Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Intra- and extracranial tandem occlusions (TOCs) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) are defined by the coexistence of an intracranial anterior or posterior circulation large vessel occlusion together with an ipsilateral extracranial occlusion or significant stenosis in the corresponding proximal vascular axis. They represent a distinct subgroup of AIS requiring tailored diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and are commonly divided into anterior (ATOCs) and posterior (PTOCs) forms. This narrative review synthesises the current evidence base regarding diagnosis, management (medical and interventional) and prognosis of TOCs. ATOCs account for around 20% of anterior circulation large-vessel occlusions, while PTOCs appear proportionally more frequent in posterior circulation stroke. Atherosclerosis is the predominant mechanism (around 70%), followed by arterial dissection (around 20%–25%), with cardioembolism and rarer causes playing a smaller role. Diagnosis can be challenging, particularly due to pitfalls such as carotid pseudo-occlusion. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the cornerstone of treatment for TOCs. In ATOCs, emerging evidence suggests that emergent carotid artery stenting improves outcomes in selected patients, with large observational cohorts such as CERES-TANDEM reporting higher functional independence without increased bleeding risk. In PTOCs, EVT is feasible and technically effective, but evidence remains limited. Vertebral stenting may be beneficial in selected cases, though morbidity and mortality remain high. Periprocedural antithrombotic therapy varies widely between centres, and high-quality data are lacking. Bridging therapy with intravenous thrombolysis appears safe and should be performed in eligible patients with tandem lesions. Prognosis has improved substantially for patients with ATOCs in the EVT era, whereas outcomes in PTOCs are less well defined. Continued efforts to generate higher-quality evidence, particularly for PTOCs, will be essential to guide treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

carotid artery diseases cerebral revascularisation ischaemic stroke stents thrombectomy thrombolytic therapy vertebrobasilar insufficiency

Introduction

The first reports describing emergent interventions for acute carotid artery occlusions appeared in the 1980s.⁴ In 1996, Nesbit et al.⁵ published the first case series of patients who underwent intracranial intra-arterial thrombolysis delivered through an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA). Following the widespread adoption of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) as the cornerstone of AIS, early observational studies highlighted the challenges of achieving successful recanalisation in ATOCs and pointed to the frequently unfavourable long-term outcomes in this subgroup of patients.^1,6 The paradigm shift introduced by mechanical thrombectomy, demonstrated by pivotal randomised controlled trials (RCTs), led to the gradual inclusion of ATOCs in pooled analyses.⁷ These confirmed that acute-phase reperfusion therapies are both safe and effective in this setting. Currently, the main area of clinical uncertainty concerns the role of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) in patients with ATOCs, particularly regarding its safety and efficacy. Closely linked to this issue is the unresolved question of optimal antithrombotic therapy, its type, timing and intensity, especially in patients requiring eCAS and in those with comorbidities necessitating anticoagulation (e.g. atrial fibrillation).

PTOCs have followed a markedly slower trajectory compared with their anterior counterparts. Although the first epidemiological and anatomical descriptions of PTOCs were published as early as 1961,⁸ systematic clinical and therapeutic studies only began to emerge after 2014, following advances in endovascular therapy for large-vessel occlusion stroke, with the first comparative studies assessing endovascular approaches for vertebral artery (VA) occlusion in the setting of basilar artery (BA) thrombosis.^8–10 The clear epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic differences between anterior and posterior TOCs suggest that they should be regarded as distinct clinical entities.

In this review, we provide an overview of TOCs across epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic domains, highlighting the unresolved questions that impact decision-making in acute stroke care.

Epidemiology of TOCs

Anterior tandem occlusions

Epidemiological studies published after 2010 consistently report that ATOCs account for roughly 13%–16% of patients with AIS undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, although some multicentre series have reported rates approaching 20%.^11–14 Beyond prevalence, these studies highlight distinct clinical characteristics in patients with ATOCs, including younger age, male predominance, higher rates of smoking, lower rates of atrial fibrillation and heart failure and longer onset-to-recanalisation times.

It is important to note that definitions of ATOCs vary across studies, particularly regarding the degree of ICA stenosis required for classification. In some series, no formal threshold is provided, while in others, the minimum degree of stenosis and the indication for endovascular intervention range between 70% and 90%, according to NASCET, ECST or ACAS criteria.^15–17 These discrepancies directly affect the size of the ATOC subgroup and may influence both reported prevalence and outcome rates.

Posterior tandem occlusions

Although PTOCs have been classically underreported, recent epidemiological studies suggest that they may be more prevalent within posterior circulation AIS than the rates typically observed for ATOCs. In a cohort of 224 patients with acute BA occlusion,¹⁸ the prevalence of PTOCs was 24.6%, with no significant differences in recanalisation rates, procedure times or clinical outcomes.¹⁸ However, concerns were raised regarding the risk of early BA reocclusion when the respective VA lesion was not treated. More recently, a considerably larger joint retrospective analysis of the BASILAR and PERSIST registries¹⁹ reported a 19.9% prevalence of PTOCs.¹⁹ Patients with TOC who underwent stenting were found to be younger and to have a higher proportion of atherosclerotic and unknown aetiologies, while no other major baseline differences were observed.¹⁹ A meta-analysis published in 2022^19,20 pooling 405 patients with posterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT; 81 PTOCs) found no differences between the subgroups (PTOC vs isolated vertebrobasilar occlusion) regarding clinical outcomes.²⁰

Overall, most available studies are limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous methods, leaving important uncertainties regarding the epidemiology and management of PTOCs.

Table 1 summarises key studies on large stroke populations, including anterior (ATOCs) and posterior tandem occlusions (PTOCs), highlighting their epidemiological characteristics.

Table 1.

Frequency of anterior and posterior tandem occlusions across major clinical studies.

Study	Study design	Country(ies)	Population type	Population size (n)	ATOC or PTOC evaluated	Frequency, n (%)
German Stroke Registry – Endovascular Treatment^11,a	Prospective, multicentric, national observational registry study enrolling consecutive patients	Germany	Anterior and posterior circulation AIS due to LVO undergoing EVT	6635	ATOC	874 (13.2%)
Grigoryan et al.^21,a	Retrospective review of prospectively collected thrombectomy databases across 3 centres enrolling consecutive patients	USA	Anterior and posterior circulation AIS undergoing EVT	952	ATOC	100 (10.5%)
Sørensen et al.²²	Retrospective review from a prospectively maintained unicentric database enrolling consecutive patients	Denmark	AIS due to LVO undergoing EVT	879	ATOC	167 (19.0%)
Oslo Stroke Reperfusion Study (OSCAR) – Review¹³	Retrospective, unicentric review enrolling consecutive patients	Norway	Anterior circulation AIS due to MeVO or LVO undergoing EVT	662	ATOC	90 (13.6%)
Eker et al.¹⁴	Retrospective review from two prospectively maintained unicentric databases enrolling consecutive patients	Switzerland, France	Anterior circulation AIS due to LVO undergoing EVT	577	ATOC	121 (21.0%)
Nolan et al.¹²	Retrospective review from a prospectively maintained unicentric database enrolling consecutive patients	USA	Anterior circulation AIS due to LVO undergoing EVT	381	ATOC	62 (16.2%)
Review of the BASILAR and PERSIST registries¹⁹	BASILAR: Observational prospective multicentric national study enrolling consecutive patients PERSIST: Observational retrospective multicentric national study enrolling consecutive patients	China	Posterior circulation AIS due to LVO undergoing EVT	1320	PTOC	263 (19.9%)
Mahmoud et al.²⁰	Meta-analysis including seven studies with heterogeneity assessment	Korea, China, Israel, Switzerland, France, Egypt	AIS due to VBO (isolated vs tandem) undergoing EVT	405	PTOC	81 (20.0%)
Baik et al.¹⁸	Retrospective review from two prospectively maintained unicentric databases enrolling consecutive patients	Korea	AIS due to BAO undergoing EVT	224	PTOC	55 (24.6%)

In both the German Stroke Registry and the study by Grigoryan et al., patients with anterior and posterior circulation AIS were included; the proportion of non-tandem anterior circulation cases was not detailed.

