Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Maternal health service utilization decreases maternal morbidity and mortality. However, the existing evidence is inadequate to design effective intervention strategies in Ethiopia.

Objectives:

This study aimed to examine the utilization of maternal health service and identify its determinants among women of reproductive age in southern Ethiopia.

Design:

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 21 to November 11, 2022 on a sample of 1140 women selected randomly from the Northern Zone of the Sidama region.

Methods:

Data were collected using the Open Data Kit mobile application and exported to Stata version 15 for analysis. We used a multilevel mixed-effects modified Poisson regression with robust standard error to identify determinants of maternal health service utilization.

Results:

Utilization of antenatal care, health facility delivery, and postnatal care was 52.0% (95% confidence interval: 49.0%, 55.0%), 48.5% (95% confidence interval: 45.6%, 51.4%), and 26.0% (95% confidence interval: 23.0%, 29.0%), respectively. Antenatal care use was associated with receiving model family training (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.06, 1.35), knowledge of antenatal care (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.54; 95% confidence interval: 1.31, 1.81), perceived quality of antenatal care (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.03), and having birth preparedness plan (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.25). The identified determinants of health facility delivery use were middle wealth rank (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.77), perceived quality of health facility delivery (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.03), antenatal care (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.36, 2.26), and high community-level women literacy (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: 1.10, 2.19). Postnatal care use was associated with facing health problems during postpartum period (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.79; 95% confidence interval: 1.18, 2.72), urban residence (adjusted prevalence ratio: 3.52; 95% confidence interval: 2.15, 5.78), knowledge of postnatal care (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.19), and low community-level poverty (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.25, 0.73).

Conclusion:

Maternal health service use was low in the study area and was influenced by individual- and community-level determinants. Any intervention strategies must consider multi-sectorial collaboration to address determinants at different levels. The programs should focus on the provision of model family training, the needs of women who have a poor perception, and knowledge of maternal health service at the individual level.

Keywords

antenatal care determinants Ethiopia health facility delivery interclass correlation multilevel analysis postnatal care utilization wealth index women of reproductive age

Introduction

Maternal health has become a global public health priority area, as shown by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).¹ Maternal health care is the care given to women during the prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal periods and includes antenatal care (ANC), skilled attendance at birth, postnatal care (PNC), safe abortion care, and family planning.^2
–4

Proper utilization of the existing maternal health service (MHS) is a cost-effective approach to decrease maternal illness and death.^2,5,6 For example, ANC gives the chance for discussion between women and health care providers regarding nutrition, obstetric danger signs (ODS), and childbirth plans;⁷ vital for protective care such as the supply of folic acid pills and tetanus toxoid vaccines,^7,8 early detection and quick treatment of complications of pregnancy and diseases.^2,7
–9

Health facility delivery (HFD) service is an important intervention approach to avert most maternal mortality during childbirth.¹⁰ Most maternal deaths occur in the time immediately after childbirth, and 15.0% happen at the start of the childbirth.¹¹ Besides, any obstetric complication during childbirth can be unanticipated and unpredictable.¹² Maternal health outcomes in such occasions are significantly improved when such complications happen in the presence of intrapartum care and health facilities that are well prepared and equipped to manage such emergency complications.^2,5,13
–15

PNC is another important intervention to prevent maternal death.¹⁶ The majority of maternal mortalities happen during the postpartum period, of which 48.9% of postnatal maternal deaths occur within 24 h of childbirth.¹⁷ Hence, high-quality and timely PNC is a fundamental approach to women’s survival and well-being.¹⁶

Due to the above benefits, the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that women use at least eight ANC visits—the first contact in the first trimester, two contacts in the second trimester, and five contacts in the third trimester,¹⁸ to attend a health facility during childbirth² and PNC visits¹⁶ for all mothers. The first PNC visit should be within 1 day after childbirth at a health institution or home, followed by at least three additional postpartum visits between the 2nd and 3rd, between the 7th and 14th, and on 42nd postpartum days.¹⁶

However, the existing maternal health service use (MHSU) is very low in developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia.⁵ For instance, according to the mini-Demographic and Health Survey (mini-DHS) conducted in 2019 in Ethiopia, 72% of pregnant mothers had at least one ANC visit, while 48% gave birth at health facilities, and merely 34% of women received PNC.⁹ These statistics were much inferior in the Sidama region, and a study reported that utilization of the ANC service was 45%, skilled birth attendance was 40.7%, and PNC was 14.3%.¹⁹ The major determinants of low MHSU are poverty and lack of access to health care, sociodemographic factors, place of residence, distance to facilities, lack of infrastructure and information, MHS seeking behaviors, women’s knowledge of ODS and MHS, insufficient and poor quality services, organizational and health system factors, lack of transport services, and cultural beliefs and practices.^3,5,9,20

Globally, several initiatives have been undertaken to increase MHSU. These measures include the safe motherhood conference in Nairobi (1987),²¹ the international conference on population and development in Cairo (1994),²² the millennium development goals conference (2000),²³ and the latest global conference of the SDGs (2016).¹ Also, the Ethiopian government has been exerting considerable efforts to increase MHSU. These measures include the formulation of a comprehensive 20-year health sector development program,²⁴ a national reproductive health strategy (2016–2020),²⁵ health extension programs,²⁶ and a growth and transformation plan.²⁷

Regardless of all the international and national measures and efforts, MHSU remains low in Ethiopia.⁹ Besides, there were significant regional and urban/rural differences at the country level,⁹ which implies the need to further study the landscape of utilization patterns of MHS in local settings. Furthermore, earlier studies that investigated the utilization of MHS in Ethiopia focused mainly on individual-level determinants^3,28 with limited consideration of community-level and contextual determinants. Moreover, the determinants of MHSU differ from region to region in Ethiopia. The utilization of MHS was highly variable and existing evidence was limited to designing effective and efficient intervention strategies. Assessing the current utilization and determinants of MHS services is helpful to inform program managers, policymakers, and implementers in designing effective intervention strategies to improve MHSU and achieve SDG 3. Thus, we aimed to examine the utilization of MHS and identify its determinants among women of reproductive age in southern Ethiopia.

Conceptual framework

Existing literature suggests that theory-based studies are critical for predicting human behaviors, including the use of services for sexual and reproductive health.²⁹ This study’s conceptual or analytical framework was based on the Andersen and Newman behavioral model of health care service utilization³⁰ and guidance from different literatures.^3,5,9,20 This conceptual framework or model assists in better comprehending the relationship between individual, societal, and health care system determinants.³⁰ It included multilevel hierarchical determinants affecting MHSU in the local context of the study area. This study has conceptualized that MHSU is linked to two levels of determinants, that is, individual- and community-level determinants. We used Andersen’s health-seeking behavioral framework to select a list of independent variables for each determinant. Figure 1 denotes the list of variables under each determinant.^30,31 The predisposing component of individual determinants refers to the features of the person and comprises social position, attitudinal, and demographic variables. The enabling factors comprise situations that make health service utilization accessible to women (linked with logistical features of obtaining services). The third component is need factors, which are the most proximal cause of health care utilization, or “illness level,” which is most directly associated with health service utilization and comprises diagnosed illness and perceived illness. In the context of this study, “illness level” can be interpreted in relation to gestation history and the present course of the gestation.^30,31 At the societal level, we have considered several factors, such as place of residence, community-level literacy of women, community-level poverty, community-level social media use, and distance from the nearest health facility (HF) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Determinants of MHS utilization among women of reproductive age in North Zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia, 2023.

