Abstract
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a significant problem in the hospital setting, with very high morbidity, mortality, and cost. We performed an evidence-based review of the literature focusing on clinically relevant pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to prevent VAP. Owing to the importance of this condition the implementation of preventive measures is paramount in the care of mechanically ventilated patients. There is evidence that these measures decrease the incidence of VAP and improve outcomes in the intensive care unit. A multidisciplinary approach, continued education, and ventilator protocols ensure the implementation of these measures. Future research will continue to investigate cost/benefit relationships, antibiotic resistance, as well as newer technologies to prevent contamination and aspiration in mechanically ventilated patients.
Keywords
Introduction
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the leading cause of mortality due to nosocomial infections and is that with a greater impact on morbidity of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) [Tablan et al. 2004; Chastre and Fagon, 2002; Rello et al. 2002]. From 8% to 28% of the complications in patients on mechanical ventilation are secondary to VAP [National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, 2004]. The rates of VAP are approximately 3% per day in the first week of mechanical ventilation, 2% per day in the second week, and 1% per day in the third week and beyond [Cook and Kollef, 1998].
Risk factors for VAP are multiple and are divided into those that are modifiable and those that are nonmodifiable. Modifiable factors include the supine position, gastric overdistension, contamination of ventilator circuits, frequent patient transfers and low pressure of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff. Nonmodifiable factors include male gender, age over 60 years, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan failure, coma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tracheostomy, re-intubation, neurosurgery and cranial trauma [Tablan et al. 2004; Kollef, 1999a; Cook et al. 1998b].
Factors such as etiologic microorganism, underlying comorbidities, host response mechanisms, and time of appearance have a direct influence on the morbidity and mortality of patients with VAP [Peleg and Hooper, 2010; Tejerina et al. 2006; Heyland et al. 1999; Fagon et al. 1993b; Rello et al. 1993]. Several reports have shown that patients who develop VAP have an increase in ICU stay of between 4.3 and 13 days [Heyland et al. 1999; Fagon et al. 1993b; Kappstein et al. 1992]. In addition, there is an increase in costs with each case of VAP (US$12,000 to US$40,000) [Tablan et al. 2004; Warren et al. 2003; Rello et al. 2002; Fagon et al. 1993a]. For these reasons, the prevention of VAP in the ICU must be considered a task of high importance. Decreasing the incidence of VAP by directed strategies could decrease the associated morbidity and mortality, the costs, and improve the safety of patients requiring mechanical ventilation [Muscedere et al. 2010]. The strategies to reduce the incidence of VAP have been investigated and there is clinical evidence that favor their use according to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines [Muscedere et al. 2008; American Thoracic Society, 2005; Dodek et al. 2004; Tablan et al. 2004; Torres and Carlet, 2001; Pittet et al. 2000; Kollef, 1999b].
We group the preventive measures for VAP into four categories: (1) general measures, (2) early extubation, (3) prevention of aspiration, and (4) decontamination (see Figure 1 and Table 1).
Preventive measures for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Evidence Grade Level I (high): evidence comes from well-conducted, randomized controlled trials. Level II (moderate): evidence comes from well-designed, controlled trials without randomization (including cohort patient series and case–control studies) and systematic analysis not collected in a randomized fashion. Level III (low): evidence comes from case studies and expert opinion.
General measures
Standard precautions
Cross transmission of pathogens plays an important role in the development of all nosocomial infections [Boyce and Pittet, 2002; Garner, 1996; Larson, 1981]. Measures to control these infections were implemented to avoid the cross transmission between patients and staff and to optimize the safety of invasive devices used in the ICU [Boyce and Pittet, 2002; Rhame et al. 1986]. Effective strategies to prevent VAP should include an infection control program to educate the medical team and allow effective decontamination of the hands, use of barrier methods, and a protocol of microbiological surveillance [Tablan et al. 2004; Kollef, 1999b; Weinstein, 1991].
A microbiological surveillance program in the ICU ensures adequate measures to prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens and aids in the selection of the empirical therapy in cases of VAP [Tablan et al. 2004; Weinstein, 1991; Haley et al. 1985]. Moreover, the presence of education programs for the health personnel in the ICU, would offer opportunities to improve the prevention of VAP, and be part of a more general effort to prevent all nosocomial infections [Babcock et al. 2004; Zack et al. 2002].
