Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-5
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Early Complications Between a Direct Anterior Approach or Posterolateral Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study
Background: Controversies remain on the best surgical approaches for unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). There are little data on simultaneous bilateral THA via direct anterior approach (SimBDAA-THA) or posterolateral approach (SimBPA-THA). Purpose: We sought to assess differences in perioperative outcomes and early medical and surgical complications between SimBDAA-THA and SimBPA-THA. Methods: This retrospective study involved patients who underwent either SimBDAA-THA in a supine position (n = 73) or SimBPA-THA in a lateral position (n = 162) at our institution from January 2015 to November 2021. The 2 groups were compared in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics, surgical parameters, and complications during 6-months of follow-up. Results: There were no differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between the 2 groups prior to surgery. Simultaneous bilateral THA via direct anterior approach significantly shortened the length of both the operation (117.50 ±19.42 vs 143.97 ± 32.20 min) and the hospitalization (140.64 ± 43.22 vs 156.24 ± 56.64 h) but increased perioperative loss of hemoglobin (3.28 ± 1.01 vs 3.21 ± 2.26 g/dL). There were no significant differences between the two groups in transfusion rate; levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein or creatine kinase; or complications. Conclusion: This retrospective study of patients at a single institution found minimal differences in perioperative outcomes or early medical and surgical complications between SimBDAA-THA and SimBPA-THA except operative time and length of hospitalization. Larger studies with longer follow-up should be conducted to identify whether a direct anterior approach is superior to a posterolateral one.
AwadMEFarleyBJMostafaG, et al. Direct anterior approach has short-term functional benefit and higher resource requirements compared with the posterior approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of functional outcomes and cost. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(6):1078–1087. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b6.Bjj-2020-1271.R1
2.
BarrettWPTurnerSEMurphyJA, et al. Prospective, randomized study of direct anterior approach vs posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty: a concise 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1139–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.060
3.
BendichILandyDCDoH, et al. Intraoperative complications and early return to the operating room in total hip arthroplasty performed through the direct anterior and posterior approaches. an institutional experience of surgeons after their learning curve. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:2829–2835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.046
4.
BerendMERitterMAHartyLD, et al. Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total hip arthroplasty an outcomes analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:421–426.
5.
BerginPFDoppeltJDKephartCJ, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1392–1398. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00557
6.
BohlDDOndeckNTDarrithB, et al. Impact of operative time on adverse events following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2256–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.037
7.
BovonratwetPChenAZShenTS, et al. What are the reasons and risk factors for 30-day readmission after outpatient total hip arthroplasty?J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:S258–S263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.011
8.
CaoJZhouYXinW, et al. Natural outcome of hemoglobin and functional recovery after the direct anterior versus the posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01716-4
9.
ChenCYinYJuncaiL, et al. The direct anterior approach for simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a short-term efficacy analysis. Arthroplasty. 2020;2:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-020-00040-w
10.
ChengTEWallisJATaylorNF, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial in total hip arthroplasty-comparing early results between the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:883–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.027
11.
ChughtaiMSamuelLTAcuñaAJ, et al. Algorithmic soft tissue femoral release in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2019;5:471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2019.10.004
12.
ChungJJDolanMTPatettaMJ, et al. Abnormal coagulation as a risk factor for postoperative complications after primary and revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:3294–3299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.024
13.
DrewryAMFullerBMSkrupkyLP, et al. The presence of hypothermia within 24 hours of sepsis diagnosis predicts persistent lymphopenia. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:1165–1169. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000940
14.
FeeleyAAFeeleyTBFeeleyIH, et al. Postoperative infection risk in total joint arthroplasty after perioperative iv corticosteroid administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:3042–3053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.057
15.
FriedmanRHomeringMHolbergG, et al. Allogeneic blood transfusions and postoperative infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:272–278. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01268
GravesSCDropkinBMKeeneyBJ, et al. Does surgical approach affect patient-reported function after primary THA?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:971–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5
18.
HartfordJMKnowlesSB. Risk factors for perioperative femoral fractures: cementless femoral implants and the direct anterior approach using a fracture table.J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2013–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.045
19.
