This study explores the feasibility of assessing self-monitoring abilities in a female semi-professional soccer team. It investigates whether athletes can accurately evaluate their external workload by comparing GPS-derived metrics with subjective estimates, including perceived exertion and self-estimated distances. Furthermore, the study exploratorily examines whether regular, session-by-session feedback improves athletes’ estimation accuracy over time compared to sporadic feedback limited to match performance. Twenty-three female athletes (age 21.1 ± 3.7 years) participated in the experiment. After familiarization with the task, their monitoring abilities were assessed by asking them to estimate total distance, very high-speed running distance (>20 km/h), and RPE (Borg CR10 scale) without accessing GPS data (7–8 training sessions considered on average). During subsequent training sessions, athletes in the experimental group were shown the actual GPS data after each post-training estimation, whereas the control group continued to estimate the parameters without feedback (56–57 training sessions considered on average). Finally, monitoring abilities were reassessed for all participants. The results show that female football players underestimated the Total Distance covered during training sessions (p < 0.001). However, the experimental group's accuracy of their distance estimations significantly improved compared to the control group (p = 0.01), suggesting that regular feedback appears to be an effective strategy for enhancing athletes’ self-monitoring abilities, with potential implications for optimizing training autonomy and performance awareness in elite sports contexts.
CumminsCOrrRO’ConnorH, et al.Global positioning systems (GPS) and micro technology sensors in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med2013; 43: 1025–1042.
2.
FosterCRodriguez-MarroyoJADe KoningJJ. Monitoring training loads: the past, the present, and the future. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: S2–S2.
3.
BoullosaDClaudinoJGFernandez-FernandezJ, et al.The fine-tuning approach for training monitoring. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2023; 18: 1374–1379.
4.
ImpellizzeriFMRampininiECouttsAJ, et al.Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc2004; 36: 1042–1047.
5.
BorgGA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc1982; 14: 377–381.
6.
FosterCBoullosaDMcGuiganM, et al.25 Years of session rating of perceived exertion: historical perspective and development. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2021; 16: 612–621.
7.
BrinkMSVisscherCArendsS, et al.Monitoring stress and recovery: new insights for the prevention of injuries and illnesses in elite youth soccer players. Br J Sports Med2010; 44: 809–815.
8.
AkenheadRNassisGP. Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: current practice and perceptions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2016; 11: 587–593.
9.
CasamichanaDCastellanoJCalleja-GonzalezJ, et al.Relationship between indicators of training load in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 369–374.
10.
PustinaAASatoKLiuC, et al.Establishing a duration standard for the calculation of session rating of perceived exertion in NCAA division I men’s soccer. J Trainology2017; 6: 26–30.
11.
Campos-VazquezMAMendez-VillanuevaAGonzalez-JuradoJA, et al.Relationships between rating-of-perceived-exertion and heart-rate-derived internal training load in professional soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2015; 10: 587–592.
12.
GaudinoPIaiaFMStrudwickAJ, et al.Factors influencing perception of effort during elite soccer training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2015; 10: 860–864.
13.
RagoVVigh-LarsenJFDeylamiK, et al.Use of rating of perceived exertion–based training load in elite ice hockey training and match-play. J Strength Cond Res2022; 36: 2837–2843.
14.
ClementeFMRamirez-CampilloRCastilloD, et al.Effects of mental fatigue in running distance and tactical behavior during small-sided games: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol2021; 12: 656445.
15.
CostaJARagoVBritoP, et al.Training in women soccer players: a systematic review on training load monitoring. Front Psychol2022; 13: 943857.
16.
AlexiouHCouttsAJ. A comparison of methods used for quantifying internal training load in women soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2008; 3: 320–330.
17.
MoreiraACrewtherBFreitasCG, et al.Session RPE and salivary immune-endocrine responses to basketball matches. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2012; 52: 682–687.
BraverTS. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn Sci2012; 16: 106–113.
20.
FlavellJH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am Psychol1979; 34: 906–911.
21.
AckermanRThompsonVA. Meta-reasoning: monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci2017; 21: 607–617.
22.
InzlichtMWernerKMBriskinJL, et al.Integrating models of self-regulation. Annu Rev Psychol2021; 72: 319–345.
23.
WellsAMatthewsG. Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model. Behav Res Ther1996; 34: 881–888.
24.
EcclesDWWardPWoodmanT, et al.Human factors and sport psychology: advancing the science of human performance. Hum Factors2011; 53: 180–202.
25.
MacIntyreTEIgouERCampbellMJ, et al.Metacognition and action: a new pathway to understanding social and cognitive aspects of expertise in sport. Front Psychol2014; 5: 1155.
26.
BrickNEMacIntyreTECampbellMJ. Thinking and action: a cognitive perspective on self-regulation during endurance performance. Front Physiol2016; 7: 159.
27.
BrickNEMacIntyreTECampbellMJ. Attentional focus in endurance activity: new paradigms and future directions. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2014; 7: 106–134.
28.
BrickNEMacIntyreTECampbellMJ. Metacognitive processes in the self-regulation of performance in elite endurance runners. Psychol Sport Exerc2015; 19: 1–9.
29.
LoveSKannis-DymandKLovellGP. Metacognitions in triathletes: associations with attention, state anxiety, and relative performance. J Appl Sport Psychol2018; 30: 421–436.
