Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

This study aims to provide a general overview of cancer risk perceptions and reported sunburns to prevent sunburn and reduce the long-term risk of developing skin cancer.

Methods

Data were obtained from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey 6 and analysis was carried out with SPSS. Descriptive statistics were conducted to explore sociodemographic characteristics, cancer risk perceptions, and behaviors surrounding sunburns in our sample. Associations between number of sunburns and sociodemographic variables were reported using multinomial regression analysis.

Results

When asked how confident patients felt about their ability to take good care of their own health, most respondents felt either very confident (44.0%) or completely confident (27.3%). When asked how often they experienced a sunburn in the past 12 months, 2.1% reported experiencing more than 6 sunburns, 30.3% reported having between 1-5 sunburns, and 67.6% reported experiencing no sunburns. Using multinomial regression analysis, statistically significant associations were reported between number of sunburns and age, gender, occupation status, marital status, education, Hispanic origin, race, and income level.

Conclusion

The results of our study reinforce the need for public health interventions that effectively disseminate information on skin cancer risk across ethnic minority groups, especially in underserved communities within the U.S.

Keywords

skin cancer prevention social determinants of health risk perceptions skin protection

“Our findings solidify the correlation between risk of alcohol consumption and increased sunburn incidence.”

Introduction

Skin cancer, characterized by the uncontrolled growth of abnormal skin cells, is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer in the United States.¹ Skin cancer is primarily manifested by three major pathologies: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma.¹ Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, collectively known as non-melanoma skin cancers, are the most common and typically have lower rates of malignancy. Melanoma is less frequent but is significantly more dangerous due to its higher likelihood of spreading to other organs.¹ According to the American Cancer Society, millions of non-melanoma skin cancers and tens of thousands of melanoma cases are diagnosed annually in the U.S.² Individuals with fair skin, a history of sun exposure or tanning bed use, and a genetic predisposition are at a heightened risk for developing skin cancer. As such, there is a critical need for targeted prevention and education efforts in these populations.³

Several barriers hinder the widespread adoption of preventive and protective behaviors against skin cancer among U.S. adults.⁴ Significant obstacles are present in the lack of awareness and misunderstanding regarding the severity of skin cancer and the effectiveness of prevention measures, such as regular use of sunscreen, wearing protective clothing, and avoiding peak sun exposure times.⁴ Additionally, cultural preferences for tanned skin and aesthetic norms can undermine public health messages advocating for sun protection.⁵ Economic factors also play a role, as not all individuals have easy access to or can afford sun protection products.⁶ Moreover, existing disparities in education and healthcare access disproportionately affect lower-income and minority communities, further complicating efforts to promote and implement routine skin cancer prevention practices across the entire population.⁶

A systematic review found that the perceived severity of UV harm was generally low in children, young adults, and older adults, which coincides with the belief of a “healthy tan.”⁷ Based on the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) data, Black Americans have a lower perceived likelihood of developing skin cancer in the future in comparison to White Americans.⁸ Black Americans also less often considered regular skin examinations important in increasing the chance of finding skin cancer early.⁸ Similarly, older adults and those with lower education levels were more likely to perceive their risk of future skin cancer as low.⁸ Perceived absolute risk, perceived comparative risk, and worry about skin cancer development have all been individually associated with sunscreen use when controlling for race, gender, and education.⁹ A survey of indoor tanning users found that increased perceived susceptibility to cancer, along with both cancer fatalism and external risk attribution beliefs, was generally associated with higher indoor tanning use.¹⁰ However, high-quality research on the effectiveness of sunscreen in preventing skin cancer has been limited and has largely focused on White populations.^11,12

Between 1990 and 2019, the burden of skin cancer in the United States, as measured by disability-adjusted life years (DALY), decreased for melanoma and remained stable for squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.¹ However, the estimated annual costs of skin cancer treatment rose from $8 billion to $8.9 billion between the years of 2012-2018.¹³ Skin cancer is more prevalent among those older than 64-years-old than those aged 18 to 64, which is concerning due to the growing elderly population in the U.S.¹³ While Black Americans are less likely to develop skin cancer, they are more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage compared to White Americans, which could contribute to higher mortality rates from skin cancer.^14,15 When looking at individual behavior, an analysis of the costs of indoor tanning in the U.S. found that restricting indoor tanning for those under 18-years-old would prevent an estimated 61,839 cases of melanoma and 6735 deaths from melanoma.¹⁶ As such, low-risk perceptions of skin cancer combined with low skin protection behaviors contribute to the burden of skin cancer in the U.S. today.

