In many emergency situations rapid vascular access is a priority, particularly in cases involving haemodynamic compromise. Traditional vascular access through the use of an intravenous cannula, although the preferred first line method, can in certain circumstances have a high rate of failure. A study by Minville et al (2006) showed that the success rate of first attempt venous cannulation can be as low as 76%. Repeated attempts at venous cannulation in patients with difficult vascular access wastes valuable time which in some situations could prove fatal.
AlawiK.A., MorrisonG.C., FraserD.D.2008Insulin infusion via an intraosseous needle in diabetic ketoacidosisAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Journal36(1) 110–12
2.
American Heart Association1988Textbook of pediatric advanced life supportDallas, AHA
3.
BaileyH.1944Bone marrow as a site for the reception of infusions, transfusions and anaesthetic agentsBritish Medical Journal1181–12
4.
BeckettD., OakesJ.L., ProctorR.D.2011Over the limit: use of peripheral venous cannulae above the manufacturer's recommended flow ratesClinical Radiology66(5) 456–58
5.
ConstantinoT.G., KirtzJ.F., SatzW.A.2010Ultrasound guided peripheral venous access vs the external jugular vein as the initial approach to the patient with difficult vascular accessJournal of Emergency Medicine39462–67
6.
CooperB.R., MahoneyP.F., HodgettsT.J., MellorA.2007Intra-osseous access (EZ-IO®) for resuscitation: UK military combat experienceJournal of the Royal Army Medical Corps153(4) 314–16
7.
DavidoffJ., FowlerR., GordonD.2005Clinical evaluation of a novel intraosseous device for adultsJournal of Emergency Medical Services3020–23
8.
DayM.W.2011Intraosseous devices for intravascular access in adult trauma patientsCritical Care Nurse31(2) 76–89
9.
DeakinC.D., NolanJ.P., SoarJ.2010European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitationResuscitation811219–451
10.
DrinkerC.K., DrinkerK.R., LundC.C.1922The circulation in the mammalian bone marrowAmerican Journal of Physiology621–92
11.
FowlerR.L., PierceA., NazeerS.2008Powered intraosseous insertion provides safe and effective vascular access for emergency patientsAnnals of Internal Medicine52(4) 152
12.
HortonM.A., BeamerC.2008Powered intraosseous insertion provides safe and effective vascular access for pediatric emergency patientsPediatric Emergency Care24(6) 347–50
13.
LeiderB.A., KirchhoffC., BognorV.2011Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veinsResuscitation8340–45
14.
LuckR.P., HainesC., MullC.C.2010Intraossious accessJournal of Emergency Medicine39(4) 468–75
15.
MillerL.J., KuhnJ.G., Von HoffD.D.2005Does IO equal IV?Prehospital Emergency Care9102
16.
MinvilleV., PianezzaA., AsehnouneK.2006Prehospital intravenous line placement assessment in the French emergency system: a prospective studyEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology23594–97
17.
OrlowskiJ.P.1984My kingdom for an intravenous lineAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children138(9) 803
18.
Resuscitation Council (UK)2010European Resuscitation Council Guidelines Available from: www.resus.org.uk/pages/gl2010.pdf [Accessed May 2015]
19.
RosettiV.A., ThompsonB.M., MillerJ.1985Intraosseous infusion: an alternative route of pediatric intravascular accessAnnals of Emergency Medicine14885–88
20.
SimmonsC.M., JohnsonN.E., PerkinR.M., van StralenD.1994Intraosseous extravasation complication ratesAnnals of Emergency Medicine23363–66
21.
WayneM.A.2006Adult intraosseous access: an idea whose time has come IsraeliJournal of Emergency Medicine6(2) 41–45
