‘One can hardly call them homophobic’: Denials of antigay prejudice within the same-sex marriage debate

Abstract

The United Kingdom’s Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act (2013) was framed by the Government as an equality measure and, as such, those who opposed the legislation were likely to be sensitive to possible accusations of prejudice. This article examines opposition to marriage equality within the British press and explores how denials of homophobia were made. Opponents to same-sex marriage attended to commonsense notions of ‘homophobes’, either by aligning their views with categories of persons not typically considered homophobic or by distancing their views from a homophobic other. Opponents also offered a counter-accusation that it was liberal supporters of same-sex marriage who were intolerant. Parallels are drawn with discursive literature on racist discourse and it appears that despite social scientists’ attempts to expand the concept of antigay prejudice, homophobia is commonly referred to in terms of irrational bigoted individuals.

Keywords

Discourse heterosexism homophobia rhetoric same-sex marriage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

(1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.

Augoustinos

Every

(2007) The language of ‘race’ and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(2): 123–141.

Augoustinos

Every

(2010) Editorial. Accusations and denials of racism: Managing moral accountability in public discourse’. Discourse & Society 21(3): 251–256.

Billig

(1987) Arguing and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Billig

(1988) The notion of ‘prejudice’: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects’. Text 8(1–2): 91–110.

Billig

(1991) Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: SAGE.

Billig

(1997) Rhetorical and discursive analysis: How families talk about the royal family. In: Hayes

(ed.) Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology. London: Psychology Press, pp. 39–54.

Billig

(2009) Discursive psychology, rhetoric and the issue of agency. Semen, 27. Available at: http://semen.revues.org/8930

Billig

Condor

Edwards

Gane

Middleton

Radley

(1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: SAGE.

10.

Burrowes

(2012) Gay rights, Christianity and the purpose of marriage (Letters to the Editor). The Times, 13 March, p. 21.

11.

Clarke

(2001) What about the children? Arguments against lesbian and gay parenting. Women’s Studies International Forum 24(5): 555–570.

12.

Coalition for Marriage (2012) Christopher Biggins says no to redefining marriage [video file]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hfa3NP1SJ84

13.

Condor

(2000) Pride and prejudice: Identity management in English people’s talk about this country. Discourse & Society 11(2): 175–205.

14.

Condor

(2006) Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16(1): 1–18.

15.

Condor

Figgou

Abell

. (2006) ‘They’re not racist …’ prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology 45(3): 441–462.

16.

Durrheim

Quayle

Whitehead

. (2005) Denying racism: Discursive strategies used by the South African media. Critical Arts 19(1–2): 167–186.

17.

Ellis

Kitzinger

(2002) Denying equality: An analysis of arguments against lowering the age of consent for sex between men. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 12(3): 167–180.

18.

Fingerhut

Riggle

EDB

Rostosky

(2011) Same-sex marriage: The social and psychological implications of policy and debates. Journal of Social Issues 67(2): 225–241.

19.

Gadamer

H-G

(1979) Truth and Method, 2nd edn. London: Sheed and Ward.

20.

Goodman

Johnson

(2013) Strategies used by the far right to counter accusations of racism. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6(2): 97–113.

21.

Gough

(2002) ‘I’ve always tolerated it but …’: Heterosexual masculinity and the discursive reproduction of homophobia. In: Coyle

Kitzinger

(eds) Lesbian and Gay Psychology: New Perspectives. Oxford: BPS Blackwell, pp. 219–238.

22.

Government Equalities Office (2012) Equal civil marriage: A consultation. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/133258/consultation-document_1_.pdf (accessed 20 October 2016).

23.

Grice

(2012) Church leaders are ‘fanning the flames of homophobia’; equalities minister tells Andrew Grice gay marriage will become law by 2015. The Independent, 15 March, p. 10.

24.

Heaphy

Smart

Einarsdottir

(2013) Same Sex Marriages: New Generations, New Relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

25.

Heffer

(2012) The real bigots in the gay marriage row are the liberals. The Mail Online, 16 March. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2116123/Gay-marriage-row-The-real-bigots-liberals.html (accessed 20 October 2016).

26.

Herek

(2004) Beyond ‘homophobia’: Thinking about sexual stigma and prejudice in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy 1(2): 6–24.

27.

