This study is focused on the influence of late-night TV comedy viewing on political talk. It is posited that debate viewing serves as a mediator of this relationship, and age is argued to be a moderator of the association between late-night TV comedy viewing and debate viewing. More specific to age, it is hypothesized that the predictive value of late-night TV comedy for political debate consumption will be greater for those audience members who are younger. A secondary analysis of 2004 national Annenberg debate panel data provides evidence of a positive indirect effect of late-night TV comedy viewing on political talk through debate viewing, and the moderator of age functioned as predicted. Thus, this study details a series of positive unintended consequences of late-night TV comedy viewing on what are defined normatively as positive democratic communicative activities (i.e., debate viewing, political discussion), and these media effects are stronger the younger the voter.
Banwart, M.C., and M.S. McKinney.2005. "Rocking the Youth Vote through Debate: Examining the Effects of a Citizen versus Journalist Controlled Debate on Civic Engagement." Journalism Studies6 (2): 153-63.
2.
Barker, D.C.2002. Rushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
Baum, M.A.2003. Soft News Goes to War. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
4.
Benoit, W.L., G.J. Hansen, and R.M. Verser.2003. "A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates." Communication Monographs70 (4): 335-50.
5.
Brians, C.L., and M.P. Wattenberg .1996. "Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers ." American Journal of Political Science40:172-93.
6.
Cao, X.2008. "Political Comedy Shows and Knowledge about Primary Campaigns: The Moderating Effects of Age and Education." Mass Communication and Society11:43-61.
7.
Carlin, D.P.1994. "A Rationale for a Focus Group Study." In The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus, ed. D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney, 3-19. Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
Chaffee, S.H.1982. "Mass Media and Interpersonal Channels: Competitive, Convergent, or Complementary?" In Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World, ed. G. Gumpert and R. Cathcart, 57-77. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Chaffee, S.H., and J.S. Schleuder.1986. "Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News." Human Communication Research13:76-107.
10.
Cohen, J.1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Rev. Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Dewey, J.1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology . New York: Henry Holt.
12.
Drew, D., and D. Weaver.2006. "Voter Learning in the 2004 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter?" Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83:25-42.
13.
Eveland, W.P., Jr., A.F. Hayes, D.V. Shah, and N. Kwak.2005. "Observations on Estimation of Communication Effects on Political Knowledge and a Test of Intracommunication Mediation ." Political Communication22:505-9.
14.
Eveland, W.P., Jr., M.J. Hutchens, and F. Shen.2009. "Exposure, Attention, or ‘Use’ of News? Assessing Aspects of the Reliability and Validity of a Central Concept in Political Communication Research." Communication Methods and Measures3 (4): 223-44.
15.
Farnsworth, S.J., and S.R. Lichter.2006. "The 2004 New Hampshire Democratic Primary and Network News." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11:53-63.
16.
Faul, F., and E. Erdfelder.1992. GPOWER: A Priori, Post-Hoc, and Compromise Power Analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University, Department of Psychology. http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower (accessed April 1, 2005).
17.
Fox, J.R., G. Koloen, and V. Sahin.2007. "No Joke: A Comparison of Substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Broadcast Network Television Coverage of the 2004 Presidential Election Campaign." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media51:213-27.
18.
Hansen, G.J., and W.L. Benoit.2007. "Communication Forms as Predictors of Issue Knowledge in Presidential Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Assessment." Mass Communication and Society10:189-210.
19.
Hart, R.P., and J. Hartelius.2007. "The Political Sins of Jon Stewart." Critical Studies in Media Communication24 (3): 263-72.
20.
Hayes, A.F.2009. "Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium." Communication Monographs76:408-20.
21.
Holbert, R.L.2005a. "Debate Viewing as Mediator and Partisan Reinforcement in the Relationship between News Use and Vote Choice." Journal of Communication55:85-102.
22.
Holbert, R.L.2005b. "Intramedia Mediation: The Cumulative and Complementary Effects of News Media Use." Political Communication22 (4): 447-61.
23.
Holbert, R.L., and W.L. Benoit.2009. "A Theory of Political Campaign Media Connectedness."Communication Monographs76 (3): 303-32.
24.
Holbert, R.L., W.L. Benoit, G.J. Hansen, and W.-C. Wen.2002. "The Role of Communication in the Formation of an Issue-Based Citizenry." Communication Monographs69:296-310.
25.
Holbert, R.L., and J. Hmielowski. Forthcoming. "Secondary Analysis in Political Communication Viewed as Creative Act." In Sourcebook of Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, ed. E. P. Bucy and R. L. Holbert.New York: Routledge .
26.
Holbert, R.L., H.L. LaMarre, and K.D. Landreville .2009. "Fanning the Flames of a Partisan Divide: Debate Viewing, Vote Choice, and Perceptions of Vote Count Accuracy." Communication Research36 (2): 155-77.
27.