Methods

Study area

The study was done in the Northern Zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia. Sidama region was newly established on June 18, 2020, and is the second smallest regional state, following Harari by land size, and the fifth largest populous in the country.³² It is located in the southern part of Ethiopia and consists of four zones, namely, the Northern, Southern, Central, and Eastern zones, and one city administration.³³ Northern zone is located 273 km south of Addis Ababa. It has eight districts and two town administrations. There are 162 Kebeles (the smallest administrative units in Ethiopia) in the zone. Based on the report from Sidama Region Health Bureau, the zone has an overall population of 1.29 million. Women of reproductive age (WRA) are estimated to constitute 23.3% of the population. The zone has 144 health posts, 36 health centers, 1 general hospital, and 4 primary hospitals. The zone’s overall potential health service coverage by public HFs is 70%.³⁴ Based on the Sidama Regional Health Bureau 2022 report, utilization of at least one ANC, HFD, and PNC were 90%, 80%, and 70%, respectively.³⁴

Study design and population

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 21 to November 11, 2022, among WRA in the Northern Zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia. We included all randomly selected WRA who gave live birth in the last 12 months and resided in the zone for at least for 6 months. Women who were ill during the data collection period were excluded from the study since their participation and consent could be affected.

Sample size determination

The sample size was computed using OpenEpi version 3. The sample size required to estimate the utilization of MHS was computed by considering the anticipated utilization of ANC (74%), HFD (48%), and PNC (34%), according to the report of a previous study,³ a margin of error of 5%, a 95% confidence level, and a design effect of 2.0. The design effect was calculated using the formula DEFF = 1 + (n−1)*ICC], where “n” is the average cluster size and ICC is the intraclass correlation coefficient. The minimum required number of clusters was computed by multiplying the effective sample size by the ICC. However, previous studies did not report the ICC value. We took the typical value of the ICC to be 0.05 from a range of values (0.01–0.05) based on the recommendation of Donner.³⁵ Accordingly, the minimum needed number of clusters was 384 × 0.05 = 19.2. To maintain the adequacy of the cluster numbers and to have sufficient power, 22 clusters were included in this study. The Kebeles which are subsets of districts were considered as clusters in this study. The sample size was adjusted for the non-response rate by dividing the initial sample size by the anticipated response rate. Based on the above information, the estimated sample size was 613 based on ANC, 795 based on HFD, and 714 based on PNC. The sample size for the determinants of MHSU was computed by taking variables significantly associated with MHSU based on previous studies done in Northern Ethiopia,³⁶ rural Haramaya district, Eastern Ethiopia,³ and Northwest Ethiopia.³⁷ Accordingly, the assumptions considered and the resulting sample sizes were summarized in Table 1 of Supplementary File 1. Hence, the sample size of 1140 obtained from the second objective was used because it was the maximum sample size determined and would be adequate to address both objectives of this study.

Sampling technique

We used a multi-stage sampling method to select eligible women. The first stage was a selection of representative districts from the Zone using a simple random sampling method. From the eight districts that are found in the Zone, four districts (Shebedino, Hawela Lida, Boricha, and Bilate Zuria) were selected randomly for this study. In the second stage, representative kebeles were selected from each district using a simple random sampling method. Accordingly, Diramo Afara 01, Morcho Negesha, Midire Genet, Morocho Shondolo, Kowoloso, and Taramesa Kebeles were selected from Shebedino district. From the Hawela Lida district, five kebeles, namely Hawela Lida 01, Murancho, Dobe Nagasha, Chafe, and Hawela Lida Rural, were randomly selected. Similarly, from the Boricha district, five kebeles (Yirba 01, Yirba Duwancho, Sadamo Dikicha, Konsore Arke, and Fulasa Aldada) were selected randomly. Finally, six kebeles, namely Balela 01, Hanja Goro, Shondolo Liwo, Sadamo Cala, Shamana Godo, and Konsore Haranja, were randomly selected from Bilate Zuria district. The third stage was a selection of the households with WRA who gave birth in the last 12 months. The households with WRA who gave birth in the last 12 months were identified by conducting the house-to-house census. The house-to-house census was conducted by community health workers who were residents of that particular Kebeles, whereas the health extension workers and Kebeles leaders were supervised during the census procedure to minimize information bias. A sampling frame was prepared based on complete household listings that contain WRA who gave birth in the last 12 months. Initially, the determined sample size was proportionally allocated to the kebeles based on their population size (WRA who gave birth in the last 12 months). A simple random sampling method was used to select eligible households in each kebeles. Finally, WRA who gave birth in the last 12 months and resided in the selected households were included in the study. When two or more mothers were eligible for the study in the selected households, one mother was selected using a lottery method. If the selected woman was absent from the household for three successive visits during the data collection period, she was considered a non-respondent.

Study variables

The outcome variables were three MHSU-related variables (ANC, HFD, and PNC). Each outcome variable has a binary response and was measured using women’s self-report. We coded each outcome variable as “1” for use and “0” for non-use of the service from skilled providers.

We categorized the independent variables into individual- and community-level variables. The individual-level variables were socioeconomic and demographic variables, such as maternal age, educational status of the women and their spouses, occupational status of the women and their spouses, household wealth index, and exposure to mass media; obstetric characteristics such as gravidity, parity, stillbirth, maternal age at marriage, the experience of ODS, and pregnancy status; women’s knowledge and attitude toward the MHS; knowledge of ODS; perceived quality of the MHS, and birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) plan. The community-level variables were place of residence, community-level literacy of women, community-level poverty, community-level social media use, and distance from the nearest HF. The details of the measurement of the variables used for this study are now provided in Table 2 of Supplementary File 1.

Data collection procedures

A structured and pretested questionnaire was used to collect our data. It was adapted from other similar previous studies.^{3,9,28,36
–39} The tool was first prepared in English. It was translated into the Sidaamu Afoo language (the prime language spoken in the study area) and back to English to maintain its originality and consistency. The forward and backward translations were done by two independent translators who were experts in English and native speakers of Sidaamu Afoo. The principal investigator (PI) and a third person who was also fluent in both languages reviewed the translated tool. Then, any inconsistency or inaccuracy between the two versions was corrected based on the problems noticed during the review. Prior to data collection, the PI trained the data collectors and supervisors for 2 days on the significance of the study, data collection procedures, objectives, methods, and ethical issues. The questionnaire was pretested on 5% of the sample in Dale district of Sidama region and amended before the actual data collection. Data were collected using the Open Data Kit (ODK) mobile application by 17 health professionals with Bachelor’s degrees who were experienced in data collection and were fluent in Sidaamu Afoo. The KoboToolbox server was used to archive data and upload it on a daily basis. Data were collected using a structured and face-to-face interviewer-administered questionnaire at the women’s homes. To minimize the risk of reporting bias, data collectors were told during training to properly explain to the women the importance of the questions and to elicit a genuine response from the women. A consistent check for incompleteness and non-consistency of the data was made daily. The data were exported from ODK to Stata version 15. The exported data were properly cleaned, coded, and categorized before the main analyses. This article was prepared based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline and the STROBE checklist is delivered as supporting information (see Supplementary File 2).

Statistical analysis

Prior to doing the main analysis, all necessary variable recoding, computations, and categorizations were done. Summary measures for categorical variables were expressed in terms of absolute frequencies and percentages, whereas for numerical variables, the mean with standard deviation (SD) was used as a descriptive measure after checking for normality of the distribution. The wealth index was calculated using principal component analysis (PCA) as a combined indicator of life standards based on 42 questions related to ownership of prudently selected household assets, such as the owner of the house, materials used for house construction, the number of rooms in a house, size of agricultural land, presence of herd or farm animals and livestock, types of fuel used for cooking, and possession of improved sanitation and water facilities.^9,40 The details of the wealth index calculation procedure for this study are provided in Table 3 of Supplementary File 1.

