Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Most adults do not adhere to established aerobic physical activity (PA) guidelines due in part to various barriers. PA snacks, or periodic short bouts of activity (<10 minutes) offer a potential strategy to overcoming such barriers and increasing PA. Previous efforts have been focused on eliciting the health benefits of PA and exercise snacks, yet adherence to this concept has not been examined. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature assessing adherence to PA snacks and health-related outcomes associated with PA snacks. PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus were searched for literature published between January 2018-September 2023. Studies investigating adherence and/or the health-related outcomes of PA snacks were included. Of 4201 articles identified, 12 studies were included in the review. Most of the studies were randomized (n = 10), focused on adults with a chronic disease/life-long condition or exhibited a sedentary lifestyle (n = 8), and reported positive health outcomes (n = 12; e.g., improvements in cardiometabolic markers and body composition). Five studies reported adherence to supervised and unsupervised PA snack interventions, with high rates ≥92%. This review supports and extends the previously reported health-related benefits of PA snacks. It also shows promise for increasing overall PA and adherence to the PA guidelines.

Keywords

health behavior inactivity healthy lifestyle

“The health outcomes assessed support prescribing or recommending multiple short bouts of activity to adults as positive.”

Introduction

The prevalence of chronic disease (e.g., heart disease, stroke, Type II diabetes) among adults in the U.S. continues to increase with six in 10 adults having at least one, and four in 10 having two or more chronic diseases.¹ Among the key modifiable lifestyle risk factors for chronic disease is lack of physical activity (PA) or insufficient activity. Evidence-based aerobic PA guidelines for adults (150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity and OR 75 minutes/week of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity OR an equivalent combination) have been established to provide guidelines for the improvement and/or maintenance of activity and related health-related outcomes including chronic disease onset.² However, the majority of adults (≥75%) do not adhere to these guidelines³ which has been attributed to common barriers (e.g., lack of time, lack of social support, lack of motivation, high costs and lack of facilities).⁴ Increased efforts in PA promotion that address these challenges are much needed. Therefore, an appealing, novel approach, PA snacks, or periodic short bouts (<10 minutes) of activity offers a potential strategy to increasing PA adherence.

A recent systematic review conducted by Jakicic et al. (2019) highlighted the health-related benefits of accumulated short bouts of PA (<10 minutes) which included positive impacts on body weight or body composition, blood pressure, blood lipids, glucose/insulin, multimorbidity, and all-cause mortality.⁵ This review informed the recent modifications to the second edition of the Physical Activity Guidelines (removing the requirement of 10 minute-bouts to count toward the minimal aerobic activity), and has introduced more of an emphasis on how PA is promoted.⁶ The “PA snack” concept or engaging in multiple short bouts (<10 minutes) of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic physical activities has gained traction as a more appealing way for individuals to increase activity and adherence to PA guidelines.^7-10 Example activities include (but not limited to) short, brisk walks at lunchtime, taking the stairs instead of elevator, and marching in spot while brewing coffee. A recent scoping review conducted by Jones et al. focused on a similar concept “exercise snacks” (note: exercise is a subcategory of PA), or brief, high intensity, structured and planned aerobic (e.g., stair sprinting), strength (circuits of bodyweight exercises), balance, and combinations of these three activities.¹¹ Results from this review show that exercise snacks produce improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness with equivocal findings for physical function, mood, quality of life, blood markers (e.g., glucose, triglycerides), and feasible, acceptable, and adherence to intervention rates were high.¹¹ Despite the health enhancing effects of PA snacks and the promising adherence rates for exercise snacks, it remains unknown whether the accumulated approach for PA influences engagement in PA in comparison to traditional approaches such as one bout of 30 minutes or breaking up PA in multiple bouts ranging from 10-15 minutes.¹² An understanding of the relationship between PA snack and adherence and how PA snacks can serve as a potentially effective strategy for improving PA adherence warrants further examination, shedding light on the development of future PA interventions.

Although Jakicic et al. reported the health-related outcomes of engaging in PA snacks,⁵ to our knowledge, there are no reviews registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register examining the relationship between short bouts (<10 minutes) of PA and adherence to intervention among adults. The purpose of this rapid review, or streamlined process to a systematic review is to summarize the current literature assessing adherence to PA snacks and health-related outcomes associated with PA snacks We hypothesize that prescribing short bouts of PA will be related to better adherence to PA interventions and increases in overall minutes of PA.

Methods

Search Strategy

The search strategy was developed by NIB with the help of a university librarian with expertise in conducting systematic reviews. The search strategy was guided by the PICO framework as shown in Table 1 and consisted of the following keywords: ((“intermittent activity” OR “intermittent exercise” OR “accumulated activity” OR bouts) AND (“Physical activity” OR “Exercise”)) NOT (“Animals” NOT (“Animals” AND “Humans”)) which were used in Jakicic et al systematic review that was focused on short bouts of PA.⁵ The full search strategy used is provided in Appendix 1. The terms PA and exercise are commonly used interchangeably, yet have distinct concepts.¹³ PA is any bodily movement that requires energy expenditure. Exercise is a subcategory of PA and is defined as structured, repetitive, purposeful (e.g., to improve physical fitness) activity that can result in positive (e.g., reduction in blood pressure) and negative (e.g., injuries, dehydration) consequences.¹³

Table 1.

