Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Prevention Mechanisms for Online Deviant Behaviors Among Thai Youth: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Social Control,Legal Knowledge,and Online Self-Control
With a substantial increase in internet usage, digital technology has transformed youth behaviors in Thailand, creating significant challenges related to online deviant behaviors (ODB)—from cyberbullying to illegal content sharing. This mixed-methods study explored prevention mechanisms among Thai youth. Key findings revealed socialization as the strongest predictor of online self-control, with variations across educational levels. University students showed the highest socialization effect, while middle school students were most influenced by online criminal law knowledge. Gender factors significantly impacted online deviant behaviors, with LGBTQ+ individuals and males showing higher tendencies. The study proposes an integrated prevention framework involving multiple stakeholders and provides evidence-based guidelines tailored to Thailand’s sociocultural context, emphasizing the need for age-appropriate interventions addressing the interplay between legal knowledge, social bonds, and self-regulatory mechanisms in digital environments.
AgbakaJ.2024. “Integrated Approaches to Combat Cyber-crime on Social Media: Legislative, Educational, and Technological Solutions.” Perspektif13(4):1213–22. doi:10.31289/perspektif.v13i4.13090.
ÁrpádI.2013. “A Greater Involvement of Education in Fight against Cybercrime.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences83:371–77. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.073.
4.
BaevaL. V.2019. “Ethic and Legal Aspects of IT Society Development and Issues of E-culture Security.” Pp. 387–77 in Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT, edited by PopkovaE. G.Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_45.
5.
BanduraA.1991. “Social Cognitive Theory of Self-regulation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2):248–87. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.
6.
BerenblumT.Weulen KranenbargM.MaimonD.2019. “Out of Control Online? A Combined Examination of Peer-offending and Perceived Formal and Informal Social Control in Relation to System-trespassing.” Journal of Crime and Justice42(5):616–31. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2019.1692424.
7.
BosslerA. M.2019. “Perceived Formal and Informal Sanctions on the Willingness to Commit Cyber Attacks against Domestic and Foreign Targets.” Journal of Crime and Justice42(5):599–615. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2019.1692423.
8.
BoydD.2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press. Retrieved August 25, 2025 (http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vm5gk).
9.
BrewerR.CaleJ.GoldsmithA.HoltT.2018. “Young People, the Internet, and Emerging Pathways into Criminality: A Study of Australian Adolescents.” International Journal of Cyber Criminology12(1):115–32. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1467853.
10.
ChenJ. K.ChangC. W.WangZ.WangL. C.WeiH. S.2021. “Cyber Deviance among Adolescents in Taiwan: Prevalence and Correlates.” Children and Youth Services Review126:106042. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106042.
11.
CiobanS.LazărA. R.BacterC.HatosA.2021. “Adolescent Deviance and Cyber-deviance. A Systematic Literature Review.” Frontiers in Psychology12:748006. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748006.
12.
CostelloB. J.LaubJ. H.2020. “Social Control Theory: The Legacy of Travis Hirschi’s Causes of Delinquency.” Annual Review of Criminology3(1):21–41. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041527.
13.
DeardenT. E.PartiK.2021. “Cybercrime, Differential Association, and Self-control: Knowledge Transmission through Online Social Learning.” American Journal of Criminal Justice46(6):935–55. doi:10.1007/s12103-021-09655-4.
14.
Department of Juvenile Observation and Protection. 2024. “National Statistics of Juvenile Cases Classified by Major Offense Categories.” Retrieved August 25, 2025 (https://www.djop.go.th/home).
15.
Elboj-SasoC.Íñiguez-BerrozpeT.Cebollero SalinasA.Bautista Alcaine AP.2024. “Listen to Me!” The Role of Family Supervision and Parental Phubbing in Youth Cyberbullying.” Family Relations73(3):1568–87. doi:10.1111/fare.12968.
ElenaC.InnaB.IrinaM.EvgenyT.NatalyaZ.GalinaC.2016. “Teacher Training for Prevention of Pupils Deviant Behaviour in ICT.” Pp. 294–97 in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Information Technologies in Science, Management, Social Sphere and Medicine, edited by BerestnevaO.TikhomirovA.TrufanovA. doi:10.2991/itsmssm-16.2016.46.
18.
EllisonN.BoydD. M.2013. “Sociality through Social Network Sites.” The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, edited by DuttonW. H.Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008.
19.