A modified Poisson regression with robust standard error was used to calculate the prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the determinants of MHSU. It is a better option to analyze cross-sectional data with binary outcome as compared to logistic regression when the prevalence of outcomes of interest is greater than 20%^41
–43 because the prevalence ratio is easier to understand and express to non-epidemiologists than the odds ratio.⁴² Besides, the odds ratio can overestimate the prevalence ratio and for the two measures, adjusting for confounding is not equal.⁴³ We built a multilevel model to consider the hierarchical nature of our data, to decrease potential standard error underestimation using the ordinary regression model,⁴⁴ and to provide a robust standard error estimate.⁴⁵ Five models were assessed, Model 0: an empty model; Model 1: model with only individual-level predictors; Model 2: model with only community-level predictors; Model 3: model containing both individual- and community-level predictors; and Model 4: the model with a random coefficient. The random effect model was evaluated using the median prevalence ratio (MPR) and ICC value.⁴⁶ The ICC value was used to describe the proportion of variability in MHSU that is due to the clustering variable (kebele), whereas MPR is an estimate of the unexplained kebele-level heterogeneity. The MPR is described as the average value of the prevalence ratio between the area at the lowest and highest risk of MHSU when randomly selecting two areas, and it was computed using the formula MPR = ~ $e^{0.95 * \sqrt{(estimated variance of clusters)}}$ .^47,48 The best-fitting model was chosen based on Akaike’s information criteria (AIC), Bayesian information criteria (BIC), and log-likelihood with likelihood ratio test. The lowest value of these attributes and a significant likelihood ratio test can be a reflection of the best-fitting model⁴⁹ (Table 7 of Supplementary File 1).

Before conducting a multilevel analysis, we decided whether or not the multilevel model was required by doing a random intercept model of mixed-effect multilevel logistic regression. This model offers data regarding ICC which is used to determine whether a multilevel model is required or not.^50,51 If the random intercept variance is significant or the ICC value is greater than 5%, the multilevel analysis model is mandatory to consider. Variables with p-values less than 0.25 on bivariable analysis and other variables of known practical significance with relevant support from the medical literature were included in a multivariable regression model.⁵² The multivariable analyses were used to control for the potential confounding variables. Effect modification was evaluated by entering interaction terms into the multivariable analysis model one at a time. Multicollinearity among the independent variables was also evaluated using a multiple linear regression model. We declared that the effect of multicollinearity would be less likely when the variance inflation factor was less than 5 for all variables.⁵³

The presence and strength of a statistically significant association were assessed using adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% CIs. A statistically significant association between the variables of interest was confirmed when the 95% CI of the APRs did not contain 1. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using the APRs from multilevel mixed-effect modified Poisson and log binomial regression models. It is associated with attempts to evaluate the suitability of a certain model specification and the degree of validity of the conclusions generated from such a model. It is also vital in circumstances where a model is anticipated to be used in the course of subsequent research studies or clinical practice to establish confidence in the outcomes of the primary analysis.⁵⁴

Result

Table 1 presents a summary of the sociodemographic and economic features of the participants. From the total of 1140 study participants, 1130 study participants took part in the study making a response rate of 99.12%. The mean (±SD) of the age of women was 28.33 (±6.26) years. The majority of respondents were within the range of 25–29 years old. The largest portion of the study participants identified themselves as being from the Sidama ethnic group (92.7%) and reported following the protestant Christian faith (85.9%), being married (98.1%), and enrolled in formal education (64.6%). More than half, 577 (51.1%), of the study respondents had access to mass media through radio, television, and newspapers.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and economic characteristics of the study participants in the Northern zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 1130).

Variables	Categories	N	%
Age of mothers (years)	15–19	25	2.2
	20–24	289	25.6
	25–29	395	35.0
	30–34	321	28.4
	35–39	94	8.3
	40–44	6	0.5
Ethnicity	Sidama	1048	92.7
	Wolayita	46	4.1
	Amhara	27	2.4
	Gurage	8	0.7
	Oromo	1	0.1
Religions	Protestant Christian	971	85.9
	Orthodox Christian	42	3.7
	Catholic Christian	65	5.8
	Muslim	52	4.6
Mothers’ education status	Cannot read and write	298	26.4
	Can read and write only (no formal education)	103	9.1
	Primary school (1–8)	513	45.4
	Secondary school (9–12)	108	9.6
	Above secondary school	108	9.5
Mothers’ occupation status	Housewife	866	76.6
	Farmer	39	4.5
	Government employee	72	6.4
	Merchant	153	13.5
Marital status	Married	1108	98.1
Marital status	Divorced/separated/widowed	22	2
Husband’s occupation status	Government employee	138	12.2
	Merchant	399	35.3
	Farmer	464	41.1
	Daily laborer	93	8.2
	Private organization employee	36	3.2
Husband’s education status	Cannot read and write	158	14.0
	Can read and write only (no formal education)	174	15.4
	Primary school (1–8)	491	43.5
	Secondary school (9–12)	140	12.4
	Above secondary	167	14.7
Family size	1–5	790	69.9
Family size	>5	340	30.1
Use of mass media	No	553	48.9
Use of mass media	Yes	577	51.1
Wealth quintile	Lowest	226	20.0
	Second	229	20.3
	Middle	223	19.7
	Fourth	226	20.0
	Highest	226	20.0

Note: There were 22 divorced/separated/widowed women in our data. However, we collected data from all women about their husband’s occupation and education status by the time they were in marital union.

Reproductive health characteristics

The mean (±SD) of the age at first marriage of the women was 18.41 (±2.33) years. Nearly one-fifth (19%) of the women had a previous history of abortion. Approximately two-thirds (63.7%) of the study respondents had given birth to two to four children. However, 11% of women had experienced a stillbirth at least once. For 68.9% of the women, the last pregnancy was planned (Table 4 of Supplementary File 1).

MHS utilization

The utilization rate for ANC (at least one visit) was 52.0% (95% CI: 49.0%, 55.0%), for HFD 48.5% (95% CI: 45.6%, 51.4%), and for PNC 26% (95% CI: 23.0%, 29.0%) (Figure 2). About 3 out of 10 mothers (28.2%) had more than four ANC visits during their most recent pregnancy as per WHO recommendation. Less than half (46.6%) of the mothers had their first ANC visit during their fourth or more months of pregnancy. Only 14.8% of women had three or more PNC visits within 6 weeks after childbirth (Table 5 of Supplementary File 1).

Figure 2.

MHSU among women of reproductive age in the Northern zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia, 2022.

Descriptive reasons for not using maternal health care services

Absence of health problems during antenatal period and fast onset of labor were the main reasons mentioned by women for not utilizing ANC (45.2%, n = 245) and HFD (42.4%, n = 247), whereas absence of health problems during postnatal period was the main reason for PNC non-utilization (61.6%, n = 515). Most women (33.0%, 337) mentioned that the availability and influence of traditional healers in the villages was a common sociocultural factor that affected MHSU (Table 6 of Supplementary File 1).

Determinants of maternal health service utilization

Women who had received model family training had a 19% higher likelihood of ANC use than their counterparts (APR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.35). A one-unit increase in women’s knowledge score of ANC (APR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.81) led to a 1.54-fold increase in the prevalence of ANC utilization, whereas a one-unit increase in women’s perceived quality of ANC score (APR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03) increased the likelihood of ANC utilization by 2%. Women’s BPCR plan increased the likelihood of ANC service utilization (APR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.25) by 13% compared to women who did not have a BPCR plan (Table 2).

Table 2.

Determinants of ANC use among women of reproductive age in the Northern zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 1130).

