A Peaceful Transfer of Power? A Content Analysis of Leadership Framing and Political Discourse in r/Politics and r/Conservative Following the 2021 U.S. Capitol Riot

Abstract

Arabic

Spanish

French

Chinese

The 2021 U.S. Capitol riot disrupted the transition of presidential power, influencing how the American public viewed President Trump and President Biden. Through a content analysis, this study investigated how users of two Reddit communities—r/politics and r/conservative—framed these leaders in the riot’s aftermath. This study finds that users were specifically concerned with presidential behavior, conflict, and U.S. democracy. Moreover, portrayals of President Trump normalized by the end of President Biden’s first 100 days. These findings contribute to scholarship examining social media data during political instability and elucidate how the U.S. Capitol riot influenced political discourse within social media.

Keywords

U.S. Capitol riot leadership framing social media content analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annenberg IOD Collaborative. (2023). An election shaped by crises. In Annenberg IOD Collaborative (Ed.), Democracy amid crises: Polarization, pandemic, protests, and persuasion (pp. 1–24). Oxford University Press.

Astor

Paybarah

(2022, August 23). Here’s where Trump’s endorsement record stands as the primaries wind down. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/23/us/politics/trump-endorsed-candidates.html

Bunting

A. M.

Frank

Arshonsky

Bragg

M. A.

Friedman

S. R.

Krawczyk

(2021). Socially-supportive norms and mutual aid of people who use opioids: An analysis of Reddit during the initial COVID-19 pandemic. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 222(1), Article 108672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108672

Cappella

J. N.

Jamieson

K. H.

(1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.

Citrin

Stoker

(2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550

De Francisci Morales

Monti

Starnini

. (2021). No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 2818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81531-x

de Vreese

C. H

. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13, 51–62.

Dunivin

Z. O.

Yan

H. Y.

Ince

Rojas

(2022). Black Lives Matter protests shift public discourse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117320119

Entman

R. M.

(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

10.

Frosch

Levy

Elinson

(2021, January 14). Extremists in Capitol riot had histories of violent rhetoric and threats. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/extremists-in-capitol-riots-had-histories-of-violent-rhetoric-and-threats-11610639781

11.

Gans

H. J.

(1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. Vintage.

12.

Gaudette

Scrivens

Davies

Frank

(2021). Upvoting extremism: Collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3491–3508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958123

13.

Gidengil

Everitt

(2003). Talking tough: Gender and reported speech in campaign news coverage. Political Communication, 20(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218869

14.

Gramlich

(2020). 5 facts about Fox News. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/08/five-facts-about-fox-news/

15.

Hale

B. J.

Grabe

M. E.

(2018). Visual war: A content analysis of Clinton and Trump subreddits during the 2016 campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018766501

16.

Hamdy

Gomaa

E. H.

(2012). Framing the Egyptian uprising in Arabic language newspapers and social media. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01637.x

17.

Hameleers

(2020). Augmenting polarization via social media? A comparative analysis of Trump’s and Wilders’ online populist communication and the electorate’s interpretations surrounding the elections. Acta Politica, 55(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0119-8

18.

Hellweg

S. A.

(1979). An examination of voter conceptualizations of the ideal political candidate. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 44(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417947909372427

19.

Hellweg

S. A.

(2004). Campaigns and candidate images in American presidential elections. In Hacker

K. L.

(Ed.), Presidential candidate images (pp. 21–47). Rowman & Littlefield.

20.

Heverin

Zach

(2012). Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21685

21.

Holian

D. B.

Prysby

C. L.

(2015). Candidate character traits in presidential elections. Routledge.

22.

Inskeep

(2021, February 8). Timeline: What Trump told supporters for months before they attacked. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/02/08/965342252/timeline-what-trump-told-supporters-for-months-before-they-attacked

23.

Jungherr

Posegga

(2022). Populist supporters on Reddit: A comparison of content and behavioral patterns within publics of supporters of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439321996130

24.

Kazin

(1998). The populist persuasion: An American history. Cornell University Press.

25.

Krafft

P. M.

Donovan

(2003). Disinformation by design: The use of evidence collages and platform filtering in a media manipulation campaign. Political Communication, 37(2), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686094

26.

