This study investigates how lawmakers legitimise their positions on legalising same-sex marriage in Japanese parliamentary debates. All speeches containing the word 同性婚/同性結婚 ‘same-sex marriage’ were obtained and divided into two corpora depending on whether the speaker agreed with its legalisation. The keywords from both corpora were extracted by comparison. A corpus-assisted method identified salient legitimation strategies. Supporters of same-sex marriage appeal to the results of polls, court rulings, opinions of other G7 member countries, and the alleged influence of religious rights to legitimise their position. Conversely, opponents of same-sex marriage highlight potential threats to traditional heteropatriarchal family structures and react negatively to pressures from other G7 member countries, emphasising Japan’s historical and religious context regarding homosexuality. The findings suggest the importance of more general discussions on human rights to move beyond the discursive framework of cultural differences.
AndoY (2022) Jimin-tō no Josei Ninshiki: “Ie Chūshinshugi no Seiji Shikō” [The recognition of women by the Liberal Democratic Party “political orientation towards family centrism”]. Akashi Shoten.
2.
BachmannI (2011) Civil partnership – ‘Gay marriage in all but name’: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK parliament. Corpora6(1): 77–105.
3.
BakerP (2004) ‘Unnatural acts’: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics8(1): 88–106.
4.
BakerP (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum.
5.
ChiangAYSuHY (2024) Stop family destruction!: Ideologies concerning family destruction metaphors in same-sex marriage debates. Critical Discourse Studies21(3): 237–253.
6.
ConradPSchneiderJW (1992) Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness: With a New Afterword by the Authors. Temple University Press.
7.
FindlayJY (2017) Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debate on same-sex marriage. Journal of Language and Sexuality6(1): 30–60.
8.
FurukawaM (1994) The changing nature of sexuality : The three codes framing homosexuality in modern Japan. U.S.-Japan Women’s Journal17: 29–55.
9.
GillingsMMautnerGBakerP (2023) Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press.
10.
HabutoESawadaJ (1915) Hentai Seiyoku Ron [Theory of Sexual Perversion]. Shunyodo.
11.
HidakaY (2023) The 3rd Awareness Survey of LGBTQ Individuals.
12.
HorieY (2010) Dōsei-kan no “kon’in” ni kansuru hihanteki kōsatsu: Nihon no shakai-seido no bunmyaku kara [Critical consideration of “marriage” between same-sex partners: From the context of Japan’s social system]. Shakai Shisutemu Kenkyū [Social System Research] 21: 37–57.
13.
KaniaU (2020) Marriage for all (‘Ehe fuer alle’)?! A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the marriage equality debate in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies17(2): 138–155.
14.
KazamaT (2016) Kanyō na bunka ni okeru homofobia [Homophobia in a tolerant culture]. Chukyo University Bulletin of the School of International Liberal Studies8(2): 1–15.
15.
KazamaTKawaguchiK (2010) Dōseiai to Iseiai [Homosexuality and Heterosexuality]. Iwanami Shinsho.
16.
KilgarriffA (2009) Simple math for keywords. In: Proceedings of corpus linguistics conference (CL 2009) (eds. MahlbergMDiazVGSmithC), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2009.
17.
KilgarriffABaisaVBuštaJ, et al (2014) The sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography1(1): 7–36.
18.
KuEK (2020) ‘Waiting for my red envelope’: Discourses of sameness in the linguistic landscape of a marriage equality demonstration in Taiwan. Critical Discourse Studies17(2): 156–174.
19.
LoveRBakerP (2015) The hate that dare not speak its name?Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict1: 57–86.
20.
NinomiyaS (2004) Kazoku tan’i kara kojin tan’i e [From the family unit to the individual unit]. In: AkasugiYTsyuchiyaYTsusuiM (eds) Dōsei Pātonā: Dōsei-Kōn, DP-Hō O Shiru Tame Ni [Domestic Partner: To Know Same-Sex Marriage and Domestic Partnership Laws]. Shakai Hihyosha, pp.66–89.
21.
PatersonLLCoffey-GloverL (2018) Discourses of marriage in same-sex marriage debates in the UK press 2011–2014. Journal of Language and Sexuality7(2): 175–204.
22.
PflugfelderGM (1999) Cartographies of desire: Male-male sexuality in Japanese discourse, 1600–1950. Culture, Health & Sexuality3(2): 255–258.
23.
SchalowPG (1989) Male love in early modern Japan: A literary depiction of the “youth”. In: DubermanMBVicinusMChaunceyGJr (eds) Hidden from History: Reclaiming the Gay and Lesbian Past. Penguin Books, pp.118–128.
24.
Silva ParedesD (2019) Shades of hate: Representations around homosexuality in Chilean church and parliamentary discourse (2005–2015). PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
25.
TamagawaM (2016) Same-sex marriage in Japan. Journal of GLBT Family Studies12(2): 160–187.
26.
TamagawaM (2018) Coming out of the closet in Japan: An exploratory sociological study. Journal of GLBT Family Studies14(5): 488–518.
27.
TurnerGMillsSvan der BomI, et al (2018) Opposition as victimhood in newspaper debates about same-sex marriage. Discourse and Society29(2): 180–197.
28.
van der BomICoffey-GloverLJonesL, et al (2015) Implicit homophobic argument structure. Journal of Language and Sexuality4(1): 102–137.
29.
van LeeuwenT (2007) Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication1(1): 91–112.
30.
van LeeuwenT (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press.