The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) is a population-based survey collecting nationally representative data about changing patterns, needs, and opportunities in the healthcare field within the U.S. and Puerto Rico. Recently, the 2022 HINTS survey included survey items to measure risk perceptions about being at-risk of cancer and skin protection behaviors. Our study aims to provide a general overview of cancer risk perceptions and the prevalence of skin-protective behaviors to prevent sunburn and reduce the long-term risk of developing skin cancer. The results of the study derived from the HINTS 6 2022 dataset will guide future researchers in understanding nationally representative estimates for skin cancer risk perception and adoption of relevant protective behaviors and the sociodemographic variables associated with increased prevalence of reported sunburns.

Methods

For the purpose of this study, the data were obtained from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey 6 (HINTS 6). HINTS has been administered routinely by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) since 2003. The aim of HINTS is to synthesize data regarding the population’s attitudes toward health-related information, including their health behaviors, opinions, and knowledge, and is nationally representative of the American public.^17,18 The target population of this survey is adult civilians who live in the United States. The version of the HINTS survey used in this study is the most recent iteration (HINTS 6) and was administered from March 7 – November 8, 2022, with the goal of reaching 7000 completed questionnaires. This version was selected for our study because of the inclusion of questions regarding risk perceptions about developing cancer, skin cancer protective behaviors, and the sociodemographic variables of interest for this topic.

Survey Administration

Based on the success of the mixed-method sample collection for HINTS 5, Cycle 3, HINTS 6 was offered to participants either online or on paper. Participants were randomly assigned one of three groups: to be offered both modes together (concurrently), or to be offered one mode before the other (sequentially, two groups). There was an unexpectedly low response rate to the traditional HINTS mailings, so HINTS 6 included a fourth mailing to a subsample of non-respondents. These non-respondents were selected using a systematic sampling approach. This extra mailing was conducted between September 27 and November 8, 2022, and included an additional payment incentive for completion. Additionally, for HINTS 6, certain PO Box addresses were excluded from the potential samples to improve the rate of deliverable mail.

Sample Selection

The HINTS 6 survey employed a two-stage sampling strategy. In stage one, a stratified sample was selected from a collection of residential addresses. Then, one adult was selected from each residence. This methodology differs from previous HINTS samples as it expands from two strata (high-minority and low-minority) to four strata (by additionally breaking out into rural and urban geographic areas). This further stratification provided a means to increase the number of rural samples collected. Data collection for HINTS 6 ran from March 7 to November 8, 2022. The survey was administered both online and by paper and was offered in English and Spanish. All groups received a $2 prepaid monetary incentive to encourage participation. Bonus incentive was offered to respondents in the control group to complete the survey online.

The HINTS 6 overall weighted response rate was 28.1%, but this differed significantly by stratum. On average, the high-minority strata had lower response rates than the low-minority strata (21% and 31%, respectively). There was no significant difference in response rates between urban and rural strata. The high-minority urban stratum had a slightly higher percentage of undeliverable households compared to all others. The total sample size for HINTS 6 was 6252.

Definitions and Measures

Three items were selected from the HINTS survey related to the survey respondents’ perception of cancer risk as follows: (1) Overall, how confident are you about your ability to take good care of your health?; (2) Compared to other people your age, how likely do you think you are to get cancer in your lifetime?; and (3) How worried are you about getting cancer? The answers to all three items were 5-point Likert scales. For confidence in ability to care for one’s health, the scale ranged from “Completely Confident” to “Not Confident at All.” Regarding likelihood of cancer compared to one’s age cohort, the scale was from “Very Unlikely” to “Very Likely,” with a separate response category if the respondent has already had cancer. When asked about worry level about getting cancer, survey answers ranged from “Not at all” to “Extremely.”