AIS, acute ischaemic stroke; ATOC, anterior tandem occlusions; BAO, basilar artery occlusion; EVT, endovascular treatment; LVO, large-vessel occlusion; MeVO, medium-vessel occlusion; PTOC, posterior tandem occlusions; VBO, vertebrobasilar occlusion.

Pathophysiology of TOCs

Most TOCs, both anterior and posterior, originate from proximal vessel pathology. The two most frequent mechanisms are progressive stenosis due to large-vessel atherosclerotic disease and sudden stenosis/occlusion due to arterial dissection. Other causes, although considerably less common, include cardioembolic sources, patent foramen ovale and carotid webs.²³

Anterior tandem occlusions

Evidence from large multicentre registries, particularly the TITAN study (2017) suggests that atherosclerotic lesions account for approximately 60%–70% of ATOCs, followed by arterial dissections in 20%–30%.²⁴ A subsequent large retrospective study²⁵ of 482 patients with ATOCs treated with EVT under different medical regimens (2018) reported a similar distribution, although with a slightly higher proportion of cardioembolic aetiologies (10%; Figure 1(a)–(c)).²⁵

Figure 1.

Tandem occlusions: types and main aetiologies. (a) CT scan showing anterior circulation tandem occlusion. (a1) CT angiography showing occlusion of the left ICA at its origin (red arrow), with calcifications signalling a possible atherosclerotic plaque. (a2) Tandem intracranial M1 occlusion (red arrow). (b) Tandem occlusion of the posterior circulation. (b1, b2) Retrograde filling of the distal BA occurs through the posterior communicating arteries; proximal V4 dissection with a visible false lumen (b1, red arrow), caused vertebral occlusion and was likely the source of the distally migrated thrombus; absence of flow in the BA on TOF MRA (b2, red arrow). (a) Atherosclerosis represents the main aetiology in both anterior and posterior tandem occlusions. (b) Dissection is the second most common cause. (c) Cardioembolism is the third cause of tandem occlusions.

Patients with atherosclerosis are typically older, more often male and have a higher burden of vascular risk factors; they also tend to present with more robust collateral circulation. The male predominance in ATOCs may partly reflect the overall higher prevalence of atherosclerosis in men. In contrast, arterial dissections are more common in younger patients with fewer vascular risk factors, frequently triggered by cervical or head trauma and are also associated with more competent circles of Willis (Figure 2).^23,26 Importantly, dissections often have a relatively favourable natural course, with spontaneous healing of the vessel wall in up to 70% of cases, usually within the first 9 months.²⁷

Figure 2.

Tandem occlusion after carotid dissection. Forty-three years-old, male, with a carotid occlusion and a tandem M2 occlusion; approached by anterograde endovascular technique. (a) Initial run shows the characteristic sharp occlusion of the ICA (white arrows). (b) After crossing the occlusion with a microcatheter, the dissection flap and the true and false lumina are clearly visible. (c) Once careful catheterisation of the true lumen is performed, a stent was deployed with successful recanalisation of the cervical carotid. (d) Allowing the progression of an aspiration catheter up to the M2 segment, with a complete intracranial recanalisation.

The nature of the proximal lesion is also relevant for EVT outcomes. Occlusive atherosclerotic lesions present greater technical challenges than dissections, owing to thicker and less compliant vessel walls. Moreover, EVT for complete occlusions differs technically from procedures in severe stenosis, as the distal lumen cannot be visualised or filled with contrast, requiring a ‘blind’ approach.²⁶ Despite these challenges, current evidence suggests that EVT may provide greater benefit in atherosclerotic lesions than in dissections, largely due to the high risk of recurrent embolisation from unstable atherosclerotic plaques.² A rare additional mechanism is carotid stump syndrome, in which a chronically occluded ICA becomes a source of recurrent embolisation, typically microemboli, but occasionally macroemboli in settings of turbulent flow, leading to repeated cerebral or retinal ischaemic events.²⁸ This has been more often reported in Asian populations where atherosclerotic disease is particularly prevalent.²⁸

Posterior tandem occlusions

In PTOCs, proximal VA atherosclerosis, especially at the ostium, represents a common aetiology, with unstable plaques acting as a source of embolisation to the distal intracranial VA or the BA.^10,29 Individual patient data pooled from the BASILAR and PERSIST registries¹⁹ has confirmed this predominance, reporting that about 75% of PTOCs are related to extracranial VA atherosclerosis, followed by cardioembolic sources (11%) and less common causes such as dissection (Figure 1(a)–(c)).¹⁹

Although rare, vertebral artery dissection has been described as a mechanism of PTOC. In these cases, AIS may result from distal embolisation of thrombus arising from the dissected artery, from complete local vessel occlusion with collapse of the vertebrobasilar system or from a combination of the two processes (TOC).³⁰

Another recognised mechanism is vertebral stump syndrome, a posterior counterpart to the carotid stump phenomenon, in which a chronically occluded vertebral artery continues to produce recurrent embolisation into the vertebrobasilar system. This is thought to occur when fragments of thrombus detach under turbulent haemodynamic conditions created by cervical collateral flow.^31,32

The intrinsically lower collateral capacity and reduced vasomotor reactivity of the posterior circulation have been emphasised as additional factors that may predispose PTOCs to more severe ischaemic injury compared with their anterior counterparts.³³

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of TOCs relies on the integration of clinical and radiological findings, as in any case of AIS.

Clinically, patients with ATOCs or PTOCs present in a manner similar to those with isolated anterior or posterior circulation large vessel occlusions. However, the characteristic ‘double hit’ phenomenon of TOC compromises haemodynamic adaptation, increasing tissue vulnerability and often resulting in a more severe clinical presentation.²²

In practice, the diagnostic pathway for suspected TOCs follows the standard protocol for suspected acute ischaemic stroke: non-contrast CT to rule out haemorrhage, followed by CT angiography (CTA) of the head and neck to identify vessel occlusions and guide further management.³⁴ Multiphase CTA has been shown to provide a higher diagnostic yield than single-phase CTA, as it allows estimation of thrombus length and improves sensitivity for both intra- and extracranial thrombi.³⁵ Brain MR combined with MR angiography is an alternative first-line approach, particularly in centres where MR is routinely available or in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast administration.³⁴

In PTOCs, CTA or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) provides the additional advantage of characterising the vertebral arterial axis. Identification of vertebral dominance is crucial to plan endovascular intervention, as TOCs typically arise from thrombosis of the dominant vertebral artery.²⁹ Vertebral dominance also influences BA configuration, which often bends contralaterally, creating a straighter path between the dominant vertebral artery and the basilar trunk.³⁶

TOCs caused by cervical artery dissection can be diagnostically challenging. Clinical suspicion is higher in younger patients, especially when there is a history of recent infection, cervical trauma or manipulation, connective tissue disease or associated cervical pain and headache.³⁷ In this setting, brain MR with a 3D T1-weighted black-blood sequence can help distinguish intramural haematomas from intraluminal occlusions.³⁸ CTA or MRA may show the typical ‘flame-shaped’ lumen and crescent-shaped intramural thrombus, while non-contrast CT can reveal watershed infarctions in patients with severe ICA stenosis or occlusion.²³

