Failure causes of production systems need to be readily identified, for effective recovery solutions. Root cause analysis can be used for this, integrated by a method for identifying coherent and sustainable solutions. In this article, root cause analysis for failure cause identification is coupled with a method of problem solving to guide the search for effective solutions, called theory of inventive problem solving. The integration of these methodologies is implemented and demonstrated on a real case concerning the solution to the potential failure of the equipment used in the torque test performed on truck engines used in high-tonnage mining operation. The incorporation of a key performance indicator analysis allows evaluating realistically the results obtained and determining the success of the solution.
PrandoR. Manual de Gestión de mantenimiento a la medida. Editorial Piedra Santa, San Salvador, El Salvador, 1996.
2.
PAS 55-1:2008. Asset management. British Standard Institute, September2008.
3.
BarberáLCrespoAViverosP. Advanced model for maintenance management in a continuous improvement cycle: integration into the business strategy. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag2012; 3(1): 47–63.
RasmusonDMKellyDL. Common-cause failure analysis in event assessment. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2008; 222(4): 521–532.
6.
US Department of Energy (DOE). Root cause analysis guidance document. DOE guideline, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Febrero1992.
7.
LatinoRJLatinoKC. Root cause analysis: improving performance for bottom-line results. 2nd ed.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC, 2002.
8.
MobleyRK. Root cause failure analysis. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.
9.
HurdleEEBartlettLMAndrewsJD. System fault diagnostics using fault tree analysis. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2007; 221(1): 43–55.
10.
XingLBodduPSunY. Reliability analysis of static and dynamic fault-tolerant systems subject to probabilistic common-cause failures. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2010; 224(1): 43–53.
11.
CornellK. WebKaizen, better faster cheaper problem solving for business. Omaha, NE: Prevail Digital Publishing, 2010.
12.
OsbornAF. Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem solving. 3rd ed.New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1963.
13.
SuttonRIHargadonA. Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin Sci Quart1996; 41(4): 685–718.
14.
MichalkoM. Thinkertoys: a handbook on creative-thinking techniques. 2nd ed.Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press, 2006.
15.
TannerD. Total creativity in business & industry. Editorial Advanced Practical Thinking Inc, 1997. ISBN-10: 0780767993; ISBN-13: 978-0780767997.
16.
AltshullerGS. Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems (original publication in Russian—1979). New York: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, 1984.
17.
AhmedRKooJMJeongYH. Design of safety-critical systems using the complementarities of success and failure domains with a case study. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2011; 96: 201–209.
18.
FlausJ-M. A model-based approach for systematic risk analysis. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2008; 222(1): 79–93.
19.
ModarresMCheonSW. Function-centered modeling of engineering systems using the goal tree–success tree technique and functional primitives. Reliab Eng Syst Safe1999; 64: 181–200.
20.
UlwickA. What customers want: using outcome-driven innovation to create breakthrough products and services. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
21.
ISO/DIS 14224:2004. Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries—collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment.
22.
SinnamonRMAndrewsJD. New approaches to evaluating fault trees. Reliab Eng Syst Safe1997; 58: 89–96.
23.
FeyVRivinE. Innovation on demand: new product development using TRIZ. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
24.
SavranskyS. Engineering of creativity: introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. 1st ed.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000.
25.
CavallucciDRousselotFZanniC. Linking contradictions and laws of engineering system evolution within the TRIZ framework. Creativ Innovat Manag2009; 18(2): 71–80.
26.
CasciniGRotiniFRussoD. Synthesis in innovation. Capitulo: networks of trends: systematic definition of evolutionary scenarios. Procedia Eng2011; 9: 355–367 (Proceeding of the ETRIA world TRIZ future conference 2008, Italy 2008).
27.
BecattiniNCasciniGRotiniF. Correlations between the evolution of contradictions and the law of ideality increase. In: Proceedings of the 9th ETRIA TRIZ future conference (sponsored by CIRP), Timisoara, Romania, 4–6 November 2009, pp.26–34 (Republished on Procedia Eng 2011; 9: 236–250).
28.
CavallucciD. Integrating Altshuller’s development laws for technical systems into the design process. CIRP Ann: Manuf Techn2001; 50(1): 115–120.
29.
LohTCKohSCL. Critical elements for a successful enterprise resource planning implementation in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Prod Res2004; 42(17): 3433–3455.
30.
CheungSOSuenHCHCheungKKW. PPMS: a web-based construction project performance monitoring system. Automat Constr2004; 13(3): 361–376.
31.
ViverosPZioENikulinC. Integration of root cause analysis and theory of inventive problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 11th international probabilistic safety assessment and management conference and the annual European safety and reliability conference, Helsinki, Finland, 25–29 June 2012.
32.
LiangK. Optimizing Unilever’s capital and emergency spare stock sizes. A thesis for the Degree of Bachelor of Applied Science, Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada, 2009.
33.
PascualRDel CastilloGLouitD. Business-oriented prioritization: a novel graphical technique. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2009; 94: 1308–1313.
34.
WangY-FXieMHabibullahMS. Quantitative risk assessment through hybrid causal logic approach. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2011; 225(3): 323–332.
35.
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, GreenbergHRCramerJJ. Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.
36.
SmithDJ. Reliability, maintainability and risk: practical methods for engineers. 5th ed.Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.
37.
VaidhyanathanRVenkatasubramanianV. Digraph-based models for automated HAZOP analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe1995; 50: 33–49.
38.
MarshDWRBearfieldG. Generalizing event trees using Bayesian networks. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2008; 222(2): 105–114.
39.
WilsonALimniosNKeller-McNultyS. Modern statistical and mathematical methods in reliability (series on quality reliability and engineering statistics), vol. 10. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2005.
40.
EversheimW. Innovation management for technical products: systematic and integrated product development and production planning. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