ElsaesserC.RussellB.OhannessianC. M.PattonD.2017. “Parenting in a Digital Age: A Review of Parents’ Role in Preventing Adolescent Cyberbullying.” Aggression and Violent Behavior35:62–72. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004.
20.
EnsN.HukalP.Blegind JensenT.2023. “Dynamics of Control on Digital Platforms.” Information Systems Journal33(4):890–911. doi:10.1111/isj.12429.
21.
FereshtehM.2024. “The Impact of Social, Cultural, and Individual Factors on Cybercrime.” Educational Administration. Theory into Practice30(5):10152–59. doi:10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4716.
22.
FordT. L.2017. “Life Unfiltered: Social Control Theory in the Age of Social Media and Substance Abuse.” Master’s Thesis, Sam Houston State University. Retrieved August 25, 2025 (http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2321).
23.
GibbsJ. L.RiceR. E.KirkwoodG. L.2021. “Digital Discipline: Theorizing Concertive Control in Online Communities.” Communication Theory32(3):305–31. doi:10.1093/ct/qtab017.
24.
GórkaM.2023. “Design of an Innovative Model of Cooperation between Schools and the Public for the Cybersecurity of Children and Adolescents.” Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education12(23):413–32. doi:10.35765/mjse.2023.1223.18.
25.
HarrisL. E.JacobsJ. A.2023. “Emerging Ideas. Digital Parenting Advice: Online Guidance Regarding Children‘s Use of the Internet and Social Media.” Family Relations72(5):2551–68. doi:10.1111/fare.12813.
26.
HeadleyM. G.Plano ClarkV. L. P.2020. “Multilevel Mixed Methods Research Designs: Advancing a Refined Definition.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research14(2):145–63. doi:10.1177/1558689819844417.
27.
HirschiT. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. University of California Press.
28.
HoltT. J.2010. “Examining the Role of Technology in the Formation of Deviant Subcultures.” Social Science Computer Review28(4):466–81. doi:10.1177/0894439309351344.
29.
HoltT. J.BosslerA. M.MayD. C.2012. “Low Self-control, Deviant Peer Associations, and Juvenile Cyberdeviance.” American Journal of Criminal Justice37(3):378–95. doi:10.1007/s12103-011-9117-3.
30.
HoltT. J.NavarroJ. N.ClevengerS.2020. “Exploring the Moderating Role of Gender in Juvenile Hacking Behaviors.” Crime and Delinquency66(11):1533–55. doi:10.1177/0011128719875697.
31.
Institute for Population and Social Research at Mahidol University. 2020. Thai Health 2020: 2 Decades of Thailand Educational Reform: Failures and Successes. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University. Retrieved August 25, 2025 (https://www.thaihealthreport.com/file_book/tnaiEn-2020.pdf).
32.
Kaitatzi-WhitlockS.2021. “Toward a Digital Civil Society: Digital Ethics through Communication Education.” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society19(2):187–206. doi:10.1108/JICES-03-2020-0029.
33.
KennedyJ.MeeseJ.van der NagelE.2016. “Regulation and Social Practice Online.” Continuum30(2):146–57. doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1143160.
34.
KimJ.LebanL.LeeY.2024. “Theoretical Explanations of the Development of Youth Hacking.” Crime and Delinquency70(8):1971–92. doi:10.1177/00111287221115639.
LeeJ. R.HoltT. J.2020. “Assessing the Factors Associated with the Detection of Juvenile Hacking Behaviors.” Frontiers in Psychology11:840. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00840.
37.
LipseyM. W.2009. “The Primary Factors That Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-analytic Overview.” Victims and Offenders4(2):124–47. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573.
38.
MardianiJ. N.NurlailyN.2022. “Sociology of Law Perspectives in Reviewing the Effective Social Control for Social Medias.” Journal of Law and Policy Transformation7(1):1–8. doi:10.37253/jlpt.v7i1.6728.
39.
McCuddyT.2021. “Peer Delinquency among Digital Natives: The Cyber Context as a Source of Peer Influence.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency58(3):306–42. doi:10.1177/0022427820959694
40.
MetheekulP.2024. “The Development and Effectiveness of Digital Well-being Intervention on Enhancing Digital Literacy and Psychological Well-being of Thai Adolescents.” Journal of Behavioural Sciences19(2):89–102. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/271266.
41.
MitchellV.PetroviciD.SchlegelmilchB. B.SzőcsI.2015. “The Influence of Parents Versus Peers on Generation Y Internet Ethical Attitudes.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications14(2):95–103. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2014.12.003.
