This study investigated skilled netball players’ visual behaviour during a sport-specific decision-making passing task under varying levels of difficulty. Twelve highly skilled female netball players from Singapore's Division 1 league wore eye-tracking glasses while completing 10 simulated netball scenarios projected life-size on a screen. Each scenario varied in difficulty based on the number of open players: one (difficult), two (medium) or three (easy). Participants were instructed to make decision within three seconds and to physically pass a ball to a teammate on the screen. Their visual (foveal) focus, quiet eye and decision time were compared. Results showed that participants focused more on their teammates compared to opponents (p < .001) and other areas (p < .001) and recorded longer fixation durations for difficult conditions compared to medium (p < .001) and easy (p = .003). While quiet eye durations did not differ across task difficulty, participants took significantly longer to make a decision in difficult (p < .001) and medium (p = .019) scenarios as compared to easy scenarios. In conclusion, skilled netball players rely on direct cues from teammates more than opponents during passing decision-making. In situations of greater uncertainty, they require more time to process visual information before making a decision.
CordovilRAraújoDDavidsK, et al.The influence of instructions and body-scaling as constraints on decision-making processes in team sports. Eur J Sport Sci2009; 9: 169–179.
2.
AshfordMAbrahamAPooltonJ. Understanding a player’s decision-making process in team sports: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Sports2021; 9: 65.
3.
McPhersonSLVickersJN. Cognitive control in motor expertise. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2004; 2: 274–300.
4.
EvansJDWhippPLaySB. Knowledge representation and pattern recognition skills of elite adult and youth soccer players. Int J Perform Anal Sport2012; 12: 208–221.
5.
CauserJFordPR. “Decisions, decisions, decisions”: transfer and specificity of decision-making skill between sports. Cogn Process2014; 15: 385–389.
6.
MusculusLKavussanuM. Do the best players “take-the-first”? examining expertise differences in the option-generation and selection processes of young soccer players. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol2018; 7: 271–283.
7.
KlattSNoëlBMusculusL, et al.Creative and intuitive decision-making processes: a comparison of Brazilian and German soccer coaches and players. Res Q Exerc Sport2019; 90: 651–665.
8.
BasevitchITenenbaumGRazonS, et al.Anticipation and situation-assessment skills in soccer under varying degrees of informational constraint. J Sport Exerc Psychol2020; 42: 59–69.
9.
MacquetAC. Recognition within the decision-making process: a case study of expert volleyball players. J Appl Sport Psychol2009; 21: 64–79.
10.
KirschenDGLabyDL. The role of sports vision in eye care today. Eye Contact Lens2011; 37: 127–130.
11.
EricksonGB. Sports vision: vision care for the enhancement of sports performance. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2020, pp.8–10.
12.
MorganSPattersonJMacMahonC, et al.Differences in oculomotor behaviour between elite athletes from visually and non-visually oriented sports. Int J Sport Psychol2009; 40: 489.
13.
DavidsKWilliamsAMWilliamsJG. Visual perception and action in sport. London: Routledge, 2005, pp.5–6.
14.
RocaAFordPRMcRobertAP, et al.Perceptual-cognitive skills and their interaction as a function of task constraints in soccer. J Sport Exerc Psychol2013; 35: 144–155.
15.
LexHEssigKKnoblauchA, et al.Cognitive representations and cognitive processing of team-specific tactics in soccer. PLoS One2015; 10: e0118219.
16.
AfonsoJGargantaJMcrobertA, et al.The perceptual cognitive processes underpinning skilled performance in volleyball: evidence from eye-movements and verbal reports of thinking involving an in situ representative task. J Sports Sci Med2012; 11: 339–345.
17.
CorrêaUCOliveiraTACDClavijoFAR, et al.Time of ball possession and visual search in the decision-making on shooting in the sport of futsal. Int J Perform Anal Sport2020; 20: 254–263.
18.
SalvucciDDGoldbergJH. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on eye tracking research & applications, Palm Beach Gardens, USA, 6-8 November 2000, pp.71–88. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
19.
BruceLFarrowDRaynorA, et al.But I can’t pass that far! the influence of motor skill on decision making. Psychol Sport Exerc2012; 13: 152–161.
20.
HüttermannSNoëlBMemmertD. Eye tracking in high-performance sports: evaluation of its application in expert athletes. Int J Comput Sci Sport2018; 17: 182–203.