Beyond confirming vessel occlusion, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) provides valuable prognostic information in TOCs, particularly through reliable assessment of collateral circulation and venous drainage. It is also useful when CTA or MRA findings are atypical or inconclusive.³⁹

Certain pitfalls require special attention. One important diagnostic challenge is the phenomenon of carotid pseudo-occlusion, which refers to the apparent occlusion of the cervical ICA on CT angiography or DSA, caused by a stagnant column of unopacified blood proximal to a terminal (carotid-T) occlusion. This finding may mimic a true TOC, although the cervical ICA is in fact patent (Figure 3).⁴⁰ The flame or beak sign, characterised by a post-bulbar flame-shaped tapering of contrast filling in the cervical ICA, is often interpreted as indicating pseudo-occlusion; however, its accuracy remains uncertain, as it may also occur in true cervical ICA occlusions. Absence of ophthalmic artery opacification when the ipsilateral common carotid artery is injected during DSA has been identified as a possible indirect sign of intracranial ICA occlusion, suggesting cervical pseudo-occlusion.^41,42 Diagnostic accuracy can be improved by combining imaging techniques such as carotid or vertebral ultrasound with delayed CTA or MRA.^23,43 Multiphase CTA, with its delayed phase, can further aid in distinguishing extracranial ICA true occlusions from pseudo-occlusions.³⁵

Figure 3.

Pseudo-occlusion of the ICA. (a–c) CT and CT angiography demonstrating left ICA occlusion mimicking tandem occlusion (red arrows). (a) Axial CT showing intracranial ICA terminus occlusion. (b, c) Axial and sagittal views showing apparent cervical ICA occlusion. (d) DSA of the same patient (red arrow) reveals delayed filling of the cervical ICA, confirming pseudo-occlusion rather than true tandem occlusion.

Treatment strategies in ATOCs

The management of ATOCs remains challenging, with several aspects still unresolved despite their inclusion in major registries and RCTs. Key issues include the optimal sequence of treating the extracranial and intracranial lesions, the safety of emergent carotid stenting, the role of IVT and the appropriate antithrombotic regimen. High-quality data are also scarce regarding the best treatment options in patients with large ischaemic cores and minor clinical presentations.

Endovascular strategies

One of the central technical questions in EVT for ATOCs is whether to treat the intracranial or extracranial lesion first. In the TITAN registry, the retrograde (‘head-first’) approach (Figure 4, (1)), addressing the intracranial occlusion first, has been associated with faster groin-to-reperfusion times, an independent predictor of good outcome, without differences in reperfusion success or complications, when compared to the anterograde (‘neck-first’) approach (Figure 4, (2)).^44,45 A meta-analysis including over 1500 patients also favoured the retrograde strategy, reporting higher rates of successful reperfusion and better functional independence at 90 days, with similar safety outcomes.⁴⁶ More recently, a simultaneous approach has been described, combining stent retriever deployment with angioplasty in a monorail fashion, potentially reducing procedure time but remaining highly operator-dependent and in need of validation in larger prospective studies.⁴⁷

Figure 4.

Tandem occlusions: endovascular techniques approach. (1) Retrograde endovascular technique (1a-1c) – Guide catheter was advanced across the carotid occlusion (1d), and a triaxial system was used to aspirate the M1 clot (1e). A carotid stent was then advanced inside the guide catheter, and the guide catheter was retrieved, leaving the stent in place for deployment (1f). Final run (1g) showing complete recanalisation of the MCA, and of the cervical ICA. There was residual spasm of the distal cervical ICA, which was reverted with 5 mg IA verapamil. (2) Anterograde endovascular technique (2a-2c) – a pre-occlusive carotid stenosis (2d), with a tandem distal M1 occlusion (2e). The stenosis was severe and could not be crossed with the triaxial thrombectomy system. Therefore, a proximal approach was chosen, with a primary carotid angioplasty and stenting (2f), followed by distal aspiration of the M1 thrombus (2g), with TICI 3 recanalisation.

Another important question is whether to immediately treat the proximal ICA lesion or defer its management. Data from the STRATIS registry⁴⁸ has shown that in practice, treatment of the cervical ICA lesion is frequently postponed.⁴⁸ The decision to defer treatment is often driven by concerns about increased haemorrhagic risk, both from sudden hyperperfusion after recanalisation and the need for intensified antithrombotic therapy, as well as the risks of acute in-stent thrombosis and acute micro- and macroembolisation due to stent manipulation at the lesion site.^49,50 On the other hand, immediate treatment may help eliminate the embolic source and restore cerebral perfusion.²⁶ The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis recommend performing carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis of 70%–99% within the first 2 weeks post-index event, while carotid artery stenting should be considered in young populations (<70 years old) with carotid stenosis of 50%–99%. These recommendations, however, derive from studies focused on atherosclerotic carotid disease and are not directly applicable to TOCs.^26,51

In ATOCs, some authors posit that carotid angioplasty alone can be sufficient in selected groups to reach the intracranial occlusion, making it possible to delay the carotid stenting.⁵² Theoretically, angioplasty alone would bypass the risks of acute antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients submitted to thrombolysis or with large core strokes. However, a 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis addressing this particular question revealed higher odds of good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) in acute carotid stenting and in the retrograde approach groups; no differences were found regarding mortality, ICH or thrombolysis status; therefore, favouring acute carotid stenting over balloon angioplasty alone in patients with ATOCs.⁵³

An individual participant data meta-analysis from the IRIS collaboration, including 340 ATOC patients from a cohort of 2267 patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion, found that acute ICA stenting was associated with improved 90-day outcomes (adjusted common odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–2.47), independent of prior IVT administration as bridging therapy. Although patients undergoing acute stenting had numerically higher rates of any ICH (44% vs 35%) and symptomatic ICH (6.3% vs 3.7%), these differences were not statistically significant.⁵⁴

Recently, the results of CERES-TANDEM, a large international multicentric retrospective cohort of patients with ATOCs, were presented at the ESO Conference.⁵⁵ This international retrospective study included 4053 patients, of whom 2522 underwent eCAS and 1531 were treated with direct EVT without stenting. In adjusted analyses, eCAS was associated with significantly better outcomes, including an improved shift in the mRS distribution at 90 days (common OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17–1.47), higher rates of functional independence (47% vs 35%) and greater successful recanalisation (91% vs 76%). Importantly, these benefits were not accompanied by an excess risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH; 11% vs 9%), although asymptomatic ICH was slightly more frequent in the stenting group. Early neurological deterioration was also less common with eCAS (19% vs 22%). Together, these results provide the strongest real-world evidence to date supporting eCAS in the management of ATOCs. However, as CERES-TANDEM was observational, confirmation from prospective randomised trials remains essential. The ongoing START (NCT05902000, completion expected in 2025) and PICASSO (NCT05611242) trials will provide critical insights into the role of eCAS in this population.