Search Strategy Developed Using the PICO Framework.

Component	Application
P - population	Adults aged 18 and older
I - intervention	Aerobic PA intervention prescribing PA snacks
C - comparison	Usual prescription (i.e., 15 mins, two times per day; 10 mins, three time per day; or 30 mins one time per day) as depicted in Figure 1; no comparison
O - outcomes	Health, adherence, compliance

Figure 1.

Common PA prescriptions or recommendations versus PA snacks.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Included studies must have: (1) focused on adults aged 18 and older, (2) been an intervention (e.g., randomized, pre-post), mixed methods, or cross-sectional, (3) focused on aerobic PA and/or exercise engaged in multiple bouts (<10 minutes), (4) reported health and/or intervention protocol adherence or compliance outcomes and (5) been published after 2018 (i.e., when the PA guidelines changed omitting requirement of bouts lasting >10 minutes to count toward meeting PA guidelines). For this review, adherence is defined as the extent to which participants complete prescribed supervised and unsupervised PA/exercise. Supervised activities are completed in controlled, research facilities (e.g., exercise laboratories) under the supervision of research staff whereas unsupervised activities are conducted freely outside of a controlled setting without any supervision. Studies with the following criteria were excluded from the review: (1) intervention protocol descriptions and purely qualitative studies; (2) meeting and conference abstracts; and (3) those focused on high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and high-intensity interval training exercise (HIIE). HIIT and HIIE are forms of interval training comprised of alternating intensities of short periods of alternating maximum-effort exercise and recovery periods.⁶ The Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report⁶ separates HIIT from aerobic PA, and for this review, HIIT and HIIE are excluded as these types of PA differ and deviate from our primary focus on aerobic PA. This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42023464374).

Data Extraction

After conducting searches in databases, all resulting references were imported to EndNote reference management software, duplicates were removed, and recorded by one reviewer (NIB). From EndNote, remaining references were exported to Microsoft Excel for screening. The following publication data were included: primary author, publication year, title, and abstract. First, two reviewers (NIB and JH) conducted a pilot screening of titles and abstract. NIB screened all titles and abstracts, and JH then screened a smaller sample (20%) of the titles and abstracts. Full-text screening was independently conducted by one reviewer (NIB) and one reviewer (JH) screened 20% of the articles. No disagreements were found.

Study Quality Assessment

Study quality was assessed independently by two reviewers (NB and JH) using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools (i.e., controlled intervention studies and observational cohort studies).¹⁴ The 14-item Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies was used to assess the quality of randomized studies. The 14-item Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to evaluate the quality of observational studies. The response options to each item/criterion of tool consists of “yes,” “no,” or “cannot determine/not reported/not applicable.” Responses of “yes” were assigned a score of 1 and responses of “no” or “cannot determine/not reported/not applicable” were assigned a score of “0.” Total scores were summed across the 14 items. Study quality was rated based on the following ranges: poor (0-4 “yes” responses), fair (5-10 “yes” responses), or “good” (11-14 “yes” responses).

Results

A total of 4201 articles were retrieved from searching PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus. After duplicates and retracted articles were removed (n = 1518), titles and abstracts were screened (n = 2683) with 2638 exclusions. The full text of 43 articles were screened and 31 were excluded, with 12 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

PRISMA Flow Chart.

Study Characteristics

Study characteristics are presented in Table 2. Of the 12 studies included, 10 are original studies and 3 are conducted using the same study sample as one of the original. The study designs were comprised of randomized (n = 6), randomized crossover (n = 4), and prospective cohort (n = 2). The majority of the studies (n = 10) were conducted in countries other than the United States (i.e., the United Kingdom (n = 2), Kenya (n = 4), Japan, Australia, Canada, and Qatar (all n = 1). The sample sizes ranged from 9 to 502 629 participants and the participant ages ranged from 18 to 79 years. Most of the studies consisted of mainly male participants (n = 8) with one study¹⁵ having an even split of 50% female and 50% male participants. A total of eight studies focused on populations with a chronic disease such as prehypertension,¹⁶ prediabetes,¹⁷ stroke,¹⁸ a life-long condition (i.e., paraplegia),¹⁹ and/or exhibits sedentary lifestyle.^20-23

Table 2.

Overview of Included Studies.

