This study examines how perceptions of a story can be altered simply by manipulating the reported winner or loser of a sports contest as well as how individual perceptions of a sports story change when the story is written by a perceived in-group (home nation) versus a perceived out-group (opposing nation). Using a combination of social identity, self-categorization, and hostile media theories, this experimental research aids the understanding of the role nationalism plays in how audiences respond to media gatekeepers from different nations. Results from 219 American participants revealed that the effect of nationalism strength on hostile media perception is greater when the national team loses than when a team wins a game. In addition, the interaction effect of nationalism and game results on the news bias perception is greater when the news is reported in a foreign newspaper than in a domestic newspaper.
AriyantoA.HornseyM. J.GalloisC. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 266–279.
2.
ArpanL. M.RaneyA. A. (2003). An experimental investigation of news source and the hostile media effect. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 265–281.
3.
BillingsA. C.BrownC. L.CroutJ. H.McKennaK. E.RiceB. A.TimanusM. E.ZeiglerJ. (2008). The Games through the NBC lens: Gender, ethnic and national equity in the 2006 Torino Winter Olympics. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 215–230.
4.
BillingsA. C.BrownK. A.BrownN. A. (2013). 5,535 Hours of impact: Effects of Olympic media on nationalism attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 579–595.
5.
BillingsA. C.EastmanS. T. (2003). Framing identities: Gender, ethnic, and national parity in network announcing of the 2002 Winter Olympics. Journal of Communication, 53, 569–586.
6.
BillingsA. C.KimY. (2014). The biggest spectacle on television’s grandest stage: Shaping viewer experiences. In GirginovV. (Ed.), The 2012 London Olympic and paralympic games (pp. 184–194). London, England: Routledge.
7.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of out-group derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657.
8.
BryantJ.OliverM. B. (2008). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
ButterworthM. L. (2007). The politics of the pitch: Claiming and contesting democracy through the Iraqi national soccer team. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4, 184–203.
10.
CottamM. L.CottamR. W.RiennerL. (2001). Nationalism & politics: The political behavior of nation states. Boulder, CO: Lynne, Rienner.
11.
ESPN Integrated Media Research. (2011). The life cycle of the sports fan. Report produced by ESPN Integrated Media Research, Bristol, CT.
12.
EnochG. (2011, 93). Life stages of the sports fan. ESPN Integrated Media Research Report, Bristol, CT.
13.
FarrellT. B. (1989). Media rhetoric as social drama: The Winter Olympics of 1984. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 158–182.
14.
FeinS.SpencerS. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44.
15.
FergusonM. J.CarterT. J.HassinR. R. (2009). On the automaticity of nationalist ideology: The case of the USA. In JostJ.KayA.ThorisdottirH. (Eds), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 53–83). New York: Oxford University Press
16.
Giner-SorollaR.ChaikenS. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165–180.
17.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
18.
GuntherA. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147–167.
19.
GuntherA. C.LiebhartJ. L. (2006). Beyond reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56, 449–466.
20.
GuntherA. C.SchmittK. (2004). Mapping the boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 55–70.
21.
GuntherA. C.MillerN.LiebhartJ. L. (2009). Assimilation and contrast in a test of the hostile media effect. Communication Research, 36(6), 747–764.
22.
HartmannT.TanisM. (2013). Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: The role of ingroup identification and status. Journal of Communication, 63, 535–555.
23.
HobermanJ. (2004). Sportive nationalism and globalization. In BaleJ.ChristensenM. K. (Eds.), Post-Olympism? Questioning the sport in the twenty-first century (pp. 177–188). Oxford, England: Berg.
24.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1999). Group distinctiveness and intergroup discrimination. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 107–127). Oxford, England: Wiley Blackwell.
25.
KellasJ. G. (1991). The politics of nationalism and ethnicity. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
26.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274.
27.
MacAloonJ. (1984). Olympic games and the theory of spectacle in modern societies. In MacAloonJ. (Ed.), Rite, drama, and festival (pp. 241–280). Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
28.
MathesonK.DursunS. (2001). Social identity precursors to the hostile media phenomenon: Partisan perceptions of coverage of the Bosnian conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 116–125.
29.
McCombsM.ShawD. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
30.
MullenB.BrownR. J.SmithC. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.
31.
PerloffR. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262.
32.
PriceV. (1989). Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 197–224.
33.
RealM. R. (1989). Super media: A cultural studies approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
ReidS. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62, 381–399.
35.
RivenburghN. K. (2000). Social identity theory and new portrayals of citizens involved in international affairs. Media Psychology, 2, 303–329.
36.
RoccasS.BrewerM. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
37.
RubinM.HewstoneM. (1998). Social identities self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40–62.
38.
SaboD.JansenS. C.TateD.CuncanM. C.LeggettS. (1996). Televising international sport: Race, ethnicity, and nationalistic bias. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 20, 7–21.
39.
SkitkaL. J. (2005). Patriotism or nationalism? Understanding post-September 11, 2001, flag-display behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1995–2011.
40.
SmithE. R.HenryS. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635–642.
41.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
42.
TomlinsonA. (1989). Representation, ideology, and the Olympic Games: A reading of the opening and closing ceremonies of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games. In McPhailT. A.JacksonR. C. (Eds.), The Olympic movement and the mass media: Past, present, and future issues (Section 7, pp. 3–12). Calgary, Canada: Hurford Enterprises.
43.
TurnerJ.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A social categorization theory. Oxford, England: B. Blackwell.
44.
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585.
45.
WannD. L. (2006). The causes and consequences of sports team identification. In RaneyA.BryantJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sport and media (pp. 331–352). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
46.
WannD. L.GrieveF. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behavior at sporting events: The importance of team identification and threats to social identity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 531–546.
47.
WannD. L.MelnickM. J.RussellG. W.PeaseD. G. (2001). Sport fans: The psychology and social impact of spectators. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
48.
WannD. L.RoyaltyJ.RobertsA. (2000). The self-presentation of sport fans: Investigating the importance of team identification and self-esteem. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 198–201.
