Research shows that high quality programs can support positive outcomes for all children, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Little research has examined the perspectives of directors working with infants and toddlers in families who are experiencing low socio-economic status (SES) in early childhood settings. This qualitative research addresses this gap by exploring directors’ understandings of inclusion relating to the needs of low SES children under 3 years and their families in the ECEC context. Qvortrup and Qvortrup’s (2018) lens of inclusion was used to analyse (a) the conceptualisation of inclusion held by the directors interviewed for this project and (b) what aspects of inclusion directors were able to influence. Findings showed that directors’ understandings were multidimensional, involving a combination of professional and contextual concerns. This paper discusses implications for working with infants and toddlers from low SES families.
AubreyC. A. (2019). What early childhood leadership for what kind of world? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 20(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119828145
Australian Institute of Family Studies (2021). Growing up in Australia: The longitudinal study of Australian children (LSAC). https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/
8.
CheesemanS.SumsionJ.PressF. (2015). Infants of the productivity agenda: Learning from birth or waiting to learn?. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000306
9.
ChristensenD. L.SchieveL. A.DevineO.Drews-BotschC. (2014). Socioeconomic status, child enrichment factors, and cognitive performance among preschool-age children: Results from the follow-up of growth and development experiences study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(7), 1789–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.003
10.
CloneyD.ClevelandG.HattieJ.TaylerC. (2016). Variations in the availability and quality of early childhood education and care by socioeconomic status of neighborhoods. Early Education and Development, 27(3), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1076674
11.
DavisB.DunnR. (2019). Professional identity in the infant room. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119855222
12.
DavisB.TorrJ.DegotardiS. (2015). Infants and toddlers: How visible are they in the early years learning framework? International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 9(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-015-0014-y
13.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Commonwealth of Australia.
14.
GraceR.BowesJ.ElcombeE. (2014). Child participation and family engagement with early childhood education and care services in disadvantaged Australian communities. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-014-0112-y
15.
HackmanD. A.FarahM. J.MeaneyM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(9), 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2897
16.
HardO’GormanL. (2007). Push-me” or “pull-you”? An opportunity for early childhood leadership in the implementation of Queensland’s early years curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Early. Childhood, 8(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2007.8.1.50
17.
HeckmanJ. J.StixrudJ.UrzuaS. (2006). The effects of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities on labour market outcomes and social behaviour. Journal of Labour Economics, 24(3), 411–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/504455
18.
IrvineS.PriceJ. (2014). Professional conversations: A collaborative approach to support policy implementation, professional learning and practice change in ECEC. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(3), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911403900311
KentG.PitsiaV.ColtonG. (2020). Cognitive development during early childhood: Insights from families living in areas of socio-economic disadvantage. Early Child Development and Care, 190(12), 1863–1877. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1543665
21.
KoivuK. L.DammanE. K. (2014). Qualitative variations: The sources of divergent qualitative methodological approaches. Quality & Quantity, 49(6), 2617–2632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0131-7
22.
LadkinD.TaylorS. S. (2010). Enacting the “true self”: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.005
23.
LeeKeenanD.PonteI. (2018). Meaningful assessment and documentation: How directors can support teaching and learning. YC Young Children, 73(5), 87–92.
24.
LeskeS. D.WoodsA.ThorpeK. (2015). What works and why? Early childhood professionals’ perspectives on effective early childhood education and care services for Indigenous families. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000114
25.
MossP. (2010). We cannot continue as we are: The educator in a struggle for survival. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 8–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.8
26.
NolanA.KilderryA.BeahanJ.LantingC.SpeldewindeC. (2017). Support for children and families at risk of experiencing vulnerability: practice review report. Melbourne, Vic.: Victoria State Government: Department Education and Training.
27.
NolanA.LambS. (2019). Exploring the social justice work of early childhood educators. Policy Futures in Education, 17(5), 618–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318796282
28.
O’ConnellM.FoxS.HinzB.ColeH. (2016). Quality early education for all: Fostering creative, entrepreneurial, resilient and capable learners. Mitchell Institute Policy Paper No. 01/2016. Mitchell Institute.
29.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2017). Policy outputs of early childhood education and care: Access, participation intensity and curriculum frameworks. In: Starting strong 2017: Key OECD indicators on early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing.
30.
OsgoodJ. (2006). Deconstructing professionalism in early childhood education: Resisting the regulatory gaze. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 5–14. http://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2006.7.1.5
31.
PascoeS.BrennanD. (2017). Lifting our game: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools through early childhood interventions. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-612290923/view
32.
PerlmanM.HoweN.GulyasC.FalenchukO. (2020). Associations between directors’ characteristics, supervision practices and quality of early childhood education and care classrooms. Early Education and Development, 31(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1679006
33.
PessanhaM.PeixotoC.BarrosS.CadimaJ.PintoA. I.CoelhoV.BryantD. M. (2017). Stability and change in teacher-infant interaction quality over time. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 40(3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.10.003
34.
Petriwskyj. (2010). Diversity and inclusion in the early years. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504515
35.
PurdueK.Gordon-BurnsD.GunnA.MaddenB.SurteesN. (2009). Supporting inclusion in early childhood settings: Some possibilities and problems for teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(8), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802110743
36.
QvortrupQvortrupL. (2018). Inclusion: Dimensions of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412506
37.
Redman-MacLarenM.MillsJ.TommbeR. (2014). Interpretive focus groups: A participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data. Global Health Action, 7(1), 25214. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25214
38.
RobertsW. (2017). Trust, empathy and time: Relationship building with families experiencing vulnerability and disadvantage in early childhood education and care services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(4), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.23965/ajec.42.4.01
39.
Rodd (2013). Leadership in early childhood: the pathway to professionalism (4th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
40.
ShahaeianA.WangC.Tucker-DrobE.GeigerV.BusA. G.HarrisonL. J. (2018). Early shared reading, socioeconomic status, and children’s cognitive and school competencies: Six years of longitudinal evidence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1482901
41.
SimsM. (2010). What does being an early childhood “teacher” mean in tomorrow’s world of children and family services? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(3), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911003500314
42.
StamopoulosE. (2015). The professional leadership and action research training model supporting early childhood leadership. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000406
43.
StamopoulosE.BarblettL. (2018). Early childhood leadership in action: Evidence based approaches for effective practice. Routledge.
44.
StanfieldR. B. (2000). The art of focused conversation: 100 ways to access group wisdom in the workplace. Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs.
van der WerfW. M.SlotP. L.KenisP. N.LesemanP. P. M. (2021). Inclusive practice and quality of education and care in the Dutch hybrid early childhood education and care system. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 15(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-020-00079-x
48.
WhitemanP.HarrisonL.CheesemanS.DavisB.DegotardiS.HadleyF.WongS.WaniganyakeM. (2018). Early childhood education participation of children from low socio-economic backgrounds: Literature review. NSW Department of Education.
49.
WilliamsP.BarclayL.SchmiedV. (2004). Defining social support in context: A necessary step in improving research, intervention, and practice. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 942–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304266997