StudyAuthor, year, Country	Design	Purpose	Sample Size and Participant Characteristics	Sample Chronic Disease/Disability
Chrismas, 2019, Qatar²³	Randomized crossover	Examine the effects of frequent short duration walking bouts on cognitive function and fatigue	N = 11; age: 27 years (21-44); 100% female; race/ethnicity: NR	Sedentary
Gay, 2018, USA¹⁷	Randomized crossover	Determine effects of short bouts (2-min and 4 min) of vigorous-intensity stair climbing on glucose levels	N = 9; 77.8% female; age: 54 years (7.42); race/ethnicity: NR	Pre-diabetic with overweight or obesity
O’Rourke, 2019, Canada¹⁵	Randomized crossover	Determine the response of interleukin-8 (IL-8, pro-inflammatory cytokine) to prolonged and interrupted sitting	N = 24; 50% female; age: 21.1 years (2.2); race/ethnicity: NR	Young, healthy adults
English, 2018, Australia¹⁸	Randomized crossover	Examine the effect of frequent, short bouts of light-intensity PA on blood pressure and plasma fibrinogen	N = 19; age (mean): 68 years; 52.6% male: race/ethnicity: NR	Stroke survivors; time since stroke (months),47 (37)
Gallagher, 2019, USA²⁴	Randomized	Determine how breaking up prolonged standing task (2 hours) with walking breaks affects standing induced low back pain	N = 19; 63.2% male; age: 22.3 years (3.3); race/ethnicity: NR	NR
Magutah, 2018²⁰	Randomized	Compare effects of short moderate-intensity exercise (<10 min bouts) on cardiometabolic markers	N = 53; 51% male; age, males: 55.5 (3.0); 49% female; age, females: 53.9 (3.0); race/ethnicity: NR	Older sedentary adults
Magutah, 2018, Kenya²¹	Randomized	Investigate the effect of short bouts (<10 min bouts) of moderate-intensity exercise on body composition	N = 53, 51% male; 49% female; race/ethnicity: NR	Older, sedentary adults
Magutah, 2020, Kenya²²	Randomized	Investigate the effect of short bouts (<10 min) of moderate-intensity exercise on cardiovascular function and cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen consumption, VO₂max)	N = 53; 51% male; 49% female; race/ethnicity: NR	Older, sedentary adults
Magutah, 2022, Kenya¹⁶	Randomized	Evaluate the effects of moderate-intensity short (7.5 min) exercise bouts on body composition and blood pressure	N = 665; 44.2% male 55.8% female; male age: 35.5 (12.2) years; female age: 34.4 years (11.8); race/ethnicity: NR	Sedentary adults with prehypertension
Bailey, 2020, United Kingdom¹⁹	Randomized	Compare post-prandial glucose, lipid, blood pressure, and psychological responses to breaking up prolonged sedentary time	N = 14; age: 51 years (9); 57% female; race/ethnicity: NR	Adults with paraplegia
Ahmadi, 2022, United Kingdom²⁵	Prospective cohort	Examine the association of dose-response of device-measured short and intermittent vigorous-intensity PA with morality, and incident cardiovascular disease and cancer	N = 71 893, age: 62.5 years (55.3, 67.7); age range: 40-69; 44.1% male, 96.8% non-Hispanic White	Adults
Chen, 2020, Japan²⁶	Prospective cohort	Investigate the independent associations of moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA in bouts of ≥10 and <10 minutes with incident functional disability	N = 1687; age: 73.3 (6.0); 37.8% men; race/ethnicity: NR	Older adults

Notes. Age is reported as [mean (standard deviation)], [mean (range)], or (median, IQR); body mass index, body fat, HbA_1C, waist circumference, time since stroke reported as [mean (standard deviation)].

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NR, not reported.

Intervention Characteristics

A total of 12 studies were included in this review, with three studies^20-22 reporting findings for the same sample and intervention. In Table 3, these studies are grouped to indicate the same sample but differing focus and outcomes for ease of interpretation.

Table 3.

Intervention Characteristics and Findings of Included Studies.

