KrouwerJSCembrowskiGS. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2010;4 (1): 75–83.
2.
BorenSAClarkeWL. Analytical and clinical performance of blood glucose monitors. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2010;4 (1): 84–97.
3.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. EP27-P. Vol. 29, No. 16. How to construct and interpret an error grid for diagnostic assays; proposed guideline. http://www.clsi.org/source/orders/free/ep27-p.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2011.
ClarkeWLCoxDGonder-FrederickLACarterWPohlSL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care.1987;10 (5): 622–8.
6.
ParkesJLSlatinSLPardoSGinsbergBH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care.2000;23 (8): 1143–8.
7.
GargSKPottsROAckermanNRFermiSJTamadaJAChaseHP. Correlation of fingerstick blood glucose measurements with GlucoWatch biographer glucose results in young subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care.1999;22 (10): 1708–14.
8.
KollmanCWilsonDMWysockiTTamborlaneWVBeckRW. Diabetes Research in Children Network Study Group. Limitations of statistical measures of error in assessing the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors. Diabetes Technol Ther.2005;7 (5): 665–72.
9.
KovatchevBPGonder-FrederickLACoxDJClarkeWL. Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: Continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. Diabetes Care.2004;27: 1922–8.
10.
EllmererMHaluzikMBlahaJKremenJSvacinaSTollerWMaderJSchauppLPlankJPieberT. Clinical evaluation of alternative-site glucose measurements in patients after major cardiac surgery. Diabetes Care.2006;29 (6): 1275–81.
11.
DobromylskyjMJSparkesAH. Assessing portable blood glucose meters for clinical use in cats in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec.2010;167 (12): 438–42.
12.
HemkensLGHildenKMHartschenSKaiserTDidjurgeitUHansenRBenderRSawickiPT. A randomized trial comparing INR monitoring devices in patients with anticoagulation self-management: Evaluation of a novel error-grid approach. J Thromb Thrombolysis.2008;26 (1): 22–30.
13.
TorreiroEGFernándezEGRodríguezRMLópezCVNúñezJB. Comparative study of accuracy and clinical agreement of the CoaguChek XS portable device versus standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients. Thromb Haemost.2009;101 (5): 969–74.
14.
PetersenJRVonmarensdorfHMWeissHLElghetanyMT. Use of error grid analysis to evaluate acceptability of a point of care prothrombin time meter. Clin Chim Acta.2010;411 (3–4): 131–4.
15.
KlonoffDC. The Food and Drug Administration is now preparing to establish tighter performance requirements for blood glucose monitors. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2010;4 (3): 499–504.
16.
KlonoffDC. Improving the safety of blood glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2011;5 (6): 1307–11.
17.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med.1993;329: 977–86.
18.
[No authors listed]. Rapid-acting insulin approved for marketing. Am J Health Syst Pharm.1996;53 (19): 2250.