Embracing a tailor-made approach to training, the aim of this study was to understand how ongoing adaptation and planning of training sessions (through bidirectional feedback between planning and assessment) contrasts with a more rigid planning with only 4-weeks adaptations, and how those differences impact on learning trajectories. A longitudinal, randomized design with a qualitative analysis was conducted during a full season with 24 girls from a U-13 volleyball team: an experimental group (E.G.) had daily adjusted planning and a contrast group (C.G.) had 4-weeks adjusted planning. Data analysis considered reflective diaries, field notes, video analysis and ongoing assessments using Game Performance Assessment Instrument, to gain a deeper understanding of athletes’ progression and identify their struggles. Based on ongoing and punctual assessment (through GPAI) the planning of the two groups diverged significantly in content and drill structure. Ongoing assessment allowed to solve, in E.G., unpredictable issues as well as develop flexible planning to adapt the specific drills and re-adapt the content. Those adaptations occurred in many ways such as: type of the drill, setting goals and changing the content of the session. In C.G., 4 weeks adaptations were permitted to moderate the extending disparities between rigid planning and ongoing adaptations, aiming to balance the group's levels. Our findings highlighted the importance of bidirectional feedback between assessment and planning, informing the coaches to possible adaptation of the training. Given the differences in learning rates, unforeseen circumstances and players’ characteristics, flexible planning and assessment is paramount to effectively steer the learning process.
KinnerkPKearneyPEHarveyS, et al.An investigation of high-performance team sport coaches’ planning practices. Sports Coach Rev2023; 12: 253–280.
2.
CantillonP. Teaching large groups. Br Med J2003; 326: 437.
3.
Den HartighRJNiessenASMFrenckenWG, et al.Selection procedures in sports: improving predictions of athletes’ future performance. Eur J Sport Sci2018; 18: 1191–1198.
4.
RønnestadBRØfstengSJEllefsenS. Block periodization of strength and endurance training is superior to traditional periodization in ice hockey players. Scand J Med Sci Sports2019; 29: 180–188.
5.
SandsWAMcNealJR. Predicting athlete preparation and performance: a theoretical perspective. J Sport Behav2000; 23: 289.
6.
AfonsoJClementeFMRibeiroJ, et al.Towards a de facto nonlinear periodization: extending nonlinearity from programming to periodizing. Sports2020; 8: 110.
7.
AraújoDDavidsK. What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition?J Conscious Stud2011; 18: 7–23.
8.
DavidsKRothwellMHydesS, et al.Enriching athlete—environment interactions in youth sport: the role of a department of methodology. Children2023; 10: 752.
KidmanL. Athlete-centred coaching: Developing inspired and inspiring people. Christchurch, New Zeland: IPC Print Resources, 2005.
11.
LoureiroMNakamuraFYRamosA, et al.Ongoing bidirectional feedback between planning and assessment in educational contexts: a narrative review. Int Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 12068.
12.
D'IsantoTD'EliaFRaiolaG, et al.Assessment of sport performance: theoretical aspects and practical indications. Sport Mont2019; 17: 79–82.
13.
EntwistleN. Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment. In: Assessment to Promote Deep Learning: Insights from AAHF’s 2000 and 1999 Assessment Conferences, 2000, pp.9–20.
14.
SmithTJHenningRAWadeMG, et al.Variability in human performance. London: CRC Press, 2014.
15.
LiHChenZZhuW. Variability: human nature and its impact on measurement and statistical analysis. J Sport Health Sci2019; 8: 527.
16.
AtkinsonOBrunsdonJJ. Changing the score: alternative assessment strategies and tools for sport in middle school physical education. Strategies2022; 35: 23–30.
17.
LeenknechtMWijniaLKöhlenM, et al.Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation. Asses Eval High Educ2021; 46: 236–255.
18.
SchildkampKvan der KleijFMHeitinkMC, et al.Formative assessment: a systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. Int J Educ Res2020; 103: 101602.
19.
BaldersonDSharpeT. The effects of personal accountability and personal responsibility instruction on select off-task and positive social behaviors. J Teach Phys Educ2005; 24: 66–87.
20.
PereiraFMesquitaIGraçaA. Accountability systems and instructional approaches in youth volleyball training. J Sports Sci Med2009; 8: 366.
21.
FranceschiAConteDAiraleM, et al.Training load, neuromuscular readiness, and perceptual fatigue profile in youth elite long-jump athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2020; 15: 1034–1038.
22.
NiemiK. ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Educ Inq2021; 12: 282–300.
23.
RibeiroJFacchiniMLoureiroM, et al.Meta-assessment: or the importance of assessing the assessment process. In: Ongoing bidirectional feedback between assessment and implementation in educational environments. Porto: Editora FADEUP, 2023, pp.73–87.
24.
RamosADavidsKCoutinhoP, et al.Tracking relations between development of tactical knowledge and tactical behaviour: a season-long action research study. Phys Educ Sport Pedag2022; 29: 1–15.
25.
LoureiroMMesquitaIRamosA, et al.Flexible training planning coupled with flexible assessment: a 12-week randomized feasibility study in a youth female volleyball team. Children2023; 10: 29.