Herek

(2009) Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: A conceptual framework. In: Hope

(ed.) Contemporary Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Identities: The 54th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. New York: Springer, pp. 65–111.

28.

Herek

(2011) Anti-equality marriage amendments and sexual stigma. Journal of Social Issues 67(2): 413–426.

29.

Hess

(2016) How ‘-phobic’ became a weapon in the identity wars. The New York Times Magazine. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/magazine/how-phobic-became-a-weapon-in-the-identity-wars.html?_r=0

30.

Hewitt

Stokes

(1975) Disclaimers. American Sociological Review 40(1): 1–11.

31.

Hull

(2001) The political limits of the rights frame: The case of same-sex marriage in Hawaii. Sociological Perspectives 44(2): 207–232.

32.

Jones

(2009) Majority of Americans continue to oppose gay marriage. Gallup Poll. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/118378/Majority-Americans-ContinueOppose-Gay-Marriage.aspx

33.

Jowett

(2014) ‘But if you legalise same-sex marriage …’: Arguments against marriage equality in the British press. Feminism & Psychology 24(1): 37–55.

34.

Jowett

Peel

(2010) ‘Seismic culture change?’ Media representations of same-sex ‘marriage’. Women’s Studies International Forum 33(3): 206–214.

35.

Kitzinger

(1996) Speaking of oppression: Psychology, politics, and the language of power. In: Rothblum

Bond

(eds) Preventing Heterosexism and Homophobia. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 3–19.

36.

Kitzinger

Peel

(2005) The de-gaying and re-gaying of AIDS: Contested homophobias in lesbian and gay awareness training. Discourse & Society 16(2): 173–197.

37.

Kitzinger

Wilkinson

(2004) The re-branding of marriage. Feminism & Psychology 14(1): 127–150.

38.

Leudar

Nekvapil

(2004) Media dialogical networks and political argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 3: 247–266.

39.

Lynn

Lea

(2003) A phantom menace and the new Apartheid: The social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society 14(4): 425–452.

40.

Matthews

Augoustinos

(2012) ‘I don’t believe in discrimination but … this is just too far’: Political discourse in the Australian marriage equality debate. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review 8(3): 128–141.

41.

Morales

(2009) Knowing someone gay/lesbian affects views of gay issues. Gallup Poll. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/118931/Knowing-Someone-Gay-LesbianAffects-Views-Gay-Issues.aspx

42.

O’Brien

(2012) We cannot afford to indulge this madness. The Sunday Telegraph, 4 March, p. 2.

43.

Peel

(2001) Mundane heterosexism: Understanding incidents of the everyday. Women’s Studies International Forum 24(5): 541–554.

44.

Pitcher

(2012) Even as a liberal, I see that gay marriage is a threat to the established Church. The Mail Online. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2158111/Even-liberal-I-gay-marriage-threat-established-Church-England.html (accessed 20 October 2016).

45.

Platell

(2014) The real gay marriage bigots are its intolerant supporters. The Mail Online, 29 March. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2592091/AMANDA-PLATELL-The-real-gay-marriage-bigots-intolerant-supporters.html (accessed 20 October 2016).

46.

Potter

(2007) Discourse and Psychology, vols 1–3. London: SAGE.

47.

Rifkind

(2012) ‘Eeeeuw’ is no argument against gay marriage; neither is saying ‘God doesn’t like it’. In fact when you think carefully, there is no plausible case at all. The Times, 9 March, p. 19.

48.

Smith

Windes

(2000) Progay/Antigay: The Rhetorical War Over Sexuality. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

49.

Speer

Potter

(2000) The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse & Society 11(4): 543–572.

50.

Summers

(2007) Rhetorically self-sufficient arguments in Western Australian parliamentary debates on Lesbian and Gay Law Reform. British Journal of Social Psychology 46(4): 839–858.

51.

Van Dijk

(1992) Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society 3: 87–118.

52.

Verkuyten

(1998) Personhood and accounting for racism in conversation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28(2): 147–167.

53.

Weinberg

(1972) Society and the Healthy Homosexual. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

54.

Widdecombe

(2012) Let’s vote over gay marriage. The Express, 29 February, p. 13.

55.

Wilkinson

Kitzinger

(2006) In support of equal marriage: Why civil partnership is not enough. Psychology of Women Review 8(1): 54–57.