Variables	Antenatal care		CPR (95% CI)	APR (95% CI)
Variables	Utilized	Not utilized
Individual-level determinants
Women’s education status
Cannot read and write	103 (34.6)	195 (65.4)	Ref	Ref
Can read and write only (without formal education)	32 (31.1)	71 (68.9)	0.97 (0.72, 1.33)	0.95 (0.82, 1.08)
Have formal education	453 (62.1)	276 (37.9)	1.63 (1.23, 2.16)	1.11 (0.94, 1.32)
Husband’s education status
Cannot read and write	47 (29.7)	111 (70.3)	Ref	Ref
Can read and write only (without formal education)	56 (32.2)	118 (67.8)	1.10 (0.73, 1.67)	1.19 (0.95, 1.51)
Have formal education	485 (60.8)	313 (39.2)	1.86 (1.21, 2.87)	1.01 (0.81, 1.27)
Use of mass media
No	212 (38.3)	341 (61.7)	Ref	Ref
Yes	376 (65.2)	201 (34.8)	1.52 (1.18, 1.94)	0.95 (0.84, 1.08)
Wealth quintile
Lowest	111 (49.1)	115 (50.9)	Ref	Ref
Second	99 (43.2)	130 (56.8)	0.94 (0.79, 1.12)	1.01 (0.83, 1.22)
Middle	86 (38.6)	137 (61.4)	0.87 (0.71, 1.06)	1.06 (0.91, 1.23)
Fourth	136 (60.2)	90 (39.8)	1.25 (0.95, 1.65)	1.02 (0.82, 1.25)
Highest	156 (69.0)	70 (31.0)	1.37 (1.08, 1.76)	1.09 (0.87, 1.39)
Age at first pregnancy^©			1.01 (0.99, 1.03)	0.99 (0.98, 1.01)
Last pregnancy status
Unplanned	122 (34.8)	229 (65.2)	Ref	Ref
Planned	466 (59.8)	313 (40.2)	1.56 (1.18, 2.07)	1.13 (0.98, 1.29)
Faced health problems during last pregnancy
No	439 (49.5)	447 (50.5)	Ref	Ref
Yes	149 (61.1)	95 (38.9)	1.29 (1.01, 1.64)	0.98 (0.87, 1.11)
Woman’s decision-making power
Non-autonomous	64 (21.3)	237 (78.7)	Ref	Ref
Autonomous	524 (63.2)	305 (36.8)	2.87 (1.76, 4.66)	0.91 (0.75, 1.09)
Received model family training
No	345 (41.7)	483 (58.3)	Ref	Ref
Yes	243 (80.5)	59 (19.5)	1.83 (1.42, 2.37)	1.19 (1.06, 1.35)**
Women’s knowledge score on ANC^©			1.26 (1.16, 1.36)	1.54 (1.31, 1.81)**
Women’s attitude score on ANC^©			1.06 (1.03, 1.08)	1.01 (0.99, 1.02)
Women’s perceived quality of ANC score^©			1.02 (1.01, 1.03)	1.02 (1.01, 1.03)**
Knowledge of obstetric danger signs
Poor	392 (44.6)	486 (55.4)	Ref	Ref
Good	196 (77.8)	56 (22.2)	1.83 (1.33, 2.53)	0.96 (0.85, 1.08)
Birth preparedness plan
Poorly prepared	313 (38.7)	496 (61.3)	Ref	Ref
Well prepared	275 (85.7)	46 (14.3)	1.95 (1.41, 2.70)	1.13 (1.02, 1.25)*
Community-level determinants
Community-level mass media use
Low	271 (44.0)	345 (56.0)	Ref	Ref
High	317 (61.7)	197 (38.3)	1.35 (0.88, 2.07)	1.07 (0.87, 1.30)
Community-level women literacy
Low	29 (25.2)	86 (74.8)	Ref	Ref
High	559 (55.1)	456 (44.9)	2.15 (0.95, 4.85)	1.19 (0.79, 1.81)

CI: confidence interval; ©: continuous variable; CPR: crude prevalence ratio; APR: adjusted prevalence ratio; Ref: reference group; ANC: antenatal care.

Significant association (p < 0.05); **Highly significant association (p < 0.01).

Women in the middle wealth rank had 35% more HFD utilization as compared to the lowest rank (APR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.77). A one-unit increase in women’s perceived quality score of HFD (APR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.04) increased the likelihood of HFD utilization by 2%. The likelihood of HFD utilization was 76% higher among women who had ANC follow-up (APR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.36, 2.29) than their counterparts. The women who live in communities where women literacy were high (APR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.19) had a higher prevalence of HFD use compared to communities where women literacy were low (Table 3).

Table 3.

Determinants of health facility delivery use among women of reproductive age in the Northern zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 1130).

Variables	Health facility delivery		CPR (95% CI)	APR (95% CI)
Variables	Utilized	Not utilized
Individual-level determinants
Women’s education status
Cannot read and write	81 (27.2)	217 (72.8)	Ref	Ref
Can read and write only (no formal education)	26 (25.2)	77 (74.8)	0.94 (0.58, 1.51)	0.93 (0.65, 1.31)
Have formal education	441 (60.5)	288 (39.5)	1.89 (1.40, 2.54)	1.18 (0.93, 1.51)
Husband’s education
Cannot read and write	39 (24.7)	119 (75.3)	Ref	Ref
Can read and write only (no formal education)	36 (20.7)	138 (79.3)	0.94 (0.52, 1.70)	0.97 (0.65, 1.46)
Have formal education	473 (59.3)	325 (40.7)	2.06 (1.39, 3.05)	1.31 (0.93, 1.86)
Mass media use
No	207 (37.4)	346 (62.6)	Ref	Ref
Yes	341 (59.1)	236 (40.9)	1.31 (1.03, 1.67)	0.94 (0.83, 1.07)
Wealth quintile
Lowest	86 (38.1)	140 (61.9)	Ref	Ref
Second	89 (38.9)	140 (61.1)	1.09 (0.81, 1.46)	1.07 (0.85, 1.35)
Middle	100 (44.8)	123 (55.2)	1.28 (0.90, 1.81)	1.35 (1.03, 1.77)*
Fourth	126 (55.8)	100 (44.2)	1.46 (1.05, 2.03)	1.12 (0.91, 1.39)
Highest	147 (65.0)	79 (35.0)	1.68 (1.09, 2.58)	1.15 (0.85, 1.55)
Antennal care use
No	133 (24.5)	409 (75.5)	Ref	Ref
Yes	415 (70.6)	173 (29.4)	2.55 (1.90, 3.41)	1.76 (1.36, 2.29)**
Encountered health problems during childbirth
No	472 (47.1)	530 (52.9)	Ref	Ref
Yes	76 (59.4)	52 (40.6)	1.19 (0.96, 1.47)	0.95 (0.75, 1.21)
Woman’s decision-making power
Non-autonomous	57 (18.9)	244 (81.1)	Ref	Ref
Autonomous	491 (59.2)	338 (40.8)	2.48 (1.55, 3.98)	1.27 (0.97, 1.61)
Women’s knowledge score of HFD^©			1.12 (1.06, 1.18)	1.00 (0.96, 1.04)
Women’s attitude score of HFD^©			1.04 (1.02, 1.06)	1.01 (0.99, 1.03)
Women’s perceived quality score of HFD^©			1.05 (1.03, 1.07)	1.02 (1.01, 1.03)*
Birth preparedness plan
Poorly prepared	319 (39.4)	490 (60.6)	Ref	Ref
Well prepared	229 (71.3)	92 (28.7)	1.59 (1.31, 1.92)	1.02 (0.90, 1.15)
Community-level determinants
Place of residence
Rural	355 (43.1)	469 (56.9)	Ref	Ref
Urban	193 (63.1)	113 (36.9)	1.28 (0.61, 2.71)	0.96 (0.58, 1.59)
Community-level women’s literacy
Low	20 (17.4)	95 (82.6)	Ref	Ref
High	528 (52.0)	487 (48.0)	2.79 (1.91, 4.08)	1.55 (1.10, 2.19)*
Community-level mass media use
Low	224 (36.4)	392 (63.6)	Ref	Ref
High	324 (63.0)	190 (37.0)	1.81 (1.16, 2.83)	1.41 (0.94, 2.10)
Distance to reach the nearest health facility
Big problem	311 (41.4)	441 (58.6)	Ref	Ref
Not big problem	237 (62.7)	141 (37.3)	1.52 (0.98, 2.36)	0.97 (0.72, 1.30)

CI: confidence interval; HFD: health facility delivery ©: continuous variable; CPR: crude prevalence ratio; APR: adjusted prevalence ratio; Ref: reference group.

Significant association (p < 0.05); **Highly significant association (p < 0.01).

