Distributed Discovery of News and Perceived Misinformation Exposure: A Cross-Continent Application of the Resilience to Online Disinformation Framework

Abstract

Perceived misinformation exposure (PME) among citizens is a global phenomenon and a normative concern because it can lead to reduced trust and faith in democratic institutions, actors, and processes. Using secondary data from multiple sources, this study analyzed individuals’ online news habits across forty-six countries in six continents (North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia: N = 91,061) and country-level factors from the resilience to online disinformation framework that shape the relationship between distributed discovery of news and PME. Multilevel analyses showed that increased incidental news exposure and searching for news online at the individual level and news sharing on social media at the country level increased PME while aggregate media trust reduced PME. Cross-level interactions also indicated that higher levels of public service media in a country attenuated the relationship between online news search and PME, exhibiting what we call soft resilience. This study demonstrates the theoretical utility of the resilience to disinformation framework and certain country-level factors that can affect the individual-level dynamics of news consumption and PME.

Keywords

misinformation online news social media polarization media trust public service media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allcott

Gentzkow

. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2):211–36. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211.

Arif

Al-Jefri

Bizzi

I. H.

Perano

G. B.

Goldman

Haq

Chua

K. L.

Mengozzi

Neunez

Smith

Ghezzi

. 2018. “Fake News or Weak Science? Visibility and Characterization of Antivaccine Webpages Returned by Google in Different Languages and Countries.” Front Immunol 9:1215. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01215.

Benjamini

Hochberg

. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57(1):289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.

Bennett

W. L.

Livingston

. 2018. “The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions.” European Journal of Communication 33(2):122–39. doi:10.1177/0267323118760317.

Boulianne

Lee

. 2022. “Conspiracy Beliefs, Misinformation, Social Media Platforms, and Protest Participation.” Media and Communication 10(4):30–41. doi:10.17645/mac.v10i4.5667.

Castro

Strömbäck

Esser

Van Aelst

de Vreese

Aalberg

Cardenal

A. S.

Corbu

Hopmann

D. N.

Koc-Michalska

Matthes

Schemer

Sheafer

Splendore

Stanyer

Stepinska

Štětka

Theocharis

. 2021. “Navigating High-choice European Political Information Environments: A Comparative Analysis of News User Profiles and Political Knowledge.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 27:827–59. doi:10.1177/19401612211012572.

Courchesne

Ilhardt

Shapiro

J. N.

. 2021. “Review of Social Science Research on the Impact of Countermeasures Against Influence Operations.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 2(5): 1–17. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-79.

Coppedge

Gerring

Knutsen

C. H.

Lindberg

S. I.

Teorell

Altman

Bernhard

Cornell

Fish

M. S.

Gastaldi

Gjerløw

Glynn

Hicken

Lührmann

Maerz

S. F.

Marquardt

K. L.

McMann

Mechkova

Paxton

Pemstein

Römer

J. V.

Seim

Sigman

Skaaning

S.-E.

Staton

Sundtröm

Tzelgov

Uberti

Wang

Y.-T.

Wig

Ziblatt

. 2021. “V-Dem Codebook v11.1.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.

Debrett

2009. “Riding the Wave: Public Service Television in the Multi-Platform Era.” Media, Culture & Society 31(5):807–27. doi:10.1177/0163443709339466.

10.

Egelhofer

J. L.

Lecheler

. 2019. “Fake News as a Two-Dimensional Phenomenon: A Framework and Research Agenda.” Annals of the International Communication Association 43(2):97–116. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782.

11.

Fraile

Iyengar

. 2014. “Not All News Sources Are Equally Informative.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 19(3):275–94. doi:10.1177/1940161214528993.

12.

Gorwa

Binns

Katzenbach

. 2020. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society 7(1): 205395171989794. doi:10.1177/2053951719897945.

13.

