From Birth to Three: Exploring Educators’ Understandings of Agency

Abstract

The Early Years Learning Framework promotes the need to recognise children’s participation rights and for educators to be responsive to and promote child agency. This study explored how infant and toddler educators understand agency, and what role they ascribe to themselves in infants’ and toddlers’ realisation of agency. Research was undertaken in early childhood settings in Brisbane, Australia. Interviews and reflection activities were conducted with 15 educators working with children under three years, and responses coded through thematic analysis. Participants provided some working definitions of agency and examples of supporting children’s agency in their everyday practices. However, responses largely revealed confusion and limited understandings of agency. Through engaging a critical feminist paradigm, a connection between the status provided to infant–toddler educators, and the impact upon their knowledge and practice is proposed, and recommendations put forward for increased opportunities relating to birth to three pedagogy.

Keywords

infant toddler agency educator professional learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ailwood

(2016). Mothers, teachers, maternalism and early childhood education and care: Some historical connections. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2007.8.2.157.

Australian Children’s Education and Care Authority . (2016). Quality Area 1: Developing a culture of learning through reflective practice. National Quality Standard: Information Sheet. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/acecqa/files/Quality InformationSheets/QualityArea1/Developinga CultureofLearningThroughReflectivePractice.pdf.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Cheeseman

Sumsion

(2016). Narratives of infants’ encounters with curriculum: The benediction as invitation to participate. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116660951.

Davis

Dunn

(2019). Professional identity in the infant room. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(3), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119855222.

Davis

Torr

Degotardi

(2015). Infants and toddlers: how visible are they in the Early Years Learning Framework? International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-015-0014-y.

Degotardi

(2013). I think, I can: Acknowledging and supporting agency during infant-educator play. In Lillemyr

O. F.

Dockett

Perry

(Eds.) Varied Perspectives on Play and Learning: Theory and Research on Early Years Education . Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.

Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR] (2009). Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

Duhn

(2014). Making agency matter: Rethinking infant and toddler agency in educational discourse. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(6), 920-931. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.918535.

10.

Elfer

Page

(2015). Pedagogy with babies: Perspectives of eight nursery managers. Early Child Devopment and Care, 185(11-12), 1762-1782. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1028399.

11.

Garvis

Manning

(2015). Do Master early childhood teacher education programs provide adequate coverage of infants and toddlers?: A review of content. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 1-13.

12.

Ghirotto

Mazzoni

(2013). Being part, being involved: The adult's role and child participation in an early childhood learning context. International Journal of Early Years Education, 21(4), 300-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2013.867166.

13.

Hatch

J. A.

(2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

14.

Helm

B. W.

(2012). Accountability and some social dimensions of human agency. Philosophical Issues, 22(1), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00226.x.

15.

Hernandez

Iyengar

S. S.

(2001). What drives whom? A cultural perspective on human agency. Social Cognition, 19(3), 269-294.

16.

Holloway

S. L.

Holt

Mills

(2018). Questions of agency: Capacity, subjectivity, spatiality and temporality. Progress in Human Geography, 43(3), 458-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518757654.

17.

Houen

Danby

Farrell

Thorpe

(2016). Creating spaces for children’s agency: ‘I wonder’ formulations in teacher–child interactions. International Journal of Early Childhood, 48(3), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-016-0170-4.

18.

Macfarlane

Cartmel

(2008). Playgrounds of Learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910803300207.

19.

Matusov

von Duyke

Kayumova

(2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0.

20.

McDowall Clark

Baylis

(2012). ‘Wasted down there’: Policy and practice with the under-threes. Early Years, 32(2), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2011.652939.

21.

Mentha

Church

Page

(2015). Teachers as brokers: Perceptions of "participation" and agency in early childhood education and care. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 23(3), 622-637.

22.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research : A guide to design and implementation (Fourth edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley brand.

23.

Osgood

(2006). Professionalism and performativity: the feminist challenge facing early years practitioners. Early Years, 26(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140600759997.

24.

Palinkas

L. A.

Horwitz

S. M.

Green

C. A.

Wisdom

J. P.

Duan

Hoagwood

(2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

25.

Quiñones

Ridgway

(2018). Collaborative forum: An affective space for infant–toddler educators’ collective reflections. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(3), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.23965/ajec.43.3.03.

26.

Recchia

S. L.

Shin

(2010). ‘Baby teachers’: How pre‐service early childhood students transform their conceptions of teaching and learning through an infant practicum. Early Years, 30(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575141003648357.

27.

Rockel

(2009). A pedagogy of care: Moving beyond the margins of managing work and minding babies. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(3), 1-8.

28.

Sahin

Sen

Dincer

(2019). Early childhood preservice teachers' experiences with reflective journal writing. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research(84), 93.

29.

Salamon

(2011). How the early years learning framework can help shift pervasive beliefs of the social and emotional capabilities of infants and toddlers. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.1.4.

30.

Shin

(2014). Enacting caring pedagogy in the infant classroom. Early Child Development and Care, 185(3), 496-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.940929.

31.

Taggart

(2014). Compassionate pedagogy: The ethics of care in early childhood professionalism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2014.970847.

32.

United Nations . (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html.

33.

Weiss

(2018). Reflections on childhood in the history of feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 979-1004. https://doi.org/10.1086/696629.

34.

Whitington

(2014). Agency in the early years. Early Childhood Australia: Everyday Learning Series, 12(1), 79.