Women who had faced health problems during postpartum had a higher prevalence of PNC use than their counterparts (APR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.72). A one-unit increase in women’s knowledge of PNC score (APR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.19) led to 11% increase in the likelihood of PNC utilization. While urban residence increased the likelihood of PNC utilization (APR = 3.52; 95% CI: 2.15, 5.78) as compared to the rural residence, the likelihood of PNC use was 67% lower for those women who resided in low-poverty communities (APR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.73) as compared to women who resided in high-poverty communities (Table 4).

Table 4.

Determinants of PNC use among women of reproductive age in the Northern zone of Sidama region, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 1130).

Variables	Postnatal care		CPR (95% CI)	APR (95% CI)
Variables	Utilized	Not utilized
Individual-level determinants
Women’s occupation
Housewife	190 (21.9)	676 (78.1)	Ref	Ref
Farmer	7 (17.9)	32 (82.1)	1.12 (0.50, 2.49)	1.16 (0.54, 2.50)
Government employee	39 (54.2)	33 (45.8)	2.07 (1.49, 2.87)	1.21 (0.93, 1.58)
Merchant	58 (37.9)	95 (62.1)	1.22 (0.97, 1.53)	1.06 (0.84, 1.35)
History of the previous stillbirth
No	225 (22.4)	779 (77.6)	Ref	Ref
Yes	69 (54.8)	57 (45.2)	1.44 (1.05, 1.97)	1.16 (0.95, 1.42)
Planned to deliver in the health facility
No	119 (22.3)	414 (77.7)	Ref	Ref
Yes	175 (29.3)	422 (70.7)	1.62 (1.10, 2.39)	1.15 (0.95, 1.42)
Health facility delivery use
No	133 (22.9)	449 (77.1)	Ref	Ref
Yes	161 (29.4)	387 (70.6)	1.37 (0.93,2.01)	0.94 (0.72, 1.21)
Faced health problems during the postpartum period
No	155 (16.6)	780 (83.4)	Ref	Ref
Yes	139 (71.3)	56 (28.7)	2.71 (1.57, 4.68)	1.79 (1.18, 2.72)**
Husband’s attitude about maternal health service use
Positive	208 (26.5)	578 (73.5)	Ref	Ref
Negative	86 (25.0)	258 (75.0)	0.70 (0.48, 1.01)	0.99 (0.68, 1.43)
Woman’s decision-making power
Non-autonomous	84 (27.9)	217 (72.1)	Ref	Ref
Autonomous	210 (25.3)	619 (74.7)	1.38 (0.97, 1.95)	0.80 (0.61, 1.07)
Women’s knowledge of PNC score^©			1.17 (1.09, 1.26)	1.11 (1.04, 1.19)**
Women’s score on attitude toward PNC^©			1.03 (1.01, 1.05)	0.99 (0.98, 1.01)
Women’s perceived quality of PNC score^©			1.01 (1.00, 1.02)	1.01 (0.99, 1.01)
Birth preparedness plan
Poorly prepared	172 (21.3)	637 (78.7)	Ref	Ref
Well prepared	122 (38.0)	199 (62.0)	2.06 (1.22, 3.48)	0.89 (0.68, 1.17)
Women’s knowledge of obstetric danger signs
Poor	168 (19.1)	710 (80.9)	Ref	Ref
Good	126 (50.0)	126 (50.0)	1.48 (0.98, 2.21)	1.37 (0.98, 1.90)
Community-level determinants
Place of residence
Rural	145 (17.6)	679 (82.4)	Ref	Ref
Urban	149 (48.7)	157 (51.3)	3.91 (2.07, 7.36)	3.52 (2.15, 5.78)**
Community-level poverty
High	167 (35.5)	303 (64.5)	Ref	Ref
Low	127 (19.2)	533 (80.8)	0.46 (0.19, 1.14)	0.43 (0.25, 0.73)*
Community-level women’s literacy
Low	57 (49.6)	58 (50.4)	Ref	Ref
High	237 (23.3)	778 (76.7)	0.39 (0.11, 1.41)	0.57 (0.26, 1.24)

CI: confidence interval; ©: continuous variable; CPR: crude prevalence ratio; APR: adjusted prevalence ratio; Ref: reference group.

Significant association (p < 0.05); **Highly significant association (p < 0.01).

Random effect model of MHSU

The multilevel modified Poisson regression model fitted better than the ordinary Poisson regression model (p < 0.001). The ICC value revealed that 35.48% of the variability in using ANC, 28.01% of the variability in using HFD, and 50.76% of the variability in using PNC were related to membership in kebeles. The MPR value demonstrated that residual heterogeneity between the residential areas when randomly selecting the two individuals in different areas was related to 1.58 times the individual likelihoods of using ANC, 1.69 times the individual likelihoods of using HFD, and 2.57 times the individual likelihoods of using PNC. The final model, even after adjusting for all potential attributable factors, revealed that the heterogeneity in MHSU across residential areas continued to be statistically significant. Furthermore, the effect of the BPCR plan on ANC use showed significant variation across the kebeles (variance = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01, 3.69). Similarly, the effect of ANC use on HFD use indicated a significant variation across the kebeles (variance = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.33). Moreover, the effect of women’s knowledge of ODS on PNC use revealed a significant variation across the kebeles (variance = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.48); (see Table 7 of the Supplementary File 1).

Sensitivity analysis result

We conducted the sensitivity analysis to compare the performance of multilevel mixed-effects modified Poisson regression with robust variance and log binomial regression models using AIC and BIC values. The multilevel mixed-effects modified Poisson regression with robust variance best fits the model for our data due to relatively small AIC and BIC values. Besides, for the moderate sample size and highly prevalent outcomes of interest, modified Poisson regression with robust standard error produces less-biased estimates of the APR than the log binomial regression model.⁴³ Thus, we used multilevel mixed-effects modified Poisson regression with robust variance based on this information (see Tables 8, 9, and 10 of the Supplementary File 1).

Discussion

The overall utilization rate was 52.0% for ANC services, 48.5% for HFD, and 26.0% for PNC. Women’s model family training, knowledge and perceived quality of ANC, and BPCR plan were determinants of ANC use. Households’ middle wealth rank, women’s perceived quality of HFD, ANC follow-up, and community-level women literacy were determinants of HFD use, whereas health problems during postpartum period, women’s knowledge of PNC, urban residence, and community-level poverty were determinants of PNC use.

Utilization of at least one ANC service was 52.0%. This result is lower than the Mini-EDHS 2019 report (74%),⁹ and studies in Gedeo Zone (72.6%),⁵⁵ Holeta town (87%),⁵⁶ Hossaina town (87.6%),⁵⁷ and Kombolcha district (86.1%) of Ethiopia.⁵⁸ The difference might be due to the study period. The previous studies were conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic, while our study was conducted immediately following the control of the pandemic. It has been argued that MHSU decreased during the pandemic due to movement restrictions, limited transport access, and fear of COVID-19 infection, and that the effects of the pandemic persisted during the post-COVID-19 period and highly influenced MHSU.⁵⁹ Another explanation might be conflicts at the country level, particularly in the Sidama region over the last 3 years. Due to the conflict, some of the HFs were temporarily closed and unable to provide health services. Even the functional HFs during the conflict period were not able to provide proper services due to shortages of supplies and drugs. Moreover, our study included women from rural settings, whereas previous studies included women from only urban areas or both settings. As a result, rural women may lack autonomy in health decision-making, and there may be a lack of access to information, poor knowledge of MHS, and inadequate HFs in the study area.