StudyAuthor, year	Study Setting	Measure of Aerobic Activity/Intensity	Intervention Description	Intervention Duration	Bout Intensity, Duration, Frequency	Results
Chrismas, 2019²³	Laboratory at sports medicine hospital (supervised)	Self-perceived moderate-intensity speed on motorized treadmill	Sitting interrupted with moderate-intensity walking on treadmill for 3 mins every 30 mins	3 visits; familiarization (1 visit); experimental conditions (2 visits)	Moderate; 3 mins x 9; accumulating 27 mins total	Breaking up prolonged sitting with short bouts of moderate cognitive function: Improved reaction time (101 seconds quicker for choice reaction time and 210 seconds quicker for simple reaction time)
Gay, 2018¹⁷	Clinical and translational research unit (supervised)	ActiGraph GT3X +worn on hip	1. Sedentary day followed by 2 mins of stair climbing every hour for 8 hours	4 days (2 days of stair climbing)	Vigorous; 2 mins x 8 vs 4 mins x 4	The 4 min bout caused a significant decrease after 30 mins when pre-exercise glucose was ≥90 mg/dl
Gay, 2018¹⁷	Clinical and translational research unit (supervised)	ActiGraph GT3X +worn on hip	2. Sedentary day followed by 4 mins of stair climbing every other hour for 8 hours	4 days (2 days of stair climbing)	Vigorous; 2 mins x 8 vs 4 mins x 4
O’Rourke, 2019¹⁵	Laboratory (supervised)	Polar electro Oy portable heart rate monitor	Seated continuously for 4 hours and performed 3 min of light-intensity activity (walking on treadmill)	3 days; baseline (1 day); experimental sessions (2 days)	Light; 3 min x 8	Lower increases in salivary IL-8 (a pro-inflammatory chemokine) in the interrupted sitting arm compared to prolonged sitting arm (P = .011). No significant findings found for IL-8 in the plasma
English, 2018, Australia¹⁸	Laboratory at medical research institute (supervised)	Heartrate (pulse oximeter) and ratings of self-perceived exertion (BORG 0-10)	3 min bouts of light-intensity exercise while standing (STAND-EX) (marching in place, squats, calf-raises) every 30 mins for 8 hours (WALK) 3 min bouts of light-intensity walking every 30 mins for 8 hours	5 days; activity monitoring for 4 days leading up to experimental condition (1 day)	Light; 3 mins x 16	Health: Among participants not taking antihypertensive medications, WALK decreased systolic blood pressure by 5.0 mmHg, STAND-Ex decreased systolic blood pressure by 4.2mmHg when compared to SIT. Among participants taking antihypertensive medications, decreased systolic blood pressure resulted (−3.4mmHg)
English, 2018, Australia¹⁸	Laboratory at medical research institute (supervised)				Light; 3 mins x 16	Adherence: Participants (100%) completed all PA snacks
Gallagher, 2019²⁴	Exercise science research center (supervised)	Treadmill at 4 km/hr (2.5 mile/h) to represent a leisurely walk	Prolonged standing for 25 mins with walking breaks on treadmill	2 days separated by 1 week	Leisurely; 5 mins x 4	For prolonged standing only, 58% of participants were pain developers vs 26% when walking breaks were inserted. Median lumbar flexion (negative angle) increased during walking compared to standing. Lumbar regions range of motion in the coronal and transverse planes increased during walking
Magutah, 2018,^20,21 2020²² *	Home-based (unsupervised)	Polar Wearlink ActITrainer accelerometers	3 short bouts of exercise (jogging) 5- <10 min	24 weeks	Moderate; 5- <10 mins × 3 days/week	Health
						Cardiometabolic markers: Significant reduction in total cholesterol among females in short bout arm compared to females in long bout arm (P = .01); improvements in high density lipoproteins; decreases in total cholesterol, decreases in total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio; reductions in lipoprotein/high density lipoprotein ratio
						Body composition: Significant decreases in body weight, body mass index, waist to height ratio, waist to hip ratio, and body fat among both sexes (all P < .05) with no significant differences between exercise regime (short vs long bouts)
						Cardiovascular function and cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen consumption): Significant increase in VO₂max among males in short bout arm when compared to males in long bout arm (P = .02); significant decrease in systolic blood pressure in males in long bout arm, resting diastolic blood pressure in males in short bout arm, and diastolic blood pressure at 5 min among males in short bout arm (all P < .05)
						Adherence: Higher in short bout arms (100% for males and females) compared to long bout arms (61.5% for males and 76.9% among females)
Magutah, 2022¹⁶	Home-based (unsupervised)	Vivoactive 4 Garmin smart watches	Male and female (short bouts): 3 bouts of fixed 7.5 min moderate-intensity bouts	12 weeks	Moderate; 7.5 min x 3/day to accumulate 150 weekly mins for 12 weeks	Health
						Body composition: Significant reduction in BMI among females in short bouts arm (P = .01)
						Blood pressure: Significant reductions in systolic blood pressure in both short and long bout arms
						Adherence
						Males: 92.1% short bout arm; 92% long bout arm; 96.3% in control arm
						Females: 94.6% in short bout, 89.3% in long bout arm and 95% for control arm
Bailey, 2020¹⁹	Laboratory (supervised)	Lode Angio arm ergometer	Sedentary time interrupted with PA breaks: Participants performed PA for 2 minutes every 20 minutes at ∼70 r/min	≥8 days; testing (2 days with washout period of ≥6 days between)	Moderate; 2 mins x 15 bouts totaling 30 mins of PA	Glucose area under the curve was significantly lower during the lunch post-prandial period in the PA break arm vs sedentary arm (P = .015)
Bailey, 2020¹⁹	Laboratory (supervised)	Lode Angio arm ergometer			Moderate; 2 mins x 15 bouts totaling 30 mins of PA	Positive affective was significantly higher in arm that engaged in PA breaks (P = .001)
Ahmadi, 2022, United Kingdom²⁵	N/A	Axivity AX3 wrist-worn accelerometry on dominant wrist for 24 hours/day for 7 days	N/A	N/A	Vigorous; up to 2 minutes on average x 4/day	Short bouts were associated with lower mortality risk (27%)
Chen, 2020, Japan²⁶	N/A	Active Style Pro HJA-350IT tri-axial accelerometer worn on either side of waist for 7 consecutive days and remove for sleeping or water activities	N/A	N/A	Light and moderate to vigorous; <10 minutes; frequency: NR	≥10 and <10 min bouts were significantly inversely associated with risk of functional disability; light PA accumulated in bouts <10 min was significantly associated with lower risk of functional disability

Note: *studies report different findings for same study sample and intervention.