Multidisciplinary team members
Multidisciplinary team participation was associated with a decrease in nosocomial infections and VAP [Cho et al. 2003; Needleman et al. 2002]. This involves training of physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, and other ancillary personnel on preventive strategies. Studies have shown that the implementation of multidisciplinary education programs reduced the incidence of VAP [Bloos et al. 2009; Rodvold, 2009; Salahuddin et al. 2004].
A higher proportion of hours of nursing care provided by registered nurses and a greater number of hours of care by registered nurses per day were associated with better care for hospitalized patients [Needleman et al. 2002]. Therefore, it is recommended to have a suitable ratio between the number of nurses and patients (ideally 1 : 1) and respiratory therapists in the ICU. In addition, the number of respiratory therapists and nurses can have a favorable influence on the duration of ICU stay and the incidence of VAP. This is probably due to the maintenance of higher standards of infection control [Cho et al. 2003; Needleman et al. 2002]. Involving respiratory therapists facilitates the success of education programs and the implementation of directed protocols to diminish the development of and the duration of mechanical ventilation [Baxter et al. 2005; Ely et al. 2001; Marelich et al. 2000]. It is recommended that all healthcare personnel involved in the management of patients at risk for VAP must take a proactive role in reducing its incidence.
Early extubation
Early weaning of mechanical ventilation
Every time that a decision for endotracheal intubation is undertaken, a strategy to remove the ETT should exist. Measures such as daily interruption of sedation and pursuing a protocol for early extubation are associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation [Wood et al. 2007; Horst et al. 1998; Kollef et al. 1997; Saura et al. 1996]. A shortened time of mechanical ventilation and therefore decreased time of ETT exposure reduces the risk of aspiration of contaminated secretions and the likelihood of developing VAP [Ely et al. 2001; Cook et al. 2000; Kress et al. 2000; Marelich et al. 2000]. The participation of nurses and respiratory therapists in protocols for early weaning from mechanical ventilation have also improved outcomes [Cook et al. 2000], reinforcing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the prevention of VAP.
Daily sedation breaks
Sedation is required frequently in the ICU setting when treating mechanically ventilated patients. Agents used to achieve sedation and analgesia are well known: benzodiazepines, propofol, haloperidol, dexmedetomidine, and opiates. The use of these medications can vary widely among ICUs [Sessler and Wilhelm, 2008]. Oversedation typically leads to side effects, including gastrointestinal motility disturbances and difficulty weaning from the ventilator. Prolonged intubation further increases the exposure to risk factors for infection, microaspiration, gastrointestinal motility, and microcirculatory disturbances [Nseir et al. 2010; Strøm et al. 2010]. The propulsive motility of the esophagus is significantly limited during any kind of prolonged sedation. Impaired esophageal motility is involved in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal reflux disease, which, in turn, is associated as a cause of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients [Kölbel et al. 2000]. The use of the least amount of sedation possible has been shown to decrease the duration of delirium in the ICU, number of ventilated days, and mortality [Shehabi et al. 2010; Ulldemolins et al. 2009; Arroliga et al. 2005; Kress et al. 2000]. In addition, the number of days of mechanical ventilation has been directly associated with the development of VAP [Cook et al. 1998b]. Nevertheless, no studies have shown a decreased rate of VAP directly related to an intermittent sedation strategy.
For the above reasons, all intubated patients should have daily sedation interruptions, while their clinical condition permits, to prevent the unnecessary accumulation of sedatives with an aim to extubate safely as promptly as possible. Also, a sedation protocol should be in place and actively followed to decrease the amount of sedation given [Schweickert and Kress, 2008; Kollef et al. 1997]. Further studies will compare different sedatives to investigate whether different agents increase the risk of nosocomial infections more than others.