Regarding the endovascular management of ATOCs with underlying carotid artery dissection, a STOP-CAD substudy of 328 patients found that eCAS was associated with higher odds of successful intracranial reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) but similar rates of 90-day functional independence and sICH compared with EVT without eCAS. Recurrence rates were low in both our study groups. These findings are consistent with a 2020 pooled analysis from the TITAN and ETIS registries.^56,57 However, causation cannot be established, as patients achieving favourable intracranial reperfusion may be more likely to undergo stenting. Importantly, angioplasty and stenting of complete occlusive ICA dissections present multiple technical challenges and risks. Catheter advancement through a complete occlusion is technically demanding and risks false lumen passage, potentially extending the dissection. Thrombus within the false lumen may embolise, causing additional cerebral ischaemia. Furthermore, a long dissection may complicate stent placement. Finally, sudden reperfusion, especially in poorly collateralised territories, may precipitate ICH.^58,59

Embolic protection devices may be used during eCAS to prevent distal embolisation with both anterograde and retrograde techniques. These devices are routinely employed in elective carotid revascularisation for symptomatic and asymptomatic disease; however, evidence supporting their use in acute settings remains limited, particularly when urgent intracranial reperfusion is required.^60–63

Table 2 summarises international recommendations on acute management of TOCs. The 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines recommend performing eCAS after EVT in selected cases, including poor antegrade ICA flow, inadequate collateral circulation or small infarct core with low bleeding risk, while deferral is suggested when intracranial reperfusion is incomplete, collateral compensation is adequate or when infarct volume or bleeding risk are high.⁶⁴

Table 2.

Recommendations on the management of tandem occlusions in major stroke guidelines.

Guideline/Society	Year	Wording/recommendation	Class/strength
AHA/ASA (US) – AIS Guidelines³⁴	2019 (update)	Treatment of tandem occlusions (both extracranial and intracranial) when performing mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable.	Class IIb, Level B-R
Australia & New Zealand Living Stroke Guidelines⁶⁵	2023–2024	Strong recommendation for EVT in anterior circulation LVO including tandem cervical ICA + intracranial occlusion, within 24 h from onset if eligible by imaging/clinical criteria.	Strong (GRADE category)
ESVS – management of atherosclerotic carotid or vertebral artery disease⁶⁴	2023	In patients undergoing EVT for intracranial LVO with concomitant 50%-99% cervical carotid stenosis (tandem lesion), carotid revascularisation (CAS/CEA) may be considered peri-procedurally.	New Class IIb, Level C recommendations (Consensus statement)
SNIS – Thrombectomy in emergent LVO⁶⁶	2019	EVT is indicated for ICA occlusions including tandem lesions; tandem occlusion is not a contraindication.	Class I, Level A
ESO–ESMINT – Thrombectomy in AIS⁶⁷	2019	Studies had important limitations; results seem comparable to isolated intracranial occlusions. ‘9/11 experts suggest that (…) patients with high-grade grade stenosis or occlusion may be treated with intraprocedural stenting if unavoidably needed.	Expert opinion
SNIS – Antithrombotic Therapy in Neurointerventional Procedures⁶⁸	2023	In patients undergoing CAS during emergent LVO AIS treatment, it may be reasonable to administer a loading dose of intravenous or oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa or P2Y12 inhibitor followed by maintenance intravenous infusion or oral dosing to prevent stent thrombosis whether or not the patient has received thrombolytic therapy.	Class IIb, Level C-LD

Class I: Strong evidence; Class IIb: Weak evidence. Level A: High-quality evidence from more than one RCT or meta-analyses of high-quality RCTs or one or more RCTs corroborated by high-quality registry studies; Level B-R: Moderate-quality evidence based on at least one RCT or meta-analyses comprising moderate-quality RCTs; Level C-LD: Observational or registry studies (randomised or not) with design or execution limitations or meta-analyses of such studies OR physiological or mechanistic studies in human subjects.

AHA/ASA, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association; AIS, acute ischaemic stroke; ATOC, anterior circulation tandem occlusions; CAS, carotid artery stenting; CEA, carotid artery endarterectomy; ESMINT, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy; ESO, European Stroke Organisation; ESVS, European Society for Vascular Surgery; EVT, endovascular treatment; ICA, internal carotid artery; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; LVO, large vessel occlusion; SNIS, Society of Neurointerventional Surgery.

Bridging therapy

While initially debated, current evidence indicates that IVT prior to EVT can be safely administered in patients with ATOCs when indicated. In addition to the findings on acute stenting described earlier,⁵³ the IRIS collaboration evaluated bridging therapy with IVT in TOCs.^71,72 The observed treatment effect with IVT plus EVT versus EVT alone corresponded to a −2.0% (95% CI −10.5 to 6.5) lower absolute risk of functional independence (mRS 0–2) in patients with tandem lesions, with no heterogeneity of treatment effect between patients with and without tandem lesions. Rates of intracranial haemorrhage and symptomatic haemorrhage were comparable between treatment groups. The safety profile is consistent with a prior meta-analysis of 15 observational studies (n = 1857), which similarly reported comparable safety with bridging therapy versus EVT alone.⁷³ Taken together, these findings suggest that the presence of tandem lesions does not modify the efficacy or safety of IVT, which should not be withheld solely on this basis.

Recent studies have also explored the use of tenecteplase (TNK) as the thrombolytic agent in bridging therapy in TOCs. TNK appears to be both safe and effective compared with alteplase. A post hoc analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK study found similar reperfusion rates, clinical outcomes and intracranial haemorrhage rates between TNK and alteplase in patients with TOC.⁷⁴ Registry data from ETIS and TETRIS in patients with ATOC further suggested higher recanalisation rates (OR 4.21; 95% CI 2.69–6.61) and lower mortality (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40–0.87) with TNK in comparison to alteplase, and while the rate of any ICH was higher in the tenecteplase group, no differences were found in sICH or parenchymal haematoma rates.⁷⁵ A substudy from the AcT trial including 128 patients with ATOC reported a higher proportion of favourable outcomes (46.0% vs 32.6%, adjusted OR 3.21; 95% CI 1.06–9.71) with TNK versus alteplase, with no difference in mortality, reperfusion success or safety outcomes.⁷⁶

Antithrombotic therapy

Periprocedural antithrombotic therapy is a critical component of TOC management, particularly when eCAS is performed. However, practice varies considerably across centres in both agent selection and timing of administration, reflecting the absence of standardised protocols. Table 3 summarises the antithrombotic regimens employed in major studies of acute extracranial stenting for TOCs.

Table 3.

Periprocedural antithrombotic regimens in clinical studies of acute extracranial stenting for tandem occlusions.

Study	Year	Target	Periprocedural AT therapy
TITAN registry⁷⁷	2019	ATOC	tPA + AP (136/246) tPA alone (11/246) No tPA or AP (99/246) Unfractionated heparin (not quantified)
ETIS and TETRIS pooled analysis^75,a	2024	ATOC	Alteplase (n = 629) or tenecteplase ( n = 124) Aspirin (n = 179) GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 22) Clopidogrel (n = 2) Cangrelor (n = 26) Heparin (n = 38)
STRATIS (Tandem Lesions)⁷⁸	2019	ATOC	No information
Farooqui et al.⁷⁹	2023	ATOC	Single AP therapy (73/363) Dual AP therapy (145/363) Intravenous AP therapy (139/363) No therapy (6/363)
Rodriguez-Calienes et al.³	2023	ATOC	Cangrelor (30/195) Aspirin + Clopidogrel (154/195) Aspirin + Ticagrelor (11/195)
BASILAR and PERSIST pooled analysis¹⁹	2025	PTOC	Intravenous continuous tirofiban infusion

In the ETIS and TETRIS pooled analysis, 256 of 753 patients underwent emergent ICA stenting; however, the specific antithrombotic regimen used in this subgroup was not reported.

