Online discussions are performed in the gaze of fellow users. To increase engagement, platforms typically let these users evaluate the comments made by others through rating systems (e.g., via Likes or Down/Up votes). Understanding how such ratings shape, and are shaped by, features of the underlying discussion is important for our understanding of online behavior. In this study, we focus on an increasingly concerning aspect of online discussions: incivility. We draw on the theory of normative social behavior to analyze a data set of over 6,000 online newspaper comments. We find that repeated incivility by the same person is more likely when their initial incivility was affirmed by both descriptive norms (incivility in nearby comments) and injunctive norms (Up votes). Repeated incivility receives more Up votes if nearby comments also include incivility but fewer Up votes if they do not, suggesting that injunctive norms are contextual and shaped by descriptive norms. We conclude that online incivility is a dynamic, normative process that is responsive to both positive feedback and proximate incivility.
Álvarez-BenjumeaA.WinterF. (2018). Normative change and culture of hate: An experiment in online environments. European Sociological Review, 34(3), 223–237.
2.
AndersonA. A.BrossardD.ScheufeleD. A.XenosM. A.LadwigP. (2014). The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009
BerryJ. M.SobierajS. (2014). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. Oxford University Press.
5.
BoatrightR. G.ShafferT. J.SobierajS.YoungD. G. (Eds.). (2019). A crisis of civility? Political discourse and its discontents. Routledge.
6.
BorahP. (2014). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827.
7.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 331–341.
8.
BudakC.GarretR. K.ResnickP.KaminJ. (2017). Threading is sticky: How threaded conversations promote comment system user retention. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134662
9.
ChandrasekharanE.SamoryM.JhaverS.CharvatH.BruckmanA.LampeC.EisensteinJ.GilbertE. (2018). The internet’s hidden rules: An empirical study of Reddit norm violations at micro, meso, and macro scales. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274301
10.
ChengJ.BernsteinM.Danescu-Niculescu-MizilC.LeskovecJ. (2017). Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213
11.
ChengJ.Danescu-Niculescu-MizilC.LeskovecJ. (2014). How community feedback shapes user behavior. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.1429.pdf
12.
ChungJ. E. (2019). Peer influence of online comments in newspapers: Applying social norms and the social identification model of deindividuation effects (SIDE). Social Science Computer Review, 37(4), 551–567.
13.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.
14.
CoeK.KenskiK.RainsS. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658–679.
15.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Belknap Press.
16.
GervaisB. T. (2015). Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 167–185
17.
HanS.BrazealL. M. (2015). Playing nice: Modeling civility in online political discussions. Communication Research Reports, 32, 20–28.
18.
HanS.BrazealL. M.PenningtonN. (2018). Is civility contagious? Examining the impact of modeling in online political discussions. Social Media + Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118793404
19.
HmielowskiJ. D.HutchensM. J.CicchirilloV. J. (2014). Living in an age of online incivility: Examining the conditional indirect effects of online discussion on political flaming. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 1196–1211.
20.
HsuehM.YogeeswaranK.MalinenS. (2015). “Leave your comment below”: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors?Human Communication Research, 41, 557–576.
21.
HwangH.KimY.HuhC. U. (2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 621–633.
22.
JamiesonK. H.VolinskyA.WeitzI.KenskiK. (2017). The political uses and abuses of civility and incivility. In KenskiK.JamiesonK. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 203–217). Oxford University Press.
23.
KenskiK.CoeK.RainsS. A. (2020). Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 795–814.
24.
KimJ. W.ParkS. (2018). How perceptions of incivility and social endorsement in online comments (Dis) encourage engagements. Behaviour & Information Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1523464
25.
KsiazekT. B. (2015). Civil interactivity: How news organizations’ commenting policies explain civility and hostility in user comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 556–573.
26.
LapinskiM. K.AndersonJ.ShugartA.ToddE. (2014). Social influence in child care centers: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Health Communication, 29(3), 219–232.
27.
LapinskiM. K.RimalR. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147.
LeeC. M.GeisnerM. I.LewisM. A.NeighborsC.LarimerM. E. (2007). Social motives and the interaction between descriptive and injunctive norms in college student drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(5), 714–721.
30.
MassaroT. M.StrykerR. (2012). Freedom of speech, liberal democracy, and emerging evidence on civility and effective democratic engagement(Discussion paper no. 12–12). Arizona Legal Studies.
31.
McLaughlinC.VitakJ. (2011). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 299–315.
32.
MolinaR. G.JenningsF. G. (2017). The role of civility and metacommunication in Facebook discussions. Communication Studies, 69, 42–66.
33.
MuddimanA. (2017). Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3182–3202.
34.
MungerK. (2016). Tweetment effects on the tweeted: Experimentally reducing racist harassment. Political Behavior, 39, 629–649.
35.
MutzD. C. (2007). Effects of “In-Your-Face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 621–635.
36.
MutzD. C.ReevesB. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15.
37.
NaabT. K.KalchA. (2017). Replying, evaluating, flagging: How users engage with uncivil and impolite comments on news sites[Paper presentation]. The International Communication Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, United States.
OrdoñezM. A. M.NekmatE. (2019). “Tipping Point” in the SoS? Minority-supportive opinion climate proportion and perceived hostility in uncivil online discussion. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2483–2504.
40.
PangN.HoS. S.ZhangA. M.KoJ. S.LowW. X.TanK. S. (2016). Can spiral of silence and civility predict click speech on Facebook?Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 898–905.
41.
PhillipsW. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
RainsS. A.KenskiK.CoeK.HarwoodJ. (2017). Incivility and political identity on the internet: Intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 163–178.
45.
RheingoldH. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Addison-Wesley.
46.
RimalR. N.RealK. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184–203.
47.
RimalR. N.RealK. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32, 389–414.
48.
RösnerL.WinterS.KrämerN. C. (2016). Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 461–470.
49.
RossiniP. (2020). Beyond incivility: Understanding patterns of uncivil and intolerant discourse in online political talk. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314
50.
RoweI. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 121–138.
51.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434.
52.
SedlanderE.RimalR. N. (2019). Beyond individual-level theorizing in social norms research: How collective norms and media access affect adolescents’ use of contraception. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64, S31–S36.
53.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper & Brothers.
54.
SkinnerB. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
55.
SklanA. D. (2013). @Socialmedia: Speech with a click of a button? #socialsharingbuttons. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 32, 377–410.
56.
SmithJ. R.LouisW. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647–666.
57.
StroudN. J.ScaccoJ. M.MuddimanA.CurryA. L. (2015). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 188–203.
58.
SuL. Y. F.XenosM. A.RoseK. M.WirzC.ScheufeleD. A.BrossardD. (2018). Uncivil and personal? Comparing patterns of incivility in comments on the Facebook pages of news outlets. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818757205
59.
SukumaranA.VezichS.McHughM.NassC. (2011). Normative influences on thoughtful online participation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979450
60.
SydnorE. (2019). Disrespectful democracy: The psychology of political incivility. Columbia University Press.
YunG. W.ParkS. (2011). Selective posting: Willingness to post a message online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 201–227.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
