wilkinson

(1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00080-0

75.

Wilkinson

(1999). Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00355

76.

Wilson

(2016). https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/1251/ ‘Spaces to speak’ of sour milk: Exploring African-Caribbean-British women’s activism and agency on childhood sexual abuse from the 1980s to the present day. PhD Thesis, London Metropolitan University. Available:.