Abbreviations: PA, physical activity; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported.

Setting

Half of the studies (n = 6) were conducted in a supervised laboratory or research unit.^{15,17-19,23,24} The other half were home-based studies (n = 6).^{16,20-22,25,26}

PA Snacks

Bout duration, frequency, and intensity varied for PA snacks. The bouts ranged from less than 2 minutes up to no more than 10 minutes. The majority of the interventions or studies assessed (n = 7) bouts lasting 5 minutes or less.^{15,17-19,23-25} One study instructed participants to engage in multiple fixed bouts of 7.5 minutes, three times per day each week to meet the PA guidelines of 150 minutes per week.¹⁶ A total of four studies did not impose a fixed duration time but prescribed or assessed a range or maximum of activity minutes.^20-22,26 Specifically, three of these studies prescribed bouts of activity lasting between 5 minutes but less than 10 minutes three times per day on a daily basis.^20-22 The other study assessed bouts that were less than 10 minutes in duration per day.²⁶

Intensities for PA snacks ranged from light to vigorous. Half of the included studies (n = 6) prescribed or assessed moderate-intensity bouts of activity.^16,19-23 Three studies assessed the effects of light intensity or leisure activity,^15,18,24 and two examined vigorous-intensity bouts.^17,25 One study examined the associations of bouts with multiple intensities (i.e., light and moderate to vigorous).²⁶

PA Measurement

There was variability among the studies with regard to the devices used to measure and assess PA. Accelerometer-based activity monitors (i.e., Actigraph, Axivity, Garmin Vivoactive smartwatch, and Active Style Pro) were used in the majority of the studies (n = 7) to objectively measure activity and intensity.^{16,17,20-22,25,26} Heart rate monitors (i.e., Polar and pulse oximeters) were used to assess intensity of activity in two studies.^15,18 Two studies used self-perceived intensity²³ and exertion (i.e., using the BORG 0-10)¹⁸ to measure intensity of activity. One study used two methods (i.e., objective and subjective) to measure intensity (i.e., pulse oximeter and self-perceived exertion BORG 0-10). One study used miles per hour to represent the intensity of a leisure walk.²⁴ Specific equipment such as treadmills^23,24 and arm ergometers¹⁹ were used in three studies.

Health-Related Outcomes

All 12 of the included studies reported health-related outcomes as shown in Table 3. Two studies reported significant reductions in body composition (e.g., body weight, body mass index, and body fat).^21,22 Cardiometabolic markers were assessed in half of the studies (n = 6)^16-20,22 with reports of significant decreases in glucose,^17,19 total cholesterol,²⁰ and blood pressure.^16,18,22 Response of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., salivary and plasma interleukin-8 (IL-8)) was examined in one study¹⁵ and results showed significantly lower increases in salivary IL-8. One study reported reduction in low back pain reports.²⁴ Cognitive function (i.e., attention and executive function) and fatigue outcomes were assessed in one study²³ and findings consisted of significantly improved reaction time, yet no effects on fatigue. Two studies examined the mortality risk and risk of functional disability²⁶ showing decreased risk for both outcomes. Five of the included studies reported health-related outcomes for comparison arms (i.e., traditional PA prescriptions of 30 min bouts and controls).^16,20-22 Four of these studies reported similar positive health outcomes consisting of improvements in cardiometabolic markers (e.g., increases in high density lipoproteins, decreases in total cholesterol, decreases in total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio),²⁰ body composition (e.g., body weight, BMI, and percent body fat),²¹ and cardiovascular function (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., maximal oxygen consumption,VO₂max).²² Another study²⁶ reported that MVPA in bouts of ≥10 mins was independently associated with a lower risk of functional disability.

Adherence Outcomes

Adherence outcomes are shown in Table 3. Adherence to intervention protocol (i.e., supervised and unsupervised) was applicable for 10 of the 12 included studies. Three of the four studies (i.e., three using the same sample of participants) used home-based assessed adherence via written exercise logs kept by participants and activity monitors. These studies reported that 100% of participants in the short bout arms adhered to the 24-week exercise prescription while 61.5% of males and 76.9% of females in the long bout arm adhered.^20-22 Furthermore, the weekly cumulative minutes of exercise were similar in both the short and long bout arms by sex (males: short vs long bout: 161.8 ± 7.2 mins vs 162.56 ± 6.1 mins, respectively; females: short vs long bout: 158.3 ± 3.6 mins vs 156.05 ± 2.7 mins, respectively). One study measured adherence based on activity monitors and written exercise logs and reported similar levels of adherence by sex and study arm (i.e., short bouts, long bouts) with levels ranging from 89.3% to 92.1%.¹⁶ Activity monitor data from this study also showed similar weekly total minutes of exercise for the short and long bouts (155.6 ± 2.9 mins vs 154.5 ± 2 mins, respectively) for male participants and 154.6 + 3.1 vs 154.7 + 3.1 for females.¹⁶ Adherence to PA intervention while supervised at a laboratory was applicable for six of the included studies with only one study¹⁸ reporting that 100% of participants adhered to the protocol. A total of four studies (i.e., three reporting on the same sample) reported adherence for comparison groups (e.g., PA bouts ≥10 mins).^16,20-22 Overall, adherences rates among the comparison groups were lower, with levels ranging from 61.5% to 89.3% and variance in levels between sexes.