This study found that HFD use was 48.5%, which is similar to the Mini-EDHS 2019 report (48.0%).⁹ However, this result is lower than that of the research done in Mana district (86.4%),²⁸ Bench Maji Zone (78.3%),⁶⁰ and Addis Ababa (97%)⁹ of Ethiopia. The probable justification for the lower proportion of HFD service in this study could be due to fewer ANC visits by women during pregnancy than in other parts of the Ethiopia. As a result, women in the study area have poor knowledge of ODS and HFD, as well as less birth and complication readiness during pregnancy. Furthermore, in the Sidama region, home delivery is a more cultural and religious practice than in other parts of Ethiopia. This argument was supported by evidence demonstrating that women in the Sidama region were discouraged from accessing and using formal MHS due to their trust in Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs), traditional and cultural beliefs.⁶¹

Utilization of at least one PNC was 26.0%. This result is lower than the finding from the national survey (34.0%),⁹ a prior study in Sidama region (32.7%),⁶² and Assela town (72.7%)⁶³ of Ethiopia. This could be attributed to the efforts of community health workers and Health Extension Workers (HEW) to raise women’s awareness of the benefits of PNC utilization in other settings. A previous study found that women who knew more about danger signs during the postpartum period used PNC services more than their counterparts.⁶⁴ The presence of cultural beliefs among community members who believe that movement outside of the home may expose women to evil spirits may reduce PNC use by limiting the movement of women after giving birth in the current study area. Furthermore, cultural practices and the degree of urbanization in the study settings may influence PNC utilization.

Our MHSU findings were extremely lower than the reports from Sidama Regional Health Bureau, utilization of at least one ANC, HFD, and PNC were 90%, 80%, and 70%, respectively.³⁴ This discrepancy might be due to the fact that routine health management information system (HMIS) data were susceptible to over-reporting MHSU indictors in Ethiopia due to competition between health facilities based on performance during the quarter review meeting, poor data recording and reporting practice, and poor data quality check mechanism.⁶⁵ Besides, there are greater mismatches or variability of HMIS report between registers, tally sheet, HMIS report, and district health information system (DHIS), which is an indication of poor data quality. Moreover, there is discrepancy between the reports at different hierarchies of health systems, such as health posts, health centers, hospitals, district health offices, zones, and regions in Ethiopia.^65,66 Study conducted in the Jimma zone of Ethiopia reported consistent finding that poor agreement between ANC, HFD, and PNC estimates acquired from the survey and HMIS report.⁶⁵

This study found that the women’s model family training increased the prevalence of ANC use. A similar result was reported from a previous study in the Sidama region.⁶² The possible rationale could be described as follows: women who received model family training from HEWs tend to possess good knowledge of MHS, a positive attitude, health-seeking behavior, and information on the benefits of ANC.

Women’s knowledge of ANC was significantly associated with ANC utilization. Consistent findings were reported from the studies conducted in Sunyani Municipality, Ghana⁶⁷ and Western Jamaica.⁶⁸ The reason might be that women who have good knowledge of ANC may better know the severity of problems during pregnancy and be prepared to use ANC. Furthermore, many studies proved that women who lack knowledge of the ANC are less likely to be prepared for birth and complications, and as a result, they frequently delay seeking proper MHS.^67
–69

Higher score on perceived quality of ANC was significantly associated with ANC utilization. The likely justification could be that women who perceive good quality in ANC services tend to be more confident, have favorable attitudes, and engage in good health-seeking behaviors that might increase their use of ANC. Others have argued that improving women’s perception of ANC service quality could increase the sustained utilization of ANC.⁷⁰

This study showed that women’s BPCR plan was positively associated with ANC use. The reasons might be that women who are well prepared have better knowledge of ODS and good communication with HCPs. Consequently, they may have organized all the required prearrangements to use ANC services efficiently and effectively. Other researchers argued that women who have good knowledge of ODS are more likely to be birth-prepared and have complications readiness and hence often use skilled care.^67
–69

The middle rank was significantly associated with HFD. Studies conducted in the Mana district of southwest Ethiopia,²⁸ Pakistan,⁷¹ rural Haiti,⁷² and Bangladesh¹² documented similar findings. The likely justification might be indirect and direct non-medical costs related to HFD services influencing service utilization in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Although HFD services are free in Ethiopia, women still pay out of pocket for indirect costs, such as transportation, some laboratory tests and drugs, and food during stays in towns. Studies claimed that women from communities with scarce resources had been challenged to pay for health care, and these costs constituted economic barriers to using MHS.^73,74 Therefore, due to a lack of economic access, the mothers may not use HFD at all or delay receiving care.

The higher score on women’s perceived quality of HFD increased the likelihood of HFD utilization. This result agreed with the studies done in the Kaffa zone of southwest Ethiopia,⁷⁵ and Northern Ethiopia.⁷⁶ The possible explanation might be that women are not merely motivated by the verified actual quality of MHS but also by their perceived quality of MHS; this indicates that information from friends, relatives, and neighbors influences their perception. Expansion of HFs to different parts of the country merely does not assure women’s use of HF care. In rural areas, the existence of several sociocultural barriers seriously affects women’s perceptions of the quality of service and their preference for home delivery over skilled delivery care.

ANC use was significantly associated with HFD utilization, which is consistent with the study finding from the Kaffa zone,⁷⁵ Mana district,²⁸ and Hossaina town of Ethiopia,⁵⁷ Bangladesh,¹² Pakistan,⁷¹ and rural Haiti.⁷² This finding can be partly explained by the evidence that ANC follow-up is one of the vital linkages between women and health professionals. The women who have ANC visits would have a high probability of receiving adequate counseling and information on ODS, BPCR plan, and the importance of safe delivery at the HFs. Also, mothers who seek health care throughout their pregnancy might be more likely to seek health care during their childbirth. Moreover, the mothers who regularly visit HFs for ANC use have earlier indicated their acceptance of the health system.

This study found that high community-level women literacy increased the prevalence of HFD. Educated women tend to possess good health-seeking behavior, are more autonomous and economically independent, have better job opportunities, and have information on the benefits of ANC.^62,70,77 This result agrees with previous studies done in the rural Haramaya district,³ Holeta town,⁵⁶ Hossaina town,⁵⁷ and Kaffa zone of Ethiopia,⁷⁵ and Bangladesh.¹² Another reason might be that the literate women could have the increased community-level mass media use that might increase the dialogue about maternal health concerns in society. The WHO report showed that women who reside in high-income communities could have better exposure to mass media, which increased their awareness and knowledge of MHS.^2,5 This argument is supported by the results of a study done in low-income countries.⁷⁸

Women who had encountered health problems during postpartum had an increased prevalence of PNC use compared to women who did not face any problems. This finding agrees with previous findings in Wonago district⁶⁴ and Debre Markos town⁷⁹ of Ethiopia, and Nepal.⁸⁰ The likely explanation might be that being exposed to complications increases the women’s and families’ anxiety about developing much more problems. Also, mothers who have observed serious warning signs have a high probability of negative impressions of susceptibility and the harshness of risks that directly lead to improved PNC utilization. Another reason could be women’s knowledge of ODS, which may be a significant motivator for the mother to obtain PNC as soon as complications happen.

The increased knowledge score of women about PNC leads to increased prevalence of PNC utilization. Studies conducted in northern Ethiopia⁸¹ and rural Nepal⁸² documented similar results. The possible justification could be that mothers who have good knowledge of PNC may better understand the benefits of PNC and be prepared to use PNC services. Also, many studies showed that women who had poor knowledge of MHS had a lower probability of getting ready, and as a result, they frequently delayed seeking proper MHS.^67
–69

Urban residence increased the prevalence of PNC service utilization. Similar results were reported from studies in the Aysaeta District of Ethiopia,⁸³ Bangladesh,¹² Nigeria,⁸⁴ and Nepal.⁸⁰ The reasons would be that mothers who reside in an urban setting are more educated, have improved exposure to mass media and information, are more autonomous, have better job opportunities, are economically independent, and are nearer to health institutions. Besides, a mother’s health-seeking behavior is extremely affected by deep-rooted sociocultural traditions and negative attitudes toward the postpartum period in the rural setting of Ethiopia. Moreover, inadequate awareness, lack of transportation and road access, poor infrastructure, unavailability, and inaccessibility of service might lead to low use of PNC in rural settings.

