Abstract
Recent research has shown that, under certain circumstances, active news avoidance can be a situational strategy and topical in scope. It does not entail substantial reduction in news consumption. Against this background, this article extends the literature by examining how several factors may moderate the avoidance–consumption relationship under democratic backsliding. Survey data analysis shows that active topical news avoidance relates negatively to mainstream news use mainly among people who see the media as inefficacious, do not adapt well to difficult circumstances, and seldom engage in political communication via social media. Similar conditional relationships do not apply to alternative media exposure.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