Prevention of aspiration
Semiseated position
Gastric reflux and further aspiration of radio-labeled gastric contents can be prevented with a semiseated position in patients on mechanical ventilation [Orozco-Levi et al. 1995; Ibáñez et al. 1992; Torres et al. 1992]. When receiving enteral nutrition, a fully supine position facilitates patient’s aspiration of subglottic secretions [Drakulovic et al. 1999; Orozco-Levi et al. 1995; Huxley et al. 1978]. The semiseated position (45°) has demonstrated a diminished rate of oral gastric aspiration and VAP [Drakulovic et al. 1999; Kollef, 1993] when compared with neutral supine position (0°) [Drakulovic et al. 1999]. Similarly, a prospective clinical study of critically ill patients, who remained in the semiseated position of 30° for the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation, and had a lower incidence of VAP compared with patients positioned at less than 30° [Kollef et al. 1999]. Other investigations have shown that the elevation of the bed rest at 45° at all times might not be feasible, but should be continued to be encouraged [van Nieuwenhoven et al. 2006]. Therefore, due to the low cost, easy application, and previous shown efficacy in VAP prevention; the semiseated position at 30–45° at all times is recommended in intubated patients, especially when receiving enteral nutrition [Alexiou et al. 2009].
Unnecessary changes and manipulation of ventilator circuits
Condensed fluids in the ventilator circuits have a risk of contamination. When contaminated, these fluids theoretically could increase the exposure of the patient to pathogens that could eventually cause VAP. Current evidence does not support frequent changes of these circuits [Cook et al. 1998a; Kollef et al. 1995; Dreyfuss et al. 1991; Craven et al. 1984]. In addition, numerous circuit changes may increase the incidence of colonization and eventually the development of VAP [Han and Liu, 2010]. Furthermore, it has been found that no routine changes in the ventilator circuits did not increase the incidence of VAP [Kollef et al. 1995]. Based on these findings, it is safe and justified not to change ventilator circuits unless they are visibly soiled [Han and Liu, 2010].
Caution should be exercised to prevent the accidental displacement of secretions from the ventilator circuits into the respiratory tract. Frequent emptying of circuit reservoirs and careful positioning of the tubing during patient transport and positioning is encouraged [Craven et al. 1998a, 1984; Craven and Steger, 1995].
Drainage of subglottic secretions
Oropharyngeal bacterial colonization and mircoaspiration of subglottotic secretions are important mechanisms for developing VAP [Bonten et al. 2004]. When an ETT is present, oral and gastrointestinal secretions can accumulate above the ETT cuff [Greene et al. 1994]. The presence, colonization, and microaspiration of these secretions are inevitable. Even adequate cuff pressure control cannot prevent microaspiration [Valencia et al. 2007].
The association of microaspiration with VAP is clearly established [Valencia et al. 2007; Craven and Steger, 1996; Valles et al. 1995; Mahul et al. 1992; Torres et al. 1992]. A strategy to perform a continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions has been developed through an ETT with an additional dorsal channel to allow the continuous or intermittent aspiration of subglottic secretions (Hi-Lo Evac tube, TYCO Healthcare/Mallinckrodt, St Louis, MO, USA). The use of a subglottic secretion ETT showed a decrease in VAP incidence, especially early VAP, but not in mortality, ICU stay, or time on mechanical ventilation [Bouza et al. 2008; Kollef, 2004; Dezfulian et al. 2005; Smulders et al. 2002; Kollef et al. 1999; Valles et al. 1995; Mahul et al. 1992]. Importantly, the dorsal channel may obstruct and prevent the continuous aspiration of secretions in up to 34% of the cases. However, newer designs from the initial models have placed the dorsal channel closer to the cuff which may have prevented this problem [Rello et al. 1996].
The incorporation of an ETT with an ultrathin polyurethane membrane cuff (7 µm compared with 50 µm in the conventional cuffs) that reduces the formation of channels and the escape of subglottic secretions to the distal airway has been used (Kimberly-Clark Microcuff ®) [Dullenkopf et al. 2003]. When compared with a conventional tube, this modality, in addition to the subglottic secretion drainage, had a significant decrease in the incidence of early and delayed VAP [Lorente et al. 2007].
The incorporation of an ETT with a dorsal channel for subglottic secretion aspiration is recommended as a preventive strategy when considering the high cost of developing VAP, low risk, and proven benefit, especially in patients mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours [Rello et al. 2002].
