While extant research on news avoidance has been conducted mainly in democratic societies, this article examines intentional news avoidance in a society undergoing severe democratic backsliding. Given the decline of political freedom and democratic institutions, citizens in such contexts may become frustrated with ongoing political change and withdraw from public affairs and the news. This could result in a form of intentional, politically driven, and topical news avoidance. At the individual level, such news avoidance is likely to be influenced by political attitudes, ability to adapt, and news affect and cognition. Analysis of survey data from post-National Security Law Hong Kong finds that negative news affect and perceived news efficacy explain intentional avoidance of news about social and political change, whereas political trust, belief in civil liberties, and adaptiveness relate to news avoidance only indirectly through negative news affect and perceived news efficacy. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.
BanduraA.1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.”Psychological Review84:191–215.
2.
BermeoN.2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.”Journal of Democracy27(1):5–19.
3.
BrandtstädterJ.RennerG.1990. “Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment: Explication and Age-Related Analysis of Assimilative and Accommodative Strategies of Coping.”Psychology and Aging5(1):58–67.
4.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW. E.StokeD.1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
5.
ChanM.LeeF. L. F.ChenH.-T.2022. “Avoid or Authenticate? A Multilevel Cross-country Analysis of the Roles of Fake News Concern and News Fatigue on News Avoidance and Authentication.”Digital Journalism12(3): 356–75. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.2016060.
6.
CouldryN.CurranJ. Eds. 2003. Contesting Media Power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
CroissantA.HaynesJ.2021. “Democratic Regression in Asia: Introduction.”Democratization28(1):1–21.
8.
DiamondL.2021. “Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes.”Democratization28(1):22–42.
9.
EdgerlyS.2022. “The Head and Heart of News avoidance: How Attitudes about the News Media Relate to Levels of News Consumption.”Journalism23(9):1828–45.
10.
GorenP.2005. “Party Identification and Core Political Values.”American Journal of Political Science49(4):881–96.
11.
GorskiL. C.2023. “Uninterested, Disenchanted, or Overwhelmed? An Analysis of Motives Behind Intentional and Unintentional News Avoidance.”Communications: European Journal of Communication Research48(4):563–87.
12.
GoyanesM.Ardevol-AbreuA.de Zúñiga HomeroG.2023. “Antecedents of News Avoidance: Competing Effects of Political Interest, News Overload, Trust in News Media, and ‘News Finds Me’ Perception.”Digital Journalism11(1):1–18.
13.
GrootenhuisM. A.LastB. F.De Graaf-NijkertJ. H.Van Der WelM.1996. “Secondary Control Strategies Used by Parents of Children with Cancer.”Psycho-Oncology5(2):91–102.
14.
HaggardS.HaufmanR.2021. Backsliding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HajekA.KonigH.-H.2015. “Informal Caregiving and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence of a Population-Based Longitudinal Study of Older Adults in Germany.”Journal of the American Medical Directors Association17(4):300–5.
16.
HernandezJ. C.2021. “Harsh Penalties, Vaguely Defined Crimes: Hong Kong’s Security Law Explained.”New York Times, June30, 2020.
17.
HetheringtonM. J.2004. Why Trust Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
HydeS. D. (2020). “Democracy’s Backsliding in the International Environment.”Science369(6508):1192–6.
19.
JacobyW. G.2006. “Value Choices and American Public Opinion.”American Journal of Political Science50(3):706–23.
20.
KalogeropoulosA.ToffB.FletcherR.2024. “The Watchdog Press in the Doghouse: A Comparative Study of Attitudes about Accountability Journalism, Trust in News, and News Avoidance.”International Journal of Press/Politics29(2):485–506.
21.
KobayashiT.ChanP.2022a. “Psychological Underpinnings of Self-censorship in Post-NSL Hong Kong.”Paper presented at the Hong Kong: Interrupted Revolutionary Movements Workshop, Australian National University, Australia, December 2022.
22.
KobayashiT.ChanP.2022b “Political Sensitivity Bias in Autocratizing Hong Kong,”International Journal of Public Opinion Research34(4):edac028. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edac028.
23.
LeeF. L. F.2023. “Beyond Self-Censorship: Emergence of Journalistic Risk Cultures in Hong Kong under the National Security Law.”The China Journal90:129–53.
24.
LeeF. L. F.ChanC.-K.2023. “Legalization of Press Control under Democratic Backsliding: The Case of Post-national Security Law Hong Kong.”Media, Culture & Society45(5):916–31.
25.
LeungD. K. K.2022. “Lying Flat When Reading the News?”Ming Pao Daily News2022. [in Chinese]
26.
LeviM.StokerL.2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.”Annual Review of Political Science3:475–507.
27.
LindellJ.BågeM. E.2022. “Disconnecting from Digital News: News Avoidance and the Ignored Role of Social Class.”Journalism2022:1980–97.
