Most online media consumption is not driven by a desire to seek out news and politics. However, the public may still encounter politics because it arises organically in communities devoted to non-political subjects. This study examines the potential of popular reality television online discussion forums to serve as online third spaces and stimulate political discussion due to the natural connections that audiences make between the cast members and “real life” in reality-based programming. Based on a quantitative analysis of political comments made to reality television subreddits and a survey of visitors to a popular subreddit focused on The Bachelor television show, the findings not only demonstrate the ability of entertainment-focused online communities to expose a broad segment of the public to political talk, but also point to the obstacles in promoting political discussion that is simultaneously enjoyable, informative, and tolerant of diverse viewpoints.
BarthelMStockingGHolcombJ, et al. (2016) Nearly Eight-in-Ten Reddit Users Get News on the Site. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
5.
BaumMA (2002) Sex, lies, and war: how soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review96(1): 91–109.
6.
BaumgartnerJZannettouSKeeganB, et al. (2020) The pushshift reddit dataset. In: Proceedings of the 14th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Atlanta, GA, 8–11 June, pp. 830–839. Menlo Park, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
7.
BodeL (2017) Gateway political behaviors: the frequency and consequences of low-cost political engagement on social media. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 25November. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117743349.
8.
BorAPetersenMB (2021) The psychology of online political hostility: a comprehensive, cross-national test of the mismatch hypothesis. American Political Science Review116: 1–18.
9.
ChengJBernsteinMDanescu-Niculescu-MizilC, et al. (2017) Anyone can become a troll: causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, Portland, OR, 25 February–1 March, pp. 1217–1230. New York: ACM.
10.
ConoverPJMillerPR (2018) Taking everyday political talk seriously. In: BächtigerADryzekJSMansbridgeJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 378–391.
11.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
12.
De Francisci MoralesGMontiCStarniniM (2021) No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports11(1): 2818.
13.
Delli CarpiniMX (2000) Gen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication17(4): 341–349.
14.
Delli CarpiniMX (2014) The political effects of entertainment media. In: KenskiKJamiesonKH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 851–870.
15.
DruckmanJNKlarSKrupnikovY, et al. (2021) (Mis-)estimating affective polarization. The Journal of Politics84: 1106–1117.
16.
FreelonDG (2010) Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. New Media & Society12(7): 1172–1190.
17.
GaudetteTScrivensRDaviesG, et al. (2020) Upvoting extremism: collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society23: 3491–3508.
18.
GearhartSZhangW (2015) “Was it something I said?” “No, it was something you posted!” A study of the spiral of silence theory in social media contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18(4): 208–213.
19.
Gil de ZúñigaHGarcia-PerdomoVMcGregorSC (2015) What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication65(5): 793–815.
20.
GrahamT (2010) Talking politics online within spaces of popular culture: the case of the Big Brother forum. Javnost—The Public17(4): 25–42.
21.
GrahamT (2012) Beyond “political” communicative spaces: talking politics on the Wife Swap discussion forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics9(1): 31–45.
22.
GrahamTWrightS (2014) Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of “superparticipants.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 625–642.
23.
GrahamTJacksonDWrightS (2016) “We need to get together and make ourselves heard”: everyday online spaces as incubators of political action. Information, Communication & Society19(10): 1373–1389.
24.
GuoLVargoCJPanZ, et al. (2016) Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93(2): 332–359.
25.
HolbertRL (2005) A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist49(3): 436–453.
26.
HuckfeldtRRSpragueJ (1995) Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KilgoDKNgYMMRiedlMJ, et al. (2018) Reddit’s Veil of Anonymity: predictors of engagement and participation in media environments with hostile reputations. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 11November. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118810216.
28.
KimDHWeeksBELaneDS, et al. (2021) Sharing and commenting facilitate political learning on Facebook: evidence from a two-wave panel study. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 27September. DOI: 10.1177/20563051211047876.
29.
KimYChenH-TGil de ZúñigaH (2013) Stumbling upon news on the Internet: effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2607–2614.
30.
KlarS (2014) Partisanship in a social setting. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 687–704.
31.
LevenduskyMSDruckmanJNMcLainA (2016) How group discussions create strong attitudes and strong partisans. Research & Politics. Epub ahead of print 21April. DOI: 10.1177/2053168016645137.
32.
MasonL (2018) Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became our Identity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
MassanariA (2017) #Gamergate and The Fappening: how Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society19(3): 329–346.
34.
MutzDC (2002) The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science46: 838–855.
Noelle-NeumannE (1991) The theory of public opinion: the concept of the spiral of silence. Annals of the International Communication Association14(1): 256–287.
39.
OhmeJ (2019) Updating citizenship? The effects of digital media use on citizenship understanding and political participation. Information, Communication & Society22(13): 1903–1928.
40.
OldenburgR (1999) The Great Good Place. New York: Marlowe.
41.
PriorM (2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RajadesinganABudakCResnickP (2021) Political discussion is abundant in non-political subreddits (and less toxic). Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09560
43.
RajadesinganAResnickPBudakC (2020) Quick, community-specific learning: how distinctive toxicity norms are maintained in political subreddits. In: Proceedings of the 14th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Atlanta, GA, 8–11 June, pp. 557–568. Menlo Park, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
44.
SantanaAD (2014) Virtuous or vitriolic: the effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice8(1): 18–33.
45.
SettleJE (2018) Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
ShearerEMitchellA (2021) News Use Across Social Media Platforms in 2020. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/
47.
TewksburyDWeaverAJMaddexBD (2001) Accidentally informed: incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78(3): 533–554.
48.
TheocharisYPabloBZoltanF, et al. (2016) A bad workman blames his tweets: the consequences of citizens’ uncivil Twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communication66(6): 1007–1031.
49.
TumasjanASprengerTOSandnerPG, et al. (2011) Election forecasts with Twitter: how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review29(4): 402–418.
50.
VragaEK (2019) What can I do? How to use social media to improve democratic society. Political Communication36(2): 315–323.
51.
WojcieszakMEMutzDC (2009) Online groups and political discourse: do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?Journal of Communication59(1): 40–56.
52.
WrightS (2012) From “third place” to “third space”: everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost—The Public19(3): 5–20.
53.
YanWSivakumarGXenosMA (2018) It’s not cricket: examining political discussion in nonpolitical online space. Information, Communication & Society21(11): 1571–1587.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