Study Quality Assessment

Study quality for the included studies was assessed and assessment ratings are presented in Table 4. The average quality score was 7.9 of 14 for randomized trials and 11.8 of 14 for observational cohort studies. The quality of all included randomized trials (n = 10; 83.3%) was rated as fair whereas the observational studies were deemed of good quality (n = 2; 16.7%).

Table 4.

Study Quality Assessment.

Study	Mean Score (Possible Range 0-14)	Quality Rating
Randomized
Chrismas, 2019²³	7.5	Fair
Gay, 2018¹⁷	7	Fair
O’Rourke, 2019¹⁵	8	Fair
Gallagher, 2019²⁴	8.5	Fair
Magutah, 2018²⁰	7.5	Fair
Magutah, 2018²¹	6.5	Fair
Magutah, 2020²²	6.5	Fair
Magutah, 2022¹⁶	9.5	Fair
Bailey, 2020¹⁹	9	Fair
English, 2018¹⁸	8.5	Fair
Overall	7.9	Fair
Observational
Ahmadi, 2022²⁵	12	Good
Chen, 2020²⁶	11.5	Good
Overall	11.8	Good

Note: Scoring for rating: 0-4 (poor); 5-10 (fair); 11-14 (good).

Discussion

We identified 12 studies assessing the health impacts and/or adherence related to prescribing or recommending PA snacks among adults. Most studies were conducted among adults that exhibited sedentary behavioral patterns and/or had a chronic disease. Overall, the health outcomes assessed support prescribing or recommending multiple short bouts of activity to adults as positive. Significant effects were observed for body composition, glucose, pain, cardiometabolic markers and cardiovascular function. As for evaluation of adherence to short bouts and PA intervention, the results were limited, yet promising as participants generally adhered to the prescribed short bouts and significantly increased their levels of PA. Based on the use of the NHLBI Study Quality Assessment Tool, the majority of studies (n = 10; 83.3%) were rated as fair. The quality assessment criteria for RCTs criteria were more rigorous corresponding with lower ratings (i.e., fair) in comparison to the prospective cohort studies with good ratings. Findings presented in this review have implications for various groups including researchers, health care providers, and allied health professionals working with adults to increase engagement in PA and adherence to established PA guidelines.

Health Outcomes

The second edition of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans⁶ eliminated the requirement of PA bouts lasting at least 10 minutes to count toward meeting guidelines as it has been recognized that bouts of any length, specifically moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA, are beneficial. A previous review highlighted the health-related impacts of short bouts of PA (<10 minutes) among adults.⁵ Jakicic and colleagues conducted a systematic review to determine whether there were health-related benefits of engaging in multiple short bouts of PA for <10 minutes vs >10 minutes.⁵ Overall, health-related effects on weight or body composition, blood pressure, lipids, glycemic control, metabolic syndrome, c-reactive protein, cardiovascular disease risk score, frailty, multimorbidity, and all-cause mortality were observed regardless of bout duration (<10 minutes vs ≥ 10 minutes).⁵ Similar to this previous review, we found health-related benefits for body composition, cardiometabolic markers and mortality risk for bouts <10 minutes. Additionally, we also found significant benefits related to cognitive function, protein (i.e., related to inflammation), pain, cardiovascular function, and cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., maximal oxygen uptake, VO₂max), and functional disability. The recent review focused on exercise snacks (i.e., higher intensity, vigorous exercise) also reported modest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness.¹¹ When comparing the health outcomes of longer bouts of traditionally recommended PA bouts ≥10 minutes (i.e., 10 mins – 3 times per day, 15 mins – 2 times per day, or 30 mins – once a day), we found similar positive findings for the previously mentioned health outcomes. Taken together, the health benefits observed from engaging in multiple short bouts of PA were shown to produce equally or similar health outcomes as longer bouts further highlighting the advantages of prescribing activity in shorter bouts.

