Following diagnosis, individuals with chronic conditions such as inflammatory arthritis (IA) face learning how to manage multiple new healthcare relationships. Despite existing literature on team care for people with IA, little is known about how teams negotiate care from perspectives of all team members.
Objective
To explore how communication is perceived and care is negotiated amongst IA healthcare teams by drawing on the perspectives of each team member.
Method
This analysis drew on data from an ongoing three-year study exploring team-based IA care. We interviewed 11 participants including two men with IA and their family care providers and healthcare providers. We used a three-staged analytic process and integrated broad tenets of social network theory to understand the relational dimensions of team members experiences.
Result
Analysis revealed three themes regarding communication and care: (1) seeking/sharing information, (2) striving to coordinate unified care, and (3) providing patients a voice.
Discussion
This study emphasizes the importance of understanding team dynamics beyond the dyad of patient and care provider. Negotiating power and decision-making in IA care is a dynamic process involving shifting levels of responsibility amongst a care team. Communication-based strategies that extend dyadic interactions may enhance teamwork and health outcomes in chronic conditions.
LiLCBadleyEMMacKayC, et al.An evidence-informed, integrated framework for rheumatoid arthritis care. Arthritis Rheum2008; 59: 1171–1183.
3.
VlielandTPLiLCMacKayC,et al.Does everybody need a team?J Rheumatol2006 Sep 1; 33: 1897–1899.
4.
BurgenerA. Enhancing communication to improve patient safety and to increase patient satisfaction. Health Care Manag (Frederick)2020; 39: 128–132.
5.
LawnSDelanyTSweetL, et al.Control in chronic condition self-care management: how it occurs in the health worker-client relationship and implications for client empowerment. J Adv Nurs2014; 70: 383–394.
6.
SzafranOTortiJKennettS,et al.Family physicians’ perspectives on interprofessional teamwork: findings from a qualitative study. J Interprof Care2018; 32: 169–177.
7.
LingardLSue-Chue-LamCTaitGR, et al.Pulling together and pulling apart: influences of convergence and divergence on distributed healthcare teams. Advances in Health Sciences Education2008; 22: 1085–1099.
8.
HeidariB. Rheumatoid arthritis: early diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Caspian J Intern Med2011; 2: 161–170.
9.
MathewsALColeskaABurnsPB, et al.Evolution of patient decision-making regarding medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2015; 68: 318–324.
10.
SumsionTLawM. A review of evidence on the conceptual elements informing client-centred practice. Can J Occup Ther2006; 73: 153162.
11.
KitsonAMarshallABassettK, et al.What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. J Adv Nurs2012; 69: 4–15.
12.
FoxAReevesS. Interprofessional collaborative patient-centred care: a critical exploration of two related discourses. J Interprof Care2015; 29: 113–118.
13.
Whalley HammellKR. Client-centred occupational therapy: the importance of critical perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther2015; 22: 237–243.
14.
MortensonWBDyckI. Power and client-centred practice: an insider exploration of occupational therapists’ experiences. Can J Occup Ther2006; 73: 261–271.
15.
JohanssonKKatajistoJSalanteräS. Pre-admission education in surgical rheumatology nursing: towards greater patient empowerment. J Clin Nurs2010; 19: 2980–2988.
16.
HargravesILeBlancAShahND, et al.Shared decision making: the need for patient-clinician conversation, not just information. Health Aff2016; 35: 627–629.
17.
GarneauKIversenMJanS, et al.Rheumatoid arthritis decision making. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology2011; 17: 231–235.
18.
LaDonnaKABatesJTaitGR, et al.‘Who is on your health-care team?’ asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles. Health Expect2017; 20: 198–210.
19.
NimmonLStenfors-HayesT. The “handling” of power in the physician-patient encounter: perceptions from experienced physicians. BMC Med Educ2016; 16, Epub ahead of print 2016.
20.
ThorneS. Secondary qualitative data analysis. Routledge International Handbook of Qualitative Nursing Research2000; 3: 68–70.
21.
LeCompteMDSchensulJJ. Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Londres: Altamira, 2010.
22.
NimmonLCristanchoS. When I say … networks and systems. Med Educ2018; 53: 331–333.
23.
VarpioLParadisEUijtdehaageS,et al.The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med2020; 95: 989–994.
24.
NimmonLArtinoARVarpioL. Social network theory in interprofessional education: revealing hidden power. J Grad Med Educ2019; 11: 247–250.
25.
FuhseJMützelS. Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research. Qual Quant2011; 45: 1067–1089.
26.
HeathSFullerAJohnstonB. Chasing shadows: defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis. Qual Res2009; 9: 645–661.
27.
NimmonLAtherleyA. Qualitative ego networks in health professions education: capturing the self in relation to others. Med Educ2022; 56: 71–81.
28.
WarnerSBowersMTDixonMA. Team dynamics: a social network perspective. Journal of Sport Management2012; 26: 53–66.
29.
KimSBochatayNRelyea-ChewA, et al.Individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors of healthcare conflict: a scoping review. J Interprof Care2017; 31: 282–290.
30.
SumsionTLencuchaR. Therapists’ perceptions of how teamwork influences client-centred practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy2009; 72: 48–54.
31.
van Eijk-HustingsYAmmerlaanJVoorneveld-NieuwenhuisH, et al.Patients’ needs and expectations with regard to rheumatology nursing care: results of multicentre focus group interviews. Ann Rheum Dis2013; 72: 831–835.
BardachSHRealKBardachDRPerspectives of healthcare practitioners: an exploration of interprofessional communication using electronic medical records. J Interprof Care2017; 31: 300–306.
34.
FoucheCKenealyTMaceJ, et al.Practitioner perspectives from seven health professional groups on core competencies in the context of chronic care. J Interprof Care2014; 28: 534–540.
35.
KerosuoH. Lost in translation: a patient-centred experience of unintegrated care. International Journal of Public Sector Management2010; 23: 372–380.
36.
GowdaDCurranTKhedagiA, et al.Implementing an interprofessional narrative medicine program in academic clinics: feasibility and program evaluation. Perspectives on Medical Education2019; 8: 52–59.
37.
NimmonLRegehrG. The complexity of patients’ health communication social networks: a broadening of physician communication. Teach Learn Med2017; 30: 352–366.