Questions related to sunburns within the past year were also selected from the survey, specifically: (1) After several months of not being in the sun very much, if you went out in the sun for one hour without sunscreen, a hat or protective clothing, what describes what would happen to your skin? (2) On the most recent time you were sunburned, what were you doing? and (3) Were you drinking alcohol at any of the times when you were sunburned? These were all characterized against a question of how many times the survey respondent had a sunburn, even a small portion of skin turning red or hurting for 12 or more hours, in the past year from too much sun exposure. This was originally a continuous variable but was redefined into the categories of no sunburns, 1-5 sunburns, or >=6 sunburns in the past year. The justification for these categories is that experiencing 6 or more blistering sunburns between the ages of 15 and 20 years has been shown to increase one’s melanoma risk by 80% and non-melanoma skin cancer risk by 68%.¹⁹

The following sociodemographic variables were utilized for this study: age, which was recoded from a continuous variable into a categorical variable with three categories of age ranges (18-39 years; 40-64 years; 65+ years); gender as a binary variable (male, female); occupational status as a categorical variable (employed, homemaker, student, retired, disabled, multiple occupation statuses selected, unemployed for 1+ years, unemployed for <1 year, other); marital status (married, living as married/living with a romantic partner, divorced, widowed, separated, single/never been married); educational level (high school degree or less, post high school training other than college, that is, vocational or technical school, some college, college graduate, postgraduate); Hispanic origin (not Hispanic or Hispanic); race (White, Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, other Asian, other Pacific Islander, multiple races selected); and income level ($0-$34,999; $35,000-$49,999; $50,000-$74,999; $75,000-$99,999; $100,000-$199,999; $200,000 or more). To account for small cell sizes for the purpose of regression analysis, different variables were recoded to include less categories. For occupational status, “unemployed for less than 1 year” and “unemployed for 1 year or more” as well as “multiple occupations” and “other occupations” were compiled together under “unemployed” and “multiple occupations/other occupation,” respectively. The sub-categories “divorced” and “widowed” were combined together for the variable “marital status,” while “post-high school training” and “some college” were compiled for the variable “education.” Finally, for the variable “race,” each of the sub-categories “Asian Indian,” “Chinese,” “Filipino,” “Vietnamese,” and “Other Asian” were combined under the sub-category “Asian,” while “American Indian or Alaska Native” and “Other Pacific Islander” were compiled into one sub-category. Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of our sample.

Table 1.

Sample Demographic Characteristics.

Demographic Variables (N = 6252)	Unweighted Frequency (Weighted %)
Age
18-39	1398 (22.7%)
40-64	2553 (41.5%)
>=65	2203 (35.8%)
Gender
Male	2307 (39.5%)
Female	3535 (60.5%)
Occupational Status
Employed	2761 (47.1%)
Homemaker	221 (3.8%)
Student	63 (1.1%)
Retired	1725 (29.4%)
Disabled	326 (5.6%)
Multiple occupation statuses selected	473 (8.1%)
Unemployed for 1 year or more	148 (2.5%)
Unemployed for less than one year	101 (1.7%)
Other occupation	44 (0.8%)
Marital Status
Married	2624 (45%)
Living as married or living with a romantic partner	373 (6.4%)
Divorced	939 (16%)
Widowed	646 (11.1%)
Separated	136 (2.3%)
Single, never been married	1119 (19.2%)
Education
High school degree or less	1455 (24.9%)
Post high school training other than college (vocational or technical)	433 (7.4%)
Some college	1239 (21.2%)
College graduate	1613 (27.6%)
Postgraduate	1108 (18.9%)
Hispanic Origin
Not Hispanic	4607 (82.2%)
Hispanic	1001 (17.8%)
Race
White	3959 (70.3%)
Black	1036 (18.4%)
American Indian or Alaska Native	58 (1.0%)
Multiple races selected	215 (3.8%)
Asian Indian	68 (1.2%)
Chinese	72 (1.3%)
Filipino	62 (1.1%)
Vietnamese	29 (0.5%)
Other Asian	76 (1.3%)
Other Pacific Islander	58 (1.0%)
Income Level
$0 to $34,999	1688 (30.6%)
$35,000 to $49,999	732 (13.3%)
$50,000 to $74,999	937 (17.0%)
$75,000 to $99,999	694 (12.6%)
$100,000 to $199,999	1012 (18.3%)
$200,000 or more	457 (8.3%)

After initial descriptive analyses were conducted and recorded in Tables 1 -3, any responses listed as “Missing data (Not Ascertained),” “Missing data (Web partial – Question Never Seen),” “Multiple responses selected in error,” were changed to “System Missing” and were excluded from consideration so as not to interfere with the statistical analyses. To be recognized as the reference variable in SPSS, the variables of interest were recoded to an arbitrary value of “100” in the Variable View, which did not interfere with descriptive counts.

Table 2.

Reported Cancer Risk Perceptions and Skin-Protective Behaviors in a Sample of U.S. Adults.