AP, antiplatelet; AT, antithrombotic therapy; ATOC, anterior circulation tandem occlusions; ICA, internal carotid artery; TITAN, Thrombectomy In TANdem occlusions; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator.

Among the most informative datasets is the TITAN registry (Thrombectomy In TANdem occlusions), an international multicentre collaboration that collected real-world data between 2012 and 2016. A 2019 analysis of 295 patients with ATOCs suggested that EVT combined with eCAS and periprocedural APT achieved higher rates of successful reperfusion and favourable outcomes, without a major excess in bleeding risk.⁷⁷ Even in patients also treated with bridging IVT, safety remained acceptable: the rate of sICH in the ‘quadruple therapy’ group (EVT + eCAS + IVT + APT) was 2.4%. In comparison, the HERMES collaboration, which pooled individual patient data from five landmark randomised thrombectomy trials in AIS, reported sICH rates just above 4% in patients with large-vessel occlusion treated with EVT.⁷ Building on these findings, the ongoing TITAN trial, launched in 2020, is designed to establish whether EVT with eCAS and APT provides superior outcomes to EVT alone. Results are expected in 2026 and are anticipated to provide more definitive guidance on this issue.⁸⁰

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are also often considered in the periprocedural setting.⁸¹ Abciximab has consistently been associated with higher rates of sICH and mortality, particularly in older patients, and its use has therefore declined.^49,82 By contrast, tirofiban appears to have a more favourable safety profile: in a 62-patient cohort, isolated tirofiban use was associated with lower mortality and better recanalisation rates compared with dual APT (DAPT), although functional outcomes were similar.⁸³ Eptifibatide has also shown promise, with early studies suggesting acceptable safety even after IVT, and later analyses indicating possible improvements in clinical outcomes IVT.^84–86 Intravenous cangrelor, a fast-acting reversible P2Y12 inhibitor, has more recently been reported as a feasible periprocedural option with a reassuring safety profile, though evidence remains limited to retrospective series.^3,87

After stenting, most centres initiate DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel once a control CT has excluded early haemorrhage.^21,77,81 The optimal duration remains uncertain. A recently published multicentre study including 223 patients with ATOCs from 12 German centres examined the safety and efficacy of different regimens.⁸⁸ The study confirmed that antithrombotic regimens differed in timing (preprocedural; periprocedural; postprocedural after day 1 or day 2; after discharge), type of medication (intravenous tirofiban; heparin; single APT usually with aspirin or clopidogrel; DAPT with aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, such as clopidogrel or ticagrelor). Their findings suggested that DAPT, initiated from day 1 and maintained to day 90, was associated with reduced risk of stent occlusion and sICH as well as better functional outcomes. In contrast, single APT or periprocedural regimens alone were not associated with significant benefit. A nationwide Korean cohort study including over 12,000 patients found that short-duration DAPT (90–180 days) was as safe and effective as longer regimens (>180 days).⁸⁹ The 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases recommend a minimum of 1 month of DAPT after stenting, which remains the most widely adopted approach in clinical practice.⁹⁰

For patients with non-cardioembolic ATOCs who are not stented, single APT with aspirin is standard, usually started within 24–48 h, but withheld for 24 h in those who received IVT. In minor ischaemic strokes, short-term DAPT for 21 days, followed by SAPT, is recommended.^91,92

Beyond APT, anticoagulation also has a role in selected subgroups. In carotid dissections, anticoagulants are considered reasonable, especially in high-risk patients.^34,93,94 An individual participant data meta-analysis combining data from the CADISS and TREAT-CAD trials showed a non-significant reduction in the composite primary endpoint, ischaemic stroke and major bleeding, among participants randomised to anticoagulation (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.08–1.05, p-value = 0.06). Additionally, when focusing solely on ischaemic stroke as an outcome, anticoagulation showed a significant benefit (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02–0.61, p-value = 0.01), suggesting a potential advantage of anticoagulation in the setting of stroke prevention.⁹⁵ Assuring secondary prevention measures is also key; smoking cessation and blood pressure control are recommended in all patients who have suffered strokes in the past, and high-intensity statin therapy is recommended in patients with noncardioembolic AIS, most particularly in patients with underlying carotid stenosis.^64,96 In patients with atrial fibrillation, early initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (OAC) is favoured.⁹⁷ In cases where patients require both eCAS and long-term anticoagulation, triple therapy with DAPT and OAC is discouraged given the high risk of bleeding and mortality; shorter periods of overlap may be considered but should be kept to a minimum.⁹⁸

Treatment strategies in PTOCs

Compared with ATOCs, the evidence base for the acute management of PTOCs is even more limited, with current recommendations largely derived from small cohorts and expert consensus. Most treatment strategies for PTOCs are extrapolated from anterior circulation occlusions, but the high prevalence of vertebral atherosclerosis in this setting introduces specific technical challenges for intervention.^99,100 Access to the BA can be achieved through two main routes: the ‘clean-road’ pathway via the patent vertebral artery, or the ‘dirty-road’ pathway through the occluded/stenotic vertebral artery.^99,101 The clean-road route may facilitate faster reperfusion and, by temporarily arresting flow, improve aspiration efficacy. However, it can also critically compromise blood flow to the basilar circulation, particularly during prolonged interventions, requiring general anaesthesia for these procedures.^10,102,103

Despite the theoretical advantages, the clean-road approach is not always feasible. Unilateral vertebral hypoplasia or distal aplasia are common anatomical variants, and in many cases, the dominant vertebral artery is the one affected by the proximal lesion. This often leaves the dirty-road approach as the only or most practical option. Although technically more challenging, it allows for direct treatment of the culprit vertebral lesion, typically through angioplasty or stenting, albeit requiring periprocedural APT.^10,29,101

Within the dirty-road approach, two main strategies are described, resembling those used in ATOCs. In the anterograde approach, vertebral angioplasty or stenting is performed first, followed by basilar thrombectomy.¹⁰ This sequence allows earlier stabilisation of the proximal atherosclerotic plaque, reducing the risk of further distal embolisation and improving antegrade flow to the BA. However, it typically results in longer time-to-reperfusion, which can worsen outcomes by delaying basilar recanalisation and increasing the risk of haemorrhagic transformation of posterior fossa infarcts. By contrast, the retrograde approach prioritises early basilar recanalisation, with vertebral stenting performed only afterwards. This reduces delays in restoring intracranial flow but carries the risk that subsequent stent placement may trigger distal embolisation.¹⁰¹

Evidence from cohort studies examining EVT in PTOCs remains inconsistent, with no clear superiority demonstrated for either clean-road or dirty-road strategies.^{9,10,18,29,101,103–106} Interpretation is limited by small sample sizes, anatomical bias (since the dominant vertebral artery is often the culprit and thus constrains the feasibility of clean-road access) and marked heterogeneity across studies. A 2022 meta-analysis pooling 7 studies and 405 patients reported no significant difference in safety or functional outcomes between approaches, but important limitations included lack of detail on endovascular techniques (e.g. thrombectomy device, angioplasty vs stenting) and substantial methodological variability, which restricts firm conclusions.²⁰

Evidence from randomised trials in posterior circulation stroke has historically excluded patients with isolated vertebral artery occlusion, but the recent VERITAS individual patient data meta-analysis (BEST, BASICS, ATTENTION, and BAOCHE trials) did provide a specific estimate for vertebral artery occlusions extending into the BA.¹⁰⁷ In this subgroup, which comprised 46 of 833 patients (6%), endovascular therapy was associated with a larger apparent benefit than for other occlusion sites (adjusted common OR for mRS 0–3 at 90 days: 8.25, 95% CI 1.58–42.93), although the very wide CIs underline the limited precision of this estimate. Given the small sample size these results are hypothesis-generating.

