The paper advances an interpretation of political scandal and its place in democratic politics, taking the scandals of the ‘Watergate era” in American politics as its evidential basis. The interpretation focuses on an aspect of political scandal that has been neglected in existing treatments, namely the politically constructed rather than epistemologically simple nature of scandalous ‘exposure”. The career of the ‘smoking gun” in the Watergate era provides illustration. The paper goes on to relate political scandal as both symptom and stimulus to trends in late-modern democratization concerning ‘hyperpolitics” (political contestation at all stages of the decision-making process) and ‘meta-information’ (information about the providers of information). On this basis, the generalization of scandal politics as a typical mode of democratic politics is suggested.
ApostolidisP.WilliamsJ. A.2004. ‘Introduction: Sex Scandals and Discourses of Power’, in ApostolidisP.WilliamsJ. A. (eds), Public Affairs: Politics in the Age of Sex Scandals.Durham and London: Duke University Press: 1–35.
2.
AratoA.1999. ‘Impeachment or Revision of the Constitution?’, Constellations6(2): 145–56.
3.
BeckU.1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London: Sage.
4.
BeckU.1997. The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order.Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
BeckU.GiddensA.LashS.1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order.Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BimberB.2003. Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BogenD.LynchM.1989. ‘Taking Account of the Hostile Native: Plausible Deniability and the Production of Conventional History in the Iran-Contra Hearings’, Social Problems36(3): 197–224.
8.
BrockD.2002. Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative.New York: Crown Publishers.
9.
CalhounC. W.1996. ‘The Political Culture: Public Life and the Conduct of Politics’, in CalhounC. W. (ed.), The Gilded Age: Essays on the Origins of Modern America.Wilmington: SR Books: 184–213.
10.
ChomskyN.2000. Rogue States: The Rule of Force in World Affairs.London: Pluto Press.
11.
CiglerA. J.LoomisB. A.1988. ‘From Big Bird to Bill Gates: Organized Interests and the Emergence of Hyperpolitics’, in CiglerA. J.LoomisB. A. (eds), Interest Group Politics, 5th edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press: 389–403.
12.
DaltonR. J.1996. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 2nd edn.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
13.
DunnC. W.2000. The Scarlet Thread of Scandal: Morality and the American Presidency. Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
EdwardsD.PotterJ.Discursive Psychology.London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
15.
GinsbergB.ShefterM.1999. Politics by Other Means: Politicians, Prosecutors, and the Press from Watergate to Whitewater, revised edn.New York and London: W. W. Norton.
16.
GreenwaldR. (dir.). 2004. Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism.CarolinaProductions/MoveOn.Org
17.
HackingI.1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
18.
HarrigerK. J.2000. The Special Prosecutor in American Politics, 2nd edn.Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
19.
KaplanR. A.2002. Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865–1920.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KellnerD.2005. Media Spectacle and the Crisis of Democracy: Terrorism, War, and Election Battles.Boulder, CO and London: Paradigm Publishers
21.
KendallD. E.1998. Preliminary Memorandum Concerning Referral of Office of Independent Counsel, published in The Starr Report.New York and London: Pocket Books
22.
KingA.1986. ‘Sex, Money, and Power’, in Hodder-WilliamsR.CeaserJ. (eds), Politics in Britain and the United States: Comparative Perspectives.Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 173–222.
23.
KovachB.RosenstielT.2000. Warp Speed: America in the Age of Mixed Media.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24.
LawrenceR. G.BennettW. L.2001. ‘Rethinking Media Politics and Public Opinion: Reactions to the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal’, Political Science Quarterly116(3): 425–46.
25.
LowiT. J.2004. ‘Power and Corruption: Political Competition and the Scandal Market’, in ApostolidisP.WilliamsJ. A. (eds), Public Affairs: Politics in the Age of Sex Scandals.Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press: 68–100.
26.
LullJ.HinermanS.1997. ‘The Search for Scandal’, in LullJ.HinermanS. (eds), Media Scandals: Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Marketplace.Cambridge: Polity Press: 1–33.
27.