Cancer Risk Perception and Protective Behavior Survey Questions	Responses	Unweighted Frequency (Weighted %)
Overall, how confident are you about your ability to take good care of your health?	Completely confident	1645 (27.3%)
	Very confident	2656 (44.0%)
	Somewhat confident	1398 (23.2%)
	A little confident	259 (4.3%)
	Not confident at all	78 (1.3%)
Compared to other people your age, how likely do you think you are to get cancer in your lifetime?	I already had cancer	562 (9.6%)
	Very unlikely	482 (8.2%)
	Unlikely	678 (11.6%)
	Neither likely nor unlikely	1636 (27.9%)
	Likely	905 (15.5%)
	Very likely	287 (4.9%)
	I don’t know	1304 (22.3%)
How worried are you about getting cancer?	Extremely	570 (9.7%)
	Moderately	890 (15.2%)
	Somewhat	1660 (28.3%)
	Slightly	1600 (27.3%)
	Not at all	1136 (19.4%)
After several months of not being in the sun very much, if you went out in the sun for an hour without sunscreen, a hat or protective clothing, which one of these bests describes what would happen to your skin?	Get a severe sunburn with blisters	149 (2.5%)
	Have a moderate sunburn with peeling	990 (16.8%)
	Burn mildly with some or no tanning	1855 (31.6%)
	Turn darker without sunburn	1750 (29.8%)
	Nothing would happen to my skin	1132 (19.3%)
During the past 12 months, how many times have you had a sunburn (even a small part of your skin turns red or hurts for 12 hours or more) from too much sun exposure?	1-5 sunburns	1697 (30.3%)
	>=6 sunburns	120 (2.1%)
	No sunburns in past 12 months	3787 (67.6%)

Table 3.

Type of Activity Reported at the Time of Sunburn.

Type of Activity Reported at The Time of Sunburn (N = 1863)	Unweighted Frequency (Weighted %)
Drinking alcohol	400 (21.5%)
Working outside at home or family/friend’s home	211 (11.3%)
Swimming	189 (10.1%)
Exercise	136 (7.3%)
Sunbathing	133 (7.1%)
Attending an outdoor event or venue	105 (5.6%)
Day-to-day activities	85 (4.6%)
Job outside	49 (2.6%)
Watching a sporting event	37 (2.0%)
Other	72 (3.9%)
Multiple activities selected	800 (42.9%)

Statistical Analyses

Data analysis was carried out with SPSS (version 29) using replicate weights. Descriptive statistics were first conducted to explore sociodemographic characteristics, cancer risk perceptions, and behaviors surrounding sunburns in our sample. Associations between number of sunburns (recoded into 0 sunburns, 1-5 sunburns, and >=6 sunburns) and sociodemographic variables were reported using chi-squared tests and multinomial regression analysis.

Results

Participant Characteristics

A total of 6252 participants participated in the survey. More than half of the respondents were female (60.5%), White (70.3%), and non-Hispanic (82.2%). The majority of respondents were 40 years old or older (77.3%), had more than a high school degree (75.1%), were married (45.0%), and were either employed (47.1%) or retired (29.4%). Over half of the respondents had a combined household income level above $50,000 (56.2%) with 17.0% reporting an income between $50,000 and $74,999, 12.6% between $75,000 and $99,999, 18.3% between $100,000 and $199,999, and 8.3% reporting $200,000 or more. Table 1 lists all sociodemographic characteristics for our study sample.

Cancer Risk Perceptions

When asked how confident patients felt about their ability to take good care of their own health, most respondents felt either very confident (44.0%) or completely confident (27.3%). Regarding how likely they felt they were to get cancer, most felt neither likely nor unlikely (27.9%) or were unsure (22.3%), and the majority were either somewhat (28.3%) or slightly (27.3%) worried about getting cancer. Only 9.7% (n = 570) reported being extremely worried about getting cancer (Table 2).

Sunburn and Skin Protection

More than half of the respondents felt that after not being in the sun very much and then spending an hour in the sun without any protection, they would either burn mildly with some or no tanning (31.6%), tan without burning (29.8%), or experience no change at all to their skin (19.3%) (Table 2). When asked how often they experienced a sunburn in the past 12 months, 2.1% reported experiencing more than 6 sunburns, 30.3% reported having between 1-5 sunburns, and 67.6% reported experiencing no sunburns (Table 2). Of the 33.80% (n = 1863) valid responses indicating they had experienced a sunburn, 21.5% (n = 400) reported drinking alcohol, 11.3% (n = 211) had been working outside, 10.1% (n = 189) were swimming, while 42.9% (n = 800) selected performing multiple activities during the most recent time they were sunburned (Table 3).

