Managing online nation-branding factors in times of immigration and refugee movements: A comparative longitudinal content analysis of @belgiumbe and @Sweden(se)

Abstract

This longitudinal study compares how Belgium and Sweden have managed their nation branding online via their official Twitter (X) accounts between 2014 and 2023. Combining a large quantitative content analysis with an in-depth qualitative framing analysis, this research scrutinises the attention to different nation brand hexagon factors and the precise role immigration has played in their online branding approach, as this time period was marked by conflicts in the Middle East, Asia and Ukraine, leading to several refugee situations. Our findings show a different approach in online nation branding among both countries. Although the digital content focusing on immigration is limited, Sweden addresses this nation-branding factor more frequently and in a more structured way than Belgium. We conclude that paying attention to the topic of immigration can serve to brand a nation by presenting its specific self-representation – in the case of Sweden, five distinctive frames were identified.

Keywords

Nation branding social media immigration refugee content analysis framing analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ab Iago

(2006) Branding Belgium. [Online] Available at: https://nation-branding.info/2006/07/11/branding-belgium/ (accessed 11 May 2022).

Andéhn

Kazeminia

Sevin

(2014) User-generated place brand equity on Twitter: The dynamics of brand associations in social media. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 10(2): 132–144.

Anholt

(1998) Nation-brands of the twenty-first century. Journal of Brand Management 5(6): 395–406.

Anholt

(2005) Anholt Nation Brands Index: How does the world see America? Journal of Advertising Research 45(3): 296–304.

Anholt

(2006) What is a Nation Brand? Superbrands: 186–187.

Anholt

(2007) Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Anholt

(2010) Places: Identity, Image and Reputation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Anzera

Gianturco

Massa

(2019) Security branding and digital narrations. Security issues representation on Twitter. International Review of Sociology 29(1): 80–101.

Aronczyk

(2008) Living the brand": Nationality, globality and the identity strategies of nation branding consultants. International Journal of Communication 2: 41–65.

10.

Aronczyk

(2009) How to do things with brands: Uses of national identity. Canadian Journal of Communication 34(2): 291–296.

11.

Bali

Karim

Rached

(2018) Public diplomacy effort across Facebook: A comparative analysis of the U.S. Consulate in erbil and the kurdistan representation in Washington. SAGE Open 8(1): 1–9.

12.

@belgiumbe (n.d) @belgiumbe. [Online] Available at: https://twitter.com/belgiumbe (accessed 11 May 2023).

13.

Bengtsson

(2011) Virtual nation branding: The Swedish embassy in second life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 4(2): 1–26.

14.

Bolin

Miazhevich

(2018) The soft power of commercialised nationalist symbols: Using media analysis to understand nation branding campaigns. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21(5): 527–542.

15.

Bolin

Ståhlberg

(2010) Between community and commodity. Nationalism and Nation Branding. Communicating the Nation: National Topographies of Global Media Landscapes: 79–101.

16.

Browning

(2015) Nation branding, national self-esteem, and the constitution of subjectivity in late modernity. Foreign Policy Analysis 11(2): 195–214.

17.

Business of Apps (2023) Twitter Revenue and Usage Statistics. [Online] Available at: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ (Accessed 15 June 2023).

18.

Choi

Y-S

Kim

H-M

(2016) The influence of public diplomacy with social Media on country image and country brands: Focusing on cultural contents. Journal of Korea Contents Society 16(3): 426–438.

19.

Chouliaraki

Stolić

(2019) Photojournalism as political encounter: Western news photography in the 2015 migration ‘crisis’. Visual Communication 18(3): 311–331.

20.

Chung

Rhee

Cha

(2020) Big data analyses of Korea's nation branding on Google and Facebook. Korea Observer 51(1): 151–174.

21.

Cincă

Hîrtie

(2010) The influence of cultural division on country image the Belgium case: Flanders vs. Wallonia. In: Perception, Meaning and Identity. Leiden: Brill, 71–80.

22.

Criekemans

(2010) Foreign Policy and Diplomacy of the Belgian Regions: Flanders and Wallonia. The Hague: Netherlands institute of international relations Clingendael.

23.