42.
NakseeharachD.2019. “The Attitude and Legal Problem on the Prevention and Control of Cyberbullying in Thailand.” CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences: Study of Students in Mahasarakham University12(1):135–71. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMUJLSS/article/view/137363.
NavarroR.Ruiz-OlivaR.LarrañagaE.YuberoS.2015. “The Impact of Cyberbullying and Social Bullying on Optimism, Global and School-related Happiness and Life Satisfaction among 10-12 Schoolchildren.” Applied Research in Quality of Life10(1):15–36. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9292-0.
47.
NgamjarusC.ChongsuvivatwongV.2014. “n4Studies: Sample Size and Power Calculations for iOS.” The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program–The Thailand Research Fund & Prince of Songkla University.
OlesonJ. C.2019. “The Criminology of Travis Hirschi: Social Control and Beyond.” Pp. 1–26 in Fifty Years of Causes of Delinquency: The Criminology of Travis Hirschi, edited by OlesonJ. C.CostelloB. J.Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429020438-1.
51.
OshodiA. N.AdelodunM. O.AnyanwuE. C.MajebiN. L.2024. “Combining Parental Controls and Educational Programs to Enhance Child Safety Online Effectively.” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences6(9):2293–2314. doi:10.51594/ijarss.v6i9.1592.
52.
PrenskyM. R.2012. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning. Corwin Press. doi:10.4135/9781483387765.
53.
SrisawatP.SrisuwanP.2024. “Legal Measures for Computer Crimes. In Case of Accessing Information of Offenders Involving with Online Financial Transactions.” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Phranakhon şi Ayutthaya Rajabhat University11(1):161–86. doi:10.14456/husoaru.2023.7.
54.
StæhrA. C.2024. “Texting, Teens, and Parental Challenges in Practices of Family Socialization.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology34(1):107–26. doi:10.1111/jola.12416.
55.
TakeoK.2021. “Knowledge and Understanding of Secondary School Students in Social Media Under Act 2017 of Computer Offenses: A Case Study of Khon Kaen Province.” Dhammathas Academic Journal21(1):29–38. Retrieved August 25, 2025 (https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dhammathas/article/view/237513).
56.
TalmudI.MeschG.2020. Wired Youth: The Online Social World of Adolescence. 2nd ed. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351227742.
UdrisR.2016. “Cyber Deviance among Adolescents and the Role of Family, School, and Neighborhood: A Cross-national Study.” International Journal of Cyber Criminology10(2):127–46. doi:10.5281/zenodo.163393.
60.
van KokswijkJ. 2010. “Social Control in Online Society-advantages of Self-regulation on the Internet International Conference on Cyberworlds, Singapore.” doi:10.1109/CW.2010.44.
61.
VoggeserB. J.SinghR. K.GöritzA. S.2017. “Self-control in Online Discussions: Disinhibited Online Behavior as a Failure to Recognize Social Cues.” Frontiers in Psychology8:2372. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02372.
62.
WayneW. D.1995. Biostatistics: A Foundation of Analysis in the Health Sciences. 6th ed. John Wiley.
63.
WangH.WangX.GengJ.ZengP.GuX.LeiL.2023. “Does Peer Alienation Accelerate Cyber Deviant Behaviors of Adolescents? The Mediating Role of Core Self-evaluation and the Moderating Role of Parent–child Relationship and Gender.” Current Psychology42(1):625–38. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01471-7.
64.
WangX.WangW.QiaoY.GaoL.YangJ.WangP.2022. “Parental Phubbing and Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Moderated Mediation Model of Moral Disengagement and Online Disinhibition.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence37(7–8):5344–66. doi:10.1177/0886260520961877.
WissinkI. B.AsscherJ. J.StamsG.-J.2023. “Online Delinquent Behaviors of Adolescents: Parents as Potential “influencers”?.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi:10.1177/0306624X231206521
67.
WolffW.BielekeM.EnglertC.BertramsA.SchülerJ.MartarelliC. S.2022. “A Single Item Measure of Self-control–Validation and Location in a Nomological Network of Self-control, Boredom, and If-then Planning.” Social Psychological Bulletin17:1–22. doi:10.32872/spb.7453
68.
WoriO. C.2023. “The Influence of Cybercriminal Activities to the Human Society.” Pp. 96–120 in Research and Applications Towards Mathematics and Computer Science, edited by WangP. Q.-W.B P. International. doi:10.9734/bpi/ratmcs/v1/5411C.
