This study tests the proposition that hostile interpretations of media content can be reduced through news media literacy training. Within the context of the controversy over the adoption of biofuels as an energy source, we employ a web-based experimental design that manipulates subjects’ exposure to media literacy training and then presents them with news coverage on the issue of biofuels. We find strong support for the notion that media literacy affects individuals’ perceptions of media credibility. Exposure to a media literacy video led to increased ratings of story credibility, as well as increased trust in the media to cover both the issue and the news more broadly. Implications of these results are discussed.
AustinEWJohnsonKK (1997) Effects of general and alcohol-specific media literacy training on children’s decision making about alcohol. Journal of Health Communication2(1): 17–42.
2.
BrownJA (1998) Media literacy perspectives. Journal of Communication48: 44.
3.
ChiaSCYoungSYWWongZWDKohWL (2007) Personal bias or government bias? Testing the hostile media effect in a regulated press system. International Journal of Public Opinion Research19(3): 313–330.
4.
ChoiJHWattJHLynchM (2006) Perceptions of news credibility about the war in Iraq: Why war opponents perceived the internet as the most credible medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 209–229.
5.
D’AlessioD (2003) An experimental examination of readers’ perceptions of media bias. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly80(2): 282–294.
6.
EaglyAHChaikenS (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7.
EvelandWPJr.ShahDV (2003) The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology24(1): 101–117.
8.
FicoFRichardsonJDEdwardsSM (2004) Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication and Society7: 301–318.
9.
Giner-SorollaRChaikenS (1994) The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology30: 165–180.
10.
GuntherAC (1988) Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly65: 279–287.
11.
GuntherAC (1992) Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly56: 147–167.
12.
GuntherACLiebhartJL (2006) Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication56: 449–466.
13.
GuntherACSchmittKM (2004) Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication54: 55–70.
14.
HobbsR (2010) Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
15.
HobbsRFrostR (2003) Measuring the acquisition of media-literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly38(3): 330–355.
16.
HobbsRJensenA (2009) The past, present, and the future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education1: 1–11.
17.
HwangHPanZSunY (2008) Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of the mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology11: 76–97.
18.
KellnerDShareJ (2005) Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education26(3): 369–386.
19.
KeppelG (1991) Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy (2009) Informing Communities: Sustaining Democracy in the Digital Age. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
21.
KundaZ (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108: 480–498.
22.
LivingstoneS (2004) Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review7: 3–14.
23.
LordCGRossLLepperMR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37: 2098–2109.
24.
MastermanL (1985) Teaching the Media. London: Comedia Publishing Group.
25.
MeyerP (1988) Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly65: 567–588.
26.
MihailidisP (2008a) Beyond Cynicism: How Media Literacy Can Make Students More Engaged Citizens. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland.
27.
MihailidisP (2008b) Are we speaking the same language? Assessing the state of media literacy in US higher education. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education8(4): 1–14.
28.
PerloffRM (1989) Ego involvement and the third-person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research16: 236–262.
29.
Pew (2009) Press Accuracy Rating Hits Two Decade Low Public Evaluations of the News Media: 1985–2009. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
30.
RounerDSlaterMDBuddenbaumJM (1999) How perceptions of news bias in news sources relate to beliefs about media bias. Newspaper Research Journal20(2): 41–51.
31.
SchmittKMGuntherACLiebhartJL (2004) Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research31: 632–639.
32.
SherifMHovlandCI (1961) Social Judgment; Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
StammKDubeR (1994) The relationship of attitudinal components to trust in media. Communication Research21: 105–123.
34.
TaberCSLodgeM (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50: 755–769.
35.
TobiasJA (2008) Culturally relevant media studies: A review of approaches and pedagogies. Simile8(4): 1–17.
36.
TsfatiYCohenJ (2005) Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10: 28–51.
37.
ValloneRPRossLLepperMR (1985) The hostile media phenomena: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49: 577–585.
38.
VragaEKTullyMRojasH (2009) Media literacy training reduces perceptions of bias. Newspaper Research Journal30: 68–81.