Daalmans

Schaap

Rovers

(2020) Loved and feared in fortress Europe: Framing the European refugee crisis. Communications 45(2): 252–263.

24.

De Cock

, et al. (2018) Refugees in the news: Comparing Belgian and Swedish newspaper coverage of the European refugee situation during summer 2015. Communications 43(3): 301–323.

25.

Dimitrov

(2018) Strategic Silence: Public Relations and Indirect Communication. London: Routledge.

26.

Dimitrov

(2019) Explicit and implicit strategies of silence. Journal of Advertising and Public Relations 2(1): 19–31.

27.

Edlom

(2022) The engagement imperative: Experiences of communication Practitioners’ brand work in the music industry. Media and Communication 10(1): 66–76.

28.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

29.

European Commission (2018) Eurobarometer Interactive. [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/index (accessed 17 September 2019).

30.

Eurostat (2022) Population and population change statistics. [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Population_and_population_change_statistics#Population_change_at_national_level (Accessed 23 June 2023).

31.

Eurostat (2023) Temporary protection for persons fleeing Ukraine - monthly statistics. [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Temporary_protection_for_persons_fleeing_Ukraine_-_monthly_statistics#Where_in_the_EU_did_people_fleeing_Ukraine_go.3F (Accessed 15 June 2023).

32.

Fawzy

(2019) Aestheticizing suffering: Evaluative stance in pulitzer-winning photos of refugees’ crisis in Europe. Discourse, Context & Media 28: 69–78.

33.

Ferra

Nguyen

(2017) #Migrantcrisis: “tagging” the European migration crisis on Twitter. Journal of Communication Management 21(4): 411–426.

34.

Fotopoulos

Kaimaklioti

(2016) Media discourses on the refugee crisis: On what have the Greek, German and British press focused? European View 15(2): 265–279.

35.

Gammeltoft-Hansen

(2017) Refugee policy as ‘negative nation branding': The case of Denmark and the Nordics. Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook: 99–125.

36.

Hao

, et al. (2021) Two decades of research on nation branding: A review and future research agenda. International Marketing Review 38(1): 46–69.

37.

Hartig

(2015) Chinese Public Diplomacy: The Rise of the Confucius Institute. London: Routledge.

38.

Hoffjann

(2026) Either be silent, or say something better than silence.” From strategic silence to the concept of strategic non-talking. Corporate Communications: An International Journal: 1–16. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-09-2025-0273

39.

Hovden

Mjelde

Gripsrud

(2018) The Syrian refugee crisis in Scandinavian newspapers. Communications 43(3): 325–356.

40.

Ipsos (2023) Nation Brands Index 2023: Japan takes the lead for the first time in NBI history. [Online] Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/en/nation-brands-index-2023 (accessed 7 June 2023).

41.

Jansen

(2008) Designer nations: Neo-liberal nation branding – Brand Estonia. Social Identities 14(1): 121–142.

42.

Kaneva

(2011) Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication 5: 117–141.

43.

Kaneva

(2017) The branded national imagination and its limits: Insights from the post-socialist experience. Strategic Review for Southern Africa 39(1): 116–138.

44.

Kaneva

Popescu

(2011) National identity lite: Nation branding in post-Communist Romania and Bulgaria. International Journal of Cultural Studies 14(2): 191–207.

45.

Kavaratzis

(2004) From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 1(1): 58–73.

46.

Kostygina

, et al. (2021) Exploring the discursive function of hashtags: A semantic network analysis of JUUL-related Instagram messages. Social Media + Society 7(4): 1–11.

47.

Kotler

Gertner

(2002) Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management 9(4): 249–261.

48.

, et al. (2019) When is silence golden? The use of strategic silence in crisis communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 24(1): 162–178.

49.

Lee

(2016) Korea's nation branding on social Media. Journal of Cybercommunication 33(3): 103–157.

50.

Marwick

boyd

(2011) To see and be seen: Celebrity practice onTwitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17(2): 139–158.

51.

MIPEX (2020) MIPEX. [Online] Available at: http://www.mipex.eu/ (accessed 17 April 2020).

52.

Nadeau

Olafsen

(2015) Country image evaluations and migration intentions. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11(4): 293–308.