Holbert, R.L., J.L. Lambe, A.D. Dudo, and K.A. Carlton.2007. "Priming Effects of The Daily Show and National TV News Viewing: Young Viewers, Political Gratifications, and Internal Political Self-Efficacy." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media51 (1): 20-38.
28.
Hollander, B.A.2005. "Late-Night Learning: Do Entertainment Programs Increase Political Campaign Knowledge for Young Viewers?" Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media49 (4): 402-15.
29.
Kaid, L.L., M.S. McKinney, and J.C. Tedesco.2000. Civic Dialogue in the 1996 Presidential Campaign: Candidate, Media, and Public Voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
30.
Kenski, K., and N.J. Stroud.2005. "Who Watches Debates? A Comparative Analysis of Presidential Debate Viewing in 2000 and 2004." American Behavioral Scientist49:213-28.
31.
LaMarre, H.L., K.D. Landreville, and M.A. Beam.2009. "The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in The Colbert Report." International Journal of Press/Politics14 (2): 212-31.
32.
Martinelli, K.A., and S.H. Chaffee.1995. "Measuring New-Voter Learning via Three Channels of Political Information." Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72:18-32.
33.
McKinney, M.S., and D.B. Carlin.2004. "Political Campaign Debates." In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. L. L. Kaid, 203-34. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
McLeod, J.M., D.A. Scheufele, and P. Moy.1999. "Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation ." Political Communication16:315-36.
35.
Moy, P., and M. Pfau.2000. With Malice toward All? The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions. Westport, CT: Praeger.
36.
Moy, P., M.A. Xenos, and V.K. Hess.2005. "Communication and Citizenship: Mapping the Political Effects of Infotainment." Mass Communication and Society8 (2): 111-31.
37.
Moy, P., M.A. Xenos, and V.K. Hess.2006. "Priming Effects of Late-Night Comedy ." International Journal of Public Opinion Research18 (2): 198-210.
38.
Mutz, D.C.2002. "The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation." American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 838-55.
39.
Nabi, R.L., E. Moyer-Gusé, and S. Byrne.2007. "All Joking Aside: A Serious Investigation into the Persuasive Effect of Funny Social Issue Messages." Communication Monographs74 (1): 29-54.
40.
Pan, Z., L. Shen, H. Paek, and Y. Sun.2006. "Mobilizing Political Talk in a Presidential Campaign: An Examination of Campaign Effects in a Deliberative Framework." Communication Research33 (5): 315-45.
41.
Patterson, T.E.2002. The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty . New York: Knopf.
42.
Patterson, T.E., and R.D. McClure.1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: Putnam.
43.
The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.2004. "Cable and Internet Loom Large in Fragmented Political News Universe." January 11. http://www.people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=200 (accessed January 20, 2010).
44.
The Pew Research Center For The People and the Press.2008. "Internet’s Broader Role in Campaign 2008: Social Networking and Online Videos Take Off." January 11. http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/384.pdf (accessed January 20, 2010).
45.
Pfau, M., J.B. Houston, and S.M. Semmler.2005. "Presidential Election Campaigns and American Democracy: The Relationships between Communication Use and Normative Outcomes." American Behavioral Scientist49: 48-62.
46.
Preacher, K.J., and A.F. Hayes.2008. "Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models." Behavior Research Methods40:879-91.
47.
Preacher, K.J., D.D. Rucker, and A.F. Hayes.2007. "Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions." Multivariate Behavioral Research42 (1): 185-227.
48.
Price, V.1992. Communication Concepts 4: Public Opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Romer, D., K. Kenski, K. Winneg, C. Adasiewicz, and K.H. Jamieson.2006. Capturing Campaign Dynamics 2000 and 2004: The National Annenberg Election Survey. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
50.
Schooler, C., S.H. Chaffee, J.A. Flora, and C. Roser.1998. "Health Campaign Channels." Human Communication Research24 (3): 410-33.
51.
Shah, D.V.1998. "Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual-Level Assessment of Social Capital." Political Psychology19:469-96.
52.
Shah, D.V., and D.A. Scheufele.2006. "Explicating Opinion Leadership: Nonpolitical Dispositions, Information Consumption, and Civic Participation." Political Communication23:1-22.
53.
Stroud, N.J.2007. "Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11 ." Political Communication24:415-32.
54.
Tsfati, Y., R. Tukachinsky, and Y. Peri.2009. "Exposure to News, Political Comedy, and Entertainment Talk Shows: Concern about Security and Political Mistrust ." International Journal of Public Opinion Research21 (4): 399-423.
55.
Young, D.G.2004. "Late-Night Comedy in Election 2000: Its Influence on Candidate Trait Ratings and the Moderating Effects of Political Knowledge and Partisanship." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media48 (1): 1-22.
56.
Young, D.G., and R.M. Tisinger.2006. "Dispelling Late-Night Myths: News Consumption among Late-Night Comedy Viewers and the Predictors of Exposure to Various Late-Night Shows." Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11 (3): 113-34.
57.
Zillmann, D., and P. Vorderer.2000. Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