Kubin

von Sikorski

(2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206.

27.

Lelkes

Sood

Iyengar

(2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband Internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20.

28.

Levitsky

Ziblatt

(2018). How democracies die. Crown.

29.

Meraz

Papacharissi

(2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472

30.

Mills

R. A.

(2018). Pop-up political advocacy communities on reddit.com: SandersForPresident and The Donald. AI & Society, 33(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0712-9

31.

Mitchell

(2020, September 14). Americans’ views of government: Low trust, but some positive performance ratings. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/09/14/americans-views-of-government-low-trust-but-some-positive-performance-ratings/

32.

Munn

(2021). More than a mob: Parler as preparatory media for the U.S. Capitol storming. First Monday, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i3.11574

33.

Naylor

(2021, February 10). Read Trump’s Jan. 6 speech, a key part of impeachment trial. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-jan-6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trial

34.

Neuman

W. R.

Just

M. R.

Crigler

A. N.

(1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. University of Chicago Press.

35.

Nimmo

D. D.

Savage

R. L.

(1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods and findings. Goodyear Publishing.

36.

Eom

Rao

H. R.

(2015). Research note—Role of social media in social change: An analysis of collective sense making during the 2011 Egypt revolution. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0565

37.

Pasek

Jamieson

K. H.

(2023). Law and order vs. Law and order with racial justice: The effect of the campaign and racialized events on attitudes and vote choice. In The Annenberg IOD Collaborative (Ed.), Democracy amid crises: Polarization, pandemic, protests, and persuasion (pp. 205–218). Oxford University Press.

38.

Pasek

Levendusky

Jamieson

K. H.

(2023). A deeper anxiety: Was status threat at play in 2020? In The Annenberg IOD Collaborative (Ed.), Democracy amid crises: Polarization, pandemic, protests, and persuasion (pp. 255–280). Oxford University Press.

39.

Patterson

T. E.

(1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. Praeger.

40.

Prakasam

Huxtable-Thomas

(2021). Reddit: Affordances as an enabler for shifting loyalties. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(3), 723–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10002-x

41.

Rajadesingan

Resnick

Budak

(2020). Quick, community-specific learning: How distinctive toxicity norms are maintained in political subreddits. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7323

42.

Robards

(2018). Belonging and neo-tribalism on social media site Reddit. In Hardy

Bennett

Robards

(Eds.), Neo-tribes: Consumption, leisure and tourism (pp. 187–206). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68207-5_12

43.

Scammell

(2015). Politics and image: The conceptual value of branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990829

44.

Semetko

Valkenburg

(2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x

45.

Sigel

R. S.

(1966). Image of the American presidency—Part II of an exploration into popular views of presidential power. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108790

46.

Statista. (2023, April). Party identification in the United States in 2022, by generation. https://www.statista.com/statistics/319068/party-identification-in-the-united-states-by-generation/

47.

Steele

E. D.

Redding

W. C.

(1962). The American value system: Premises for persuasion. Western Speech, 26, 83–91.

48.

Stier

Bleier

Lietz

Strohmaier

(2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728

49.

Stokes

D. E.

(1963). Spatial models of party competition. The American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952828

50.

Strömbäck

Dimitrova

D. V.

(2006). Political and media systems matter: A comparison of election news coverage in Sweden and the United States. Harvard International Journal of Press/politics, 11(4), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06293549

51.

Stuckey

M. E.

(2020). “The power of the presidency to hurt”: The indecorous rhetoric of Donald J. Trump and the rhetorical norms of democracy. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 366–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12641

52.

United States Department of Justice. (2021, December). One year since the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/one-year-jan-6-attack-capitol

53.

Valentino

N. A.

Beckmann

M. N.

Buhr

T. A.

(2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18(4), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600152647083

54.

Valenzuela

Bachmann

Lawrence

R. G.

Gil

Zúñiga

(2023). Politics and media in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly: A centennial research retrospective. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(4), 808–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231203542

55.

Valenzuela

Piña

Ramírez

(2017). Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: How conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12325