Endotracheal tube cuff pressure
An adequate ETT cuff pressure should provide airway sealing, no alteration of the mucosal perfusion, and prevention of aspiration of subglottic secretions into the airways. [Rello et al. 1996]. Even with an optimal cuff pressure, the possibility of draining of secretions into the distal airway persists. This can be explained by the formation of folds or longitudinal channels in the cuff [Valencia et al. 2007]. In addition, specific ventilator settings may have an influence on the passage of secretions [Pitts et al. 2010]. The recommended optimal cuff pressure, obtained from experimental animal models and intubated patients, should be between 20 and 35 cm of H2O [American Thoracic Society, 2005; Sengupta et al. 2004; Cook and Kollef, 1998; Seegobin and van Hasselt, 1984]. Respiratory therapists and staff in the ICU should monitor adequate cuff pressure frequently.
Decontamination strategies
Oral decontamination
The pathophysiology of VAP involves a secondary colonization of the upper respiratory tract by nosocomial pathogens, accumulation of secretions above the ETT cuff, and ultimately, aspiration of these contaminated secretions into the respiratory tract [Bonten et al. 2004]. Current evidence regarding the use of topical antibiotics for oral decontamination as a preventive therapy is controversial [Dallas and Kollef, 2009].
Several agents have been studied for oral decontamination. These include iseganan, chlorhexidine, and povidone iodine. Iseganan has failed to show any significant benefit over placebo in preventing VAP in a large randomized trial [Kollef et al. 2006]. Povidone iodine was demonstrated to be effective in decreasing the rate of VAP in patients with severe head trauma, but it has not been studied in other patient populations [Seguin et al. 2006].
Chlorhexidine in varying concentrations (0.12%, 0.2%, and 2%) has been studied in both medical and surgical ICU patient populations. It is useful in preventing VAP in patients who have undergone heart surgery [Chlebicki and Safdar, 2007; Pineda et al. 2006]. Unfortunately, there have been mixed results in noncardiac patients [Panchabhai et al. 2009]. It is theorized that chlorhexidine only delays the development of VAP, as it had no benefit in mortality, number of days on mechanical ventilation, and other patient outcomes. This is reflected by the benefit seen in patient populations that were intubated for a shorter period of time comparatively. When higher concentrations were used (i.e. 2%) there were significant reductions in VAP rates [Tantipong et al. 2008; Koeman et al. 2006]. This evidence postulates that higher concentrations may be more effective in preventing VAP. Other measures, such as electric toothbrushing, have not showed effectiveness in the prevention of VAP [Pobo et al. 2009].
We recommend the use of povidone iodine or chlorhexidine (preferably at higher concentrations) as an intervention of low cost for oral decontamination, as current evidence supports a significant decrease in VAP incidence [Liberati et al. 2009; Chan et al. 2007; Mori et al. 2006; Tablan et al. 2004].
Selective decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract
A selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) has been proposed as a strategy to prevent primary and secondary endogenous infections in mechanically ventilated patients. The term ‘selective’ is derived from the eradication of Gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus aureus and fungi [Taylor et al. 2007], while not affecting the normal endogenous flora (anaerobic bacteria, Streptococcus viridans, Enterococcus spp., and coagulase negative Staphylococcus), which are protective against colonization by Gram- negative microorganisms [van der Waaij, 1982].
Four points are proposed in the protocol of SDD: (1) use of a combination of nonabsorbable antibiotics, polymyxin, tobramycin and amphotericin B or nystatin in the oropharynx and through the enteral tube during the time of stay in the ICU; (2) use of intravenous antibiotics, specifically a third-generation (or second-generation) cephalosporin for 4–9 days; (3) preventive measures to avoid cross colonization; and (4) taking cultures from the oropharynx and rectum on admission and twice per week to monitor the effectiveness of the decontamination and the appearance of resistant organisms [Bonten and Krueger, 2006; Bonten, 2006].
A meta-analysis of 36 case–controlled trials including 6922 patients demonstrated that SDD is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of VAP and mortality [Liberati et al. 2009]. Other authors have reported an absolute reduction in mortality [Krueger et al. 2002], number of days in the ICU, and intrahospital mortality [de Smet et al. 2009; de La Cal et al. 2005; de Jonge et al. 2003]. These benefits have been established in postsurgical, posttrauma, medical, surgical, and burn patients [de La Cal et al. 2005; de Jonge et al. 2003; Krueger et al. 2002].
