Existing research indicates that people with populist attitudes express lower trust in media, especially in Public Service Media. It is assumed that these people are alienated because of their values: populist ideology stems from anti-pluralism whereas Public Service Media promotes pluralism. This study tests this assumption by comparing the predictors of trust in Public Service Media between the populist party sympathizers and the sympathizers of other political parties in the Czech Republic. Two main expectations were included as predictors for trust in Public Service Media, specifically that media should conform to one's worldview (i.e., the cohesive dimension of trust in media) and that media should adhere to the normative standards of journalism (i.e., the normative dimension of trust in media). Using multigroup structural equation modeling, the study analyzes data from a 2019–2020 representative survey of the adult Czech population (N = 3,251). The results suggest that, for the populist party sympathizers, trust in Public Service Media links only to their expectation that media should conform to their worldview, while the sympathizers of other political parties expect normative standards to be maintained. This is interpreted and discussed as support for the assumption that this value-based mismatch links to the populist audience members' lower trust in Public Service Media.
AkkermanAgnesMuddeCasZasloveAndrej. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies47(13).
2.
AndersonBenedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
3.
BastlováMarie. 2017. “Okamura: Chceme zrušit Senát a zestátnit Českou televizi a Český rozhlas” (Okamura: We want to abolish the Senate and nationalize Czech Television and Czech Radio). Retrieved April 4, 2022. https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravydomov/tomio-okamura-senat-zruseni-financovani-spd-cesky-rozhlas_1710232153_gol.
4.
BerkowitzDaniel, ed. 1997. Social Meanings of News: A Text-Reader. London: Sage.
5.
BiltereystDaniel. 2004. “Public Service Broadcasting, Popular Entertainment and the Construction of Trust.” European Journal of Cultural Studies7(3):341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549404044787.
Boyd-BarrettOliverRantanenTerhi. 2002. “Global and National News Agencies: Opportunities and Threats in the Age of the Internet.” In The Media: An Introduction, ed. BriggsAdamCobleyPaul, 57–69. London: Longman.
CarpentierNico. 2017. The Discursive-Material Knot. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
10.
CisarOndřejStetkaVaclav. 2016. “Czech Republic: The Rise of Populism from the Fringes to the Mainstream.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrombackJesperde VreeseClaes H., 295–308. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016-32.
11.
CohenJacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
CushionStephen. 2019. “Autonomy Journalism under (Ideological) Threat: Safeguarding and Enhancing Public Service Media into the 21st Century.” Journalism20(1):69–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807036.
DanillerAndrewAllenDouglasTalleviAshleyMutzDiana C.. 2017. “Measuring Trust in the Press in a Changing Media Environment.” Communication Methods and Measures11(1):76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1271113.
15.
DebrettMary. 2009. “Riding the Wave: Public Service Television in the Multi-Platform Era.” Media, Culture & Society31(5):807–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709339466.
16.
DondersKaren. 2012. Public Service Media and Policy in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
EberlJakub-MoritzHuberRobert A.GreussingEsther. 2021. “From Populism to the “Plandemic”: Why Populists Believe in COVID-19 Conspiracies.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties31(1):272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924730.
18.
EBU. 2012. Empowering Society a Declaration on the Core Values of Public Service Media. Grand-Saconnex: European Broadcasting Union.
ElchardusMarkSpruytBram. 2016. “Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology.” Government and Opposition51(1):111–133.
22.
EngesserSvenErnstNicoleEsserFrankBüchelFlorin. 2017. “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society20(8):1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697.
23.
EsserFrankStepinskaAgnieszkaHopmannDavid. 2016. “Populism and the Media: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrombackJesperde VreeseClaus H., 295–308. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016-32.
24.
FawziNayla. 2019. “Untrustworthy News and the Media as “Enemy of the People?” How a Populist Worldview Shapes Recipients’ Attitudes toward the Media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics24(2):146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981.
25.
FawziNayla. 2020. “Right-Wing Populist Media Criticism.” In Perspectives on Populism and the Media, ed. KrämerBenjaminHoltz-BachaChristina, 39–57. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
26.
FawziNaylaKrämerBenjamin. 2021. “The Media as Part of a Detached Elite? Exploring Antimedia Populism among Citizens and Its Relation to Political Populism.” International Journal of Communication15(1):3292–3314. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14795.
