Matching ICD-9-CM Codes to Clinical Indicators — Is it the Way to Go?

Abstract

In early 1997, the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) Care Evaluation Program (CEP) collaborated with the National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH) to determine the feasibility of matching ICD-9-CM codes with a selected number of clinical indicators developed by CEP. While the results of this activity were encouraging, CEP is hesitant in advocating the use of ICD-9-CM as the complete answer to the data collection ‘burden’ experienced by health care organisations collecting clinical indicator data.¹ CEP is concerned that obtaining clinical indicator data through ICD-9-CM coding alone may limit clinician participation in quality activities, narrow the focus of performance monitoring to one department, potentially compromise the intent of the indicators, and encourage a culture of ‘near enough is good enough’. This paper examines the limitations of ICD-9-CM coding as the sole means of extracting clinical indicator data.