Objective. To examine whether cerebral activity during passive movements decreases with time after stroke, and if reduced activity in the representation for the upper extremity can be reversed with training. Methods. Brain activity was measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during passive wrist flexion-extension in 7 patients at varying time points after stroke, in a cross-sectional design. Upper limb function was also measured in all patients. Five of the patients took part in a training program and were measured again, behaviorally and with fMRI posttraining. Healthy control individuals of comparable age were also studied. Results. In patients, reduced activity over time after stroke was found for the group in the supplementary motor area (SMA), contralateral primary motor cortex, and prefrontal and parietal association areas along with ipsilateral cerebellum. Activity in most of these areas was also reduced in the patient group as compared to the control group. After a half-hour of daily training for 4 weeks with repetitive passive and active arm movements, cerebral activation increased in the pre-SMA and SMA, ipsilateral primary sensory cortex and intraparietal sulcus, and contralateral cerebellum in parallel with functional improvements of the upper limb. Areas common to both analyses included the SMA, pre-SMA, primary sensory cortex, intraparietal sulcus, and cerebellum. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that a down-regulation of sensorimotor activity occurs progressively over time as a result of inactivity and that training may reverse the reduced brain activity.
Pascual-Leone A. , Torres F.Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers . Brain. 1993;116(Pt1): 39-52 .
5.
Elbert T. , Pantev C. , Wienbruch C. , et al. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players . Science. 1995;270(5234): 305-307 .
6.
Classen J. , Liepert J. , Wise SP , et al. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice . J Neurophysiol.1998;79(2): 1117-1123 .
7.
Karni A. , Meyer G. , Jezzard P. , et al. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning . Nature. 1995;377(6545): 155-158 .
8.
Butefisch CMPlasticity in the human cerebral cortex: lessons from the normal brain and from stroke . Neuroscientist. 2004; 10(2): 163-173 .
9.
Calautti C. , Baron JCFunctional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review . Stroke. 2003; 34(6): 1553-1566 .
10.
Chen R. , Cohen LG , Hallett M.Nervous system reorganization following injury . Neuroscience . 2002;111(4): 761-773 .
11.
Rijntjes M. , Weiller C.Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: the contribution of functional imaging . Prog Neurobiol.2002;66(2): 109-122 .
12.
Calautti C. , Leroy F. , Guincestre JY , et al. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm . Stroke. 2001; 32(11): 2534-2542 .
13.
Carey LM , Abbott DF , Egan GF , et al. Motor impairment and recovery in the upper limb after stroke: behavioral and neuroanatomical correlates . Stroke. 2005;36(3): 625-629 .
14.
Feydy A. , Carlier R. , Roby-Brami A. , et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation . Stroke. 2002;33(6): 1610-1617 .
15.
Tombari D. , Loubinoux I. , Pariente J. , et al. A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients . Neuroimage. 2004;23(3): 827-839 .
16.
Ward NS , Brown MM , Thompson AJ , et al. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study . Brain.2003;126(Pt 11): 2476-2496 .
17.
Johansen-Berg H. , Rushworth MF , Bogdanovic MD , et al. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.2002;99(22): 14518-14523 .
18.
Jorgensen HS , Nakayama H. , Raaschou HO , et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study . Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1995; 76(5): 406-412 .
19.
Page SJ , Gater DR , Bach YRReconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation . Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2004; 85(8): 1377-1381 .
Andre JM , Didier JP , Paysant J.“Functional motor amnesia” in stroke (1904) and “learned non-use phenomenon” (1966). J Rehabil Med.2004;36(3): 138-140 .
22.
Sterr A. , Freivogel S. , Schmalohr D.Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents . Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2002;83 ( 12): 1726-1731 .
23.
Liepert J. , Bauder H. , Wolfgang HR , et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans . Stroke. 2000;31(6): 1210-1216 .
24.
Luft AR , McCombe-Waller S. , Whitall J. , et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial . JAMA.2004;292(15): 1853-1861 .
25.
Nelles G. , Jentzen W. , Jueptner M. , et al. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography . Neuroimage.2001;13(6 Pt 1): 1146-1154 .
26.
Lindberg P. , Schmitz C. , Forssberg H. , et al. Effects of passive-active movement training on upper limb motor function and cortical activation in chronic patients with stroke: a pilot study . J Rehabil Med.2004;36(3): 117-123 .
