The following paper examines how the philosophy of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) can be used to improve the quality of clinical documentation and coding. The philosophical basis of CQI and its application in the healthcare environment is outlined. Health information managers need to explore inventive ways of solving the problem of inadequate clinical documentation and high coding error rates, particularly in light of the current casemix-based funding environment.
Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (1993). The ACHS accreditation guide: Standards for Australian health care facilities (12th Ed.). Sydney: ACHS.
2.
CallenJ.RobertsonL.PhillipsJ. (1992). Quality and timeliness of clinical documentation: An analysis of one strategy trialed at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney. Proceedings of the 4th National Casemix Conference. Queensland: The Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services.
3.
CassidyB.S. (1991). Total quality management: An implementation strategy for excellence in the MRD. Topics in Health Records Management, 11(3), 44–57.
4.
ChisholmK.ChuY.C.SzetoK.FungH. (1994). Data quality: Monitoring the accuracy of clinical information. Journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia, 24 (4), 135–136.
5.
CopleyA. (1993). Using CQI teams to solve a filing problem. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Quality Assurance in Healthcare. Adelaide: The Australasian Association for Quality Assurance in Healthcare.
6.
CrowleyS.BaldingB. (1992). Quality assurance (and clinical indicators): Can they pay for themselves in an output-based funding environment?Proceedings of the 4th National Casemix Conference. Queensland: The Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (1993). Recoding study of hospital records 1993/94.Victoria: Department of Health and Community Services.
7.
DemingW.E. (1992). Out of the crisis.Sydney: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DonabedianA. (1989). Institutional and professional responsibilities in quality assurance. Quality Assurance in Health Care, 1 (1), 3–11.
9.
DonoghueM. (1992). The prevalence and cost of documentation and coding errors. Australian Medical Record Journal, 22(3), 91–97.
10.
EagarK.InnesK. (1992). Report of the national patient abstracting and coding project. Creating a common language: The production and use of patient data in Australia. (1)Commonwealth Department of Health Housing and Community Services.
11.
EntwistleR.AtkinsonJ.DeaneJ. (1992). Better methods for a familiar problem. Proceedings of the 4th National Casemix Conference. Queensland: The Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services.
12.
FirouzanP.A. (1995). Can clerks using coding systems code as accurately as trained medical record specialists?Journal of American Health Information Management Association, 66 (5), 65–67.
13.
GitlowH.GitlowS.OppenheimA.OppenheimR. (1989). Tools and methods for the improvement of quality.New York: Richard D Irwin Inc.
14.
HardesG.GibberdR.W. (1992). Improving quality to reduce costs. Proceedings of the 4th National Casemix Conference. Queensland: The Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services.
15.
Health and Community Services (1993). Victoria's health reforms the first step: Casemix funding for public hospitals. Discussion Paper.
16.
HolmesL. (1995). The Australian coder workforce. Proceedings of the Seventh Casemix Conference. Adelaide: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health.
17.
HydeL.A. (1992). Developing a quality management program for coded data. Journal of American Health Information Management Association, 63 (1), 50–52.
18.
ImaiM. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan's competitive success.New York: Random House.
19.
IshikawaK. (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
20.
JonesL.M. (1993). The quality of clinical documentation and subsequent effect on DRG assignment.Sydney: Casemix Development Program, Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing, and Community Services.
21.
JuranJ.M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality: An executive handbook.New York: The Free Press.
22.
LaingJ.M. (1992). Continuous quality improvement of coded data: A data quality study for category 650. Journal of American Health Information Management Association, 63 (1), 54–56.
23.
National Health Data Committee (1995). National health data dictionary. Version 4.0.Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
24.
New South Wales Department of Health (1991). An investigation of the quality of documentation and abstraction from patient records in five NSW hospitals.Information Centre NSW Heath Department.
25.
New South Wales Department of Health (1994). The first New South Wales health outcomes conference. Health Outcomes Newsletter, 2, 1–2.
26.
ReidB.A. (1991). The effects of coding on the allocation of DRGs. Australian Studies in Health Services Administration. No. 70, University of New South Wales.
27.
ServaisC. (1992). Computer assisted coding quality management. Journal of American Health Information Management Association, 63(1), 42–49.
28.
TurnerR.WhittenB. (1992). The application of continuous quality improvement tools in reducing the length of stay for hip replacement patients: A base hospital's experience. Australian Clinical Review, 12, 63–70.
29.
Van GemertL. (1992). Clinical data quality: The SA Health Commission's pro-active strategy. Proceedings of the 4th National Casemix Conference. Queensland: The Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services.
30.
WatsonP.J.GoughT.L. (1991). The status of ICD 9 CM coding in NSW and ACT hospitals. Volume 1. Report.School of Health Information Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney.
31.
WestbrookJ.I.GoodwinM.B. (1990). The use of diagnosis-related groups to highlight quality of care issues. Australia Clinical Review, 10, 103–109.
32.
WilsonL.L. (1993). Quality management, the blind man and the elephant. Australian Medical Record Journal, 23(1), 12–13.