Beyond VERITAS, additional insights come from observational series. An analysis of the BASILAR and PERSIST registries including 1320 patients with posterior circulation large-vessel occlusion identified 217 (19.9%) with PTOCs.¹⁹ Among them, 84 underwent acute vertebral stenting (with periprocedural IV tirofiban) and 133 did not. Patients treated with stenting had more favourable outcomes at both 90 days and 1 year, with higher odds of functional independence and lower mortality, without an excess of sICH. These findings suggest that acute-phase vertebral stenting can be both beneficial and safe in selected PTOC patients. Importantly, this study also indicated that IVT appears to be safe when used in combination with EVT for PTOCs. Together, these data reinforce the long-standing view that PTOCs, like their anterior counterparts, derive meaningful benefit from EVT.^20,101,108

Evidence on IVT before EVT in PTOCs is very limited. The BASILAR/PERSIST registry analysis is one of the few studies to specifically report on this question. In PTOC patients, no significant differences were observed between bridging therapy and direct EVT regarding functional outcomes, complications or mortality.¹⁹ Therefore, IVT should be performed in patients with PTOCs who otherwise have no contraindications.¹⁰⁹

Periprocedural therapy in acute VA stenting is highly variable across centres but broadly mirrors anterior circulation practice. The main concern is haemorrhagic transformation, although posterior circulation infarcts appear to carry a somewhat lower bleeding risk compared to anterior ones.¹⁹ Intravenous tirofiban is among the most commonly used periprocedural antiplatelet agents. In a retrospective series of 105 patients with posterior circulation occlusion (not specific to PTOCs), tirofiban use was associated with faster reperfusion, lower mortality and lower sICH rates, although no clear differences in long-term functional outcomes were observed.¹¹⁰

Prognosis

Anterior tandem occlusions

The advent of EVT and eCAS has markedly improved outcomes for patients with ATOCs, both in terms of functional recovery and acute mortality reduction. In older IVT-only cohorts, favourable outcomes (mRS 0–2 at 90 days) were achieved in only around 20% of patients.²⁵ Contemporary data suggest that approximately 40%–45% of patients achieve functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days, with excellent outcomes (mRS 0–1) in about one quarter. In the CERES-TANDEM⁵⁵ cohort, which represents the largest dataset to date (4053 patients), overall rates of independence and excellent recovery were 42.5% and 25.7%, respectively.⁵⁵ sICH occurred in around 11% of patients, similar to what has been reported in other large EVT cohorts. These figures highlight the progress achieved with modern endovascular approaches, although outcomes remain less favourable than in non-tandem large vessel occlusions, and 90-day mortality continues to range between 15% and 25%.^2,111,112

Posterior tandem occlusions

Posterior circulation AIS has long been associated with worse outcomes and higher mortality compared with anterior circulation stroke, owing to the critical involvement of the brainstem and the limited capacity of the posterior fossa to accommodate oedema. Prognosis in PTOCs reflects both these inherent risks and the technical challenges of endovascular therapy.¹⁸ Successful recanalisation is achieved in most cases, with recent series reporting rates of around 85%–90% of cases. Despite this, favourable functional outcome at 90 days (mRS 0–2) is attained in only about 35%–40% of patients.^19,108

Anatomical factors such as vertebral artery dominance also influence outcome. Patients with stenosis or occlusion of a dominant VA generally have a poorer prognosis, whereas lesions affecting a hypoplastic or co-dominant artery are associated with milder presentations and better recovery. Bilateral VA occlusion, although less frequent, carries a poor prognosis.¹¹² Mortality remains substantial, with most contemporary studies reporting 90-day rates of 30%–40%.^19,108

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

None.

Declarations

ORCID iDs

João Duarte

Mariana B. Morais

Isabel Fragata

Diana Aguiar de Sousa

References

Rubiera

Ribo

Delgado-Mederos

, et al. Tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2006; 37: 2301–2305.

Anadani

Marnat

Consoli

, et al. Endovascular therapy of anterior circulation tandem occlusions. Stroke 2021; 52: 3097–3105.

Rodriguez-Calienes

Oliver

Hassan

, et al. Safety of intravenous cangrelor versus dual oral antiplatelet loading therapy in endovascular treatment of tandem lesions: an observational cohort study. Stroke Vasc Interven Neurol. Epub ahead of print November 2023. DOI: 10.1161/SVIN.123.001020.

Walters

Ojemann

Heros

RC.

Emergency carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 1987; 66: 817–823.

Nesbit

Clark

O’Neill

, et al. Intracranial intraarterial thrombolysis facilitated by microcatheter navigation through an occluded cervical internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1996; 84: 387–392.

Kim

Garami

Mikulik

, et al. Early recanalization rates and clinical outcomes in patients with tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion and isolated middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2005; 36: 869–871.

Goyal

Menon

van Zwam

, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–1731.

McDowell

Potes

Groch

The natural history of internal carotid and vertebral–basilar artery occlusion. Neurology 1961; 11(4 Pt 2): 153–157.

Ecker

Tsujiura

Baker

, et al. Endovascular reconstruction of vertebral artery occlusion prior to basilar thrombectomy in a series of six patients presenting with acute symptomatic basilar thrombosis. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6: 379–383.

10.

Cohen

Leker

Gomori

, et al. Emergent revascularization of acute tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions: endovascular approaches and technical considerations – confirming the role of vertebral artery ostium stenosis as a cause of vertebrobasilar stroke. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 34: 70–76.

11.

Feil

Herzberg

Dorn

, et al. Tandem lesions in anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2021; 52: 1265–1275.

12.

Nolan

Regenhardt

Koch

, et al. Treatment approaches and outcomes for acute anterior circulation stroke patients with tandem lesions. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30: 105478.

13.

Enriquez

BAB

Nome

, et al. Predictors of outcome after endovascular treatment for tandem occlusions: a single center retrospective analysis. BMC Neurol 2023; 23: 82.

14.

Eker

Bühlmann

Dargazanli

, et al. Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic tandem occlusions in anterior circulation stroke: technical aspects and complications compared to isolated intracranial occlusions. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 1046.

15.

Ferguson

Eliasziw

Barr

HWK

, et al. The North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 1751–1758.

16.

Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351: 1379–1387.

17.

Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421–1428.

18.

Baik

Jung

Kim

, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for tandem vertebrobasilar stroke. Stroke 2020; 51: 1883–1885.

19.

Doheim

Qiu

, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute posterior circulation tandem lesions: insights from the BASILAR and PERSIST registries. J Stroke 2025; 27: 75–84.

20.

Mahmoud

Zaitoun

MMA

Abdalla

MA.

Revascularization of vertebrobasilar tandem occlusions: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2022; 64: 637–645.

21.

Grigoryan

Haussen

Hassan

, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusions: large multicenter series and systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 41: 306–312.

22.

Sørensen

Leslie-Mazwi

Jensen

, et al. Endovascular therapy of tandem occlusions: baseline characteristics and outcomes compared with intracranial occlusion. Stroke Vasc Interven Neurol 2023; 3(1): e000466.

23.

Di Donna

Muto

Giordano

, et al. Diagnosis and management of tandem occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Eur J Radiol Open 2023; 11: 100513.

24.

Gory

Piotin

Haussen

, et al. Thrombectomy in acute stroke with tandem occlusions from dissection versus atherosclerotic cause. Stroke 2017; 48: 3145–3148.

25.