Multinomial Regression Analysis

Using multinomial regression analysis, statistically significant associations were reported between number of sunburns (1-5 sunburns; >=6 sunburns) and different sociodemographic variables, considering the “no sunburns reported in the past 12 months” as the base outcome for comparison purposes. P-values were calculated using chi-squared tests, with significance being set at P < 0.05. Compared to the reference age group (18-39 years old), older participants, classified in the 40-64 and >=65 age groups, had significantly lower relative risks of reporting 1-5 sunburns and >=6 sunburns (P < 0.001). Similarly, the risk of females reporting 1-5 sunburns and >=6 sunburns was 0.877 (P = 0.031) times and 0.650 (P = 0.025) lower than males, respectively. Moreover, disabled, unemployed, and participants reporting multiple occupations had significantly lower risks of reporting 1-5 sunburns compared to employed participants (0.001). Disabled participants had also significantly lower risks of reporting >=6 sunburns compared to their employed counterparts (P < 0.001). When it comes to marital status, participants reporting living as married or living with a romantic partner had 1.396 times the risk of disclosing 1-5 sunburns over the past 12 months (P = 0.004) compared to their married counterparts, while being divorced/separated, widowed, or single significantly lowered the risk of having 1-5 sunburns. Being divorced and separated was also associated with 0.479 times lower risk of having >=6 sunburns. Furthermore, all educational categories, including participants in the post-high school, college graduate, and postgraduate categories had significantly higher risks of reporting 1-5 sunburns compared to participants with a high school degree or less than high school level of education (P < 0.001). When it comes to ethnicity, identifying as Hispanic had a 0.762 times lower risk of reporting 1-5 sunburns compared to White participants (P < 0.001). As for race, identifying as Black, Asian, or as having multiple raced significantly reduced the risk of reporting 1-5 sunburns over the past 12 months compared to their White counterparts. Black respondents were also less likely to report >=6 sunburns (P < 0.001). Finally, when it comes to income level, all income category groups above the $0 to $34,999 range had significantly higher risks of reporting 1-5 sunburns over the past year (P < 0.001), with the highest income group having over 4 times the risk of reporting at least 1 sunburn (P < 0.001) and over 2 times the risk of reporting at least six sunburns (P = 0.01) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Multinomial Regression of the Association Between Sociodemographic Characteristics and Number of Reported Sunburns.

