Increasingly, research is being undertaken with people from diverse cultures, with many countries revitalising the foundations of their cultural heritage. Cultural sensitivity is an essential skill for researchers, and researchers are challenged to carefully consider cultural contexts of all research and data collection methods. In this paper, we describe and reflect on our experiences of facilitating qualitative research, specifically focus groups, across three continents and using a postmodern approach, deconstruct focus group utility. We offer four strategies for conducting focus groups that provide practical guidance suggestions for qualitative researchers facilitating focus groups in these populations. Our reflections reinforce that understanding our own multicultural assumptions and biases, being reflexive and mindful and using the suggested strategies to facilitate focus groups in different cultures may prevent researchers from adopting essentialist cultural stereotypes.
AnthiasF (2013) Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: Towards an intersectional framing. The Sociological Review61(2): 323–343.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012) Household income, expenditure and wealth, Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
3.
BarbourRS (2005) Making sense of focus groups. Medical Education39(7): 742–750.
ChangSJ (2010) When East and West meet: An essay on the importance of cultural understanding in global business practice and education. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies2: 1–13.
6.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, London, UK: Sage.
7.
CrenshawK (1994) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
8.
CulleyLHudsonN (2009) Constructing relatedness ethnicity, gender and third party assisted conception in the UK. Current Sociology57(2): 249–267.
9.
CulleyLHudsonNRapportF (2007) Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: Researching infertility in British South Asian communities. Qualitative Health Research17(1): 102–112.
10.
Derrida J (1996) Remarks on deconstruction and pragmatism. Deconstruction and Pragmatism, 84.
11.
DuitsLVan ZoonenL (2006) Headscarves and porno-chic disciplining girls’ bodies in the European multicultural society. European Journal of Women’s Studies13(2): 103–117.
12.
EsterhuizenP (2010) The Journey from Neophyte to Registered Nurse: A Dutch Experience of Professional Socialization, Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
13.
GreenvilleJPobkeCRogersN (2013) Trends in the Distribution of Income in Australia, Canberra, Australia: Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper.
14.
GudykunstWBMatsumotoYTing-ToomeyS (1996) The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research22(4): 510–543.
15.
GunaratnamY (1997) Culture is not enough. In: FieldDHockeyJSmallN (eds) Death, Gender and Ethnicity, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 166–186.
16.
HalcombEJGholizadehLDiGiacomoM (2007) Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing16(6): 1000–1011.
17.
Hall ET (1989) Beyond Culture. New York: Random House LLC.
18.
Hesse-BiberSNLeavyP (2010) The Practice of Qualitative Research, London, UK: Sage.
19.
HuHC (2009) The Chinese concept of “face”. American Anthropologist46(1): 45–64.
20.
Kamberelis G and Dimitriadis G (2011) Focus groups: contingent articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In: Denzin NK and Lincoln YS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. vol. 4, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 545--563.
21.
KeshavarezSBaharudinR (2009) Parenting style in a collectivist culture of Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences10(1): 66–73.
22.
KiddPMarshallM (2001) Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research10(3): 293–308.
23.
KitzingerJ (1995) Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal311: 299–302.
24.
KitzingerJ (1994) The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness16(1): 103–121.
25.
KruegerRCaseyM (2009) Focus Groups. A Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
KruegerRA (2009) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
KruegerRACaseyMA (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
KvaleS (1995) The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry1(1): 19–40.
29.
LatherPA (2007) Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts Toward a Double(d) Science, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30.
LeeJJLeeKP (2009) Facilitating dynamics of focus group interviews in East Asia: Evidence and tools by cross-cultural study. International Journal of Design3(1): 17–28.
31.
LyotardJ-F (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, vol. 10. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
MackeySJacksonDWalterG (2012) Editorial: ‘Face’ and its cultural dimensions: Some considerations for nurse educators. Journal of Clinical Nursing21(13–14): 1797–1798.
33.
MorganD (1996) Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology22: 129–152.
34.
Morgan DL (2012) Focus groups and social interaction. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, Marvasti AB and McKinney KD (eds) Handbook of Interview Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 161--176.
35.
MurdickNShorePChittooranMM (2004) Cross-cultural comparison of the concept of “otherness” and its impact on persons with disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities39(4): 310–316.
36.
OlsonJSBealHO (2011) The Ethnic Dimension in American History, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
PhillipsTSmithP (2000) What is ‘Australian’? Knowledge and attitudes among a gallery of contemporary Australians. Australian Journal of Political Science35(2): 203–224.
38.
RolfeGJasperMFreshwaterD (2010) Critical Reflection in Practice: Generating Knowledge for Care, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
RosenauP (1992) Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
SingelisTMBrownWJ (1995) Culture, self, and collectivist communication linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research21(3): 354–389.
41.
VissandjéeBAbdoolSNDupéréS (2002) Focus groups in rural Gujarat, India: A modified approach. Qualitative Health Research12(6): 826–843.
42.
WebbCKevernJ (2001) Focus groups as a research method: A critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing33(6): 798–805.
43.
WillgerodtMA (2003) Using focus groups to develop culturally relevant instruments. Western Journal of Nursing Research25(7): 798–814.
44.
WittgensteinL (1980) Culture and Values, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
45.
YuN (2001) What does our face mean to us?Pragmatics & Cognition9(1): 1–36.