HaynesJAHopperRHJrHoH, et al. Direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty lowers the risk of dislocation compared to the posterior approach: a single institution experience. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37:495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.011
20.
HoudekMTWylesCCWattsCD, et al. Single-anesthetic versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:48–54. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01223
21.
InoueDGraceTRRestrepoC, et al. Outcomes of simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty for 256 selected patients in a single surgeon’s practice. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2292.R1
22.
JaffeWLCharnleyJ. Bilateral Charnley low-friction arthroplasty as a single operative procedure. A report of fifty cases. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1971;32:198–214.
23.
KhoshbinAHoitGHenryPDG, et al. Risk of total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture fixation: the importance of age. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:3194–3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.025
24.
KimYHKwonORKimJS. Is one-stage bilateral sequential total hip replacement as safe as unilateral total hip replacement?J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:316–320. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21817
25.
KunzeKNMcLawhornASJules-ElyseeKM, et al. Effect of anterior approach compared to posterolateral approach on readiness for discharge and thrombogenic markers in patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04484-4
26.
LeiYHuangQXuB, et al. Multiple low-dose dexamethasone further improves clinical outcomes following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1426–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.057
27.
LeiY-TXuBXieX-W, et al. The efficacy and safety of two low-dose peri-operative dexamethasone on pain and recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2018;42:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3537-8
28.
LinTJBendichIHaAS, et al. A comparison of radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty between the posterior approach and direct anterior approach with intraoperative fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:616–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.046
29.
MeermansGKonanSDasR, et al. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:732–740. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.38053
30.
MorcosMWHartAAntoniouJ, et al. No difference in major complication and readmission rates following simultaneous bilateral vs unilateral total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2541–2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.050
31.
NewmanETWattersTSLewisJS, et al. Impact of perioperative allogeneic and autologous blood transfusion on acute wound infection following total knee and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:279–284. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01041
32.
ParkHJChangMJKimTW, et al. Effects of Intravenous dexamethasone on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:3909–3914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.021
33.
PartridgeTCJCharityJAFSandifordNA, et al. Simultaneous or staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty? An analysis of complications in 14,460 patients using national Data.J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.022
34.
PincusDJenkinsonRPatersonM, et al. Association between surgical approach and major surgical complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. JAMA. 2020;323:1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0785
35.
PostZDOrozcoFDiaz-LedezmaC, et al. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:595–603. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-595
36.
RykovKMeysTKnobbenBAS, et al. MRI assessment of muscle damage after the posterolateral versus direct anterior approach for THA (Polada Trial). a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty2021;36:3248–3258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.009
37.
SarantisMGMandrekasPIStasiS, et al. Serum biomarkers for the assessment of muscle damage in various surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies. Int Orthop. 2022;46:1681–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05442-w
38.
SarpongNOChiuY-FRodriguezJA, et al. Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty with contemporary blood management is associated with a low risk of allogeneic blood transfusion. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37:544–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.039
39.
SpaansAJvan den HoutJAAMBolderSBT. High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:342–346. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.711701
40.
StoneAHSibiaUSAtkinsonR, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve when transitioning from posterolateral to direct anterior hip arthroplasty: a consecutive series of 1000 cases.J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2530–2534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.086
41.
SuracePSultanAAGeorgeJ, et al. The association between operative time and short-term complications in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 89,802 surgeries. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.015
42.
UçanVEziciVAliyevO, et al. Comparison of tapered-wedge short and standard-length femoral stems in single-stage bilateral direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2021;45:3119–3127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05152-9
43.
WangLXuZ. Comparison of the early results of Lateral Direct Anterior Approach (L-DAA) and traditional Posterolateral Approach (PLA) in hip arthroplasty. Comput Math Methods Med. 2021;2021:1187011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1187011
44.
WangXJiangWHuangQ, et al. Dexamethasone attenuates the perioperative acute phase response for simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37:888–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.010
45.
WonS-HParkJ-WLeeY-K, et al. No clinically important differences in thigh pain or bone loss between short stems and conventional-length stems in THA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479:767–777. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001505
46.
ZhaoH-YKangP-DXiaY-Y, et al. Comparison of early functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior or posterolateral approach: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:3421–3428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.056
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