LumbyC.2001. ‘The President's Penis: Entertaining Sex and Power’, in BerlantL.DugganL. (eds), Our Monica, Ourselves: The Clinton Affair and the National Interest.New York: New York University Press: 225–36.
28.
Malti-DouglasF.2000. The Starr Report Disrobed. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press.
29.
MarkovitsA. S.SilversteinM.1988a. ‘Introduction: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies’, in MarkovitsA. S.SilversteinM. (eds). 1988b. The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies.New York and London: Holmes & Meier: 1–12.
30.
MarkovitsA. S.SilversteinM. (eds). 1988b. The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies.New York and London: Holmes & Meier
31.
McGerrM. E.1986. The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
MillerT.2001. ‘The First Penis Impeached’, in BerlantL.DugganL. (eds), Our Monica, Ourselves: The Clinton Affair and the National Interest.New York: New York University Press: 116–33.
33.
MiroffB.2000. ‘Courting the Public: Bill Clinton's Postmodern Education’, in SchierS. E. (ed.), The Postmodern Presidency: Bill Clinton's Legacy in U.S. Politics.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press: 106–123.
34.
MisztalB.1996. Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order.Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
MorganD.1988. ‘The Politics of Image: Scandals in American Political Life’, Corruption and Reform3(3): 247–59.
36.
NorrisP. (ed.). 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
OwenD.2000. ‘Popular Politics and the Clinton/Lewinsky Affair: The Implications for Leadership’, Political Psychology21(1): 161–77.
38.
QuirkP. J.2000. ‘Scandal Time: The Clinton Impeachment and the Distraction of American Politics’, in RozellM. J.WilcoxC. (eds), The Clinton Scandal and the Future of American Government.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press: 119–41.
39.
RichA.WeaverR. K.1998. ‘Advocates and Analysts: Think Tanks and the Politicization of Expertise’, in CiglerA. J.LoomisB. A. (eds), Interest Group Politics, 5th edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press: 235–53.
40.
RidleyF. F.1988. ‘Scandal, Morals and Politics’, Corruption and Reform3(3): 293–306.
41.
SabatoL. J.2000. Feeding Frenzy: Attack Journalism and American Politics, revised edn.Baltimore, MD: Lanahan Publishers.
42.
SabatoL. J.StencelM.LichterS. R.2000. Peepshow: Media and Politics in an Age of Scandal. Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
SafireW.1993. Safire's New Political Dictionary: The Definitive Guide to the New Language of Politics.New York: Random House
44.
ScheuermannW. E.1999. ‘Kenneth Starr's Rule of Law — And Ours’, Constellations6(2): 137–41.
45.
SchudsonM.1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers.New York: Basic Books.
46.
SchudsonM.1993. Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past.New York: Basic Books.
ShenkD.1997. Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut.London: Abacus.
49.
SunsteinC.2001. Republic.com.Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
50.
TarrowS.1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd edn.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
ThompsonJ. B.1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media.Cambridge: Polity Press.
52.
ThompsonJ. B.2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge and New York: Polity Press.
53.
VaronJ.2004. ‘It Was the Spectacle, Stupid: The Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr Affair and the Politics of the Gaze’, in ApostolidisP.WilliamsJ. A. (eds), Public Affairs: Politics in the Age of Sex Scandals.Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press: 232–58.
54.
WattenbergM. P.1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s.Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
55.
WiebeR. H.1967. The Search for Order: 1887–1920.London: Macmillan.
56.
WilliamsB. A.DelliCarpini M. X.2000. ‘Unchained Reaction: The Collapse of Media Gatekeeping and the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal’, Journalism1(1): 61–85.
57.
WilliamsR.1995. ‘The Last Word on the Iran-Contra Affair? The Final Report of the Independent Counsel’, Crime, Law and Social Change23(4): 367–85.
58.
WilliamsR.1998. Political Scandals in the USA.Edinburgh: Keele University Press.
59.
WilliamsR.1999. ‘The Persecution of the Presidency? The Role of the Independent Counsel’, Parliamentary Affairs52(2): 291–305.
60.
ZallerJ. R.1998. ‘Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science’, PS: Political Science and Politics 31(2): 182–9.