Variables	Categories	1-5 sunburns		P-value	95% CI		>=6 sunburns		P-value	95% CI		No sunburns
Variables	Categories	N (%)	RR	P-value	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	N (%)	RR	P-value	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	No sunburns
Age	18-39	593 (47%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	54 (4%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	Base Outcome
	40-64	789 (34%)	0.538*	<0.001*	0.465	0.623	45 (2%)	0.324*	<0.001*	0.212	0.496
	>=65	307 (16%)	0.197*	<0.001*	0.166	0.233	21 (1%)	0.145*	<0.001*	0.086	0.246
Gender	Male	689 (32%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	58 (3%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
Gender	Female	943 (29%)	0.877*	0.031*	0.779	0.988	57 (2%)	0.650*	0.025*	0.445	0.948
Occupation Status	Employed	1033 (39%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	68 (3%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
	Homemaker	67 (35%)	0.805	0.211	0.631	1.027	7 (4%)	0.847	0.677	0.389	1.846
	Student	21 (34%)	0.871	0.384	0.638	1.189	4 (7%)	1.191	0.690	0.506	2.804
	Retired	269 (17%)	0.923	0.776	0.533	1.600	16 (1%)	2.685	0.069	0.926	7.784
	Disabled	49 (17%)	0.316*	<0.001*	0.272	0.369	5 (2%)	0.290*	<0.001*	0.167	0.503
	Unemployed	72 (32%)	0.607*	<0.001*	0.484	0.762	4 (2%)	0.701	0.325	0.346	1.421
	Multiple occupations/Other occupation	125 (27%)	0.324*	<0.001*	0.235	0.448	11 (2%)	0.516	0.159	0.206	1.295
Marital Status	Married	863 (35%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	55 (2%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
	Living as married or living with a romantic partner	150 (42%)	1.396*	0.004*	1.110	1.757	12 (3%)	1.787	0.077	0.939	3.400
	Divorced/Separated	219 (23%)	0.451*	<0.001*	0.385	0.527	18 (2%)	0.479*	0.007*	0.279	0.821
	Widowed	75 (14%)	0.422*	<0.001*	0.261	0.684	3 (1%)	0.958	0.943	0.294	3.124
	Single, never been married	323 (31%)	0.850*	0.042*	0.727	0.994	25 (2%)	1.013	0.959	0.621	1.652
Education	High school or less	238 (19%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	29 (2%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
	Post high school training (vocational or technical)/Some college	409 (26%)	1.470*	<0.001*	1.225	1.764	30 (2%)	0.891	0.668	0.526	1.509
	College graduate	585 (38%)	2.559*	<0.001*	2.145	3.053	39 (3%)	1.421	0.165	0.865	2.336
	Postgraduate	403 (38%)	2.500*	<0.001*	2.068	3.022	17 (2%)	0.855	0.622	0.459	1.593
Hispanic Origin	Not Hispanic	1377 (31%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	99 (2%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
Hispanic Origin	Hispanic	236 (26%)	0.762*	<0.001*	0.647	0.897	14 (2%)	0.603	0.091	0.336	1.084
Race	White	1365 (36%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	100 (3%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
	Black	72 (8%)	0.152*	<0.001*	0.118	0.196	2 (1%)	0.030*	<0.001*	0.004	0.216
	American Indian or Alaska Native/Pacific Islander	24 (23%)	0.601	0.105	0.324	1.113	0 (0%)	0	0.988	-	-
	Asian	62 (21%)	0.461*	<0.001*	0.344	0.619	3 (1%)	0.316	0.051	0.099	1.004
	Multiple races selected	60 (29%)	0.681*	0.018*	0.495	0.937	7 (3%)	0.666	0.432	0.241	1.837
Income Level	$0 to $34,999	275 (18%)	ref	ref	ref	ref	26 (2%)	ref	ref	ref	ref
	$35,000 to $49,999	180 (26%)	1.527*	<0.001*	1.220	1.911	17 (2%)	1.811	0.078	0.936	3.505
	$50,000 to $74,999	266 (30%)	1.803*	<0.001*	1.473	2.206	22 (2%)	1.972*	0.028*	1.075	3.617
	$75,000 to $99,999	231 (35%)	2.158*	<0.001*	1.742	2.673	15 (2%)	1.732	0.117	0.872	3.439
	$100,000 to $199,999	416 (42%)	3.023*	<0.001*	2.506	3.647	21 (2%)	1.853	0.052	0.996	3.449
	$200,000 or more	226 (50%)	4.308*	<0.001*	3.410	5.442	12 (3%)	2.655*	0.010*	1.261	5.560

*Significant relative risk ratios based on a P-value <0.05 calculated using chi-squared test.

Discussion

The present research seeks to offer an understanding of the general perception of skin cancer risk alongside the prevalence of protective actions to prevent sunburns and reduce subsequent skin cancer risk in a national sample of U.S. adults. Using the HINTS 6 2022 dataset, our analyses provide nationally representative estimates that could help future researchers approximate skin cancer risk perception and the rate at which protective behaviors are used. Furthermore, our study identifies and reports the demographic factors associated with higher occurrence of sunburns and additionally examines the distribution of cancer risk perceptions alongside respondent characterizations of their sunburns and the environmental factors contributing to them.

Our results showed that perceptions are primarily intermediate when it comes to skin cancer risk perception, as only 9.1% (n = 570) reported being extremely worried about getting cancer, while the majority of respondents were either somewhat (26.6%) or slightly (25.6%) worried about getting cancer. It should be noted that most survey respondents were White (63.3%), and non-Hispanic (73.7%). These results highlight a need for public health programs or resources aimed toward cultivating additional awareness about skin cancer susceptibility and risk across all demographics. Several studies since 2010 have drawn attention to the low-risk perceptions held in ethnic minority groups within the U.S. despite their having a similar prevalence of skin cancer to other ethnic groups.^8,20–22 One study performed in 2012 by Buster et al. determined that Black Americans and individuals without a college degree perceived themselves as having significantly lower risk of developing skin cancer.⁸ This result is corroborated by a literature review performed in 2014 that found a significant trend across multiple studies, in that Black Americans and Hispanics had very low-risk perceptions when it came to the prospect of developing skin cancer.²¹ The results of our study, in the context of similar research findings, further reinforce a long-standing need for public health interventions that effectively disseminate information on cancer susceptibility and risk across the spectrum of ethnic minority groups, especially in underserved communities within the U.S.

