Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy

Abstract

This article presents survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy to serve as proxies for observed skill measures, which are much more expensive and difficult to collect for large samples. Findings are based on a study that examined users’ digital literacy through both observations and survey questions, making it possible to check the validity of survey proxy measures. These analyses yield a set of recommendations for what measures work well as survey proxies of people’s observed web-use skills. Some of these survey measures were administered on the General Social Survey 2000 and 2002 Internet modules, making the findings relevant for the use of existing large-scale national data sets. Results suggest that some composite variables of survey knowledge items are better predictors of people’s actual digital literacy based on performance tests than are measures of users’ self-perceived abilities, a proxy traditionally used in the literature on the topic.

Keywords

methods surveys measures skill web use digital literacy,internet,online behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

DiMaggio, P. , Hargittai, E. , Celeste, C. , & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). New York: Russell Sage.

Dutton, W. H. , & Anderson, R. E. (1989). Computers and literacy: Differing perspectives in the social sciences. Social Science Computer Review, 7, 1-6.

Fallows, D. (2004). The Internet and daily life. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.

Hargittai, E. (2002a). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people’s Web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Perspectives, 53, 1239-1244.

Hargittai, E. (2002b). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. Retrieved March 4, 2005, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html

Hargittai, E. (2003). How wide a Web? Inequalities in accessing information online. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

Hargittai, E. (2004). Classifying and Coding Online Actions. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 210-227.

Hargittai, E. (2004). Life beyond Google. Retrieved March 4, 2005, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3601371.stm

10.

Howard, P. E. N. , & Jones, S. (2003). Society online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Howard, P. E. N. , Rainie, L. , & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 383-404.

12.

Lynch, S. (1999). Bayesi an estimation of polychoric and polyserial correlations via Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithms: A simulation study comparing posterior mean and maximum likelihood estimators. Durham, NC: Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University.

13.

Mossberger, K. , Tolbert, C. J. , & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

14.

Rieh, S. Y. (2004). On the Web at home: Information seeking and Web searching in the home environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 743-753.

15.

Shashaani, L. (1994). Gender differences in computer experience and its influence on computer attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 347-367.

16.

Spink, A. , Jansen, B. J. , Wolfram, D. , & Saracevic, T. (2002). Frome-sex to e-commerce:Web search changes. IEEE Computer, 35, 107-109.

17.

Spink, A. , Wolfram, D. , & Jansen, B. J. (2001). Searching the Web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 226-234.

18.

van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide. London: Sage.

19.

Wellman, B. , & Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.