28.
MannellK.MeeseJ.2022. “From Doom-Scrolling to News Avoidance: Limiting News as a Wellbeing Strategy During COVID Lockdown.”Journalism Studies23(3):302–19.
29.
McCannJ. A.1997. “Electoral Choices and Core Value Change: The 1992 Presidential Campaign.”American Journal of Political Science41(2):564–83.
30.
MoeH.NaerlandT. U.Ytre-ArneB.2024. “Ritual Check-in, Shocked Immersion, Regained Stability: A Sequential Typology of News Experiences in Crisis Situations.”Media, Culture & Society46(2):425–35.
31.
NewmanN.FletcherR.2017. Bias, Bullshit and Lies. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
32.
OhmeJ.AraujoT.ZaroualiB.de VreeseC. H.2022. “Frequencies, Drivers, and Solutions to News NonAttendance: Investigating Differences Between Low News Usage and News (Topic) Avoidance with Conversational Agents.”Journalism Studies23(12):1510–30.
33.
PalmerR.ToffB.Rasmus NielsenK.2020. “‘The Media Covers up a Lot of Things’: Watchdog Ideals Meet Folk Theories of Journalism.”Journalism Studies21(14):1973–89.
34.
PalmerR.ToffB.Rasmus NielsenK.2023. “Examining Assumptions Around How News Avoidance Gets Defined: The Importance of Overall News Consumption, Intention, and Structural Inequalities.”Journalism Studies24(6):697–714.
35.
ParkC. S.2019. “Does Too Much News on Social Media Discourage News Seeking? Mediating Role of News Efficacy Between Perceived News Overload and News Avoidance on Social Media.”Social Media + Society5(3):1–12.
36.
RothbaumF.WeiszJ. R.SnyderS. S.1982. “Changing the World and Changing the Self: A Two-process Model of Perceived Control.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42(1):5–37.
37.
SchäferS.Aaldering LoesL.LechelerS.2022. “‘Give me a break!’ Prevalence and Predictors of Intentional News Avoidance During the COVID-10 Pandemic.”Mass Communication & Society26(4):671–94.
38.
SchwartzS. H.CapraraG. V.VecchioneM.BainP.BianchiG.CapraraM. G.CieciuchJ.KirmanoğluH.BasleventC.LönnqvistJ.-E.MamaliC.ManziJ.PavlopoulosV.PosnovaT.SchoenH.SilvesterJ.TaberneroC.TorresC. V.VerkasaloM.VondrákováE.WelzelC.ZaleskiZ.2014. “Basic Personal Values Underlie and Give Coherence to Political Values: A Cross National Study in 15 Countries”Political Behavior36(4):899–930.
39.
ShenX.TruexR.2020. “In Search of Self-censorship.”British Journal of Political Science51(4):1672–84.
40.
SkovsgaardM.AndersenK.2020. “Conceptualizing News Avoidance: Towards a Shared Understanding of Different Causes and Potential Solutions.”Journalism Studies21(4):459–76.
41.
SongH.JungJ.KimY.2017. “Perceived News Overload and Its Cognitive and Attitudinal Consequences for News Usage in South Korea.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(4):1172–90.
42.
ThompsonM. R.2021. “Pushback after Backsliding? Unconstrained Executive Aggrandizement in the Philippines versus Contested Military Monarchical Rule in Thailand.”Democratization28(1):124–41.
43.
ThompsonS. C.NanniC.LevineA.1994. “Primary versus Secondary and Central versus Consequence: Related Control in HIV-positive Men.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(3):540–7.
44.
ToffB.KalogeropoulosA.2020. “All the News That’s Fit to Ignore: How the Information Environment Does and Does Not Shape News Avoidance.”Public Opinion Quarterly 84(S1):366–90.
45.
ToffB.NielsenR. K.2022. “How News Feels: Anticipated Anxiety as a Factor in News Avoidance and a Barrier to Political Engagement.”Political Communication39(6):697–714.
46.
VilliM.AharoniT.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.BoczkowskiP.HayashiK.MitchelsteinE.TanakaA.Kligler-VilenchikN.2022. “Taking a Break from News: A Five-nation Study of News Avoidance in the Digital Era.”Digital Journalism10(1):148–64.
47.
WadsworthM. E.SantiagoC. D.EinhornL.2009. “Coping with Displacement from Hurricane Katrina: Predictors of One-year Post-traumatic Stress and Depression Symptom Trajectories.”Anxiety, Stress & Coping22(4):413–32.
48.
WoodstockL.2014. “The News-Democracy Narrative and the Unexpected Benefits of Limited News Consumption: The Case of News Resisters.”Journalism15(7):834–49.
49.
Ytre-ArneB.MoeH.2021. “Doomscrolling, Monitoring and Avoiding: News Use in COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown.”Journalism Studies22(13):1739–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