Our study also revealed that 27.1% of participants reported having experienced between 1-5 sunburns in the past 12 months. Previous studies have highlighted how sunburns are a major risk for developing melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer.²³ It should be highlighted that there is a dose-response relationship between the number of sunburns and risk for developing skin cancer, notably melanoma.²³ Additionally, our study found that 6.4% (n = 400) of the participants reported consuming alcohol while being sunburned. Alcohol intake has been identified as a risk factor for sunburn in prior reports.²⁴ In a cross-sectional study, it was identified that heavier average alcohol use was positively associated with the number of sunburns an individual has experienced.²⁴ Our findings further solidify the correlation between risk of alcohol consumption and increased sunburn incidence.

Through a multinomial regression analysis, our study revealed statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) across all sociodemographic variables in relation to the reported number of sunburns over the past year. Social determinants of health, including race/ethnicity, sex, income, and employment status have been associated with risk for sunburn and skin cancer.^8,25,26 While minority populations have a lower prevalence of sunburn, it has been identified that, through the acculturation process, Hispanics develop a higher perceived benefit of exposure to ultraviolet radiation, leading to an increased risk of sunburns.⁸ While lower prevalence of sunscreen use has been identified among Black American and Hispanic individuals, factors such as sex, education, and income also affect one’s sunscreen practices.⁸ Among Black Americans and Hispanics, female sex, education, income, and age were associated with increased sunscreen use.⁸ Male sex and lower educational attainment has been previously associated with decreased odds of sun protective behaviors and increased risk for across the general population.^25,26 In addition, income has also been associated with risk for sunburns, with higher income being associated with increased odds of frequent sunburn.²⁵ However, outdoor labor, which is perceived with lower socioeconomic status, is associated with increased sun exposure and increased risk for skin cancer.²⁷ In the United States, Hispanic individuals are overrepresented in the field of outdoor work and are therefore at even greater risk for UV exposure and increased skin cancer risk.²⁷

This study has several limitations related to its cross-sectional nature. The data was collected from the HINTS 6 survey, which was conducted with a nationally representative sample using a combination of structured interviews, either by phone or in person. Conducting the survey via random digit-dial telephone methods can result in low response rates and may reduce the validity of some baseline measurements. The sample predominantly consisted of White, non-Hispanic individuals, which may have influenced the findings related to risk perception and skin protection behaviors, along with the associations reported between sociodemographic variables and reported number of sunburns over the past year. Moreover, social desirability bias might have been introduced by having participants answer higher perceived risk of skin cancer and/or lower number of sunburns to align with the perceived correct societal responses. Furthermore, since HINTS is a cross-sectional study, causality cannot be established and the verisimilitude of the differences seen in the reported number of sunburns across social determinants of health (SDoH) variables requires additional study. Despite these limitations, this study is one of the few studies exploring associations between reported number of sunburns and sociodemographic characteristics, in addition to examining prevalence of protective skin behaviors adopted by the U.S. adult population in a nationally representative sample. Future research should attempt to further elicit the role of various SDoH in influencing skin protection behaviors, with the goal of developing interventions targeting specific groups identified as having higher risk of skin cancer, thus decreasing the socioeconomic burden of U.S. adult skin cancers.

Conclusion

Understanding perceptions of the risks of skin cancer and the prevalence of skin-protective behaviors is crucial in reducing the risk of developing skin cancer, especially among vulnerable groups. This study highlights the necessity of increasing awareness about skin cancer susceptibility and risk. All sociodemographic variables were significantly associated with the number of reported sunburns in the past year. Subsequent studies should build upon this foundation to explore how additional SDoH affect both the incidence of sunburns among ethnic minority and low-income groups and behaviors related to sunburn prevention. Understanding these factors is essential to any effort aimed at mitigating the various harms wrought by skin cancer among U.S. adults.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Lea Sacca

References

Aggarwal

Knabel

Fleischer

. United States burden of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer from 1990 to 2019. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:388-395. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.109

Basal & squamous cell skin cancer statistics. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/basal-and-squamous-cell-skin-cancer/about/key-statistics.html. Accessed 10 Sep 2024.

Gruber

Zito

. Skin cancer. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.

