The Quest for Genuinely Participatory and Inclusive Research Approaches: Exploring and Expressing Experience Through Cultural Animation and Transcription Poetry
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2020
The Quest for Genuinely Participatory and Inclusive Research Approaches: Exploring and Expressing Experience Through Cultural Animation and Transcription Poetry
This paper discusses approaches used in an AHRC (Arts and Humanities Research Council) research project across a number of sites in the United Kingdom. The Disability and Community: Dis/engagement, Dis/enfranchisement, Dis/parity, and Dissent (D4D) project explores issues around disability and community, investigating diverse topics related to inclusion/exclusion. The D4D project is distinctive in the combination of academic and nonacademic Co-Investigators. One objective is to contribute to the evolution of a research language that is accessible to a wider public. Using arts-based approaches, the research team also seeks to develop research methods and an ethical framework that will be appropriate for co-constructed community research. This paper focuses on different ways of exploring and expressing participant experience. First, it considers the use of cultural animation (CA) as an alternative to the traditional interview, providing participant and researcher reflections. Cultural animation is a participatory arts-based and embodied methodology of community engagement and knowledge coproduction that draws on everyday experience of participants. Transcription poetry (TP) converts interview transcripts into poems. Short interview extracts and poems are selected here to illustrate the approach. D4D team members believe that CA generates authentic and rich data where there is not only fidelity to participant experience through the TP process but a greater resonance in the words than would have been the case in traditional representations.
AffleckW.GlassK.MacdonaldM. E. (2013). The limitations of language: Male participants, stoicism, and the qualitative research interview. American Journal of Men’s Health, 7(2), 155–162.doi:10.1177/1557988312464038http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23093076
2.
AlvessonM. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33.doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925191
3.
BarrettE. (2007). Experiential learning in practice as research: Context, method, knowledge. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 6(2), 115–124.doi:10.1386/jvap.6.2.115_1
4.
BenneyM.HughesE. C. (1956). Of sociology and the interview: Editorial preface. American Journal of Sociology, 62(2), 137–142.doi:10.1086/221953
5.
BriggsC. (2002). Interviewing, power/knowledge, and social inequality. InGubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp.911–922). Sage.
6.
BrownJ. M. (2017). A dialogical research methodology based on Buber: Intersubjectivity in the research interview. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(3), 415–436.doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12174
7.
BurdickM. (2011). Researcher and teacher-participant found poetry: Collaboration in poetic transcription. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 12(SI 1.10), 1–18.
8.
ByrneG. (2017). Narrative inquiry and the problem of representation: ‘Giving voice’ making meaning. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40(1), 36–52.
9.
ChiltonG.LeavyP. (2014). Arts-based research practice: Merging social research and the creative arts. InLeavyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp.403–422). Oxford University.
10.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
11.
CotterillP. (1992). Interviewing women: Issues of friendship, vulnerability, and power. Men’s Studies International Forum, 15(5/6), 593–606.
12.
DenzinN. K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1(1), 23–46.doi:10.1177/146879410100100102
13.
DenzinN. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto. Routledge.
14.
DwyerP. (2004). Augusto Boal and the woman in Lima: A poetic encounter. New Theatre Quarterly, 20(2), 155–163.doi:10.1017/S0266464X04000053
15.
EisnerE. W. (1981). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 10(4), 5–9.doi:10.3102/0013189X010004005
16.
EnoshG.BuchbinderE. (2005). The interactive construction of narrative styles in sensitive interviews: The case of domestic violence research. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(4), 588–617.doi:10.1177/1077800405275054
17.
FaulknerS. L. (2009). Poetry as method: Reporting research through verse. Routledge.
18.
FaulknerS. L. (2016). The art of criteria: Ars criteria As demonstration of vigor in poetic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(8), 662–665.
19.
Gasson,N. R.SandersonL. J.BurnettG.van der MeerJ. (2015). ‘It’s all he’s going to say’: Using poetic transcription to explore students’ mainstream and residential school experiences. Disability and Society, 30(5), 731–742.