Adherence

Adherence to supervised and unsupervised short bout PA intervention protocols was explicitly reported in five studies (i.e., three conducted among same sample).^16,18,20-22 Four of these studies were home-based and used objective and subjective measures to assess adherence to intervention, with reports of high adherence to short bouts at 12 weeks (94.6% among females and 92.1% among males) and 24 weeks (100% for both females and males) follow-up. One study conducted in a supervised laboratory reported 100% adherence to the intervention protocol.¹⁸ These findings are comparable to the adherence rates (80%–100%) for studies included in the Jones et al. review focused on exercise snacks.¹¹ Several supervised studies were conducted in a laboratory, but adherence was not reported. Thus, it is unclear to what extent participants adhered with the protocol. However, it could be implied that the participants within these studies adhered fully as they were supervised within controlled environments. Despite the reporting from the few studies, there is need for better reporting for future studies.

Four studies^16,20-22 had the goal of increasing PA and increasing adherence to the PA guidelines. Three of these studies (i.e., two conducted using the same sample) reported cumulative minutes of PA/exercise at follow-up.^20-22 Among sedentary adults with prehypertension, cumulative moderate-intensity exercise minutes were similar (>150 minutes) for both interventional groups at 24 weeks.¹⁶ Similarly, in another study, cumulative minutes of moderate-intensity exercise was >150 minutes at 12-week follow-up.¹⁶ Both of these findings are noteworthy as this sheds light on prescribing short bouts of aerobic physical activity to successfully increase levels of activity and adherence to established PA guidelines, especially given the extremely low rates of PA and prevalence of meeting the guidelines.

Directions for Future Research

Prescribing or recommending short bouts (<10 minutes) of varying intensity activity was effective for reducing and/or improving several health-related outcomes and increasing levels of PA. Further, studies that compared short bouts (<10 minutes) and longer bouts (≥10 minutes) showed that positive health outcomes were produced regardless of the bout duration. For researchers, when developing future PA interventions among adult populations (i.e., healthy, sedentary, have a chronic disease or disability), short bouts should be considered in addition to the traditional recommendations. While the activities in this review included common activities such as walking, jogging, and stair climbing, other daily activities that can serve as PA snacks (e.g., marching in place while coffee brews, quick household chores) should be considered. For health care providers who provide PA counseling or recommendations, it is important to address the frequently reported PA barriers with PA snacks. Based on the high adherence to prescribed PA snacks, health care providers should consider recommending PA snacks instead of longer bouts of activity. Providing examples of activities that can be completed in short bouts can be more palatable for patients. Addressing the common barriers of time, high costs of facilities/resources, lack of social support are pertinent to increasing PA.

Strengths and Limitations

No review (to our knowledge) has examined the impact on adherence to the prescription of short bouts, a main focus for this review. While this review was systematic, it was a rapid review conducted for literature published between January 2018 and September 2023. Further, race and ethnicity were not reported for most of the included studies, with only one study reporting a predominately non-Hispanic White sample of adults (96.8%). Generalizability of these findings to other racial and ethnic groups, as well as to individuals without chronic conditions, may be limited suggesting areas warranting further research.

Conclusions

This review both supports and extends health-related benefits from recent reviews focused on PA and exercise snacks and provides preliminary insights in relation to adherence. The findings suggest that promoting PA snacks in comparison to longer bouts ≥10 minutes to adults could be a promising approach for increasing levels of PA and adherence to established PA guidelines.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Allison Howard, a librarian at the University of South Florida for her efforts in helping with the search strategy.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Nashira I. Brown’s work was funded by the National Cancer Institute while postdoctoral fellow at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (T32CA090314; MPIs: S. T. Vadaparampil and V.N. Simmons).

ORCID iD

Nashira I. Brown

Search Strategy.

Database	Search Strategy
PubMed	((“Intermittent activity” [tiab] OR “intermittent exercise” [tiab] OR “accumulated activity” [tiab] OR bouts [tiab]) AND (“physical activity” [tiab] OR “Exercise” (mh) OR “Exercise” [tiab]))
	NOT (“Animals” [Mesh] NOT (“Animals” [Mesh] AND “Humans” [Mesh])) filters: years: 2018-2023
	Limit: English language
CINAHL	S2 (((MH “Animals+”) OR (MH “Animal studies”) OR (TI “animal model*”)) NOT (MH “human”))
	S1 (“intermittent activity” OR “intermittent exercise” OR “accumulated activity” OR bouts) ) AND (“physical activity” OR (MH “physical activity”) OR exercise OR (MH “exercise”))
	S1 NOT S2
	Filters: years: 2018-2023
	English language
	Peer reviewed
	Exclude MEDLINE records
SPORTDiscus	((DE “PHYSICAL activity”) OR (DE “EXERCISE”)) AND ((DE “INTERVAL training”) OR “intermittent activity” OR “intermittent exercise” OR “accumulated activity” OR bouts) filter: Published date: 20180101-20231231; peer reviewed; language: English; document type: Article

References

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion . Chronic Diseases in America. Updated November 28, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/infographic/chronic-diseases.htm. Accessed November 1, 2023.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . How Much Physical Activity do Adults Need? Updated June 2, 2022 https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/adults/index.htm. Accessed November 1, 2023.

Elgaddal

Kramarow

Reuben

. Physical activity among adults aged 18 and over: United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief. 2022:1-8.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Overcoming Barriers to Physical Activity. Updated June 16, 2021 https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/adding-pa/barriers.html. Accessed November 1, 2023.