21.
MilnerDGoodaleM. The visual brain in action. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp.21–24.
22.
VaterCWilliamsAMHossnerEJ. What do we see out of the corner of our eye? The role of visual pivots and gaze anchors in sport. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2020; 13: 81–103.
23.
MannDTWilliamsAMWardP, et al.Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol2007; 29: 457–478.
24.
VickersJN. Perception, cognition, and decision training: the quiet eye in action. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp.10–12.
25.
VickersJN. Mind over muscle: the role of gaze control, spatial cognition, and the quiet eye in motor expertise. Cogn Process2011; 12: 219–222.
26.
MooreLJVineSJCookeA, et al.Quiet eye training expedites motor learning and aids performance under heightened anxiety: the roles of response programming and external attention. Psychophysiology2012; 49: 1005–1015.
27.
WilliamsAMSingerRNFrehlichSG. Quiet eye duration, expertise, and task complexity in near and far aiming tasks. J Motor Behav2002; 34: 197–207.
28.
GonzalezCCCauserJMiallRC, et al.Identifying the causal mechanisms of the quiet eye. Eur J Sport Sci2017; 17: 74–84.
29.
HewitJButtonCHumaPA, et al.Assessing and developing agility in netball players: Reactive decision making. Technical report for the Netball New Zealand, New Zealand, November 2010.
30.
JacobyLLDallasM. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J Exp Psychol Gen1981; 110: 306–340.
31.
JacobyLLWhitehouseK. An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception. J Exp Psychol Gen1989; 118: 126–135.
32.
SangerMABunsMTThomasKT. The effect of virtual training on speed and accuracy of decision making in sport. J Hum Kinet2019; 70: 261–273.
33.
SilvaAFConteDClementeFM. Decision-making in youth team-sports players: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 3803.
34.
FarrowD. A multi-factorial examination of the development of skill expertise in high performance netball. Talent Dev Excell2010; 2: 123–135.
35.
ButtonCCroftJUeharaL. Examination of the visual search characteristics of netball players. J Sport Exerc Psychol2010; 5: 22–27.
36.
BruceLFarrowDRaynorA. How specific is domain specificity: does it extend across playing position?J Sci Med Sport2012; 15: 361–367.
37.
GiancamilliFGalliFChiricoA, et al.When the going gets tough, what happens to quiet eye? The role of time pressure and performance pressure during basketball free throws. Psychol Sport Exerc2022; 58: 102057.
38.
BlancaMJAlarconRArnauJ, et al.Non-normal data: is ANOVA still a valid option?Psicothema2017; 29: 552–527.
39.
BlancaMJArnauJGarcía-CastroFJ, et al.Non-normal data in repeated measures ANOVA: impact on type I error and power. Psicothema2023; 35: 21–29.
40.
LakensD. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol2013; 4: 863.
41.
JinPGeZFanT. Research on visual search behaviors of basketball players at different levels of sports expertise. Sci Rep2023; 13: 1406.
42.
RaabMJohnsonJGAckermanPL, et al.Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. J Exp Psychol Appl2007; 13: 158–170.
43.
RaabM. Decision making in sports: influence of complexity on implicit and explicit learning. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2003; 1: 406–433.
44.
WilliamsMDavidsKBurwitzL, et al.Proficiency-related differences in anticipation and visual search strategy in soccer. J Sport Exerc Psychol1993; 15: S91.
45.
VaeyensRLenoirMWilliamsAM, et al.The effects of task constraints on visual search behavior and decision-making skill in youth soccer players. J Sport Exerc Psychol2007; 29: 147–169.
46.
SavelsberghGJPWilliamsAMKampJVD, et al.Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 279–287.
47.
AbernethyBWoodJM. Do generalized visual training programmes for sport really work? An experimental investigation. J Sports Sci2001; 19: 203–222.
48.
SirnikMErčuljFRoškerJ. Research of visual attention in basketball shooting: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022; 17: 1195–1210.
49.
FarrowDYoungWBruceL. The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology. J Sci Med Sport2005; 8: 52–60.
50.
WilliamsAMEricssonKA. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Hum Mov Sci2005; 24: 283–307.
51.
MacquetACKragbaK. What makes basketball players continue with the planned play or change it? A case study of the relationships between sense-making and decision-making. Cogn Technol Work2015; 17: 345–353.