Papanagiotou

Haussen

Turjman

, et al. Carotid stenting with antithrombotic agents and intracranial thrombectomy leads to the highest recanalization rate in patients with acute stroke with tandem lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 1290–1299.

26.

Poppe

Jacquin

Roy

, et al. Tandem carotid lesions in acute ischemic stroke: mechanisms, therapeutic challenges, and future directions. Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41: 1142–1148.

27.

Baracchini

Tonello

Meneghetti

, et al. Neurosonographic monitoring of 105 spontaneous cervical artery dissections. Neurology 2010; 75: 1864–1870.

28.

Nagalapuram

Tharumia Jagadeesan

Ramasamy

Carotid stump syndrome: an uncommon cause of recurrent ipsilateral strokes. Cureus 2021; 13(1): e12688.

29.

Liang

Wang

Zhao

, et al. Management of posterior circulation tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke: recanalize the dominant vertebral artery with priority. Interv Neuroradiol 2023; 29: 570–576.

30.

Kondo

Ishihara

Uemiya

, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke caused by vertebral artery dissection: a report of three cases and literature review. NMC Case Rep J 2021; 8(1): 817–825.

31.

Rossi

Iaccarino

Bonura

, et al. Exploring vertebral artery stump syndrome: an overlooked cause of posterior ischemic strokes. A narrative review of current management options. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2024; 33: 107819.

32.

Suzuki

Dembo

Hara

, et al. Vertebral artery stump syndrome. Intern Med 2018; 57: 733–736.

33.

Kojima

Shimozato

Hayashi

, et al. Treatment strategies for basilar top syndrome caused by acute vertebral artery occlusion. J Neuroendovasc Ther 2020; 14: 215–221.

34.

Powers

Rabinstein

Ackerson

, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019; 50(12): e344–e418.

35.

Fernández-Gómez

Zitan-Saidi

Gallo-Pineda

, et al Single vs. Multiphase computed tomography angiography in acute internal carotid artery occlusion: an accuracy and interobserver agreement study. Clin Imaging 2023; 102: 60–64.

36.

Nishikata

Hirashima

Tomita

, et al. Measurement of basilar artery bending and elongation by magnetic resonance cerebral angiography. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2004; 38: 251–259.

37.

Debette

Leys

Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 668–678.

38.

Luo

Guo

Z-N

Niu

P-P

, et al. 3D T1-weighted black blood sequence at 3.0 Tesla for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2016; 1: 140–146.

39.

Shaban

Huasen

Haridas

, et al. Digital subtraction angiography in cerebrovascular disease: current practice and perspectives on diagnosis, acute treatment and prognosis. Acta Neurol Belg 2022; 122: 763–780.

40.

Grossberg

Haussen

Cardoso

, et al. Cervical carotid pseudo-occlusions and false dissections. Stroke 2017; 48: 774–777.

41.

Choi

Jang

Koo

, et al. Multiphasic computed tomography angiography findings for identifying pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 2020; 51: 2558–2562.

42.

Kargiotis

Psychogios

Safouris

, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute isolated proximal internal carotid artery occlusions: a narrative review. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022, 15: 17562864221136335.

43.

Chai

Sheng

Xie

, et al. Assessment of apparent internal carotid tandem occlusion on high-resolution vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41: 693–699.

44.

Haussen

Turjman

Piotin

, et al. Head or neck first? Speed and rates of reperfusion in thrombectomy for tandem large vessel occlusion strokes. Interv Neurol 2020; 8: 92–100.

45.

Manning

Warne

Meyers

PM.

Reperfusion and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of the stent-retriever-based, early window endovascular stroke trials. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 301.

46.

Min

Bai

, et al. Antegrade or retrograde approach for the management of tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2022; 12: 757665.

47.

Kiwan

Alvarado-Bolanos

Maree

, et al. Simultaneous approach in tandem occlusion: a safe, effective, and faster way to achieve recanalization. J Neurointerv Surg 2025; 18(1): 126–132.

48.

Mueller-Kronast

Zaidat

Froehler

, et al. Systematic evaluation of patients treated with neurothrombectomy devices for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2017; 48: 2760–2768.

49.

Heck

Brown

MD.

Carotid stenting and intracranial thrombectomy for treatment of acute stroke due to tandem occlusions with aggressive antiplatelet therapy may be associated with a high incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 170–175.

50.

Pop

Zinchenko

Quenardelle

, et al. Predictors and clinical impact of delayed stent thrombosis after thrombectomy for acute stroke with tandem lesions. Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40(3): 533–539.

51.

Bonati

Kakkos

Berkefeld

, et al. European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J 2021; 6: I–XLVII.

52.

Zhao

Zhang

, et al. Angioplasty alone versus acute stenting for acute tandem occlusions due to internal carotid artery atherosclerotic. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 208: 106818.

53.

Zevallos

Farooqui

Quispe-Orozco

, et al. Acute carotid artery stenting versus balloon angioplasty for tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11(2): e022335.

54.

Cavalcante

Treurniet

Kaesmacher

, et al. Acute carotid stenting for tandem lesions in patients randomized to endovascular treatment with or without thrombolysis: results from the IRIS individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke 2026; 57(1): 27–37.

55.

Romoli

Molina

Zapata-Arriaza

, et al. Emergent carotid stenting for acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke with tandem lesions: the multicenter CERES-TANDEM study. Neurology 2026; 106(2): e214528.

56.

Marnat

Lapergue

Sibon

, et al. Safety and outcome of carotid dissection stenting during the treatment of tandem occlusions. Stroke 2020; 51: 3713–3718.

57.

Sousa

Rodrigo-Gisbert

Shu

, et al. Emergent carotid stenting during thrombectomy in tandem occlusions secondary to dissection: a STOP-CAD secondary study. Stroke 2025; 56: 808–817.

58.

Kadkhodayan

Jeck

Moran

, et al. Angioplasty and stenting in carotid dissection with or without associated pseudoaneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2328–2335.

59.

Ansari

Kühn

Honarmand

, et al. Emergent endovascular management of long-segment and flow-limiting carotid artery dissections in acute ischemic stroke intervention with multiple tandem stents. Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 97–104.

60.

T-Y

Chen

W-H

Y-M

, et al. Another endovascular therapy strategy for acute tandem occlusion: protect-expand-aspiration-revascularization-stent (PEARS) technique. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: e431–e438.

61.

Chen

W-H

T-Y

Y-M

, et al. Endovascular therapy strategy for acute embolic tandem occlusion: the pass-thrombectomy-protective thrombectomy (Double PT) technique. World Neurosurg 2018; 120: e421–e427.

62.

Cheng

Rajah

Gao

, et al. Passing extracranial artery occlusion by intermediate catheter with expanding microballoon (PEACE): a novel endovascular therapy in acute tandem occlusion stroke. J Endovasc Ther 2022; 29: 790–797.

63.

Gemmete

Wilseck

Pandey

, et al. Treatment strategies for tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Semin Intervent Radiol 2020; 37: 207–213.

64.

Naylor

Rantner

Ancetti

, et al. Editor’s choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65: 7–111.

65.

Stroke Foundation. Australian and New Zealand living clinical guidelines for stroke management, https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management (2025, accessed 1 September 2025).

66.

Mokin

Ansari

McTaggart

, et al. Indications for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke from emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 215–220.

67.

Turc

Bhogal

Fischer

, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15: e8–e8.

68.

Schirmer

Bulsara

Al-Mufti

, et al. Antiplatelets and antithrombotics in neurointerventional procedures: guideline update. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15: 1155–1162.