27.
FawziNaylaMothesCornelia. 2020. “Perceptions of Media Performance: Expectation-Evaluation Discrepancies and Their Relationship with Media-Related and Populist Attitudes.” Media & Communication8(3):335–347. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3142.
28.
FawziNaylaSteindlNinaObermaierMagdalenaProchazkaFabianArltDorotheeBlöbaumBerndDohleMarcoEngelkeKatherineHanitzschThomasJackobNikolausJakobsIlkaKlawierTilmanPostSenjaReinemannCarstenSchweigerWolfgangZiegeleMarc. 2021. “Concepts, Causes and Consequences of Trust in News Media—A Literature Review and Framework.” Annals of the International Communication Association45(2):154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181.
GiddensAnthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity (Reprint). Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
GoyanesManuel. 2021. “Public Service Broadcasting and Democracy: Main Research Topics and Suggestions for the Future.” In The Values of Public Service Media in the Internet Society, ed. Túñez-LópezMiguelCampos-FreireFranciscoRodríguez-CastroMarta, 21–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56466-7_2.
32.
HameleersMichaelBosLindade VreeseClaes H.. 2017. “The Appeal of Media Populism: The Media Preferences of Citizens with Populist Attitudes.” Mass Communication and Society20(4):481–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1291817.
33.
HanitzschThomasVan DalenArjenSteindlNina. 2018. “Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695.
34.
HanleySeánVachudovaMilada Anna. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics34(3):276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457.
35.
Holtz-BachaChristina. 2021. “The Kiss of Death. Public Service Media under Right-Wing Populist Attack.” European Journal of Communication36(3):221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323121991334.
36.
HorowitzMinnaCushionStephenDragomirMariusManjónSergio GutiérrezMerviPantti. 2022. “A Framework for Assessing the Role of Public Service Media Organizations in Countering Disinformation.” Digital Journalism10(5):843–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1987948.
37.
InglehartRonald F.NorrisPippa. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash.” HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818659 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659.
38.
IyengarShantoWestwoodSean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science59(3):690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152.
39.
JagersJanWalgraveStefaan. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research46(3):319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.
40.
JustNataschaBüchiMoritz. 2017. “A Blind Spot in Public Broadcasters’ Discovery of the Public: How the Public Values Public Service.” Internation Journal of Communication11:992–1011. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-136531.
41.
KalogeropoulosAntonisSuiterJaneUdrisLinardsEiseneggerMark. 2019. “News Media Trust and News Consumption: Factors Related to Trust in News in 35 Countries.” International Journal of Communication13(1):3672–3693. https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-175863.
42.
Knobloch-WesterwickSilviaMothesCorneliaJohnsonBenjamin K.WesterwickAxelDonsbachWolfgang. 2015. “Political Online Information Searching in Germany and the United States: Confirmation Bias, Source Credibility, and Attitude Impacts.” Journal of Communication65(3):489–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12154.
43.
KnudsenErikDahlbergStefanIversenMagnus H.JohannessonMikael P.NygaardSilje. 2021. “How the Public Understands News Media Trust: An Open-Ended Approach.” Journalism23(11):2347–2363. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211005892.
44.
KochCédric M.MeléndezCarlosKaltwasserCristobál Rovira. 2021. Mainstream Voters, Non-Voters and Populist Voters: What Sets Them Apart?” Political Studies: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211049298.
45.
KohringMatthiasMatthesJörg. 2007. “Trust in News Media: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale.” Communication Research34(2):231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071.
46.
KrämerBenjamin. 2018. “Populism, Media, and the Form of Society.” Communication Theory28(4):444–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty017.
47.
KrämerBenjaminLangmannKlara. 2020. “Professionalism as a Response to Right-Wing Populism? An Analysis of a Metajournalistic Discourse.” International Journal of Communication14(1):5643–5662. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14146/3266.
McQuailDennis. 2013. Journalism and Society. London: Sage.
50.
MiheljSabinaKondorKatherineŠtětkaVáclav. 2022. “Establishing Trust in Experts During a Crisis: Expert Trustworthiness and Media Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Science Communication44(3):292–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221100558.
51.
MouffeChantal. 2005. On the Political. New York: Routledge.
MuddeCas. 2016. “Europe’s Populist Surge: A Long Time in the Making.” Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations)95(6):25–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43948378.