Hall

P. A.

Lamont

. 2013. “Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era.” In Social Resilience in the Neo-Liberal Era, eds. Hall

P. A.

Lamont

, 1–31. New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Hameleers

2020. “Populist Disinformation: Exploring Intersections between Online Populism and Disinformation in the US and the Netherlands.” Politics and Governance 8(1):146–57. doi:10.17645/pag.v8i1.2478.

15.

Heisig

J. P.

Schaeffer

. 2019. “Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction.” European Sociological Review 35(2):258–79. doi:10.1093/esr/jcy053.

16.

Himelein-Wachowiak

Giorgi

Devoto

Rahman

Ungar

Schwartz

H. A.

Epstein

D. H.

Leggio

Curtis

. 2021. “Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19.” J Med Internet Res 23(5):e26933. doi:10.2196/26933.

17.

Holbert

R. L.

Park

. 2020. “Conceptualizing, Organizing, and Positing Moderation in Communication Research.” Communication theory 30(3):227–46. doi:10.1093/ct/qtz006.

18.

Horowitz

Cushion

Dragomir

Gutiérrez Manjón

Pantti

. 2021. “A Framework for Assessing the Role of Public Service Media Organizations in Countering Disinformation.” Digital Journalism 10(5):843–65. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1987948.

19.

Humprecht

Esser

Van Aelst

. 2020. “Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25(3):493–516. doi:10.1177/1940161219900126.

20.

Jones-Jang

S. M.

Kim

D. H.

Kenski

. 2020. “Perceptions of Mis- or Disinformation Exposure Predict Political Cynicism: Evidence From a Two-Wave Survey During the 2018 US Midterm Elections.” New Media & Society 23(10):3105–25. doi:10.1177/1461444820943878.

21.

Jost

P. J.

Pünder

Schulze-Lohoff

. 2020. “Fake News - Does Perception Matter More Than the Truth?” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 85:101513. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101513.

22.

Klinger

Svensson

. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media & Society 17(8):1241–57. doi:10.1177/1461444814522952.

23.

Lee

A. M.

2015. “Social Media and Speed-Driven Journalism: Expectations and Practices.” International Journal on Media Management 17(4):217–39. doi:10.1080/14241277.2015.1107566.

24.

Lee

Gil de Zúñiga

Munger

. 2023. “Antecedents and Consequences of Fake News Exposure: A Two-Panel Study on How News Use and Different Indicators of Fake News Exposure Affect Media Trust.” Human Communication Research 49:408–20. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqad019.

25.

Lee

J. K.

. 2019. “Stumbling Upon the Other Side: Incidental Learning of Counter-Attitudinal Political Information on Facebook.” New Media & Society 21(1):248–65. doi:10.1177/1461444818793421.

26.

Mason

2018. “Ideologues Without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(1):280–301.

27.

Matthes

Corbu

Jin

Theocharis

Schemer

van Aelst

Strömbäck

Koc-Michalska

Esser

Aalberg

Cardenal

A. S.

Castro

de Vreese

Hopmann

Sheafer

Splendore

Stanyer

Stępińska

Štětka

Zoizner

. (2022). Perceived prevalence of misinformation fuels worries about COVID-19: A cross-country, multi-method investigation. Information, Communication & Society, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2022.2146983

28.

Min

S. J.

Wohn

D. Y.

. 2018. “All the News That You Don’t Like: Cross-Cutting Exposure and Political Participation in the Age of Social Media”. Computers in Human Behavior 83:24–31. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.015.

29.

Newman

Fletcher

Schulz

Andi

Nielsen

R. K.

. 2020. “Digital News Report 2020.” http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/.

30.

Newman

Fletcher

Schulz

Andi

Robertson

C. T.

Nielsen

R. K.

2021. Digital News Report 2021. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/

31.

Norris

2020. “Measuring Populism Worldwide”. Party Politics 26(6):697–717. doi:10.1177/1354068820927686.

32.

Oeldorf-Hirsch

2018. “The Role of Engagement in Learning From Active and Incidental News Exposure on Social Media.” Mass Communication and Society 21(2):225–47. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022.

33.