69.

Heran

Lindsay

Gubitz

, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: acute stroke management, 7th edition practice guidelines update, 2022. Canadian J Neurol Sci 2024; 51: 1–31.

70.

NICE Guideline. Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542436/ (2022, accessed 3 September 2025).

71.

Majoie

Cavalcante

Gralla

, et al. Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials. Lancet 2023; 402: 965–974.

72.

Cavalcante

Treurniet

Kaesmacher

, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment versus endovascular treatment alone for patients with large vessel occlusion and carotid tandem lesions: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials. Lancet Neurol 2025; 24: 305–315.

73.

Sui

Shi

Yang

, et al. Bridging techniques compared with direct endovascular therapy for stroke due to tandem occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2024; 47: 1339–1343.

74.

Yogendrakumar

Churilov

Mitchell

, et al. Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase and alteplase in patients with tandem lesion stroke. Neurology 2023; 100(18): e1900–e1911.

75.

Marnat

Lapergue

Gory

, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus alteplase combined with endovascular treatment of anterior circulation tandem occlusions: a pooled analysis of ETIS and TETRIS. Eur Stroke J 2024; 9: 124–134.

76.

Bala

Almekhlafi

Singh

, et al. Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in stroke patients with carotid tandem lesions: Results from the AcT trial. Int J Stroke 2024; 19: 322–330.

77.

Zhu

Bracard

Anxionnat

, et al. Impact of emergent cervical carotid stenting in tandem occlusion strokes treated by thrombectomy: a review of the TITAN collaboration. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 206.

78.

Jadhav

Zaidat

Liebeskind

, et al. Emergent management of tandem lesions in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2019; 50: 428–433.

79.

Farooqui

Zaidat

Hassan

, et al. Functional and safety outcomes of carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke with tandem lesions. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6: e230736.

80.

Zhu

Hossu

Soudant

, et al. Effect of emergent carotid stenting during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke patients with tandem occlusion: a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (TITAN) protocol. Int J Stroke 2021; 16: 342–348.

81.

De Rubeis

Prosperini

Badia

, et al. Profile of antiplatelet regimens for emergent carotid stenting in tandem occlusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 247: 108595.

82.

Zhu

Cao

Safety of glycoprotein IIb–IIIa inhibitors used in stroke-related treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2020; 26: 1076029620942594.

83.

Garayzade

Berlis

Schiele

, et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous infusion of tirofiban after emergent carotid artery stenting. Clin Neuroradiol 2024; 34: 163–172.

84.

Osteraas

Crowley

Panos

, et al. Eptifibatide use following emergent carotid stenting in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke with tandem occlusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 105021.

85.

Jost

Roels

Brown

, et al. Low-dose eptifibatide for tandem occlusion in stroke: safety and carotid artery patency. Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42: 738–742.

86.

Latacz

Popiela

Brzegowy

, et al. Correction: Latacz et al. Safety and efficacy of low-dose eptifibatide for tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Neurol. Int. 2024, 16, 253–262. Neurol Int 2025; 17: 90.

87.

Jumaa

Rodriguez-Calienes

Dawod

, et al. Low dose intravenous cangrelor versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in endovascular treatment of tandem lesions. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2023; 32: 107438.

88.

Keil

Stahn

Bohmann

, et al. Safety, efficacy and timing of antithrombotic therapy in emergency stenting of acute stroke patients with tandem lesions, German multicenter data-analysis. Front Neurol 2025; 16: 1554691.

89.

Yoo

Lim

Seo

K-D.

Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid artery stenting: a nationwide cohort study. Stroke 2025; 56: 613–620.

90.

Mazzolai

Teixido-Tura

Lanzi

, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J 2024; 45: 3538–3700.

91.

Wang

Zhao

, et al. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 11–19.

92.

Johnston

Easton

Farrant

, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 215–225.

93.

Markus

Levi

King

, et al. Antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulation therapy in cervical artery dissection. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76: 657.

94.

Yaghi

Shu

Fletcher

, et al. Anticoagulation versus antiplatelets in spontaneous cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2024; 55: 1776–1786.

95.

Kaufmann

Harshfield

Gensicke

, et al. Antithrombotic treatment for cervical artery dissection. JAMA Neurol 2024; 81: 630.

96.

Dawson

Béjot

Christensen

, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on pharmacological interventions for long-term secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Eur Stroke J 2022; 7(3): I–II.

97.

Dehbi

H-M

Fischer

Åsberg

, et al. Collaboration on the optimal timing of anticoagulation after ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and prospective individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (CATALYST). Lancet 2025; 406: 43–51.

98.

Weller

Dorn

Meissner

, et al. Antithrombotic treatment and outcome after endovascular treatment and acute carotid artery stenting in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. Neurol Res Pract 2022; 4: 42.

99.

Baik

Kim

Jung

A review of endovascular treatment for posterior circulation strokes. Neurointervention 2023; 18: 90–106.

100.

Heit

Chaudhary

Mascitelli

, et al. Focused update to guidelines for endovascular therapy for emergent large vessel occlusion: basilar artery occlusion patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2024; 16: 752–756.

101.

Weinberg

Sweid

Sajja

, et al. Posterior circulation tandem occlusions: classification and techniques. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 198: 106154.

102.

Boeckh-Behrens

Pree

Lummel

, et al. Vertebral artery patency and thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusions. Stroke 2019; 50: 389–395.

103.

Baik

Park

Kim

J-H

, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in subtypes of basilar artery occlusion: relationship to recanalization rate and clinical outcome. Radiology 2019; 291: 730–737.

104.

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Endovascular revascularisation of acute tandem vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: seven case series with literature reviews. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2018; 3: 17–21.

105.

Piechowiak

Kaesmacher

Zibold

, et al. Endovascular treatment of tandem occlusions in vertebrobasilar stroke: technical aspects and outcome compared with isolated basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 25–29.

106.

Sun

Raynald Tong

, et al. Analysis of treatment outcome after endovascular treatment in different pathological subtypes of basilar artery occlusion: a single center experience. Transl Stroke Res 2021; 12: 230–238.

107.

Nogueira

Jovin

Liu

, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute vertebrobasilar occlusion (VERITAS): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2025; 405: 61–69.

108.

Klail

Piechowiak

Krug

, et al. Endovascular revascularization of vertebrobasilar tandem occlusions in comparison to isolated basilar artery occlusions: a multi-center experience. Interv Neuroradiol. Epub ahead of print April 2024. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241240045.

109.

Strbian

Tsivgoulis

Ospel

, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2024; 16: 1–32.

110.

Sun

Zhang

Tong

, et al. Effects of periprocedural tirofiban vs. Oral antiplatelet drug therapy on posterior circulation infarction in patients with acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 254.

111.

Bücke

Aguilar Pérez

AlMatter

, et al. Functional outcome and safety of intracranial thrombectomy after emergent extracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusions. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 940.

112.

Compter

van der Hoeven

EJRJ

van der Worp

, et al. Vertebral artery stenosis in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): prevalence and outcome. J Neurol 2015; 262: 410–417.

Management of tandem occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Epidemiology of TOCs

Anterior tandem occlusions

Posterior tandem occlusions

Pathophysiology of TOCs

Anterior tandem occlusions

Posterior tandem occlusions

Diagnosis

Treatment strategies in ATOCs

Endovascular strategies

Bridging therapy

Antithrombotic therapy

Treatment strategies in PTOCs

Prognosis

Anterior tandem occlusions

Posterior tandem occlusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declarations

ORCID iDs

References