In spite of the low cost and existence of clinical evidence, SDD is not accepted widely [Jongerden et al. 2010; Taylor et al. 2007; Dodek et al. 2004; Tablan et al. 2004]. The main concern is the high risk for selection of multiresistant pathogens. The antibiotics used in SDD do not treat most Gram-positive bacteria, so an expected increase in colonization rates and infection with Enterococcus sp and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been reported [de La Cal et al. 2005; Lingnau et al. 1997; Verwaest et al. 1997; Wiener et al. 1995; Bonten et al. 1993]. SDD has also been associated with a gradual increase in antibiotic resistance in the respiratory tract [Oostdijk et al. 2010]. Authors in favor of this strategy have proposed the addition of topical and intravenous vancomycin to control MRSA in the ICUs where this pathogen is endemic [Silvestri et al. 2004]. Some authors have documented no selection of multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria with SDD [de Jonge et al. 2003]. On the other hand, the benefit of SDD is not clear in ICUs where MRSA, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria are endemic [Bonten, 2006; Lingnau et al. 1997; Verwaest et al. 1997; Wiener et al. 1995].
Defining whether SDD is useful and safe remains controversial, especially in hospitals with a high prevalence of multiresistant pathogens. The inappropriate use of antibiotics remains a threat for resistance and may affect effective treatment of different infections, in particular, those acquired in the hospital. Future studies will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these measures.
Prevention of biofilm formation/silver-coated endotracheal tubes
Through the regulation of specific genes, microcolonies of bacteria can secrete a polymeric extracellular substance that allows adherence to a selected surface (i.e. ETT) forming a viscous layer called a biofilm [Donlan and Costerton, 2002]. This has been shown to occur as early as 24 hours after intubation [Perkins et al. 2010]. These biofilms are prevalent in humid surfaces. Its viscous and adherent nature complicates elimination and offers mechanical protection to the bacteria; as antibiotics cannot penetrate this substance. Moreover, bacteria have greater resistance to antibiotics due to their hypometabolic state [Stewart, 2003]. When the biofilm accumulates it can be dislodged during procedures (i.e. tracheal suctioning and bronchoscopy) and directly inoculate the endobronchial surface [Adair et al. 1999; Inglis et al. 1989].
Antiseptic substances, such as silver, can prevent biofilm formation in the ETT [Olson et al. 2002; Hartmann et al. 1999]. A prospective, randomized, and multicentered pilot study reported that the use of the silver-coated ETT was safe, slowed down the colonization, and reduced the formation of the biofilm [Rello et al. 2006]. In November of 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), authorized the use of the silver-coated ETT, based on the diminution of the risk of VAP with its use. Further studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of VAP and delayed time to VAP occurrence [Afessa et al. 2010; Kollef et al. 2008]. The cost-effectiveness of these devices is still under debate [Gentile and Siobal, 2010], but there is evidence that this strategy may result in hospital savings [Shorr et al. 2009].
Conclusion
We have focused on the evidence related to the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapeutic maneuvers involved in the prevention of VAP. Owing to the high cost, morbidity, and mortality of VAP, preventive measures are paramount in the care of mechanically ventilated patients. There is evidence that these measures decrease mortality and improve outcomes in the ICU, and include general measures, early extubation, aspiration prevention, and decontamination. A multidisciplinary approach, continued education, and ventilator protocols ensure the implementation of these measures. Future research will continue to investigate cost/benefit relationships, antibiotic resistance, as well as newer technologies to prevent contamination and aspiration in mechanically ventilated patients.
Footnotes
Funding
Dr Restrepo’s time is supported by the National Institute of Health and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH/NHLBI) (award number K23HL096054). The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH/NHLBI. The funding agencies had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of this presentation. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, nor the UTHSCSA.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest were reported by Dr Maselli. Dr Restrepo has served on the advisory board of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Theravan, Forest Laboratories, and Novartis. He has also served as a consultant for Theravan and Pfizer (Wyeth).