Another key result of our study was the strong negative relationship between the use of PNC and community-level poverty. The prevalence of PNC use increased for women who resided in high-poverty communities. This finding agreed with the study finding from Ghana.⁸⁵ The probable justifications for the higher proportion of PNC utilization by poor women in the study area could be due to the fact that displaced families during the Sidama and Guji Oromo border conflicts were residing in urban areas nearer to health facilities. Furthermore, many aid organizations are providing support for the poor pregnant and lactating women through the health facilities. As a result, poor women in the study area have more likely visited a health facility to obtain aid and services compared to women from rich families. In contrast, studies from Ethiopia⁸⁶ and West Africa⁸⁷ reported a significant positive association between low-community poverty and PNC use.

Limitations of the study

The probability of recall bias may be high since we recruited women who gave birth in the last 12 months. Women might be unable to recall most of the ODS of pregnancy and postpartum periods, which may underestimate the magnitude of ODS and affect its association with ANC and PNC use. Our findings may be influenced by reporting bias because the data were collected from the women’s self-reports. There is the risk of intentionally misreporting personally related determinants such as age, education, occupation, wealth index, women’s attitude toward MHS, and perceived quality of care (social desirability bias). Therefore, the extent of these determinants might have been undervalued or overvalued, and as such, the association of these determinants with MHSU might have been underestimated or overestimated.

Conclusion

In the study area, the utilization of MHS was very low as compared with the national plan. The underutilization of MHS showed that much work remained to be done to improve women’s health outcomes. Our study identified several pertinent determinants of MHSU. The women’s model family training, knowledge and perceived quality of ANC, and the BPCR plan were determinants of ANC use. Households’ middle wealth rank, women’s perceived quality of HFD, ANC follow-up, and community-level women’s literacy were determinants of HFD use. Health problems during postpartum, women’s knowledge of PNC, urban residence, and community-level poverty were determinants of PNC use. Thus, intervention strategies should focus on promoting women’s school enrollment, creating women-focused economic reforms, strengthening model family training and BPCR plan, and developing programs to improve women’s knowledge and perception of MHS.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-whe-10.1177_17455057231218195 – Supplemental material for Individual- and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-whe-10.1177_17455057231218195 for Individual- and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis by Amanuel Yoseph, Wondwosen Teklesilasie, Francisco Guillen-Grima and Ayalew Astatkie in Women’s Health

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-2-whe-10.1177_17455057231218195 – Supplemental material for Individual- and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-whe-10.1177_17455057231218195 for Individual- and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis by Amanuel Yoseph, Wondwosen Teklesilasie, Francisco Guillen-Grima and Ayalew Astatkie in Women’s Health

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-3-whe-10.1177_17455057231218195 – Supplemental material for Individual- and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-whe-10.1177_17455057231218195 for Individual- and community-level determinants of maternal health service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis by Amanuel Yoseph, Wondwosen Teklesilasie, Francisco Guillen-Grima and Ayalew Astatkie in Women’s Health

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hawassa University and Sidama region for their financial support. They also thank the study participants, data collectors, supervisors, and administrators at different levels in the Sidama region who directly and indirectly contributed to this study. Finally, they thank Netsanet Kibru for her big support, such as duplication of consent form and funded transportation fee.

Declarations

ORCID iDs

Amanuel Yoseph

Ayalew Astatkie

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1, 2015, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (accessed 22 May 22 2023).

World Health Organization. Maternal health, https://www.who.int/health-topics/maternal-health#tab=tab_1 (accessed 22 May 2023)

Kifle

Azale

Gelaw

, et al. Maternal health care service seeking behaviors and associated factors among women in rural Haramaya District, Eastern Ethiopia: a triangulated community-based cross-sectional study. Reprod Health 2017; 14: 6.

World Health Organization, UNPF, World Bank and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice. 3rd ed. World Health Organization, 2015, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/249580

World Health Organization. Maternal mortality, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality (accessed 22 May 2023).

Zhao

Han

You

, et al. Maternal health services utilization and maternal mortality in China: a longitudinal study from 2009 to 2016. BMC Pregn Childb 2020; 20: 220.

Antenatal care module: 13—providing focused antenatal care, https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=44&printable=1

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf

Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Mini Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2019: key indicators report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Rockville, MD: CSA and ICF, 2019.

10.

World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund. WHO/UNICEF joint database on SDG 3.1.2 skilled attendance at birth, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/

11.

Tesfay

Tariku

Zenebe

, et al. Critical factors associated with postpartum maternal death in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2022; 17(6): e0270495.

12.

Huda

Chowdhury

El Arifeen

, et al. Individual and community level factors associated with health facility delivery: a cross sectional multilevel analysis in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(2): e0211113.

13.

Inter-Agency Working Group (IAWG). Chapter 9: maternal and newborn health, https://iawgfieldmanual.com/manual/mnh

14.

Koblinsky

MMZ

Hussein

Mavalankar

, et al. Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet 2006; 368(9544): 1377–1386.

15.

Onambele

O-LW Guillen-Aguinaga

Forjaz

, et al. Maternal mortality in Africa: regional trends (2000–2017). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 13146.

16.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/352658/9789240045989-eng.pdf

17.

Dol

Hughes

Bonet

, et al. Timing of maternal mortality and severe morbidity during the postpartum period: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20: 2119–2194.

18.

De Masi

SBM

Tunçalp Peña-Rosas

ÖJP

Lawrie

, et al. Integrated person-centered health care for all women during pregnancy: implementing World Health Organization recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Glob Health Sci Pract 2017; 5(2): 197–201.

19.

Areru

Dangisso

MH.

Low and unequal use of outpatient health services in public primary health care facilities in southern Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21: 776.

20.

Samuel

Zewotir

North

Decomposing the urban–rural inequalities in the utilisation of maternal health care services: evidence from 27 selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Reprod Health 2021; 18: 216.

21.

Sai

FT.

The safe motherhood initiative: a call for action. IPPF Med Bullet 1987; 21: 1–2.

22.

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). International conference on population and development. 1994, https://www.unfpa.org/icpd

23.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Millennium development goals. 2015, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sdgoverview/mdg_goals.html

24.

Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health (EFMOH). Ministry of Health Ethiopia, health sector development program (HSDP IV). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: MoH, 2010.

25.

Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). National reproductive health strategy to improve maternal and child health 2016–2020. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: MOH, 2016.

26.

Federal Ministry of Health. Health Extension Program in Ethiopia: Addis Ababa. 2004, http://www.ethiopia.gov.et/English/MOH/Resources/Documents/HEW%20profile%20Final%2008%2007.pdf

27.

MoFED. Growth and transformation plan (GTP) 2010/11-2014/15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2010.

28.

Yoseph

Abebe

Mekonnen

, et al. Institutional delivery services utilization and its determinant factors among women who gave birth in the past 24 months in Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 265.

29.

Kumi-Kyereme

ASA

Darteh

EKM

. Factors contributing to challenges in accessing sexual and reproductive health services among young people with disabilities in Ghana. Global Soc Welfare 2020; 5: 1–10.

30.

Andersen

Newman

JF.

Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1973; 51(1): 95–124.

31.

Andersen

RM.

Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter. J Health Soc Behav 1995; 36(1): 1–10.

32.

Council ratify Ethiopian’s new ethnic-Sidama statehood. Borkena.com. Borkena Ethiopian News, 19 June 2020, https://borkena.com/2020/06/18/council-ratify-ethiopias-new-ethnic-sidama-statehood/

33.

Sidama Regional State Council. Establishment of new zones structure and budget approval for 2015 EFY agendas report: Regional State Council Office. Unpublished report, 2022, Sidama Regional State Council, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

34.

Sidama Regional Health Bureau. Annual regional health and health-related report: Regional Health office, unpulished report, 2022. Sidama Regional Health Bureau, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

35.

Donner

Birkett

Buck

Randomization by cluster: sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 906–914.

36.

Aregay

Alamayehu

Assefa

, et al. Factors associated with maternal health care services in Enderta district, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Am J Nurs Sci 2014; 3(6): 117–125.