54.
MüllerJan Werner. 2016. What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
55.
NapoliPhilip M. 2001. “Social Responsibility and Commercial Broadcast Television: An Assessment of Public Affairs Programming.” International Journal on Media Management3(4):226–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241270109389971.
56.
NaxeraVladimir. 2018. “The Never-Ending Story: Czech Governments, Corruption and Populist Anti-Corruption Rhetoric (2010–2018).” Politics in Central Europe14(3):31–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0017.
NewmanNicFletcherRichardSchulzAnneAndıSimgeNielsenRasmus Kleis. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
59.
NiemeierTimo. 2018. “AfD: Ohne den Rundfunkbeitrag w€are alles besser.” (AfD: Everything would be better without the broadcasting fee). Retrieved April 4, 2022. https://www.dwdl.de/magazin/68116/afd_ohne_den_rundfunkbeitrag_waere_alles_ besser/.
60.
NorrisPippaInglehartRonald. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
PołońskaEva. 2019. “Watchdog, Lapdog, or Attack Dog? Public Service Media and the Law and Justice Government in Poland.” In Public Service Broadcasting and Media Systems in Troubled European Democracies, ed. PołońskaEvaBeckettCharlie, 227–257. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
62.
PolyákGábor. 2019. “Media in Hungary: Three Pillars of an Illiberal Democracy.” In Public Service Broadcasting and Media Systems in Troubled European Democracies, ed. PołońskaEvaBeckettCharlie, 279–303. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
ProchazkaFabianSchweigerWolfgang. 2019. “How to Measure Generalized Trust in News Media? An Adaptation and Test of Scales.” Communication Methods and Measures13(1):26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1506021.
64.
SalgadoSusanaLuengoOscarPapathanassopoulosStylianosSuiterJaneStępińskaAgnieszka. 2021. “Crisis and Populism: A Comparative Study of Populist and Non-Populist Candidates and Rhetoric in the News Media Coverage of Election Campaigns.” European Politics and Society23(5):563–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1896882.
65.
SchulzAnne. 2019. “Where Populist Citizens Get the News: An Investigation of News Audience Polarization Along Populist Attitudes in 11 Countries.” Communication Monographs86(1):88–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1508876.
66.
SchulzAnneLevyDavidKleisNielsen Rasmus. 2019. Old, Educated, and Politically Diverse: The Audience of Public Service News. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
67.
SchulzAnneWirthWernerMüllerPhillip. 2020. “We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens’ False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions.” Communication Research47(2):201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854.
68.
SchulzeHeidi. 2020. “Who Uses Right-Wing Alternative Online Media? An Exploration of Audience Characteristics: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Politics and Governance8(3):6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925.
69.
SehlAnnikaSimonFelix M.SchroederRalph. 2020. “The Populist Campaigns Against European Public Service Media: Hot Air or Existential Threat?” International Communication Gazette8(3):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048520939868.
SpruytBramKeppensGilVan DroogenbroeckFilip. 2016. “Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?” Political Research Quarterly69(2):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138.
72.
StanleyBen. 2011. “Populism, Nationalism, or National Populism? An Analysis of Slovak Voting Behaviour at the 2010 Parliamentary Election.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies44(4): 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.10.005.
StrömbäckJesperTsfatiYarivBoomgaardenHajoDamstraAlytLindgrenElinaVliegenthartRensLindholmTorun. 2020. “News Media Trust and Its Impact on Media Use: Toward a Framework for Future Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association44(2):139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338.
78.
TewksburyDavidRittenbergJason. 2012. News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
TóthFanniMihejlSabinaŠtětkaVáclavKondorKatherine. 2022. “Approach to Selective Exposure: News Consumption and Political Polarization in Eastern Europe.” The International Journal of Press/Politics: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211072552.
80.
VodaPetr.HavlíkVlastimil. 2021. “The Rise of Populists and Decline of Others: Explanation of Changes in Party Support in the Czech Republic.” Problems of Post-Communism68(4):279–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1869906.
WirthWernerEsserFrankWettsteinMartinEngesserSvenWirzDominikSchulzAnneErnstNicole, et al. 2016. The Appeal of Populist Ideas, Strategies and Styles: A Theoretical Model and Research Design for Analyzing Populist Political Communication.” NCCR Democracy. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20358.37440.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
