This study aims to determine the relationship between gaze behavior and serve accuracy in parabadminton athletes under training conditions. Fifteen parabadminton athletes ranked among the top ten in the world participated in the study, including 9 females (33 ± 11,96 years); and 6 males (27,16 ± 9,51 years). The athletes performed 20 consecutive serves on each side of the court, for a total of 40 executions. Gaze behavior data was collected using the Tobii Glasses 2 eye tracking system. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the correlation between serve accuracy and gaze behavior The results showed no significant association between serve accuracy and the number of fixations or fixation duration. However, a trend toward greater success was identified in the SL4 class when the athlete fixated on the shuttlecock, and in the WH2 class when the athlete fixated on the net. Considering the technical specifications of the equipment used to study gaze tracking, investigating this variable in badminton is feasible and acceptable for professionals in the sport.
International Badminton Association For Disable Players. IBAD. Laws: badminton for disable people. Appendix 5. January 2009.
2.
Myo-JungKMyung-WonS. Basic theory and practice of badminton for the disabled. Seoul, Korea: Daekyo, 2012.
3.
Badminton World Federation. BWF. 2020.
4.
YükselMF. Examination of reaction times of elite physically disabled badminton players. Int J Sport Culture Sci2017; 5: 319–327.
5.
JaniaczykM. Para-badminton-sport for people with disabilities. Physiother Q2015; 23: 66.
6.
Badminton World Federation. BWF Para-Badminton classification and regulations. 2011.
7.
BroadbentDPCauserJWilliamsAM, et al.Perceptual cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: future research directions. Eur J Sport Sci2014; 15: 322–331.
8.
AfonsoJGargantaJMcrobertA, et al.The perceptual cognitive processes underpinning skilled performance in volleyball: evidence from eye-movements and verbal reports of thinking involving an in situ representative task. J Sports Sci Med2012; 11: 339.
9.
AlderDBBroadbentDPSteadJ, et al.The impact of physiological load on anticipation skills in badminton: from testing to training. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 1816–1823.
10.
PirasALobiettiRSquatritoS. Response time, visual search strategy, and anticipatory skills in volleyball players. J Ophthalmol2014; 2014: 189268.
11.
SavelsberghGJPWilliamsAMVan der KampJ, et al.Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 279–287.
12.
MannDTWilliamsAMWardP, et al.Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol2007; 29: 457–478.
13.
WilliamsAMJanelleCMDavidsK. Constraints on the search for visual information in sports. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2004; 2: 301–318.
14.
LandMF. Vision, eye movements, and natural behavior. Vis Neurosci2009; 26: 51–62.
15.
VickersJN. Advances in coupling perception and action: the quiet eye as a bidirectional link between gaze, attention, and action. Prog Brain Res2009; 174: 279–288.
16.
VickersJN. Origins and current issues in quiet eye research. Current Issues in Sport Science2016; 1: 1–11.
17.
VickersJN. The quiet eye: origins, controversies and future directions. Kinesiology Review2016b; 5: 119–128.
18.
NugrohoA. Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Servis Pendek Bulutangkis Untuk Atlet Kelompok Anak-Anak, Pemula, Remaja dan Taruna. Pend Kepelatihan Olahraga-S12016: 1–7.
19.
AbernethyBRussellDG. Expert-novice differences in an applied selective attention task. Journal of Sport Psychology1987; 9: 326–345.
20.
WilsonMRCauserJVickersJN. The quiet eye as a characteristic of expertise. In: WilliamsAM (eds) Routledge handbook of sport expertise. London: Routledge, 2015, p.22.
21.
KlostermannAMoeiniradS. Fewer fixations of longer duration? Expert gaze behavior revisited. Ger J Exerc Sport Res2020; 50: 146–161.
22.
KredelRVaterCKlostermannA, et al.Eye-tracking technology and the dynamics of natural gaze behavior in sports: a systematic review of 40 years of research. Front Psychol2017; 8: 1845.
23.
AlderDFordPRCauserJ, et al.The coupling between gaze behavior and opponent kinematics during anticipation of badminton shots. Hum Mov Sci2014; 37: 169–179.
24.
BottomsLSinclairJTaylorK, et al.The effects of carbohydrate ingestion on the badminton serve after fatiguing exercise. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 285–293.
25.
HussainIAhmedSMohammadA, et al.Videographical analysis of short service in badminton. J Educ Pract2011; 2: 1–5.
26.
SethB. Determination factors of badminton game performance. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health2016; 3: 20–22.
27.
GawinWFriesUMaiwaldC. Superior gaze strategies of elite badminton players and the significance of natural research conditions. International Journal of Racket Sports Science2022; 4: 41–51.
28.
ChiaJSBurnsSFBarrettLA, et al.Increased complexities in visual search behavior in skilled players for a self-paced aiming task. Front Psychol2017; 8: 987.
29.
GriceT. Badminton: steps to success. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 2007.
30.
Del VillarFGonzálezLGIglesiasD, et al.Expert-novice differences in cognitive and execution skills during tennis competition. Percept Mot Skills2007; 104: 355–365.
31.
MackGSB. The game of badminton – the rules and tactics of a singles match. Redditch: Read Books, 2016.
32.
TongYMHongY. The playing pattern of world’s top single badminton players. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, 2000.
33.
VialSCochraneJBlazevichAJ, et al.Using the trajectory of the shuttlecock as a measure of performance accuracy in the badminton short serve. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 14: 91–96.
34.
DuncanMJChanCKClarkeND, et al.The effect of badminton-specific exercise on badminton short-serve performance in competition and practice climates. Eur J Sport Sci2017; 17: 119–126.
35.
VialSCroftJLSchroederRT, et al.Does the presence of an opponent affect object projection accuracy in elite athletes? A study of the landing location of the short serve in elite badminton players. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 412–417.
36.
DickTP. Badminton tactics in singles and doubles play. Redditch: Read Books, 2011.
37.
Loiseau-TaupinMRuffaultASlawinskiJ, et al.Effects of acute physical fatigue on gaze behavior and performance during a badminton game. Front Sports Act Living2021; 3: 725625.
38.
DiscombeRMCotterillST. Eye tracking in sport: a guide for new and aspiring researchers. Sport Exerc Psychol Rev2015; 11: 49–58.
39.
LeeSMKimSParkSH. Self-paced sport events under temporal constraints: visual search, quiet eye, expertise and constrained performance time in far aiming tasks. Int J Appl Sports Sci2009; 21: 146–161.
40.
VickersJN. Visual control when aiming at a far target. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform1996; 22: 342–354.
41.
RipollHKerlirzinYSteinJF, et al.Analysis of information processing, decision making, and visual strategies in complex problem solving sport situations. Hum Mov Sci1995; 14: 325–349.
42.
WardPWilliamsAMBennettSJ. Visual search and biological motion perception in tennis. Res Q Exerc Sport2002; 73: 107–112.
43.
VineSJWilsonMR. The influence of quiet eye training and pressure on attention and visuo-motor control. Acta Psychol2011; 136: 340–346.
44.
WilliamsAMSingerRNFrehlichSG. Quiet eye duration, expertise, and task complexity in near and far aiming tasks. J Mot Behav2002; 34: 197–207.