Ognyanova

Lazer

Robertson

R. E.

Wilson

. 2020. “Misinformation in Action: Fake News Exposure is Linked to Lower Trust in Media, Higher Trust in Government When Your Side is in Power.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1(4):1–19. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-024.

34.

Osmundsen

Bor

Vahlstrup

P. B.

Bechmann

Petersen

M. B.

. 2021. “Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter.” American Political Science Review 115(3):999–1015. doi:10.1017/s0003055421000290.

35.

Park

C. S.

Gil de Zúñiga

. 2020. “Learning About Politics From Mass Media and Social Media: Moderating Roles of Press Freedom and Public Service Broadcasting in 11 Countries.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 33:315–35. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaa021.

36.

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

. 2021. “The Psychology of Fake News.” Trends Cogn Sci 25(5):388–402. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007.

37.

Quiring

Ziegele

Schemer

Jackob

Jakobs

Schultz

. 2021. “Constructive Skepticism, Dysfunctional Cynicism? Skepticism and Cynicism Differently Determine Generalized Media Trust.” International Journal of Communication 15:3497–3518.

38.

Rossini

Mont’Alverne

Kalogeropoulos

. 2023. “Explaining Beliefs in Electoral Misinformation in the 2022 Brazilian Election: The Role of Ideology, Political Trust, Social Media, and Messaging Apps.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 4(3):1–16. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-115.

39.

Schäfer

2023. “Incidental News Exposure in a Digital Media Environment: A Scoping Review of Recent Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association 47(2):242–60. doi:10.1080/23808985.2023.2169953.

40.

Sindermann

Cooper

Montag

. 2020. “A Short Review on Susceptibility to Falling for Fake Political News.” Curr Opin Psychol 36:44–8. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014.

41.

Singh

Lima

Cha

Kulshrestha

Ahn

Y. Y.

Varol

. 2022. “Misinformation, Believability, and Vaccine Acceptance Over 40 Countries: Takeaways From the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Infodemic.” PloS one 17(2):e0263381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263381.

42.

Stoeckel

Carter

Lyons

B. A.

Reifler

. 2022. “The Politics of Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe.” Eur J Public Health 32(4):636–42. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac041.

43.

Stroud

N. J.

2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60(3):556–76. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x.

44.

Stubenvoll

Heiss

Matthes

. 2021. “Media Trust Under Threat: Antecedents and Consequences of Misinformation Perceptions on Social Media.” International Journal of Communication 15: 2765–86.

45.

Tandoc

E. C.

2019. “The Facts of Fake News: A Research Review.” Sociology Compass 13(9):1–9. doi:10.1111/soc4.12724.

46.

Toff

Nielsen

R. K.

. 2018. “I Just Google It”: Folk Theories of Distributed Discovery.” Journal of Communication 68(3):636–57. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy009.

47.

Van Aelst

Strömbäck

Aalberg

Esser

de Vreese

Matthes

Hopmann

Salgado

Hubé

Stępińska

Papathanassopoulos

Berganza

Legnante

Reinemann

Sheafer

Stanyer

. 2017. “Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge For Democracy?” Annals of the International Communication Association 41(1):3–27. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.

48.

van Kessel

Sajuria

Van Hauwaert

S. M.

. 2020. “Informed, Uninformed or Misinformed? A Cross-National Analysis of Populist Party Supporters Across European Democracies.” West European Politics 44(3):585–610. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1700448.

49.

Vraga

E. K.

Tully

. 2019. “News Literacy, Social Media Behaviors, and Skepticism Toward Information on Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society 24(2):150–66. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1637445.

50.

Wardle

Derakhshan

. 2017. “Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking.” https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html.

51.

Wasserman

Madrid-Morales

. 2019. “An Exploratory Study of ‘Fake News’ and Media Trust in Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa.” African Journalism Studies 40(1):107–23. doi:10.1080/23743670.2019.1627230.

52.

Weeks

B. E.

Gil de Zúñiga

. 2019. “What’s Next? Six Observations for the Future of Political Misinformation Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 65(2):277–89. doi:10.1177/0002764219878236.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.37 MB