Shanshal

Khaleel

Hammoodi

. Sun Exposure and Usage of Sun Protection: Knowledge, Perception and Practice among University Students. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2024;31(2):208-221. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.2.19

Chen

H-Y

Robinson

Jablonski

. A Cross-cultural exploration on the psychological aspects of skin color aesthetics: implications for sun-related behavior. Translational Behavioral Medicine ibz063. 2019;10(1):234-243. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz063

Hung

Beazer

Bounsanga

Hon

Lipsky

. An exploration of the use and impact of preventive measures on skin cancer. Healthcare. 2022;10:743. doi:10.3390/healthcare10040743

Garside

Pearson

Moxham

. What influences the uptake of information to prevent skin cancer? A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Educ Res. 2010;25:162-182. doi:10.1093/her/cyp060

Buster

You

Fouad

Elmets

. Skin cancer risk perceptions: a comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:771-779. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.021

Kiviniemi

Ellis

. Worry about skin cancer mediates the relation of perceived cancer risk and sunscreen use. J Behav Med. 2014;37:1069-1074. doi:10.1007/s10865-013-9538-1

10.

Carcioppolo

. When does perceived susceptibility to skin cancer influence indoor tanning? The moderating role of two risk perception beliefs. J Health Commun. 2016;21:1170-1178. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1237593

11.

Iannacone

Hughes

MCB

Green

. Effects of sunscreen on skin cancer and photoaging. Photoderm Photoimm Photomed. 2014;30:55-61. doi:10.1111/phpp.12109

12.

Sander

Burbidge

Beecker

. The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin cancer. CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J). 2020;192:E1802-E1808. doi:10.1503/cmaj.201085

13.

Kao

S-YZ

Ekwueme

Holman

Rim

Thomas

Saraiya

. Economic burden of skin cancer treatment in the USA: an analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey data, 2012–2018. Cancer Causes Control. 2023;34:205-212. doi:10.1007/s10552-022-01644-0

14.

Bradford

. Skin cancer in skin of color. Dermatol Nurs. 2009;21:170-178.

15.

Soza-Vento

Parker

Kirsner

. Comparison of stage at diagnosis of melanoma among hispanic, Black, and white patients in miami-dade county, Florida. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:704-708. doi:10.1001/archderm.142.6.704

16.

Guy

Zhang

Ekwueme

Rim

Watson

. The potential impact of reducing indoor tanning on melanoma prevention and treatment costs in the United States: an economic analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:226-233. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.029

17.

Hesse

Moser

Rutten

LJF

Kreps

. The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline. J Health Commun. 2006;11:vii–xvi. doi:10.1080/10810730600692553

18.

Nelson

Kreps

Hesse

, et al. The health information national trends survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun. 2004;9:443-460. doi:10.1080/10810730490504233

19.

Skin cancer. https://www.aad.org/media/stats-skin-cancer. Accessed 1 Aug 2024.

20.

Brady

Kashlan

Ruterbusch

Farshchian

Moossavi

. Racial disparities in patients with melanoma: a multivariate survival analysis. CCID. 2021;14:547-550. doi:10.2147/CCID.S311694

21.

Harvey

Patel

Sandhu

Wallington

Hinds

. Social determinants of racial and ethnic disparities in cutaneous melanoma outcomes. Cancer Control. 2014;21:343-349. doi:10.1177/107327481402100411

22.

Kim

Boone

West

Rademaker

Liu

Kundu

. Perception of skin cancer risk by those with ethnic skin. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:207-208. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2008.566

23.

Cho

W-Q

Weinstock

Han

Qureshi

. History of severe sunburn and risk of skin cancer among women and men in 2 prospective cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:824-833. doi:10.1093/aje/kwv282

24.

Mukamal

. Alcohol consumption and self-reported sunburn: a cross-sectional, population-based survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:584-589. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.04.033

25.

Braun

Adler

Goodman

Yeung

. Sunburn frequency and risk and protective factors: a cross-sectional survey. Dermatol Online J. 2021;27:3-4. doi:10.5070/D3274053150

26.

McKenzie

Nahm

Kearney

Zampella

. Sun-protective behaviors and sunburn among US adults. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023;315:1665-1674. doi:10.1007/s00403-023-02547-z

27.

Niu

Riley

Stapleton

, et al. Sunburns and sun protection behaviors among male hispanic outdoor day laborers. IJERPH. 2022;19:2524. doi:10.3390/ijerph19052524

Examining U.S. Adults Risk Perceptions and Skin Protection Behaviors Using the 2022 HINTS Database

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Survey Administration

Sample Selection

Definitions and Measures

Statistical Analyses

Results

Participant Characteristics

Cancer Risk Perceptions

Sunburn and Skin Protection

Multinomial Regression Analysis

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References