53.

Neidhardt

A-H

Butcher

(2022) Disinformation on Migration: How Lies, Half-Truths, and Mischaracterizations Spread. [Online] Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/how-disinformation-fake-news-migration-spreads (accessed 11 June 2025).

54.

Olins

(2002) Branding the nation - the historical context. Journal of Brand Management 9(4): 241–248.

55.

Palmgren

Åkerlund

Viklund

(2023) Refugees versus ‘refugees’: The role of islamophobia in Swedish alternative media’s reporting on Ukrainian asylum seekers. Media, Culture & Society 45(7): 1400–1417.

56.

Pamment

Olofsson

Hjorth-Jenssen

(2017) The response of Swedish and Norwegian public diplomacy and nation branding actors to the refugee crisis. Journal of Communication Management 21(4): 326–341.

57.

Popa

R-E

(2016) Branding the nation in the digital era: Why don't you come over? Cultures of Communication – Cultures de la Communication 1: 95–113.

58.

Puschmann

Sundin

De Coninck

, et al. (2019) Migration and integration policy in Europe: Comparing Belgium and Sweden. In: Images of Immigrants and Refugees in Western Europe: Media Representations, Public Opinion and Refugees’ Experiences. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 21–36.

59.

Rucka

De Cock

(2024) Sweden’s online nation branding in times of refugee movement: A multimodal analysis of “Portraits of migration”. Communications-European Journal of Communication Research 49(1): 118–143.

60.

Rucka

De Cock

Smits

(2023) Nation branding in times of refugee crisis: Digital media practices of Belgian and Swedish governmental institutions. Journal of Public Diplomacy 3(2): 1–26.

61.

Skodo

(2018) Sweden: By Turns Welcoming and Restrictive in its Immigration Policy. [Online] Available at: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/sweden-turns-welcoming-and-restrictive-its-immigration-policy (Accessed 17 January 2024).

62.

Ståhlberg

Bolin

(2010) Between community and commodity: nationalism and nation branding. In: Roosvall A and Salovaara-Moring I (eds) In: Communicating the Nation: National Topographies of Global Media Landscapes. Göteborg: Nordicom, 79–101.

63.

Statista (2023) Monthly number of asylum applications from refugees from Ukraine in Sweden from January 2022 to February 2023. [Online] Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1295091/sweden-number-asylum-applications-week-country-origin/ (accessed 18 June 2023).

64.

Surowiec

Štětka

(2017) Branding Poland online: Propagating and resisting nation branding on Facebook. In: Social Media and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Florence: Routledge, 160–181.

65.

@Sweden (n.d) @Sweden. [Online] Available at: https://twitter.com/Sweden (accessed 11 May 2023).

66.

Szczepanik

(2016) The ‘good’ and ‘bad’ refugees? Imagined refugeehood(s) in the Media coverage of the migration crisis. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies 10(2): 23–33.

67.

Szumski

(2022) Sweden receives fewer Ukrainian refugees than expected. [Online] Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/sweden-receives-fewer-ukrainian-refugees-than-expected/ (accessed 17 January 2024).

68.

UNHCR (n.d.) UNHCR master glossary of terms. [Online] Available at: https://www.unhcr.org/glossary (accessed 22 10 2025).

69.

van Dijck (2013) Facebook and the engineering of connectivity: A multi-layered approach to social media platforms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 19(2): 141–155.

70.

van Dijck

Poell

(2013) Understanding social Media logic. Media and Communication 1(1): 2–14.

71.

Van Gorp

(2005) Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage. European Journal of Communication 20(4): 484–507.

72.

Volcic

(2008) Former yugoslavia on the world wide web: Commercialization and branding of nation-states. International Communication Gazette 70(5): 395–413.

73.

Volcic

Andrejevic

(2011) Nation branding in the era of commercial nationalism. International Journal of Communication 5(1): 598–618.

74.

Walker

(2022) ‘Emergency villages’ needed to receive influx of Ukrainian refugees, migration minister says. [Online] Available at: https://www.brusselstimes.com/210075/emergency-villages-needed-to-receive-influx-of-ukrainian-refugees-migration-minister-says (Accessed 17 January 2024).