26.
RamosACoutinhoPDavidsK, et al.Developing players’ tactical knowledge using combined constraints-led and step-game approaches—A longitudinal action-research study. Res Q Exerc Sport2021; 92: 584–598.
27.
RamosACoutinhoPMesquitaI. How can coaches tailor the coaching practices to scaffold players’ learning development? An insider action-research study in youth volleyball team. Sports Coach Rev2023: 1–22.
28.
RodriguesJCoutoMRochaR, et al.How small-sided games’ court dimensions affect tactical-technical behavior in beginner volleyball athletes. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022; 17: 1385–1395.
29.
PambudiKBPujiantoDNopiyantoYE, et al.Teaching games for understanding: application of learning methods to volleyball material. Indones J Sport Health Phys Educ Sci2024; 2: 7–13.
30.
ElliottJHollandJThomsonR. Longitudinal and panel studies. In: The SAGE handbook of social research methods. London: SAGE, 2008, pp.228–248.
31.
MoherDSchulzKFAltmanDG, et al.The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med2001; 134: 657–662.
32.
HedgesLVGurevitchJCurtisPS. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology1999; 80: 1150–1156.
33.
MercerJ. The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxf Rev Educ2007; 33: 1–17.
34.
CuschieriS. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J Anaesth2019; 13: S27.
35.
MezirowJ. Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Educ Q1996; 46: 158–172.
36.
RonkainenNJWiltshireG. Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: a realist perspective. Int J Sport Exerc2021; 19: 13–28.
37.
MatthewsMR. Philosophical problems with constructivism: some considerations for student-centered learning and teaching. In: The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education. Routledge, 2020, pp. 47–64.
38.
AlharahshehHHPiusA. A review of key paradigms: positivism VS interpretivism. Glob Acad J Humanit Soc Sci2020; 2: 39–43.
39.
StoszkowskiJCollinsD. Communities of practice, social learning and networks: exploiting the social side of coach development. Sport Educ Soc2014; 19: 773–788.
40.
RibeiroJDavidsKAraújoD, et al.Exploiting bi-directional self-organizing tendencies in team sports: the role of the game model and tactical principles of play. Front Psychol2019; 10: 1–8.
41.
OslinJLMitchellSAGriffinLL. The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): development and preliminary validation. J Teach Phys Educ1998; 17: 231–243.
42.
FortesLSFreitas-JúniorCGPaesPP, et al.Effect of an eight-week imagery training programme on passing decision-making of young volleyball players. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2020; 18: 120–128.
43.
MoonJParkY. Evaluation of assessment techniques for preservice physical education teachers in volleyball skills during blended learning. J Phys Educ Sport2023; 23: 648–657.
44.
EtikanIMusaSAAlkassimRS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat2016; 5: 1–4.
45.
McKayAKStellingwerffTSmithES, et al.Defining training and performance caliber: a participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2021; 17: 317–331.
DarawshehW. Reflexivity in research: promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Ther Rehabil2014; 21: 560–568.
48.
PhillippiJLauderdaleJ. A guide to field notes for qualitative research: context and conversation. Qual Health Res2018; 28: 381–388.
49.
MesquitaICoutinhoPDe Martin-SilvaL, et al.The value of indirect teaching strategies in enhancing student-coaches’ learning engagement. J Sports Sci Med2015; 14: 657.
50.
BraunVClarkeV. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2019; 11: 589–597.
51.
PattonMQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage publications, 2014.
52.
PassmoreJFillery-TravisA. A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what's to come. Coaching: Int J Theory Res Pract2011; 4: 70–88.
CorreiaVCarvalhoJAraújoD, et al.Principles of nonlinear pedagogy in sport practice. Phys Educ Sport Pedag2019; 24: 117–132.
55.
LeeMCYChowJYKomarJ, et al.Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PloS one2014; 9: e104744.
56.
CollinsDTaylorJAshfordM, et al.It depends coaching–the most fundamental, simple and complex principle or a mere copout?Sports Coach Rev2022: 1–21.
57.
CisternaDGotwalsAW. Enactment of ongoing formative assessment: challenges and opportunities for professional development and practice. J Sci Teach Educ2018; 29: 200–222.
58.
da CostaYPMartinsFde Souza FonsecaF, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation over prefrontal cortex did not improve the decision-making skill of athletes exposed to prolonged social media use: a crossover and randomised investigation. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2024: 1–17.
59.
GriffinLMitchellS. The tactical games model and game performance assessment. In: Teaching games and sport for understanding. London: Routledge, 2023, pp.25–39.
60.
YongtaweeAParkJKimY, et al.Athletes have different dominant cognitive functions depending on type of sport. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2022; 20: 1–15.
61.
AfonsoJRamosACoutinhoP, et al.Creative learning activities: thinking and playing “outside the box”. In: Learner-Oriented teaching and assessment in youth sport. Porto, Portual: Routledge, 2022, pp.101–113.
62.
MaloneJJHarperLDJonesB, et al.Perspectives of applied collaborative sport science research within professional team sports. Eur J Sport Sci2019; 19: 147–155.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
