In this article an empirically oriented conceptualization of frames is developed,
using the issue of asylum and illegal immigration in the Belgian press as a test
case. The methodological focus of this study is on the question of how these frames
can be detected in the coverage. How can they be defined independently of the
researcher’s perspective, knowing that the naming of frames in itself
already involves a kind of framing? Two frames are reconstructed and deductively
‘measured’ by a content analysis: on the one hand,
‘asylum-seekers are innocent victims’ and, on the other hand,
‘asylum-seekers are intruders’. In the second phase, this
article examines to what extent eight Belgian newspapers used these two frames to
cover the issue of asylum. A homogeneity analysis by means of HOMALS is introduced
in the framing research. It turns out to be a fruitful way to establish the frames
in the news more precisely. The construction of indices made it possible to explore
the evolution of the use of frames over time. Surprisingly, the Christmas mood was a
factor that caused a frame-shift and it even led to a media hype.
Anderson, Malcolm
(1997) Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern
World.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
2.
Bartlett, Frederic C.
(1932) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social
Psychology.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
3.
Bateson, Gregory
(1972) ‘A Theory of Play and
Fantasy’, pp. 177-193 in Steps to an
Ecology of Mind: A Revolutionary Approach to Man’s Understanding of
Himself.
New York: Ballantine Books
.
4.
Brosius, Hans-Bernd
and
Peter Eps
(1995)
‘Prototyping Through Key Events: News Selection in the Case of
Violence Against Aliens and Asylum Seekers in Germany’
, European Journal of Communication10:
391-412
.
5.
Cappella, Joseph N.
and
Kathleen H. Jamieson
(1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public
Good.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
6.
Carragee, Kevin M.
and
Wim Roefs
(2004)
‘The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research’
, Journal of Communication54:
214-233
.
7.
Cox, Trevor F.
and
Michael A.A. Cox
(2001) Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd edn.London: Chapman and Hall/CRC
.
8.
D’Angelo, Paul
(2002)
‘News Framing as a Multiparadigmatic Research Program: A Response
to Entman’
, Journal of Communication52:
870-888
.
9.
De Bens, Els
(2001) De pers in België [The Press in
Belgium].
Tielt: Lannoo
.
10.
De Vreese
,
Claes H.
,
Jochen Peter
and
Holi A. Semetko
(2001)
‘Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National
Comparative Study of Frames in the News’
, Political Communication18:
107-122
.
11.
Edelman, Murray
(1993)
‘Contestable Categories and Public Opinion’
, Political Communication10:
231-242
.
12.
Entman, Robert M.
(1991)
‘Framing US Coverage of International News: Contrasts in
Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents’
, Journal of Communication41(4):
6-28
.
13.
Entman, Robert M.
(1993)
‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’
, Journal of Communication43(4):
51-58
.
14.
Fiske, Susan T.
and
Shelley E. Taylor
(1991) Social Cognition.
New York: McGraw-Hill
.
15.
Gamson, William A.
(1995) ‘Constructing Social
Protest’, pp. 85-106 in
H. Johnson
and
B. Klandermans
(eds) Social Movements and Culture.
London: UCL Press
.
16.
Gamson, William A.
and
Kathryn E. Lash
(1983) ‘The Political Culture of Social Welfare
Policy’, pp. 397-415 in
S.E. Spiro
and
E. Yuchtman-Yaar
(eds) Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political
Perspectives.
New York: Academic Press
.
17.
Gitlin, Todd
(1980) The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making
and Unmaking of the New Left.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
18.
Goffman, Erving
(1981)
‘A Reply to Denzin and Keller’
, Contemporary Sociology10(1):
60-68
.
19.
Graber, Doris A.
(1988) Processing the News: How People Tame the Information
Tide.
New York: Longman
.
20.
Hackett, Robert A.
(1984)
‘Decline of a Paradigm? Bias and Objectivity in News Media Studies’
, Critical Studies in Mass Communication1:
229-259
.
21.
Harrell-Bond, Barbara
(1999) ‘The Experience of Refugees as Aid
Recipients’, pp. 136-168 in
A. Ager
(ed.) Refugees: Perspectives on the Experience of Forced
Migration.
London and New York: Continuum
.
22.
Huysmans, Jef
(2000)
‘The European Union and the Securitization of Migration’
, Journal of Common Market Studies38(5):
751-777
.
23.
Iyengar, Shanto
(1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political
Issues.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
24.
Kaye, Russell
(2001) ‘Blaming the Victim’,
pp. 53-70 in
R. King
and
N. Wood
(eds) Media and Migration: Constructions of Mobility and
Difference.
London: Routledge
.
25.
Krippendorff, Klaus
(1982) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its
Methodology.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
.
26.
McQuail, Denis
(2000) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory.
London: Sage
.
27.
Nelson, Thomas E.
and
Zoe M. Oxley
(1999)
‘Issue Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion’
, The Journal of Politics61:
1040-1067
.
28.
Nelson, Thomas E.
and
Elaine A. Willey
(2001) ‘Issue Frames that Strike a Value
Balance: A Political Psychology Perspective’, pp.
245-266 in
S.D. Reese
,
O.H. Gandy
and
A.E. Grant
(eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding
of the Social World.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
29.
Neuendorf, Kimberly A.
(2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
30.
Neuman, W. Rusell
,
Marion R. Just
and
Ann N. Crigler
(1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of
Political Meaning.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
.
31.
Pan, Zhongdang
and
Gerald M. Kosicki
(1993)
‘Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse’
, Political Communication10:
55-75
.
32.
Scheufele, Dietram A.
(1999)
‘Framing as a Theory of Media Effects’
, Journal of Communication49(1):
103-122
.
33.
Tankard, James W.
(2001) ‘The Empirical Approach to the Study of
Media Framing’, pp. 95-106 in
S.D. Reese
,
O.H. Gandy
and
A.E. Grant
(eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding
of the Social World.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
34.
Tuchman, Gaye
(1978) Making News: A Study in the Construction of
Reality.
New York: The Free Press
.
35.
Van de Geer, John P.
(1988) Analyse van kategorische gegevens [Analysis of
Categorical Data].
Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus
.
36.
Van der Kloot, Willem A.
(1997) Meerdimensionale schaaltechnieken voor gelijkenisen
keuzedata [More Dimensional Scaling Techniques for Similarity and Choice
Data].
Utrecht: Lemma
.
37.
Van Gorp, Baldwin
(2002)
‘Werken aan de werkelijkheid. Een casestudie over de inplanting
van een asielcentrum’ [Working on Reality. A Case Study of the
Establishment of an Asylum Centre]
, Tijdschrift voor Sociologie23(3-4):
325-341
.
38.
Van Gorp, Baldwin
(2005) ‘Media Framing of the Immigration Issue:
The Case of the Belgian Press’, pp.
125-148 in
H. De Smedt
,
L. Goossens
and
C. Timmerman
(eds) Unexpected Approaches to the Global Society.
Antwerp: Garant
.
39.
Vasterman, Peter
(2004) Mediahype.
Amsterdam: Aksant
.
40.
Zetter, Roger
(1999) ‘International Perspectives on Refugee
Assistance’, pp. 46-82 in
A. Ager
(ed.) Refugees: Perspectives on the Experience of Forced
Migration.
London and New York: Continuum
.