27.
Carey JR , Kimberley TJ , Lewis SM , et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke . Brain.2002;125(Pt 4): 773-788 .
28.
Rizzolatti G.The mirror neuron system and its function in humans . Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005;210(5-6): 419-421 .
29.
Ehrsson HH , Spence C. , Passingham REThat's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb . Science. 2004;305(5685): 875-877 .
30.
Jeannerod M. , Frak V.Mental imaging of motor activity in humans . Curr Opin Neurobiol.1999;9(6): 735-739 .
31.
Kaelin-Lang A. , Luft AR , Sawaki L. , et al. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input . J Physiol.2002;540(Pt 2): 623-633 .
32.
Weiller C. , Juptner M. , Fellows S. , et al. Brain representation of active and passive movements . Neuroimage.1996;4(2): 105-110 .
33.
Ziemann U. , Meintzschel F. , Korchounov A. , et al. Pharmacological modulation of plasticity in the human motor cortex . Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(2): 243-251 .
34.
Brett M. , Leff AP , Rorden C. , et al. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking . Neuroimage. 2001;14(2): 486-500 .
35.
Ward NS , Brown MM , Thompson AJ , et al. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study . Brain.2003;126(Pt 6): 1430-1448 .
36.
Duvernoy HMThe Human Brain: Surface, Blood Supply and Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy . New York: Springer ; 2000.
37.
Schmahmann JD , Doyon J. , Toga AW , et al. MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum . San Diego: Academic Press ; 2000.
38.
Loubinoux I. , Carel C. , Pariente J. , et al. Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts . Neuroimage . 2003;20(4): 2166-2180 .
39.
Ciccarelli O. , Toosy AT , Marsden JF , et al. Identifying brain regions for integrative sensorimotor processing with ankle movements . Exp Brain Res.2005;166(1): 31-42 .
40.
Drevets WC , Burton H. , Videen TO , et al. Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation . Nature.1995;373(6511): 249-252 .
41.
Rushworth MF , Johansen-Berg H. , Gobel SM , et al. The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection . Neuroimage. 2003;20(Suppl 1): S89-S100 .
42.
Jurgens U.The efferent and afferent connections of the supplementary motor area . Brain Res.1984;300(1): 63-81 .
43.
Kelly RM , Strick PLCerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate . J Neurosci.2003;23(23): 8432-8444 .
44.
Ward NS , Brown MM , Thompson AJ , et al. Longitudinal changes in cerebral response to proprioceptive input in individual patients after stroke: an FMRI study . Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(3): 398-405 .
45.
Conforto AB , Kaelin-Lang A. , Cohen LGIncrease in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation . Ann Neurol.2002;51(1): 122-125 .
46.
Dum RP , Strick PLMotor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate . Physiol Behav.2002;77(4-5): 677-682 .
47.
Dettmers C. , Fink GR , Lemon RN , et al. Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain . J Neurophysiol.1995;74(2): 802-815 .
48.
Koski L. , Mernar TJ , Dobkin BHImmediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke . Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004 ; 18(4): 230-249 .
49.
Staines WR , Graham SJ , Black SE , et al. Task-relevant modulation of contralateral and ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex and the role of a prefrontal-cortical sensory gating system . Neuroimage. 2002;15(1): 190-199 .
50.
Godde B. , Ehrhardt J. , Braun C.Behavioral significance of input-dependent plasticity of human somatosensory cortex . Neuroreport.2003;14(4): 543-546 .
51.
Ehrsson HH , Fagergren A. , Jonsson T. , et al. Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study . J Neurophysiol.2000;83 (1): 528-536 .
52.
Maldjian JA , Gottschalk A. , Patel RS , et al. Mapping of secondary somatosensory cortex activation induced by vibrational stimulation: an fMRI study . Brain Res.1999;824(2): 291-295 .
53.
Gerloff C. , Bushara K. , Sailer A. , et al. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke . Brain. 2006; 129: 791-808 .
54.
Doyon J. , Benali H.Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills . Curr Opin Neurobiol.2005; 15(2): 161-167 .
55.
Krakauer JWMotor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation . Curr Opin Neurol.2006;19 ( 1 ): 84-90 .
56.
Monfils MH , Plautz EJ , Kleim JAIn search of the motor engram: motor map plasticity as a mechanism for encoding motor experience . Neuroscientist. 2005;11(5): 471-483 .
