At the heart and in the margins: Discursive construction of British national identity in relation to the EU in British parliamentary debates from 1973 to 2015

Abstract

The study focuses on the discursive construction of the UK’s identity in the European Union (EU) in the debates of the British House of Commons. The data come from the Hansard, and the time period analysed is from the start of the UK’s membership in the European Community (EC) in 1973 up to the general election of 2015, in which Brexit, that is, the national referendum on leaving the EU, was one of the main themes. Methods of corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) were adopted in the analysis of the debates. The findings suggest that even though the identity of a ‘leader’ in the EU has been frequently constructed in parliamentary discourse, a competing representation of the United Kingdom as an outsider and as a nation insecure of its role in the EU has been strongly present throughout the membership.

Keywords

Brexit CADS corpus-assisted discourse studies critical discourse analysis Hansard national deixis national identity parliamentary debates the European Union the UK

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alasuutari

Rautalin

Tyrkkö

(2018) The rise of the idea of model in policymaking: The case of the British parliament, 1803–2005. European Journal of Sociology 59: 341–363.

Alexander

Davies

(2015–) Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. Available at: http://www.hansard-corpus.org

Baker

(2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Baker

Gabrielatos

KhosraviNik

et al . (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306.

Balcerowicz

Rzonca

Kalina

et al . (2013) Economic Growth in the European Union. Brussels: The Lisbon Council.

Billig

(2010) Banal Nationalism (reprint edition). London: SAGE.

Blair

(1997) Speech by the Prime Minister Tony Blair at Lord Mayor’s banquet, 10 November. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070701145014/http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page1070.asp (accessed 26 October 2018).

Bucholtz

Hall

(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.

Charteris-Black

(2011) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

10.

Fairclough

(1989) Language and Power. New York: Longman.

11.

Forster

(2002) Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945. London: Routledge.

12.

Gibbins

(2014) Britain, Europe and National Identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

13.

Hall

(1996) Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In: Hall

Du Gay

(eds) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: SAGE, pp. 1–17.

14.

Heppell

(2002) The ideological composition of the Parliamentary Conservative Party 1992–97. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(2): 299–324.

15.

Higgins

(2004) Putting the nation in the news: The role of location formulation in a selection of Scottish newspapers. Discourse & Society 15(5): 633–648.

16.

Ichijo

(2012) Entrenchment of unionist nationalism: Devolution and the discourse of national identity in Scotland. National Identities 14(1): 23–37.

17.

Kavanagh

Richards

Geddes

et al . (2006) British Politics, 5th edn. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Law

(2001) Near and far: Banal national identity and the press in Scotland. Media, Culture & Society 23: 299–317.

19.

Meyer

(2001) Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA methods of critical discourse analysis. In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 14–31.

20.

Mollin

(2007) The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210.

21.

Musolff

(2017) Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16(5): 641–657.

22.

Partington

Duguid

Taylor

(2013) Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

23.

Petersoo

(2007) What does ‘we’ mean? National deixis in the media. Journal of Language and Politics 6(3): 419–436.

24.

Reicher

Hopkins

(2001) Self and Nation: Categorization, Contestation and Mobilization. London: SAGE.

25.

Slembrouck

(1992) The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature 1(2): 101–119.

26.

Tajfel

Turner

(1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin

Worchel

(eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47.

27.

Wenzl

(2018) ‘We want to trust the people’: National identity construction and the EU referendum. In: In the name of the people: representing the people in twenty-first century politics, Pamplona, 22–24 November 2018.

28.

Wodak

(2011) ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion – discrimination via discourse. In: Delanty

Wodak

Jones

(eds) Identity, Belonging and Migration. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 54–77.

29.

Wodak

(2016) ‘We have the character of an island nation’: A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s ‘Bloomberg Speech’ on the European Union. Working Paper RSCAS 2016/36, July. Fiesole: European University Institute.

30.

Wodak

De Cillia

Reisigl

et al . (2009) The Discursive Construction of National Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

31.

Young

(1993) Britain and European Unity, 1945–1992. London: Macmillan Press.