20.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
21.
GlesneC. (1997). That rare feeling: Re-presenting research through poetic transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(2), 202–221.doi:10.1177/107780049700300204
22.
Haines-SaahM.OliffeJ. (2012). Visual methods in gender and health research. InOliffeJ. L.GreavesL. (Eds.), Designing and conducting gender, sex, and health research (Chap. 7, pp.127–144). Sage.
23.
HamiltonL.TaylorN. (2017). Ethnography after humanism. Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
HarveyL. (2015). Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 23–38.doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.914487
KelemenM.SurmanE.DikomitisL. (2018). Cultural animation in health research: An innovative methodology for patient and public involvement and engagement. Health Expectations, 21(4), 805–813.doi:10.1111/hex.12677http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29532582
27.
LafrenièreD.CoxS. M. (2013). “If you can call it a poem”: Toward a framework for the assessment of arts-based works. Qualitative Research, 13(3), 318–336.doi:10.1177/1468794112446104
28.
Lévi-StraussC. (1969). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.
29.
LevinsonM. (2017). When participants don’t wish to participate in participatory action research, and when others participate on their behalf: The representation of communities by real and faux participants. The Urban Review, 49(3), 382–399.doi:10.1007/s11256-016-0390-9
30.
LyonsL.ChipperfieldJ. (2000). (De)constructing the interview: A critique of the participatory model. Resources for Feminist Research, 28(1/2), 33–48.
31.
MalinowskiB. (1922). Argonauts of the western Pacific. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32.
MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (2012). Complicating voice in a refusal to “let participants speak for themselves”. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 745–751.doi:10.1177/1077800412453017
33.
NewkirkT. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. InMortensenP.KirschG. E. (Eds.), Ethics and representation of qualitative studies (pp.3–16). National Council of Teachers of English.
34.
NierseC. J.SchipperK.van ZadelhoffE.van de GriendtJ.AbmaT. A. (2012). Collaboration and co-ownership in research: Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations, 15(3), 242–254.doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21332617
35.
NindM. (2008). Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: Methodological challenges. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods NCRM/012. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/491/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-012.pdf
36.
Personal correspondence, (2018). E-mail 1.12.18 from Sutherland A. to myself (Levinson, M.P.).
37.
PoolS.PahlK. (2016). The work of art in the age of mechanical co-production. InO’BrienD.MatthewsP. (Eds.), After urban regeneration: Communities, policy and place (pp.79–94). Policy Press
38.
PrendergastM. (2009). Introduction: The phenomena of poetry in research. InPrendergastM.LeggoC.SameshimaP. (Eds.), Poetic inquiry (pp. xix–xli). Sense Publishers.
39.
QuS. Q.DumayJ. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238–264.doi:10.1108/11766091111162070
40.
RichardsonL. (1992). The poetic representation of lives: Writing a postmodern sociology. InDenzinN. K. (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 13, pp.19–28). JAI.
41.
SilvermanD. (1998). Qualitative research: Meanings or practices?Information Systems Journal, 8(1), 3–20.
42.
SmartF.LoadsD. (2017). Poetic transcription with a twist: Supporting early career academics through liminal spaces. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(2), 134–143.doi:10.1080/1360144X.2016.1210519
43.
SmithB.SparkesA. (2004). Men, sport, and spinal cord injury: An analysis of metaphors and narrative types. Disability & Society, 19(6), 613–626.doi:10.1080/0968759042000252533
44.
SparkesA. C.DouglasK. (2007). Making the case for poetic representations: An example in action. The Sport Psychologist, 21(2), 170–190.doi:10.1123/tsp.21.2.170
45.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
46.
SteeleJ. (2015). Boat tree game buttons: Practice report. Jericho Road Solutions.
47.
SutherlandA. (2010). Transcription poetry as a vehicle for documenting the lives of disabled people [Conference session]. Lancaster University, UK. September 2010.
48.
Van EnkA. A. J. (2009). The shaping effects of the conversational interview: An examination using Bakhtin’s theory of genre. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(7), 1265–1286.