30.
LoveSKannis-DymandLLovellGP. Development and validation of the metacognitive processes during performances questionnaire. Psychol Sport Exerc2019; 41: 91–98.
31.
BarrettEKannis-DymandLLoveS, et al.Sports specific metacognitions and competitive state anxiety in athletes: a comparison between different sporting types. Appl Cogn Psychol2023; 37: 200–211.
32.
AckermanRThompsonVA. Meta-reasoning: shedding metacognitive light on reasoning research. In: SternbergRJ (eds) International handbook of thinking and reasoning. London: Routledge, 2017, pp.1–15.
33.
FlemingSM. Metacognition and confidence: a review and synthesis. Annu Rev Psychol2024; 75: 241–268.
34.
NietfeldJL. An examination of metacognitive strategy use and monitoring skills by middle distance runners. J Appl Sport Psychol2003; 15: 307–320.
35.
AngiusLMerliniMHopkerJ, et al.Physical and mental fatigue reduce psychomotor vigilance in professional football players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2022; 17: 1391–1398.
36.
AndersenSSHansenPØ. Hærem T. How elite athletes reflect on their training: strong beliefs–ambiguous feedback signals. Reflect Pract2015; 16: 403–417.
37.
FogartyGJElseD. Performance calibration in sport: implications for self-confidence and metacognitive biases. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2005; 3: 41–57.
38.
WeinbergRSGouldD. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. 6th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2015.
39.
Torres-GuijarroSBengoecheaM. Gender differential in self-assessment in higher education. High Educ Res Dev2017; 36: 1072–1084.
40.
PallierG. Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks. Sex Roles2003; 48: 265–276.
41.
StamFKouzinouSVisscherC, et al.The value of metacognitive skills and intrinsic motivation for sport performance. Psychol2020; 11: 326.
42.
van der SluisABrinkMSPluimBM, et al.Self-regulatory skills and prevention of overuse injuries in tennis players. Scand J Med Sci Sports2019; 29: 1050–1058.
43.
AhmedMDYan HoWKBegumS, et al.Perfectionism, self-esteem, and the will to win among adolescent athletes: the effects of the level of achievements and gender. Front Psychol2021; 12: 580446.
44.
ValzolgherCVerdeletGSalemmeR, et al.Reaching to sounds in VR: promoting adaptation to altered auditory cues. Neuropsychologia2020; 149: 107665.
45.
MaloneJJLovellRVarleyMC, et al.Unpacking the black box: applications and considerations for using GPS devices in sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: S2–18.
46.
RiboliAFranciniLRossiE, et al.Top-class women’s soccer performance: peak demands and distribution of the match activities relative to maximal intensities during official matches. Biol Sport2024; 41: 207–215.
47.
Vantieghem-NicolasLMorinJBCotteT, et al.Concurrent validity and reliability of the sprint force–velocity profile assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech. Sensors2023; 23: 8189.
48.
Rodríguez-MarroyoJAAntoñanC. Validity of the session rating of perceived exertion for monitoring exercise demands in youth soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2015; 10: 404–407.
49.
HoppeMWBaumgartCPolglazeT, et al.Validity and reliability of GPS and LPS for measuring distances covered and sprint mechanical properties in team sports. PLoS One2018; 13: e0192708.
GiovanelliEDesoldaBValzolgherC, et al.Metacognitive awareness of lip-reading gains in young and older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res2025; 68(10): 4720–7735.
52.
DarmawanATASukocoPMarhaendroASD, et al.Mental toughness and self-confidence of volleyball extracurricular participants: a study of gender differences. Retos2025; 62: 470–479.
53.
CulvinABowesA. Introduction: women’s football in a global, professional era. In: CulvinABowesA (eds) Women’s football in a global, professional era (emerald studies in sport and gender). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2023, pp.1–13.
54.
PfisterG. Assessing the sociology of sport: on women and football. Int Rev Sociol Sport2015; 50: 563–569.
55.
SætherSAAspvikNPHøigaardR. Norwegian football academy players: self-assessed skills, stress and coach-athlete relationship. (Manca anno, rivista e volume; confermi i dati?).
56.
LiWManoharanPCuiX, et al.The effects of musical feedback training on metacognition and self-directed learning. Front Hum Neurosci2023; 17: 1304929.
57.
LuoTLiuC. The impact of feedback on metacognition: enhancing in easy tasks, impeding in difficult ones. Conscious Cogn2023; 116: 103601.
58.
PostAKKoningRHVisscherC, et al.Reflection and evaluation processes for elite swimming performance. Psychol Sport Exerc2022; 61: 102219.
59.
PriceACollinsD. Exploring the development of ‘understanding’ in youth soccer players. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog2024: 1–19.
60.
McCardleLYoungBWBakerJ. Self-regulated learning and expertise development in sport: current status, challenges, and future opportunities. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2019; 12: 112–138.
61.
KirschenbaumDSKarolyP. When self-regulation fails: tests of some preliminary hypotheses. J Consult Clin Psychol1977; 45: 1116–1125.
62.
ChowGMLuzzeriM. Post-event reflection: a tool to facilitate self-awareness, self-monitoring, and self-regulation in athletes. J Sport Psychol Action2019; 10: 106–118.