37.

Getachew

TAA

Aychiluhim

. Focused antenatal care service utilization and associated factors in Dejen and Aneded Districts, Northwest Ethiopia. Prim Health Care 2014; 4: 170.

38.

Ahmed

RSM

Abose

Assefa

, et al. Levels and associated factors of the maternal healthcare continuum in Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. PLoS ONE 2022; 17(10): e0275752.

39.

Chaka

EE.

Multilevel analysis of continuation of maternal healthcare services utilization and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. PLOS Glob Publ Health 2022; 2(5): e0000517.

40.

Vyas

Kumaranayake

Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan 2006; 21(6): 459–468.

41.

Schmidt

Kohlmann

When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?

Int J Publ Health 2008; 53: 165–167.

42.

Barros

Hirakata

VN.

Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3: 21.

43.

Petersen

Deddens

JA.

A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 1–9.

44.

Kleiman

Understanding and analyzing multilevel data from real-time monitoring studies: an easily-accessible tutorial using R [Internet]. PsyArXiv, 2017, https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/xf2pw/

45.

Snijders

TAB

Bosker Roel

. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2012.

46.

Koo

TKLM

. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163.

47.

Gebeyehu

Geremew

Belew

, et al. Number of antenatal care visits and associated factors among reproductive age women in Sub-Saharan Africa using recent demographic and health survey data from 2008–2019: a multilevel negative binomial regression model. PLoS Glob Public Health 2022; 2(12): e0001180.

48.

Merlo

Chaix

Ohlsson

, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2006; 60(4): 290–297.

49.

Dziak

Coffman

Lanza

, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. Brief Bioinform 2020; 21: 553–565.

50.

Tabachnick

Fidell

Ullman

JB.

Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2007.

51.

Kleiman

Understanding and analyzing multilevel data from real-time monitoring studies: an easily-accessible tutorial using R, 2017, https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/xf2pw/

52.

Hosmer

Jr Lemeshow

Sturdivant

RX.

Applied logistic regression. New Yok: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

53.

Senaviratna

Cooray

Diagnosing multicollinearity of logistic regression model. Asian J Prob Stat 2019; 5: 1–9.

54.

Salciccioli

Crutain

, et al. Sensitivity analysis and model validation. In: MIT Critical Data (ed.) Secondary analysis of electronic health records. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 263–271.

55.

Muluneh

AA.

Utilization of antenatal care and associated factors in Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Reprod Health 2021; 13(1): 40–49.

56.

Birmeta

Dibaba

Woldeyohannes

Determinants of maternal health care utilization in Holeta town, central Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 256.

57.

Dutamo

Assefa

Egata

Maternal health care use among married women in Hossaina, Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 365.

58.

Zelalem Ayele

Belayihun

Teji

, et al. Factors affecting utilization of maternal health care services in Kombolcha district, Eastern Hararghe zone, Oromia Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia. Int Sch Res Notices 2014; 2014: 917058.

59.

Murewanhema

Mpabuka

Moyo

, et al. Accessibility and utilization of antenatal care services in sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review. Birth 2023; 50: 496–503.

60.

Tadele

Lamaro

Utilization of institutional delivery service and associated factors in Bench Maji zone, Southwest Ethiopia: community based, cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 101.

61.

Kea

Tulloch

Datiko

, et al. Exploring barriers to the use of formal maternal health services and priority areas for action in Sidama zone, southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregn Childb 2018; 18: 96.

62.

Tsegaye

Shudura

Yoseph

, et al. Predictors of skilled maternal health services utilizations: a case of rural women in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2021; 16(2): e0246237.

63.

Tumbure

Argaw

Fantahun

, et al. Assessment of postnatal care service utilization and associated factors in Asella town, Arsi zone, Oromiya regional state, Ethiopia. Glob J Reprod Med 2018; 6: 13–20.

64.

Tefera

Hailu

Tilahun

Early postnatal care service utilization and its determinants among women who gave birth in the last 6 months in Wonago district, south Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2021; 2021: 4286803.

65.

Ouedraogo

Kurji

Abebe

, et al. A quality assessment of Health Management Information System (HMIS) data for maternal and child health in Jimma zone, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(3): e0213600.

66.

Solomon

Addise

Tassew

, et al. Data quality assessment and associated factors in the health management information system among health centers of southern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2021; 16(10): e0255949.

67.

Sekyere Stephen Owusu. Factors associated with antenatal care service utilization among women with children under five years in Sunyani Municipality, Ghana, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.27.21252585v1

68.

Respress

Jolly

Osia

, et al. A cross-sectional study of antenatal care attendance among pregnant women in western Jamaica. J Pregn Child Health 2017; 4(4): 341.

69.

Kabakyenga

Östergren

Turyakira

, et al. Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda. Reprod Health 2011; 8: 33.

70.

Oladapo

Osiberu

MO.

Do sociodemographic characteristics of pregnant women determine their perception of antenatal care quality. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13(4): 505–511.

71.

Agha

Williams

Quality of antenatal care and household wealth as determinants of institutional delivery in Pakistan: results of a cross-sectional household survey. Reprod Health 2016; 13: 84.

72.

Séraphin

Ngnie-Teta

Ayoya

, et al. Determinants of institutional delivery among women of childbearing age in rural Haiti. Matern Child Health J 2015; 19(6): 1400–1407.

73.

Kalu-Umeh

Sambo

Idris

, et al. Costs and patterns of financing maternal health care services in rural communities in northern Nigeria: evidence for designing national fee exemption policy. Int J MCH AIDS 2013; 2(1): 163–172.

74.

Dalinjong

Wang

Homer

CSE

. Has the free maternal health policy eliminated out of pocket payments for maternal health services? Views of women, health providers and insurance managers in northern Ghana. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(2): e0184830.

75.

Hailemariam

SGL

Asnake

Agegnehu

, et al. Perceived physical accessibility, mother’s perception of quality of care, and utilization of skilled delivery service in rural Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med 2021; 9: 1036794.

76.

Fisseha

Berhane

Worku

, et al. Distance from health facility and mothers’ perception of quality related to skilled delivery service utilization in northern Ethiopia. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9: 749–756.

77.

Grown

Gupta

Pande

Taking action to improve women’s health through gender equality and women’s empowerment. Lancet 2005; 365: 541–543.

78.

Fatema

Impact of mass media on the utilization of aternal healthcare services in south Asia. Electronic theses and dissertations 2031, 2019, https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/2031

79.

Limenih

Endale

Dachew

BA.

Postnatal care service utilization and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last 12 months prior to the study in Debre Markos town, northwestern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Med 2016; 2016: 7095352.

80.

Khanal

Adhikari

Karkee

, et al. Factors associated with the utilisation of postnatal care services among the mothers of Nepal: analysis of Nepal demographic and health survey 2011. BMC Women Health 2014; 14: 19.

81.

Gebrehiwot

Medhanyie

Gidey

, et al. Postnatal care utilization among urban women in northern Ethiopia: cross-sectional survey. BMC Women Health 2018; 18: 78.

82.

Dhakal

Chapman

Simkhada

, et al. Utilisation of postnatal care among rural women in Nepal. BMC Pregn Childb 2007; 7: 19.

83.

Ibrahim

Mare

Nur

Postnatal care utilization and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the Aysaeta district, northeast Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional Study. Ethiop J Health Sci 2022; 32(6): 1123–1132.

84.

Babalola

Fatusi

Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria: looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregn Childb 2009; 9: 43.

85.

Adu

Tenkorang

Banchani

, et al. The effects of individual and community-level factors on maternal health outcomes in Ghana. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(11): e0207942.

86.

Tadele

Getinet

Determinants of postnatal care check-ups in Ethiopia: a multi-level analysis. Ethiop J Health Sci 2021; 31(4): 753–760.

87.

Solanke

Amoo

Idowu

AE.

Improving postnatal checkups for mothers in west Africa: a multilevel analysis. Women Health 2018; 58(2): 221–245.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

0.04 MB

0.14 MB