Jakicic

Kraus

Powell

, et al. Association between bout duration of physical activity and health: systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1213-1219. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001933

Piercy

Troiano

Ballard

, et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018:320, 2020-2028.

Islam

Gibala

Little

. Exercise snacks: a novel strategy to improve cardiometabolic health. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2022;50(1):31-37. doi:10.1249/jes.0000000000000275

Tyldesley-Marshall

Greenfield

Parretti

, et al. Snacktivity™ to promote physical activity: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Med. 2022;29(5):553-564. doi:10.1007/s12529-021-10040-y

Gokal

Amos-Hirst

Moakes

, et al. Views of the public about Snacktivity™: a small changes approach to promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour. BMC Publ Health. 2022;22(1):618. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13050-x

10.

Sanders

Biddle

SJH

Gokal

, et al.

Snacktivity™’ to increase physical activity: time to try something different?

Prev Med. 2021;153:106851. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106851

11.

Jones

Clifford

Stamatakis

Gibbs

. Exercise snacks and other forms of intermittent physical activity for improving health in adults and older adults: a scoping review of epidemiological, experimental and qualitative studies. Sports Med. 2024. doi:10.1007/s40279-023-01983-1

12.

Murphy

Blair

Murtagh

. Accumulated versus continuous exercise for health benefit: a review of empirical studies. Sports Med. 2009;39(1):29-43. doi:10.2165/00007256-200939010-00003

13.

Dasso

. How is exercise different from physical activity? A concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2019;54(1):45-52. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12296

14.

National Heart L, Blood Institute . Study Quality Assessment Tools. Accessed November 1, 2023. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 1 November 2023.

15.

O’Rourke

Meens-Miller

Jeffrey

Saleem

Green-Johnson

Dogra

. Short bouts of walking attenuates the response of IL-8 to prolonged sitting in healthy adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023;123(6):1271-1281. doi:10.1007/s00421-023-05153-z

16.

Magutah

Mbuthia

Akiruga

Haile

Thairu

. Effect of fixed 7.5 minutes’ moderate intensity exercise bouts on body composition and blood pressure among sedentary adults with prehypertension in Western-Kenya. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(7):e0000806. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000806

17.

Gay

Buchner

Erickson

Lauture

. Effect of short bouts of high intensity activity on glucose among adults with prediabetes: a pilot randomized crossover study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;141:168-174. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.045

18.

English

Janssen

Crowfoot

, et al. Frequent, short bouts of light-intensity exercises while standing decreases systolic blood pressure: breaking up Sitting Time after Stroke (BUST-Stroke) trial. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(9):932-940. doi:10.1177/1747493018798535

19.

Bailey

Withers

Goosey-Tolfrey

, et al. Acute effects of breaking up prolonged sedentary time on cardiovascular disease risk markers in adults with paraplegia. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(8):1398-1408. doi:10.1111/sms.13671

20.

Magutah

Meiring

Patel

Thairu

. Effect of short and long moderate-intensity exercises in modifying cardiometabolic markers in sedentary Kenyans aged 50 years and above. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4(1):e000316. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000316

21.

Magutah

Patel

Thairu

. Effect of moderate-intensity exercise bouts lasting <10 minutes on body composition in sedentary Kenyan adults aged ≥50 years. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4(1):e000403. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000403

22.

Magutah

Thairu

Patel

. Effect of short moderate intensity exercise bouts on cardiovascular function and maximal oxygen consumption in sedentary older adults. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6(1):e000672. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000672

23.

Chrismas

BCR

Taylor

Cherif

Sayegh

Bailey

. Breaking up prolonged sitting with moderate-intensity walking improves attention and executive function in Qatari females. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219565. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219565

24.

Gallagher

Payne

Daniels

Caldwell

Ganio

. Walking breaks can reduce prolonged standing induced low back pain. Hum Mov Sci. 2019;66:31-37. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2019.03.012

25.

Ahmadi

Clare

Katzmarzyk

Del Pozo Cruz

Lee

Stamatakis

. Vigorous physical activity, incident heart disease, and cancer: how little is enough? Eur Heart J. 2022;43(46):4801-4814. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac572

26.

Chen

Honda

Chen

Narazaki

Kumagai

. Dose-response association between accelerometer-assessed physical activity and incidence of functional disability in older Japanese adults: a 6-year prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(9):1763-1770. doi:10.1093/gerona/glaa046

Health-Related Benefits and Adherence for Multiple Short Bouts of Aerobic Physical Activity Among Adults

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Search Strategy

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Data Extraction

Study Quality Assessment

Results

Study Characteristics

Intervention Characteristics

Setting

PA Snacks

PA Measurement

Health-Related Outcomes

Adherence Outcomes

Study Quality Assessment

Discussion

Health Outcomes

Adherence

Directions for Future Research

Strengths and Limitations

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Search Strategy.

References